Monday, August 03, 2026

How Namibia Pulled Ahead In Africa’s Hottest Offshore Oil Basin

  • Namibia is rapidly outpacing South Africa in the Orange Basin, advancing major discoveries like TotalEnergies' Venus and Shell's Merlin toward development.

  • Namibia's streamlined regulatory framework has attracted investment, with fast permitting and predictable licensing.

  • Industry leaders warn South Africa risks missing a major opportunity, as environmental litigation and regulatory delays continue to stall offshore exploration despite significant resource potential.

Namibia is rapidly emerging as Africa’s next major oil producer while neighboring South Africa, which controls roughly two-thirds of the same Orange Basin petroleum province, remains years behind in developing essentially the same petroleum system. The Orange Basin, an offshore deepwater petroleum province spanning the Atlantic maritime border between the two countries, is estimated to contain more than 20 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Yet while Namibia has attracted a succession of world-class discoveries and moved rapidly toward commercial development, South Africa has struggled to translate the same geological opportunity into producing assets. TotalEnergies' (NYSE:TTE) deepwater Venus Project in offshore Namibia now targets an initial production capacity of roughly 150,000 barrels of oil per day, with first oil aimed for 2030. Venus-1X  is estimated to contain 1.5 billion barrels of light crude and 4.8 trillion cubic feet of gas. TotalEnergies has also taken over operations of the massive Mopane discovery from Portugal’s Galp Energia (OTCPK:GLPEF).

Last month, Shell Plc (NYSE:SHEL) and its JV partners reported a major oil discovery at the Merlin-1X exploration well within Petroleum Exploration Licence 39 (PEL 39). Located in Namibia’s Orange Basin roughly 290 kilometers off the coast, the resource has recoverable reserves estimated at 750 million barrels for Phase 1. The success of Merlin-1X marks a critical turnaround for the consortium.

In early 2025, Shell booked a $400 million impairment on its Namibian offshore portfolio following engineering hurdles at older discovery wells with complex geology and high gas-to-oil ratios, including Graff-1X and Jonker-1X. Those challenges had initially slowed commercialization plans, but the Merlin-1X discovery has significantly improved the outlook for the company’s Namibian acreage.

In contrast, South Africa has made little progress here, despite owning two-thirds of the basin. 

South Africa’s largest undeveloped offshore gasLocated in Oranger Basin’s Block 2A, the Ibhubesi Gas Field is South Africa’s largest undeveloped offshore gas field, holding an estimated 540 billion cubic feet of natural gas and 4.3 million barrels of condensate. Back in 2022, Eco Atlantic Oil & Gas drilled the Gazania-1 Well in South Africa's West Coast to a depth of 2,360 meters but failed to find sufficient volumes for commercial drilling. However, legal challenges and regulatory hurdles have also played a big role in encumbering South Africa’s progress.

Namibia's rapid ascent as a global deepwater oil hub in the Orange Basin has largely been driven by its stable, single-window regulatory model, while South Africa is encumbered by layers of permitting bottlenecks. Namibia’s Ministry of Mines and Energy, alongside the national oil company NAMCOR, provides international operators with predictable timelines and transparent licensing processes.

Namibia has paired world-class geology with one of Africa’s fastest and most predictable petroleum licensing systems. The Ministry of Mines and Energy and state-owned NAMCOR operate under a standardized Model Petroleum Agreement, a transparent fiscal regime that includes a 35% petroleum income tax and a 5% royalty, and clearly defined approval timelines. As a result, international operators have been able to move discoveries into appraisal at remarkable speed, with exploration and appraisal permits typically secured within three to nine months. In South Africa, by contrast, overlapping regulatory authority and prolonged approval processes can stretch permitting timelines to as long as five years.

Meanwhile, ongoing environmental litigation has also delayed numerous oil and gas wells expected to be drilled in South Africa in the coming years. 

In March 2026, activists and fishing cooperatives petitioned the High Court to rescind permits for up to 10 ultra-deep-water exploration wells off the West Coast. Last year, the Western Cape High Court overturned environmental authorization for TotalEnergies and Shell to drill along the southwest coast, with the court citing critical failures in assessing oil spill impacts on small-scale fishers. A landmark October 2025 court ruling also invalidated environmental authorization for a proposed Eskom gas-to-power plant in Richards Bay. Meanwhile, a foundational 2021 lawsuit filed by local communities blocked a Shell seismic survey, with a definitive precedent-setting ruling expected later this year from South Africa's highest court. 

"We cannot explore, we cannot spend money in a geography if we have to face courts permanently and the permitting becomes really too complex," TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne lamented during the company’s earnings presentation.

South Africa’s Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Gwede Mantashe has pushed for specialized energy courts to address delays from environmental lawsuits, citing blocked offshore oil and gas projects by companies like Shell and TotalEnergies. Mantashe contends that regular legal challenges reflect a resistance to national progress, prompting the push for fast-tracked dispute mechanisms.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

Harold Hamm Bets Bigger on Argentina’s Vaca Muerta Shale Boom

By Tsvetana Paraskova - Aug 03, 2026

Continental Resources, the company founded by shale billionaire Harold Hamm, looks to expand in Vaca Muerta as international companies vie to develop Argentina’s proven prolific shale patch.

Continental is set to bid in this year’s bid round for acreage in Vaca Muerta in the biggest auction in the basin in a decade, sources with knowledge of the plans have told Bloomberg.

Bids will be opened on August 19. The province of Neuquén, where most of Vaca Muerta is located, has launched the biggest licensing round in the shale play in a decade, offering 15 blocks up for grabs—more than double the number of blocks in the previous auction.

Interest in Vaca Muerta has increased in recent years as Argentina under Javier Milei has introduced tax cuts and other benefits for investors in the shale patch, where oil and gas production has been growing steadily for two years.

Vaca Muerta is top of the list of oil and gas companies, including U.S. shale giants, as a de-risked basin with proven geology that’s far away from having to rely on the Strait of Hormuz or any other corridor in the Middle East to ship barrels out.

Continental Resources has had a footprint in Argentina, which the U.S. firm began to increase early this year.

In January 2026, Continental doubled down on its shale expansion outside the U.S. with an acquisition of stakes in four Vaca Muerta blocks.

“Vaca Muerta is one of the most compelling shale plays in the world, and we're thrilled to continue to invest in Argentina and build Continental's position through this agreement with Pan American Energy,” Continental Resources president and CEO Doug Lawler said at the time.

“We take a long-term view of resource development, regardless of geography. As I like to say, 'The rock doesn't know what country it's in.'”

Continental is now looking to expand its Vaca Muerta exposure in the licensing round ending this month.

Amid the global oil supply shock this year, Vaca Muerta tops the shortlist of regions where the next generation of reliable barrels will come from, analysts at Rystad Energy said earlier this year.

The Argentinian shale play is already outperforming U.S. plays such as the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford on well productivity measures, Rystad Energy reckons, and expects crude production from Vaca Muerta to top 1 million barrels per day (bpd) by the end of the decade.

After a slow start earlier this decade, Vaca Muerta is now booming. The latest production figures showed that crude oil output hit an all-time high of 887,227 bpd in May, up by 19% from a year earlier.

“Argentina is offering international companies their best organic entry point into Vaca Muerta in a decade,” Jai Singh, Head of US Oil & Gas Research at Rystad Energy, said, referring to the bid round of 2026.

“The basin is maturing fast, infrastructure is being built at pace, and the bid terms are designed to attract operators who can bring North American shale expertise to bear.”

According to Singh, “This bid round is the moment that the world’s most important non-US shale play formally invites the world in.”

Vaca Muerta has already made Argentina the fourth-largest oil producer in Latin America—a position that may improve in the future as the government prioritizes the development of the local energy industry, encouraging infrastructure projects aiming to boost the offtake capacity of the Vaca Muerta.

Plans for infrastructure include the Vaca Muerta Oil Sur (VMOS) pipeline set to carry over 180,000 bpd of crude in Phase I and up to 550,000 bpd once Phase II is completed.

In addition, Argentina’s state firm YPF, Italy’s Eni, and the United Arab Emirates’ XRG are putting in place plans for the integrated upstream-midstream project, Argentina LNG, to produce, export, and market Vaca Muerta’s gas resources.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

Australian Regulator Wants Tougher Pollution Rules for Darwin LNG Plants

Two of Australia's biggest LNG projects led by Santos and Inpex could face stricter environmental and pollution reporting rules after the Northern Territory Environment Protection Authority (NT EPA) recommended 23 ways to address a previous under-reporting of emissions.

The regional EPA of the state that hosts Inpex's Ichthys LNG and Santos' Darwin LNG has just announced the outcome of a review of the Darwin Airshed LNG Licenses.

The review was triggered last year following a significant upward revision of Inpex's 2023/24 emissions estimates, including benzene, and related community concern about potential human health impacts.

In October 2025, Inpex, the operator of the Ichthys LNG facility in Darwin, revised its emissions estimates for 2023/24 upwards by a significant amount after conducting a review of estimation methods.

The Inpex review examined emissions calculations from Ichthys LNG for the 2024 financial year and identified discrepancies between reported and actual emissions including total volatile organic compounds (VOCs) benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene.

“INPEX takes full accountability for these unintentional errors which have been reported to the NT EPA,” the company said at the time.

But as a result of the upward revision of emissions estimates, the EPA of the Northern Territory initiated its own review and came up with as many as 23 recommendations for the Darwin Airshed and the licenses for Ichthys LNG and Darwin LNG. The recommendations include applying numerical emission concentration limits and maximum mass emissions rates to pollutants, stricter limits on hot venting, and an audit every 5 years to verify that facilities are implementing best practice for pollution control.

For Ichthys LNG, the state environmental agency recommends the installation of continuous monitoring equipment for the acid gas stream, capable of measuring benzene and other pollutants of concern in real time.

Combined, Ichthys LNG and Darwin LNG account for about 10% of the annual LNG imports of Japan and Taiwan.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

 

Ukrainian Drone Attacks Push Russia's Largest Online Retailer Abroad

  • Wildberries is seeking warehouse capacity in Kazakhstan after Ukrainian drone strikes reportedly destroyed at least 10% of its inventory in Russia.

  • Moving inventory to Kazakhstan could reduce the risk of further drone attacks but introduces delays due to congestion and tighter controls at the Kazakhstan-Russia border.

  • The disruption is affecting businesses across Central Asia, while fears of a new Russian military mobilization are driving another wave of emigration into neighboring countries.

Desperate to blunt the threat posed by Ukrainian drone attacks, the operator of Wildberries, Russia’s leading e-commerce platform, is looking to lease warehouse space in neighboring Kazakhstan.

In response to a series of recent Ukrainian drone strikes across Russia that have destroyed at least 10 percent of Wildberries’ inventory, representatives of RMB Group, the e-commerce platform’s parent company, are scouring Kazakhstan and are “ready to occupy all available warehouse space in the country,” according to the Russian business daily Kommersant, citing four anonymous real estate sources. 

Ukraine has asserted that Wildberries is a legitimate military target because the platform has been used to distribute equipment and electronics that are used on the battlefield in Ukraine. Wildberries representatives deny any connection to the warfare in Ukraine.

Wildberries representatives told Kommersant that the company is building a 100,000 square meter facility near Almaty and another facility of 160,000 square meters near Astana. But those warehouses won’t be ready until 2027 at the earliest, and they appear mainly intended for serving the Kazakh market. 

Additional space is needed in Kazakhstan to handle the distribution of goods to customers in Russia. According to the Kommersant sources, Wildberries is reluctant to find new warehousing space in Russia to replace facilities destroyed by drones, and instead wants to add storage capacity in Kazakhstan. At the same time, Russian vendors are reportedly balking at making deals, worried that the risks of working with Wildberries outweigh any financial reward. Warehouse inventory in Kazakhstan is reportedly very limited.

While warehousing goods in Kazakhstan would likely shield the company’s facilities from Ukrainian drone attacks, it could pose other difficulties for Wildberries’ efforts to quickly and efficiently deliver goods. Kazakhstan and Russia are both members of the Eurasian Economic Union, which, in theory, facilitates free trade between the two countries. In reality, the Kazakh-Russian border is far from open.

Over the past year, cargo trucks have faced lengthy waits to clear customs at border points all along the frontier.  

And in July, Kazakh authorities introduced police checkpoints at major border crossings, ostensibly to eliminate gas-purchase tourism by Russians seeking to circumvent gasoline shortages in Russia. 

Vendors in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are reporting significant losses due to Ukraine’s destruction of Wildberries’ warehouses in Russia. Some small businesses in Kyrgyzstan that rely on Wildberries’ distribution network have been hurt so badly that the State Tax Service in Bishkek has offered them tax holidays until the end of the year. Kazakh businesses have not been hit as hard, but still have reportedly lost at least $3 million worth of merchandise

Meanwhile, Central Asia is experiencing a second massive wave of Russian immigration, similar to that which occurred in 2022 after the start of Russia’s unprovoked attack on Ukraine. Kazakh authorities have reported a large increase in real estate purchases and investments by Russians. The catalyst for the new wave is fear in Russia that the Kremlin will resort to a military draft/full mobilization in the fall, aiming to bolster the depleted Russian army and solidify its eroding fighting capability in Ukraine. Armenia is also reporting a large influx of Russians.

By Eurasianet

Ukraine’s Drone Campaign Drives Russian Oil Refining to 24-Year Low


Russian crude processing fell to its lowest level in more than two decades in July after Ukraine expanded its drone campaign from refineries to tankers, pipelines and export infrastructure, according to The Moscow Times, citing Bloomberg analysis. 

Russian refineries processed an estimated 3.6 million barrels per day in July, the lowest monthly level since May 2002 and roughly one-third below the seasonal average. Between 2020 and 2025, Russian refineries typically processed between 5.3 million and 5.6 million barrels per day during the same period.

Ukraine struck 18 Russian refineries in July, surpassing the previous monthly record of 17 attacks set in May. Targets included the 440,000-barrel-per-day Omsk refinery, Russia’s largest, more than 2,500 kilometers from the Ukrainian border. Ukrainian drones also struck five large oil tankers, five pieces of port infrastructure and two pipelines during the month. Bloomberg counted 30 attacks on Russia’s oil infrastructure in July, the second-highest monthly total since the full-scale invasion began.

Ukrainian forces concentrated on refineries during the first half of July before moving against tankers and export logistics later in the month. Refinery strikes resumed during the final week, with three large plants hit during the last three days of July and four more attacked over the weekend, according to Sergei Vakulenko of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

Last week, Russia extended its ban on most diesel and gasoline exports to prevent domestic shortages as refinery outages reduced fuel production. Reduced processing has also forced producers to export larger volumes of crude oil, increasing pressure on ports and tanker fleets already disrupted by Ukrainian strikes.

Bloomberg reported that only four tankers loaded crude at Novorossiysk during the week ending July 26, down from seven and eight during the previous two weeks. Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, said Russia can reroute some crude through Baltic ports, though pipeline, storage and tanker capacity is insufficient to replace all Black Sea export volumes.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com


 

Ukraine Strikes Lukoil's Volgograd Refinery as Drone Attacks Resume

Ukraine has struck one of Russia’s biggest refineries, Lukoil’s Volgograd processing facility, the Ukrainian forces said on Friday as they resumed attacks on Russian refining capacity.

The Volgograd refinery, which has the capacity to process 300,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude, produces gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. It was hit by Ukrainian forces, Ukraine’s Security Service said in a Telegram post on Friday.

The hit was “successful,” Ukraine said, without offering details as to the extent of damage.

Andrei Bocharov, the governor of Russia’s Volgograd region, said on Friday that a fire broke out at an industrial facility in the fuel and energy complex in the region following a mass drone attack. Bocharov did not name the site.

This is not the first strike on the Volgograd refinery, which early this year had to suspend crude oil processing after a Ukrainian drone attack triggered a fire at the plant.

The renewed drone attacks on refineries from Ukraine come after several weeks of a lull, during which Ukrainian forces focused on hitting tankers in the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea.

The brief respite in the attacks on refineries allowed some units to resume operations after repairs. This past weekend, Russia’s Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said that the fuel crisis in Russia had started to ease as some refineries have restarted operations.

However, this week Russia extended the ban on gasoline and diesel exports from July 31 to the end of the year in a sign that the situation has not improved too much.

Amid peak demand season, Russia has been suffering from gasoline and diesel shortages for nearly three months, as Ukraine’s drone campaign to strike Russian refineries forced many large processing sites offline in the spring and early summer.

The overnight attack on the Volgograd refinery could now worsen the crisis.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com 


Russia Is Running Out of Soldiers, Oil, and Time

  • Russia's war effort is under growing pressure, with mounting military losses, relentless Ukrainian drone strikes on refineries, and attacks damaging nearly 43% of Russia's refining capacity

  • The U.S. and EU are preparing tougher sanctions, targeting Russia's oil exports, shadow fleet, and major buyers such as China and India, with tariffs and stricter enforcement aimed at squeezing Moscow's energy revenues.

  • Economic strains are intensifying, as Russia faces stagnating growth, shrinking sovereign reserves, a worsening fuel crisis, and the prospect of broader conscription after September elections.

Over 1,600 days into Russian President Vladimir Putin’s 10-day special military operation and the situation for the Kremlin continues to deteriorate. Since Moscow ordered its troops illegally into Ukraine on 24 February 2022, more than 450,000 of them have been killed, with another 1 million wounded or missing. Ukraine’s extraordinary development of its own military -- including a stunning build-out of its drone capabilities -- now means Russian monthly casualties have reached the critical negative replacement rate -- meaning that there are more dead and wounded per month (over 30,000) than can be replaced through recruitment (around 27,000). And there are now 8 Russian casualties for every 1 Ukrainian casualty, up from a ratio of roughly 3:1 earlier in the conflict. Adding to its self-inflicted woes, Russia’s key oil and gas infrastructure has been under sustained attack from Ukrainian drones since early 2024, followed by an even deeper, highly concentrated blitz that began in August 2025. Since the start of 2026, Ukrainian drones have attacked Russian refineries at least 194 times, bringing total cumulative damage to nearly 43% of Russia’s entire operating refinery capacity. As bad as this is for Putin’s war, things are set to become very much worse very soon.

Aside from a further tightening of the noose held by Ukraine over Crimea (illegally seized by Russia in 2014) in what is shaping up to be a textbook operation of asymmetric isolation and siege, and a further rolling bombardment of Russia’s vital oil and gas installations, the US and Europe have plans to push its economy into an outright crisis by the end of this year through swingeing new sanctions. In Europe’s case, the European Union (EU) of 27 member countries agreed on 23 July in their 21st Sanctions Package against Russia to freeze the oil price cap at the present level of US$44.10 per barrel for at least another year. The EU cap affects Russian seaborne crude oil and petroleum products exported to third countries outside the EU, most notably China and India, as the EU has already banned all direct imports of Russian oil into its own borders. This freeze paused an expected increase of more than US$10 per barrel that was likely to have resulted in the EU’s scheduled review this month from the floating calculation mechanism adopted by the bloc last year. At the same time, the EU took further measures against Russia’s shadow fleet, and against the ecosystems that support it. For a start, it added 41 vessels to the asset freeze list and, for the first time, it expanded its authority to sanction vessels that do not directly carry Russian oil but instead provide support services to shadow fleet tankers. For example, any vessel caught refuelling, towing, or conducting ship-to-ship cargo transfers with a blacklisted shadow tanker will now automatically be designated and hit with a total maritime services ban. Another major escalation allows EU countries to confiscate and sell oil cargoes discovered on detained shadow fleet vessels. The aim of these measures was made crystal clear by President of the European Commission (the executive branch of the EU) Ursula von der Leyen: “At a time when Ukraine has built military momentum, our sanctions continue to weaken the economic foundations of Russia’s war effort.”

This comment could have been equally applicable to the U.S.’s likely next round of sanctions, following 28 July’s overwhelming 86-12 vote of the Senate to advance the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026. For Russia, this would be the most catastrophic collection of powers yet brought to bear on the country because of its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. To begin with, it would allow the U.S. to impose massive, targeted tariffs on imported goods from the leading five countries that buy Russian oil or gas and enable sanctions evasion, based on the most recent 12-month period preceding the date of the enactment of the act. As of today, the top five individual countries are: China, India, Turkey, Brazil, and Azerbaijan. Having said that, the EU as a group would feature in fourth place as a collective, as it remains the largest global buyer of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) at 49% of its total LNG exports and still takes 32% of its remaining pipeline gas via exemptions for countries including Hungary and Slovakia. However, the EU is committed to ending all imports of Russian LNG by January 2027, natural gas by September 2027, and crude oil by December 2027. More specifically, the bill would impose duties of up to 100% of the value of all goods from the worst five offenders, with similar taxes being applied to countries judged to have facilitated Russian oil sanctions evasion. The law would additionally prohibit any new U.S. investment in Russia’s energy sector and ban exports of U.S. energy products to Russia within 30 days of enactment. Moreover, tariffs of up to 500% would be applied to all goods imported directly from Russia, including oil, natural gas, LNG, petroleum products and coal. Echoing the EU’s ongoing moves against Russia’s shadow fleet, the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 would seek to identify foreign vessels used to transport Russian-origin crude oil, uranium, natural gas, LNG, petroleum products or coal as ‘blocked property’ (frozen assets) if they lack correct maritime insurance or evade compliance with price caps established by the Price Cap Coalition or the U.S.

At a recent Atlantic Council Eurasia Center forum, former Russian Federation officials said increased oil sanctions could tip Russia's economy into crisis. Ex-prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov added that: “Mr Putin will face a big problem by the end of this year […] This is a good period of creating, I would say, coordinated pressure on Putin on all sides: Ukraine, the West, and of course, growing problems in Russia.” Indeed, in the first few months of the war, Russia was making much more from its oil and gas exports than it had for a long time before the invasion, due to the spike in prices, analysed in full in my latest book on the new global oil market order. Even for the following two or so years, the country was benefiting from its shift into a wartime economy, but this appears finally to have hit its natural limits, triggering a dangerous spiral of severe stagflation, a collapsing sovereign safety net, and a systemic domestic fuel crisis. Back in June last year, the highly respected Governor of the Central Bank of Russia (CBR), Elvira Nabiullina, declared that Russia’s ‘free resources’ were exhausted, during an address at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. This assessment highlighted a critical depletion of labour, manufacturing capacity, and National Wealth Fund assets, leading to a projected economic stall. Subsequently, the CBR slashed its 2026 GDP growth forecast down to 0-1% (with the Ministry of Economic Development projecting just 0.4%). Official data from Rosstat revealed the economy contracted by 0.2% in the first part of the year, breaking a multi-quarter streak of wartime growth. Meanwhile, Russia’s National Wealth Fund (its sovereign rainy-day cushion) has seen its liquid assets plummet from 6.5% of GDP down to just 1.8%. This bleak backdrop is not an ideal one for a likely widening of conscription to be announced after the nationwide legislative and regional elections from 18 to 20 September 2026 -- the first major parliamentary vote held in Russia since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine began. “Putin will wait until after these have taken place to announce his plan to boost numbers [of soldiers] at the front, and if this does include, as many expect, a widening of conscription, then the anti-war feeling already present in the cities could spread quickly,” a senior source who works closely with the EU’s security complex exclusively told OilPrice.com last week.

By Simon Watkins for Oilprice.com


 

How Geothermal and Nuclear Could Help the U.S. Catch China in the Energy Race

  • China outspent the U.S. by more than 2-to-1 on clean energy investment between 2019 and 2025, and dominates global solar, wind and battery supply chains.

  • The U.S. has carved out a lead in enhanced geothermal and next-generation nuclear power, two of the few clean energy sectors still drawing bipartisan support.

  • The Department of Energy projects enhanced geothermal alone could supply 90 gigawatts of power by 2050, enough for roughly 65 million homes.

China is winning the race for global clean energy dominance. Beijing has outspent every other country on Earth for years now, and controls critical global clean energy supply chains. Over the same time period, the United States has taken a major step back from clean energy objectives under the Trump administration, giving Beijing even more leverage. But while China’s ascension to global energy superpower status may seem like a foregone conclusion against this backdrop, the United States may have a unique opportunity to even the playing field thanks to two emerging technologies that still enjoy broad bipartisan support: enhanced geothermal and next-gen nuclear power.

Between 2019 and 2025, Beijing spent more than the rest of the world combined on clean energy.  Compared to China’s more-than $500 billion in investments over that time period, the United States enjoyed a relatively scant $236 billion in clean energy investing, only 40 percent of which came from U.S. companies, “showing the US dependence on foreign direct investment for its manufacturing sector,” according to an Atlas Public Policy report published earlier this year.

The United States’ and Israel’s war in Iran has only granted more of an advantage to China. Extreme and ongoing volatility in global fossil fuel markets is catalyzing the global clean energy transition as countries rush to wean themselves off of oil and gas imports and build up their own solar and wind industries. This stands to grant a windfall to Chinese companies, which supply the most affordable and abundant clean energy components such as solar panels, wind turbines, and battery-powered energy storage systems.

But while China has established a lead in solar and wind power technologies that the United States has slim hopes of catching up with, the United States has carved out narrow leads in some alternative and cutting-edge clean energy sectors, most notably geothermal energy and some next-generation nuclear power technologies. The Trump administration has reversed Biden-era legislation supporting a wide array of clean energy supports, but it has doubled down on these two approaches as critical platforms of the United States’ strategy for energy security and independence against the backdrop of skyrocketing energy demand growth thanks to data center hyperscalers and the artificial intelligence boom.

‘Enhanced’ geothermal energy – that which uses advanced drilling technologies to tap into the heat of the Earth’s core from nearly anywhere on its surface – is increasingly capturing the attention of the public and private sectors alike, and has enjoyed vanishingly rare bipartisan support in the United States over the course of the last several administrations. Buoyed by sizable investments from the federal government as well as from Big Tech, the United States is fast becoming the distinguished frontrunner in the global geothermal energy sector. The United States Department of Energy projects that enhanced geothermal projects could provide about 90 gigawatts of carbon-free energy in the U.S. by 2050, or about enough to power at least 65 million homes.

Meanwhile, advanced nuclear technologies are enjoying a similar level of enthusiasm from the public and private sectors as the Trump administration earmarks significant resources from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Reactor Pilot Program to fast-track the testing and commercialization of advanced nuclear technologies like small modular reactors, molten salt reactors, and even nuclear fusion in order to bring them to scale. At the same time, Wall Street and Silicon Valley are throwing their weight behind advanced nuclear startups in an attempt to solve the growing AI energy crisis.

“China may lead in solar and wind power and in battery manufacturing, but the United States has the upper hand in two other essential technologies: enhanced geothermal and new nuclear energy,” Foreign Affairs recently reported in an article about ‘America’s Surprising Energy Advantage’. The piece goes on to say: “These may indeed be more valuable than solar and wind power because they draw from clean energy sources that do not depend on the weather. Washington, however, will have to coordinate with large technology firms and its many foreign partners if it wants to export its geothermal and nuclear capabilities to the wider world—or indeed power its own AI sector. Otherwise, Beijing will keep pulling ahead.”

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com