It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Thursday, June 04, 2026
Ex-marine fighter pilot tears apart Trump Pentagon chief for flouting military rules
U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine attend a House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense hearing on President Donald Trump's FY2027 budget request for the Department of Defense, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 12, 2026. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
An ex-Marine fighter pilot tore into President Donald Trump's Pentagon during a Wednesday appearance on CNN, taking the agency to task over damning new reports about promotions being blocked for women and minority officers.
Earlier this week, the New York Times reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had, potentially in defiance of military rules, intervened to block nine officers from being added to a list for promotions, half of whom were either women or people of color. This revelation came amidst a growing trend of Hegseth firing, demoting or otherwise disrespecting military officers who are not white men, or those who had previously participated in pro-diversity activities.
During Wednesday's edition of The Situation Room on CNN, co-host Pamela Brown discussed the reports with Amy McGrath, who previously served as a fighter pilot for the Marine Corps and retired after 20 years of service, achieving the rank of lieutenant colonel. She has also become a frequent Democratic candidate for Congress from Kentucky, running unsuccessful bids for the House in 2018 and, most notably, to unseat Mitch McConnell in the Senate in 2020. She also sought the 2026 Democratic nomination for McConnell's seat, but lost in the primary to former state representative Charles Booker.
In the interview, McGrath explained how the candidates put forward for this promotion list are already the "best of the best," having "spent their entire careers in doing very hard jobs, very high performance," and added that they face the "toughest scrutiny of performance records of any profession that I know" in order to get there.
"Takes months of review, and these boards, they make sure you've done the tough jobs," McGrath said. "They make sure you've done them very well. All of these officers have done this, or they wouldn't have gotten to this point. And for the names to be pulled by Secretary Hegseth, clearly, because of race and gender, is outrageous, and it's beneath what America stands for. And unfortunately, there's not much that folks in the military can do about it."
McGrath further touched on the broader campaign by Hegseth to purge the military of what Brown called "so-called wokeness."
"Pete Hegseth and his team are trolling the military records and social media accounts of officers, and they're punishing anyone who has ever served on a diversity task force, potentially in the past, or have said anything having to do with championing diversity in the past," she explained. "They're punishing anyone who was involved in the withdrawal of Afghanistan."
She continued later: "And this sends just a chilling message to everyone in the Pentagon and everyone within DOD. They're walking around, people are walking around scared right now... trying not to get fired. And that's, you know, a problem. It's ultimately a problem for our national security writ large."
McGrath also called it "absolutely wrong and outrageous" for officers to be punished for things in the past that they had no choice but to do once given orders, likening it to the purge of the Justice Department of any employees who were assigned to the classified documents case involving President Donald Trump and his Mar-a-Lago residence.
Rubio confronted in live hearing with video proving he 'lied to Congress'
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies at a U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 3, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calf.) hammered Secretary of State Marco Rubio as he appeared in a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Tuesday over questions about President Donald Trump's fitness for office. Rubio's reactions led Lieu to claim he was lying under oath.
Lieu showed the footage of the December Cabinet meeting in which Trump appeared to doze off next to Rubio.
"That's false," Rubio said. "That's false. I've never seen him fall asleep. On the contrary, the guy doesn't sleep, which is a big problem because he calls me at two in the morning. He calls me at five in the morning. And, you know, I like to sleep a little bit. You know, not 12 hours, but at least six."
Trump's insomnia was addressed by CNN medical expert Dr. Jonathan Reiner. Reiner said that chronic insomnia can be “a severe illness," in large part because it can add "about 3-1/2 years to one’s age and [contribute] to a decline in mental functions."
"Secretary Rubio, I'm going to show you in a moment that you just lied to Congress," Lieu cut in.
"Oh, ok," Rubio said.
"This is a Cabinet meeting from last month where Donald Trump is sleeping while you are talking. Please show this video," Lieu said. "You are literally talking about issues of war and peace, and Donald Trump is sleeping right next to you."
"If Donald Trump cannot stay awake at these important meetings where the cameras are rolling, can you imagine what he is like when the cameras are not there? Have you been at classified meanings were Donald Trump has fallen asleep?" the congressman asked.
Rubio replied again that he'd never been in any meeting in which Trump fell asleep.
"So, you are lying again? Lying consistently to Congress," Lieu responded.
He went on to say that Trump's drowsiness "caused other countries to perceive him differently." He claimed that Trump is mocked as "weak and feeble."
Lieu then showed a clip from the French News in which Trump appears to fall asleep at a Memorial Day ceremony last month. His eyes appeared to be closed for a large portion of the ceremony.
"There's something wrong with his cognitive acts, and the fact that on a number of occasions Donald Trump will contradict himself and literally — in literally the same meeting or interview," Lieu continued. He showed another clip in which Trump "says the Iranian military is both destroyed and not destroyed at the same time."
Lieu closed by praising Rubio, saying that he's done a lot to travel around the world and trying to clean up the "mess that was left to you."
Security expert explains how 'nuts' Trump put the US in a downward spiral U.S. President Donald Trump looks on as he speaks to reporters onboard Air Force One, on travel from West Palm Beach, Florida, to Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., February 16, 2026. REUTERS Elizabeth Frantz
According to distinguished security scholar Phillips P. O’Brien, the leadership of President Donald Trump has set the United States on a downward spiral in which it is “weaker every day.” Perhaps even more alarming, the US “may never come back” from the diminished state Trump will leave it in.
O’Brien — whose book War and Power is widely cited by strategy experts — asserts that there are several factors driving the country’s decline under Trump, but the most looming is the president’s decision to launch war with Iran.
“The US does not control its own destiny at this point in the war,” writes O’Brien. “Indeed every day the American position is weakening. The US is in a far weaker state than it was when the ceasefire was announced on April 7, and will be in weaker position next week when I write this (unless Trump surrenders)... Recently we are seeing arguably the greatest example of the growth of American global weakness that Trump has accelerated. Trump has shown that the USA cannot control either Iran or Israel — indeed that he is panicking as those two states are doing what they want regardless of his threats or wishes. The idea of the USA as either the indispensable partner or unstoppable enemy is gone. It may never come back.”
O’Brien says evidence of this weakening can be seen by looking back to June 2025. After the U.S. joined Israel in a bombing campaign against Iran, the Israelis wanted to continue the attack, while Trump wanted it over fast. When he ordered Israel to stop, at the time, the country yielded.
No longer. “In the last few weeks Trump has tried to do something similar and the Israelis are basically not reacting, but doing what Netanyahu wants to do,” specifically in Lebanon. Israel has not only persisted in attacking its neighbor but has seized sizeable territory, complicating peace negotiations. “This Israeli military action has been driving Trump nuts,” says O'Brien, but “unlike last year, however, Trump cannot simply order the Israelis to turn around — and as such is getting desperate,” lashing out at Netanyahu in a screaming, curse-laden phone call. Israel has only continued to step up its military efforts. “This is what I mean about the USA getting weaker every day,” says O’Brien.
At the same time, Trump keeps insisting that a deal is close, even as the Iranians say they’ve cut off talks. And all the while, the president is posting that everyone should “just sit back and relax, it will all work out well in the end — it always does!”
“Look closely at the power imbalance here,” notes O’Brien. “It is the US government that is desperate to keep up the fiction that the negotiations are going well, that Iran is making major concessions and that a deal is close. The Iranians, on the other hand, are happy to project the opposite image; that they can walk away from the talks and are happy to let this string for longer.”
What’s more, writes O’Brien, “This weakness ties into what Trump is doing with the GOP and the federal government…People need to ask themselves why Trump is prizing absolute subservient loyalty over anything. It's not just that he wants to punish his enemies… Trump is setting up a parallel system to protect himself and maintain his power, and that is based on total control of the GOP and executive government. This might actually be the thing that makes U.S. decline unstoppable. He is, as always, willing to destroy the country to save himself.”
O’Brien points to many domestic circumstances that are weakening the country, all driven by Trump’s efforts, from the collapsing economy, to his electoral revenge campaign, to the appointment of inexperienced, incapable loyalists to key positions, to his wildly corrupt slush fund.
“Why is Trump doing what seems to be decisions to make himself less popular and less politically secure going forward?” writes O’Brien. “The answer is not because he is stupid…it is because he is adopting what could be called a scorched earth strategy to protect himself and his power going forward. He wants absolute and total control of the GOP, even if that means he might lose a seat here or there. And he wants a federal government that will do whatever he wants when he wants.”
O’Brien ends with a dire warning: “It sets him up to corrupt either the November vote or its results. People are being too blase about this election. Trump has a party that is completely under his sway and a federal government that is staffed by uber loyalists. It gives him terrible and powerful options to subvert democracy.”
Trump's worst economic bomb is about to drop: analysis (Reuters)
While warning signs have been flashing ever since President Donald Trump’s war with Iran resulted in the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, fallout in the form of a major economic disaster is yet to manifest. “That won’t last forever,” writes the American Prospect columnist Ryan Cooper, who warns that “something is going to snap.”
The danger wouldn’t be so looming if the war appeared to be nearing its end, but as Cooper points out, there is little evidence to support such a hope, noting that Iran has “cut off contact with American negotiators, and the two sides are once again shooting at each other. Trump, for his part, recently told a CNBC reporter that I’ really don’t care. I couldn’t care less’ if negotiations are over. They ‘started to get very boring,’ he added.”
So apparently, according to Trump himself, he’s feeling no pressure to make a deal, which is exactly what he said in early May. Cooper warns that this places the U.S. in a dangerous position, because while there hasn’t been a “truly major crisis” yet, “it’s only a matter of time before one or more of the severely strained parts of the global economy breaks.”
Total catastrophe has so far been avoided based on four factors. First, despite Trump’s best efforts to oppose a green-energy transition, companies and countries around the world have leaned into alternative energy as fossil fuel prices have shot up. At the same time, many nations, particularly in Asia, have begun rationing oil consumption, which while painful, has helped stave off collapse. But a third “more ominous” factor, says Cooper, is that the world has been forced to draw heavily on existing stocks of oil and natural gas.
According to Cooper, “Many people saw the Iran war coming, and filled up every oil tanker and storage facility they possibly could. A great deal of that has since been used up. The vast storage complex at Cushing, Oklahoma (regarded as a storage benchmark), has declined from 33 million barrels to 24.5 million — and they can’t be fully emptied. ‘You can’t draw them down to zero because there is gunk at the bottom of the tanks,’ oil analyst Matt Smith told CNN.” At the same time, countries around the world are depleting their reserves.
“We’re approaching unheard of inventory levels,” Exxon Senior Vice President Neil Chapman said recently. “Once you get to that point, then you’ll see price shoot up.”
A fourth factor, writes Cooper, is “the behavior of the media and financial markets. The D.C. political press can be relied on to uncritically repeat Trump’s preposterous lies about an imminent deal, no matter how many times they have been proved false. Traders on oil and oil futures markets, being either deluded by the media or blinded by wishful thinking or simply incapable of believing that the president of the United States is as stupid and insane as he in fact is, have consistently expected the strait to open back up soon…Oil prices again fell sharply after Trump’s latest promise.” Despite this market manipulation, Cooper warns, “Sooner or later, oil traders are either going to face reality, or bankrupt themselves.”
As Cooper points out, “reserve releases and comically underpriced oil futures are effectively subsidizing oil consumption.” While a few countries, primarily in Asia, have taken measures to reduce oil usage, many world leaders “have encouraged their nations to continue using energy at normal levels, and therefore to chew through global inventories more quickly. That means if and when the supply shock hits, it will hit even harder.”
On that note, Cooper dives into the looming crises that are poised to destroy several key sectors of the economy.
“The most obvious one is in oil itself,” Cooper explains. “As storages dwindle and run out, the only way to match demand to supply will be for the price to rise high enough to destroy something like 10 to 20 percent of global oil consumption. And because a great deal of oil demand is obligatory and therefore not very price-sensitive, that price will likely be north of $150 per barrel. That means gas and diesel at the pump in the $8-to-$10 range, and a corresponding price hike for anything that needs to be transported, or involved in plastic in some way, which is to say basically everything.” Other sectors like agriculture, aluminum, and industrial commodities are in similarly precarious situations due to plunging stock and skyrocketing prices, the fallout from which will be wide-ranging and devastating.
And worse still, notes Cooper, “even if the Strait of Hormuz opens tomorrow, these problems are going to take years to resolve.” Oil fields will take months to resume production, vital infrastructure will take years to rebuild, and the need to restock reserves will drive years of structurally higher demand.
What’s more, the situation is still in flux, and it could continue to deteriorate in ways no one has forecasted. All of this, says Cooper, suggests that an economic bomb is about to go off, the likes of which the world has never seen.
“You know what they say,” he concludes. “It’s always darkest right before it gets pitch-black.”
Trump's cuts to this agency will cost families $500 a year: report U.S. President Donald Trump reacts as he attends the premiere of the documentary film Melania at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. (REUTERS)
President Donald Trump’s changes to the Social Security program, implemented under the guidance of X CEO Elon Musk, will cost many families $500 a year.
The new analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) projects that benefit checks will be cut by $500 a month on average if the program is allowed to hit its “go-broke” date by late 2013. If these cuts were not imposed, the CRFB found, the absence of the 24 percent benefit cut in the Social Security Administration’s payments will cause the fund to be entirely exhausted.
“Applying this projected reduction to current state-level data, we estimate an across-the-board monthly cut would range from $459 to $556 across the 50 states and the District of Columbia,” the report explained. It identified the 10 states that will have the highest average cuts as Connecticut ($556), New Jersey ($554), New Hampshire ($553), Delaware ($549), Maryland ($541), Washington ($531), Minnesota ($530), Massachusetts ($527), Michigan ($523) and Utah ($523).
“The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) believes any discussion of Social Security solvency must be grounded in the reality that millions of older Americans depend on these earned benefits to pay for housing, food, healthcare, and other essential expenses,” Senior Citizens League spokesperson Shannon Benton told Nexstar. “Acting sooner rather than later can help restore the program’s long-term solvency while minimizing the impact on beneficiaries and avoiding sudden benefit reductions that millions of Americans can simply cannot afford.”
The CRFB added, “No state would be spared from the potentially devastating effects of insolvency.”
According to a recent report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Trump has weakened the Social Security program by gutting its staff.
“In just 15 months, the Trump Administration has pushed out more than 8,000 Social Security Administration (SSA) workers — causing SSA’s largest one-year staffing reduction on record,” the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “This 14 percent cut has compromised SSA’s ability to reliably serve seniors, bereaved families, and people with disabilities. By January 2026, SSA had fewer employees than at any time since 1967, when the agency was not yet responsible for administering Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and served 52 million fewer beneficiaries.”
Speaking with AlterNet last month, former Social Security Commissioner Martin O’Malley disputed the widespread argument made by fiscal conservatives that the program faces the threat of insolvency.
“This isn’t true — but it is often repeated,” O’Malley told AlterNet at the time. “Social Security is a pay as you go program. It is not funded by deficit spending. It is more akin to an insurance company. People premiums and benefits are paid out from those premiums. Even the surplus — which because of income inequality is being depleted sooner (2032) than thought in 1983, even that was built up by payroll tax, not borrowed money. “
O’Malley added, “An utter devaluation of the dollar — which Trump is causing and risking in so many reckless and self/serving ways (bitcoin), would be really bad for everything in US including Soc Sec, it is not true that Social Security depends on deficit spending for its support or benefits. (Except a small portion of admin expenses).”
'Unwell': Trump's surprising sizing chart draws immediate mockery
0 U.S. President Donald Trump holds a placard comparing the reflecting to skyscrapers at the Oval Office of the White House, in Washington, D.C., June 3, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
President Donald Trump showed off a surprising size chart during a press gaggle in the Oval Office on Wednesday, leaving onlookers stunned.
Trump held up a chart comparing the size of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation project underway to famous skyscrapers such as the Willis Tower in Chicago, the Empire State Building, and One World Trade Center in New York. The chart was titled, "Our Pool is Bigger than Skyscrapers."
"So, if you lay it on its side, it would take two or three of them to fill it in," Trump told reporters as he held the sign. "The width is almost 200 feet wide."
Political analysts and observers were stunned by the moment and shared their reactions on social media.
"I don’t know who needs to hear this, but skyscrapers are vertical, and pools are flat," journalist Aaron Rupar posted on X.
"He keeps showing off this same chart. Unwell," the MeidasTouch Network posted on X.
"To be fair, the way things are going in his presidency, it's only a matter of time until those skyscrapers are lying on their side," the political advocacy group Majority Democrats posted on X.
"The way in which men like Trump will so predictably hold a public show-and-tell to compare the size of phallic objects…" Michelle Kinney, a Democratic strategist, posted on X.
‘The Country Is Not Trump’s to Liquidate’: New Report Details Depths of Presidential Corruption and Grift
“Americans know they’re being ripped off and are demanding accountability.”
The American Economic Liberties Project and Groundwork Collaborative on Wednesday released a joint report detailing how President Donald Trump’s unprecedented corruption is padding his own pockets at the expense of US taxpayers.
The report—titled “The Price of Corruption: How Trump’s Pay-to-Play Administration is Driving Up Costs for Working Families”—explains how Trump isn’t just using the presidency to enrich himself, but leaving ordinary Americans to foot the bill for his corrupt dealings
The report notes that the TrumpRx website, which purports to offer Americans deep discounts on drugs, is actually a scheme for funneling even more money to large pharmaceutical companies.
“When Trump rolled out TrumpRX earlier this year, the administration claimed it was a way for Americans to access more affordable prescription drugs,” the report states. “Instead, the platform fails to disclose information about less expensive generic alternatives and, in some instances, charges consumers more for products that are available for less elsewhere.”
Rather than providing real relief, the report charges, TrumpRx “serves as free advertisement for Big Pharma and may be lining the pockets of the president’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., who is on the board of prescription drug platform BlinkRX, which stands to benefit from the administration’s promotion of direct-to-patient medicine sales.”
The report also highlights the way that Trump has used his tariffs, which raise the cost of imported goods for US consumers, as a personal self-enrichment tool, such as when he slashed tariffs on Switzerland “just a few days after Swiss business leaders presented him with a personalized gold bar worth more than $130,000 and a Rolex desk clock.”
Trump levied tariffs against Brazil last year in retaliation for that country convicting a political ally, former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, of plotting a coup to illegally stay in power after he lost an election to current President Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva.
“Americans paid the price for Trump’s international allies breaking the law,” states the report, “as coffee imported from Brazil surged to a 40% increase in price.”
One particularly egregious instance of Trump’s corruption, the report explains, comes from the president’s unprecedented number of pardons of political allies, including hundreds of rioters who violently stormed the US Capitol on his behalf on January 6, 2021.
Beyond the high-profile rioter cases, the report shines a spotlight on a number of white-collar criminals who have received presidential clemency, including Paul Walczak, “a nursing home executive convicted of tax evasion” who was pardoned “three weeks after his mother donated $1 million to Trump at a Mar-a-Lago fundraiser,” and cryptocurrency mogul Changpeng Zhao, who received a pardon months after helping boost the Trump family’s crypto venture.
The report notes that the Trump administration has also stacked regulatory agencies in ways that directly benefit the business interests of the president’s family members, most prominently in the realm of online prediction markets tied to Donald Trump Jr.
“Over the past year, Donald Trump Jr. has served as a strategic advisor to Kalshi and a large investor in Polymarket, while the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)—the agency overseeing these firms—has acted as their ally, rather than their watchdog,” the report says. “Both firms had actively lobbied Trump’s CFTC to block states from regulating prediction markets in the same way they regulate gambling companies.”
Morgan Harper, director of policy and advocacy at the American Economic Liberties Project, called the report on Trump’s corruption “a reminder that we cannot afford to look away or pretend that any of this is normal.”
“The country,” Harper added, “is not Trump’s to liquidate.”
Molly Claflin, senior fellow at Groundwork Collaborative, made the case that Trump’s corruption and the economic pain being felt by Americans are inseparable.
“As working families buckle under the weight of Trump’s high prices, the president is further driving up costs by abusing his position to direct taxpayer-funded kickbacks to his family and political allies,” said Claflin. “His erratic policymaking is making daily life more expensive. Americans know they’re being ripped off and are demanding accountability.”
MAGA lawmaker calls for progressive American Hasan Piker to be banned from his own country
FILE PHOTO: Randy Fine, Republican nominee for 2025 Florida's 6th congressional district special election, speaks at a watch party, as Florida holds a special election for a U.S. House of Representatives seat vacated by National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, in Ormond Beach, Florida, U.S. April 1, 2025. REUTERS/Octavio Jones/File Photo
Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) said he thinks progressive influencer Hasan Piker should be banned from the United States after the United Kingdom blocked his visit with fellow commentator and his uncle, Cenk Uygur, TMZ reported on Wednesday.
The MAGA lawmaker was walking on Capitol Hill when a TMZ reporter asked Fine to comment on Piker's entry to the country being revoked over the weekend. The two were scheduled to speak at the SXSW London Festival but were turned away "because of their criticism of Israel," The BBC reported.
"Well I don't think he should be allowed into America, so I think that's a good start," Fine said.
The TMZ reporter responded and asked Fine, "What about freedom of speech?"
"People have freedom of speech but I think when you're a terrorist you should be held responsible for that," Fine said. "And I think he's clearly a supporter of terror. He's a walking billboard for the problem of birth tourism. He was brought here by his Turkish family, they had him, then they took him home, made him hate America, then sent him in to torment us. The guy's a horrible human being and I wouldn't let him into my country if it was up to me, so I don't blame them."
Piker, who is an American citizen, has condemned Islamophobia and been an outspoken critic of MAGA and the Trump administration. He has a large social media following, primarily through streaming on Twitch and weighing in on political topics. He frequently discusses social issues and engages in debates with commentators across the political spectrum.
The reporter pushed back again and suggested that "banning him from a country is [a] pretty crazy step for someone who is expressing his opinion."
"And by the way, they're allowed to do that," Fine said.
When the reporter pressed the Republican again on freedom of speech, he repeated his talking point.
"He promotes Muslim terror, so I think they're making the right decision," said Fine, making the unsubstantiated claim. "I'm surprised they did it but I think they did the right thing."
‘Absurd and Cowardly’: Labour Government Slammed for Barring Hasan Piker, Cenk Uygur From UK
“An Israeli politician who oversaw genocide? Here’s a red carpet!” one critic said in response to the ban.
Influencer Hasan Piker speaks at Web Summit Vancouver 2026 at Vancouver Convention Centre in Vancouver, Canada on May 13, 2026. (Photo By Florencia Tan Jun/Web Summit via Sportsfile via Getty Images)
The UK government is drawing heavy criticism for barring Cenk Uygur and Hasan Piker, two prominent critics of Israel, from entering the country.
According to a Monday report from The Guardian, the UK’s Home Office cancelled electronic travel authorizations (ETA) for both Uygur and Piker on grounds that their presence in the country “may not be conducive to the public good.”
Uygur took to social media shortly afterward and said the UK banned him due to his criticisms of Israeli influence over US policy.
“I didn’t get banned for criticizing the UK, but for criticizing Israel,” Uygur wrote. “They broke the irony record by saying it was because I said Israel might control other governments.”
“Think about it,” Uygur added, “if I had said that the Israeli government controls the British government so thoroughly that they’ll ban someone from coming to the UK just for criticizing Israel, they would have said that was an antisemitic statement. This is absolutely Kafkaesque.”
Shortly after Uygur’s post, Piker, who is Uygur’s nephew, accused the UK government of barring him for similar reasons.
“The UK has revoked my visa as well,” Piker wrote. “All at the behest of Israel. The west is betraying ‘liberal values’ for a genocidal fascist foreign government.”
UK commentator Owen Jones noted the “double standard” in the UK’s decision to bar Israel critics such as Uygur and Piker, but not applying the same restrictions to Israeli politicians who have engaged in genocidal rhetoric against Palestinians.
“An Israeli politician who oversaw genocide? Here’s a red carpet!” wrote Jones. “And you can say anything, however murderous, about Palestinians and freely enter. If you say: ‘I’m glad Israel wiped Gaza from the face of the earth,’ in you come!”
Jeremy Corbyn, former leader of the UK Labour Party, the current ruling party whose government decided to bar the two Israel critics, described the move as “an absurd and cowardly decision from an increasingly authoritarian government.”
“Let us call this what it is,” Corbyn added, “an attack on the freedom to criticize Israel, as well as the UK government’s own complicity in genocide.”
Jemimah Steinfeld, chief executive of the Index on Censorship, told The Guardian that the ban is “paternalistic” on the government’s part because it “assumes we are just passive consumers of views rather than people who can think, judge, and challenge.”
Steinfeld also predicted that the ban would ultimately be ineffective.
“It confers an underdog status to the people not allowed to enter, it could embolden other countries to follow suit, and it feels fairly meaningless in the internet age where people can simply go online to hear what they have to say,” she said. “Free speech is tested by hard cases and, in this instance, the UK is failing.”
‘Profits Over Safety’: Chemical Disasters Under Trump Pile Up as More Safety Cuts Loom
“Instead of protecting workers and families from death, injury, and illness, Trump’s EPA is putting communities at greater risk of harm,” said the Coalition to Prevent Chemical Disasters.
An aerial view of water being sprayed onto an overheated 34,000-gallon tank at GKN Aerospace on May 23, 2026 in Garden Grove, California. (Photo by Apu Gomes/Getty Images)
Two recent high-profile chemical plant disasters are putting a spotlight on the Trump administration’s aggressive deregulation of the industry, with even more cuts to chemical safety regulations expected in the coming months.
The disasters—one at a paper mill in Washington state that killed 11 people and the other in an aerospace plastics facility in California that forced tens of thousands of people to evacuate their homes—came after months of warnings from experts and labor unions about the impact of the administration’s deregulatory agenda.
In late March, for instance, members of United Steelworkers (USW) rallied in Washington, DC to protest against a US Environmental Protection Agency plan to scrap regulations enacted under former President Joe Biden, which included “new safeguards such as identifying safer technologies and chemical alternatives, requiring implementation of safeguard measures in certain cases, more thorough incident investigations, and third-party auditing.”
USW Local 13-228 process safety specialist Phil Stagg at the time warned that scrapping the rule would put “profits over safety” by prioritizing cost cutting over worker safety.
Following last week’s twin disasters, the Coalition to Prevent Chemical Disasters also pointed to plans to weaken Biden-era safety regulations as a grave mistake that will put American workers at greater risk.
“The fatal and shocking incidents communities have faced in recent days demonstrate the urgent need to implement and build on existing regulatory safeguards so communities near chemical facilities are protected from chemical disasters,” the group said. “But, instead of protecting workers and families from death, injury, and illness, Trump’s EPA is putting communities at greater risk of harm by weakening the nation’s primary defense against chemical facility incidents.”
The administration has also been targeting the Chemical Safety Board (CSB), an independent federal watchdog charged with investigating the root causes of industrial chemical accidents.
As The New York Timesreported last month, Trump’s proposed budget all but eliminates the CSB by cutting its funding down to $0 while arguing that the watchdog merely duplicates work already done by the EPA.
Rep. Marie Glusenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) said in a Sunday social media post that the CSB did essential work in preventing future accidents, and she vowed to fight the administration’s plans to zero out its budget.
“I’ll be making it my priority ensuring [CSB] has the resources they need for a through, unbiased investigation,” Perez said. “They also have three vacancies currently on that board of directors, and my hope is that we’re able to work with the administration to ensure that people with real trades experience are appointed to that board.”
Jordan Barab, a former deputy assistant secretary at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), explained in an interview published by Mountain State Spotlight last week that CSB produces invaluable work about chemical disasters’ root causes, whereas the EPA’s work focuses on whether disasters were caused by violating federal regulations.
In particular, Barab noted that CSB can “look at other problems, other causes that aren’t necessarily covered by regulations or standards,” and added that “a lot of the ways the industry has modernized to improve safety are based on recommendations that came out of the CSB.”
Schumer Among Top Dems Who Marched at NYC Israel Parade With Accused ‘War Criminal’ Smotrich
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has called for the “annihilation” of Gaza and has led forced displacement efforts in the West Bank. US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is seen at the 2026 Israel Day Parade on May 31, 2026 in New York City. (Photo by BG048/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images)
Numerous headlines over the weekend focused on New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s decision not to attend the city’s Israel Day Parade on Sunday, with Israeli officials condemning his absence and outlets emphasizing that he was breaking “with a decades-long political custom because of his support of Palestinian rights.”
But with the Israeli government’s approval rating plummeting among the US public, including Jewish Americans, since Israel began its US-backed assault on Gaza more than two-and-a-half years ago, progressives were asking not why Mamdani skipped the parade—but why top Democratic officials such as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (NY) chose to take part in it, especially considering the involvement of Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.
The International Criminal Courtrequested a warrant for Smotrich’s arrest last month over his efforts to forcibly expel thousands of Palestinians from their homes in the West Bank, a violation of international law. He has played a key role in efforts to expand Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which have ramped up since October 2023, when Israel began attacking Gaza’s entire population of over 2 million Palestinians in retaliation for a Hamas-led attack. He also publicly called for the “annihilation” of Gaza in 2024.
The New York Timesreported that Smotrich was not part of Israel’s official delegation that was sent to take part in the annual parade, whose theme this year was “Proud Americans, Proud Zionists,” but he marched nonetheless.
The Israeli government sent about 10 members of the Israeli Knesset to take part in the event, including two members of National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir’s ultranationalist Otzma Yehudit Party. Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu, who said last year that Israel was “rushing toward Gaza being wiped out,” was also part of the delegation.
As Smotrich was joining establishment Democratic figures from New York state in the parade—including New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, US Rep. Dan Goldman, Attorney General Letitia James, and New York City Council Speaker Julie Menin—Ben-Gvir on Sunday was publicly calling for the Israel Defense Forces to “flatten” Beirut’s suburbs in the IDF’s incursion into Lebanon—“a direct incitement to mass civilian destruction,” according to Middle East Eye.
“Why is it controversial for Zohran to skip a parade because of his principles but not for Democratic politicians to march with a fascist bigot like Smotrich?” asked Ben Rhodes, a former national security official under the Obama administration.
At the parade, Schumer spoke about his view that Jewish Americans’ “security and our safety is never safe as long as we lack a place of refuge, a homeland,” but Ali Abunimah, director of Electronic Intifada, wondered how the Senate leader’s involvement in a parade with officials who have openly called for ethnic cleansing would make hundreds of thousands of Muslim New Yorkers, including thousands of Palestinian Americans, feel about their own safety.
“How can all New Yorkers feel safe, especially Muslims and Palestinians, when the New York City police commissioner marches with genocidal criminals like Smotrich for the same supremacist cause?” said Abunimah, suggesting Commissioner Jessica Tisch should be removed for her involvement in the parade. “Would Mayor Zohran Mamdani keep a police chief who marched with [the Ku Klux Klan]?”
The city’s Democratic Socialists of America chapter called for Smotrich to “be arrested to face justice for his horrific crimes against Palestinians and humanity,” and said that “every politician who marched with him aligned themselves with Israel’s crimes.”
Along with the participation of Smotrich and Eliyahu, Palestinian journalist Abubaker Abed noted that at the parade, the flag of the IDF’s Golani Battalion, which was behind the killing of 15 Palestinian paramedics in Rafah last year, was displayed at the event.
Beth Miller, the political director for Jewish Voice for Peace, took issue with a statement by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that condemned Mamdani for not taking part in the parade, calling it “the city’s largest and most visible Jewish celebration.”
“It’s antisemitic to conflate Jews and Israel. Which is exactly what the ADL is doing by calling the ‘Israel Day Parade’ a ‘Jewish celebration,’” said Miller. “As a Jewish person who lives here, I’m pretty fucking glad we finally have a mayor who isn’t at a parade celebrating atrocity crimes.”
Ryan Grim of Drop Site News pointed out that while New York City was welcoming the Israeli delegation, including officials from the country’s extreme right, commentators Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur were barred from entering the United Kingdom. Both have vehemently criticized Israel and were flagged as potentially not being “conducive to the public good.”
Journalist Krystal Ball of the online show “Breaking Points” said sardonically that the two concurrent events displayed “Western values.”
.jpg)
