Anita Singh
Mon, May 9, 2022
Mother Teresa, pictured in 1993 - AP
Mother Teresa: For The Love of God? (Sky Documentaries) featured quite a spectrum of opinion. “She was a modern-day Jesus.” “She was a charlatan, pure and simple.” “The most admired woman in the world.” “A bit of a psychopath, to be honest with you.”
Documentary-makers often take a position against the prevailing orthodoxy. But that has already been done in the case of Mother Teresa. Christopher Hitchens performed a demolition job on her saintly reputation in the 1990s, both in writing and in a film, Hell’s Angel. Instead, For The Love of God? remains faithful to the question mark in its title. Over three parts, it features interviews with supporters and detractors, inviting the viewer to make up their own mind. The result is a comprehensive and balanced assessment of Mother Teresa’s life, portraying her as a complex figure.
She devoted herself to the poor and worked indefatigably into her eighties. She rescued the destitute from the streets of Kolkata, taking in orphaned children and opening a home for the dying. None of that is in doubt.
But her public image obscured some uncomfortable truths. Jack Preger, a British doctor who went to work in Kolkata, was appalled by the conditions he found at her institutions. Patients were not being provided with decent medical care or pain relief, because the sisters preferred simply to pray for the alleviation of pain. Much of the money donated by well-wishers did not find its way to the poor, but was instead handed over to the Vatican.
She ran the Missionaries of Charity almost as a cult, according to one former member, with sisters instructed to cease contact with their families. Perhaps most damningly of all, she appeared to turn a blind eye to sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. (The Missionaries of Charity told the programme that Mother Teresa had no knowledge of abuse.)
Her critics included Dr Aroup Chatterjee, who moved to London from Kolkata and was amazed by the extent to which her role had been mythologised in the West. “People kept telling me that Mother Teresa was feeding Kolkata, clothing Kolkata… I just couldn’t believe that this level of lies, misinformation and fantasy could pervade the world in such a way.”
But the Hitchens-level criticism felt as overdone as the blind loyalty displayed by some of her fiercest supporters. While Mother Teresa clearly had many faults, there was nothing here to back up the “charlatan” claim (made by the filmmaker and activist Tariq Ali). Most likely, she was neither saint nor sinner, but something in between.
No comments:
Post a Comment