Saturday, March 02, 2024

PRO PALESTINE CAMPAIGN 
Left-wing firebrand George Galloway wins UK by-election
WORKERS PARTY OF GB WIN!

AFP Published March 2, 2024 
George Galloway celebrates after winning the by-election, at his campaign headquarters, in Rochdale, near Manchester.—Reuters

ROCHDALE: Left-wing firebrand George Gallo­way was elected to the UK parliament on Friday after tapping into anger over the Israel-Hamas war in a by-election.

Galloway, 69, first became an MP in 1987 and will return to the House of Commons for the first time since 2015 after winning the seat of Roc­hdale, in the north of England, by nearly 6,000 votes.

The vote saw the main opposition Labour party withdraw its candidate, Azhar Ali, after he touted a conspiracy theory that Israel had allowed Hamas to carry out its attack on October 7.

Galloway put the Gaza conflict front and centre of his campaign in Rochdale, which has a 30 per cent Muslim population.


Workers Party leader put Gaza conflict front and centre in his campaign

“Keir Starmer, this is for Gaza,” Galloway, leader of the Workers Party of Great Britain, said in his victory speech, referring to the Labour party’s leader.

“You have paid, and you will pay, a high price for the role that you have played in enabling, encouraging and covering for the catastrophe presently going on in occupied Palestine in the Gaza Strip,” he added.

The Scottish-born Gall­o­way, nicknamed “Gorge­ous George”, has had a long and chequered political career, in which he has represented several parties, including Labour.

He sparked controversy in the 1990s when he visited then-Iraq leader Saddam Hussein, telling him: “Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability”.

Galloway gained international attention in 2005 when he was called to testify over Iraq in the US Senate. He had earlier been expelled from Labour over his stance on the war.

His majority of 5,697 votes in Rochdale amou­nted to 18.3 per cent of the total, on a turnout of 39.7 per cent.

The surprise runner-up was David Tully, a local businessman and independent candidate.

It is very rare for none of the main parties to finish in first and second place.

Published in Dawn, March 2nd, 2024


How Labour has reacted to George Galloway’s by-election win in Rochdale

Galloway overturned Labour's 9,668 majority to win the by-election in the previously Labour safe seat with a majority of 5,697, securing 12,335 votes overall.




The Labour Party has slammed George Galloway for only being interested in ‘stoking fear and division’, after his victory in the Rochdale by-election.

Galloway overturned Labour’s 9,668 majority to win the by-election in the previously Labour safe seat with a majority of 5,697, securing 12,335 votes overall.

The by-election was triggered when veteran Labour MP and former interim Manchester mayor, Tony Lloyd, died in-post at the age of 73 in January.

The Labour Party had withdrawn support for its own candidate, Azhar Ali, after he was found to have made anti-semitic comments. Despite Labour suspending its former candidate, he still appeared on voting papers in Rochdale under the party banner, because electoral law meant ballot papers could not be changed after publication.

Following Galloway’s victory, the Labour Party said it deeply regretted being unable to field a candidate in the by-election.

A spokesperson said: “We deeply regret that the Labour party was unable to field a candidate in this by-election and apologise to the people of Rochdale. George Galloway only won because Labour did not stand.

“Rochdale deserved the chance to vote for an MP that would bring communities together and deliver for working people. George Galloway is only interested in stoking fear and division. As an MP he will be a damaging force in our communities and public life.

“The Labour party will quickly begin the process to select a new Labour candidate for the general election, and will be campaigning hard to deliver the representation and fresh start that Rochdale deserves.”

Labour MP and deputy national campaign co-ordinator Ellie Reeves apologised on BBC Radio 4 on Friday morning for not having stood an endorsed candidate.

“If Labour had stood, I don’t believe George Galloway would have won. Our job now is to select a Labour candidate for the general election…someone that can work with all the communities in Rochdale to rebuild trust.”

“We ran no campaign there in support of Azhar Ali. We regret that we weren’t able to have a candidate…but it was the right decision.”

A full breakdown of the Rochdale 
by-election results

Galloway overturned Labour’s 9,668 majority to win the by-election



George Galloway has returned to Parliament after winning the Rochdale by election. The by election was triggered when veteran Labour MP Tony Lloyd died in-post at the age of 73 in January.

Galloway overturned Labour’s 9,668 majority to win the by-election in the previously Labour safe seat with a majority of 5,697, securing 12,335 votes overall.

The Labour Party has slammed Galloway for only being interested in ‘stoking fear and division’ after his victory saying that it deeply regretted being unable to field a candidate in the by-election.

An independent candidate, David Tully, finished second on 6,638 votes. The Conservative candidate Paul Ellison finished third on 3,731 votes.

Labour’s former candidate Azhar Ali, who the party withdrew backing for during the campaign because of anti-semitic statements he had made, but who it could not take off the ballot, finished fourth behind the Tories with 2,402 votes – just 7.7% of the vote.

For a full breakdown of the results, see below:

Workers Party: George Galloway – 12,335

Independent: David Tully – 6,638

Conservative: Paul Ellison – 3,731

Labour: Azhar Ali – 2,402

Liberal Democrats: Iain Donaldson – 2,164

Reform UK: Simon Danczuk – 1,968

Independent: William Howarth – 523

Independent: Mark Coleman – 455

Green: Guy Otten – 436

Independent: Michael Howarth – 246



Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward



Rochdale by-election: Results breakdown and analysis as George Galloway says ‘this is for Gaza’

John B Hewitt / Shutterstock

George Galloway has won a landslide victory in the Rochdale by-election, saying his victory showed Keir Starmer has paid a “high price” for his stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict as Labour’s suspended candidate slumped to fourth in its former seat.

The controversial politician, standing for the Workers’ Party, got 12,335 votes after a campaign dominated by Gaza, pulling off another insurgent campaign against his former party over its foreign policy by winning a majority of almost 6,000.

An independent candidate, David Tully, finished second on 6,638 votes. The Conservative candidate Paul Ellison finished third on 3,731 votes.

Labour’s former candidate Azhar Ali, who the party withdrew backing for during the campaign but too late to take him off the ballot, finished fourth behind the Tories with 2,402 votes – just 7.7% of the vote.

Former Labour Rochdale MP Simon Danczuk, standing for the Reform Party, got 1,968 votes. He represented the Rochdale constituency between 2010 and 2017.

‘Keir Starmer, this is for Gaza’

The constituency in north-west England was previously seen as a safe Labour seat. The by-election was triggered by the death of local MP Tony Lloyd.

Galloway said in his victory speech: “Keir Starmer, this is for Gaza. You have paid and you will pay for the role you have played in enabling, encouraging and covering for the catastrophe presently going on in occupied Palestine in the Gaza strip.

“The plates have shifted tonight…Keir Starmer’s problems just got 100 times more serious than they were before today.

“This is going to spark a movement, a landslide, a shifting of the tectonic plates in scores of parliamentary constituencies, beginning here in the North West, in the West Midlands, in London, from Ilford to Bethnal Green and Bow, labour is on notice that they have lost the confidence of millions of voters.”

He claimed Muslim voters were “bitterly angry” about Labour, but it would be “foolish” not to think “millions of other citizens” are too.

Ed Owen, a former adviser to New Labour minister Jack Straw, said Galloway’s speech was “full of self-serving arrogance and pomposity” and “overblown rhetoric”.

He said the “poor people of Rochdale” both “can and will get shot of him at general election.

Galloway vowed to ‘make Rochdale great again’

Highlighting the upcoming local elections, he added: “Rochdale town councillors, I put you on notice that I plan to put together a grand alliance…the councillors have to go.”

Galloway put his victory down to both international and local issues, and called Starmer a “betrayer”.

He said the “heart has been piece by piece removed” from Rochdale, including the 2011 closure of its A&E and ongoing threat to its football club’s future.

One campaign letter to voters pledged to “make Rochdale great again” by bringing back “big names” to the high street and campaigning for health services and Rochdale AFC. It said he believed in “law and order”,  family and Brexit, had “no difficulty defining what a woman is” and would ensure there were “no grooming gangs on my watch”.

‘The lesson is about candidate selection’

Luke Tryl, UK director of More in Common, said it was a “terrible result for main parties”, but “the circumstances mean it is far more likely the lesson here is one about candidate selection and due diligence than about public opinion more broadly”.

Labour MP and deputy national campaign co-ordinator Ellie Reeves apologised on BBC Radio 4 on Friday morning for not having stood an endorsed candidate.

“If Labour had stood, I don’t believe George Galloway would have won. Our job now is to select a Labour candidate for the general election…someone that can work with all the communities in Rochdale to rebuild trust.”

“We ran no campaign there in support of Azhar Ali. We regret that we weren’t able to have a candidate…but it was the right decision.”

“It is impossible to know how Labour would have performed with another candidate that had the party’s backing (although one can reasonably assume a lot better than they did), whereas the Conservative candidate appears to have been the victim of the national swing.”

Pollster Joe Twyman of Deltapoll said the decline of the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem vote marked a “stunning change”, falling from 89.8% in 2019 to just 26.7%.

A contest between former Labour politicians

Galloway compared himself to former prime minister Winston Churchill in winning in multiple constituencies, saying he had “bettered” his record by being elected three times “outside the parameters of the great parties of state”.

Galloway, a prominent critic of former Labour prime minister Tony Blair over the Iraq war, served as a Labour MP between 1987 and 2003, representing Glasgow Kelvin. He was elected for the Respect Party in 2005, representing Bethnal Green and Bow until 2010, and was again elected to parliament at the 2012 Bradford West by-election, but lost the seat in 2015.

Azhar Ali’s suspension from Labour mid-campaign came after he apologised “unreservedly” when the Mail on Sunday alleged he told a meeting last year that Israel “allowed” Hamas’ attack on October 7th in order to get a “green light to do whatever they bloody want”.

The comments by the former Lancashire Labour group leader sparked heavy criticism, including from Labour itself. Shadow minister Nick Thomas-Symonds told broadcasters Ali’s words were “completely wrong”, and “in no way represent” Labour’s views. The Jewish Representative Council of Greater Manchester called the reported comments a “conspiratorial narrative”, “highly offensive” and “completely fictitious”.

The comments emerged on February 10th. On February 12th Labour announced that it would not support Ali at the by-election, leaving it without a candidate as it was too late for a new one to be added to ballot papers. A spokesman for the party said it followed “new information about further comments made by Azhar Ali coming to light”, but the decision not to act earlier sparked heavy media criticism.

GEORGE GALLOWAY BANNED FROM CANADA 
BY TORY GOVERNMENT  

Theguardian.com

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/mar/20/george-galloway-banned-canada

Mar 20, 2009 ... ... government, institution or process as they are understood in Canada;. (b) engaging in or instigating the subversion by force of any government ...

Cp24.com

https://www.cp24.com/mobile/canada-bans-outspoken-british-mp-1.381372?cache=yesclipId10406200text/html;charset=utf-80404/7.549035

Mar 20, 2009 ... ... George Galloway from Canada despite opposition claims of censorship. ... Harper's government has also waged a long-running battle with Arab ...

Theglobeandmail.com

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-mp-takes-canadian-ban-to-court/article20442095

Mar 25, 2009 ... Supporters of George Galloway say the ban has no legal justification ... Harper's government's direction on war," said Ms. Chow, an NDP MP ...


ON THE OTHER HAND

Opinion Byelections


After George Galloway’s triumph in Rochdale, urgent questions loom for Keir Starmer – and the left, too

Labour’s leader has left Muslim supporters disenchanted. And the left must think hard about what happens when his approach unravels


THE GUARDIAN
Fri 1 Mar 2024 

When Keir Starmer’s political project comes crashing down, as one day it will, George Galloway’s Rochdale triumph should be remembered as a portent. For hardcore Starmerites, this assertion is easily dismissed. Courtesy of the Tories’ comprehensive self-immolation, Labour is heading for a crushing landslide victory. With an average 19-point lead – an undeniably stunning turnaround from the party’s 2019 rout – there is no sign of the usual polling swingback a government enjoys in election year. Rishi Sunak is an inept prime minister leading an intellectually exhausted government, devoid of any ideas except doubling down on the same policies that left Britain with an unprecedented squeeze in living standards, stagnant growth and a shrivelled public realm. When Starmer becomes prime minister in November, as he almost certainly will, he is unlikely to be worrying much about Rochdale, which may well return to the Labour fold in a general election anyway.

Well, such complacency may prove a mistake. The Labour candidate was, of course, belatedly disowned by the national leadership after claiming that Israel deliberately allowed the 7 October atrocities to happen, and deploying a crude antisemitic trope about the influence of “certain Jewish quarters” in the media. Labour – which has today apologised to the people of Rochdale for failing to offer a viable Labour candidate – will easily dismiss the candidate’s derisory vote, and yet overall turnout – nearly 40% – was actually higher for than the last three byelections. This means that, despite some demoralised voters staying at home in a farcical election, Galloway won far more votes than the Labour, Tory and Liberal Democrat candidates combined: that is, he clearly enjoyed an enthused turnout, many rallied by the message summed up at his victory speech: “Keir Starmer, this is for Gaza.” Labour says Galloway won because there was no Labour candidate. That is highly debatable.

This is all despite the fact that Galloway – despite being a compelling orator and a formidable campaigner – is, to say the least, a controversial figure, bitterly rejected by most of the left (myself included) on account of, say, voting Conservative in Scotlandappalling comments about rape, sidling up to Nigel Farage in the Brexit referendum campaign, and issuing statements such as: “As a father of six children, I’m socially conservative. I don’t want my children taught the kind of things Labour wants to teach them in schools.”

Undoubtedly, many who plumped for him are Muslim – understandably more aggrieved than the average Briton about Israel’s slaughter of mostly Muslim Palestinians. But Rochdale has a significantly smaller Muslim population than other seats Galloway has successfully contested, and he won wider support, too. That he specifically sought support from Muslim voters has been portrayed as somehow tawdry: this itself is testament to how mainstream Islamophobia is in Britain, as though seeking to address specific concerns of Muslim voters were not legitimate.

The truth is that Muslim voters are an important and growing plank of Labour’s electoral coalition, but the party treats them with contempt – as voting fodder who are otherwise an embarrassment to it. Consider the case of the former Labour minister Phil Woolas, who in 2010 had his victory in Oldham – 6 miles from Rochdale – overturned by a court when he was found to have stoked religious tensions to win by distributing a deeply Islamophobic leaflet. Some parliamentary colleagues leapt to his defence. In the brutal Batley and Spen byelection in 2021 – in which Labour defeated Galloway – party sources reportedly briefed that antisemitism among Muslim voters was losing Labour support, and boasted that they’d won Tory voters at the expense of the “conservative Muslim vote over gay rights and Palestine”. According to a survey of Muslim Labour members in 2022, 46% felt Starmer had handled Islamophobia “very badly”, with a further 18% opting for “quite badly”. When predominantly Muslim councillors resigned in disgust at Gaza, a party source reportedly bragged they were “shaking off the fleas”.


What are the main U-turns Labour has made under Keir Starmer



But it’s not just about Muslim voters, important though that is. It was Iraq that toxified Tony Blair among swathes of Labour’s natural electoral coalition. That was after he had been prime minister for many years. For Starmer, this has happened in opposition: 52% of voters think Starmer is doing badly as Labour leader, with just 33% saying he is doing well: remarkable for a man almost inevitably destined for No 10. Why? Because Starmer deceitfully abandoned his solemn promises – “pledges”, he called them – in his leadership campaign, such as taxing the rich, public ownership of utilities, scrapping tuition fees and much else. He failed to then develop an alternative vision, even going so far as to trash his more recent flagship £28bn green investment fund. He has promised to keep Tory policies that drive children into poverty, while refusing to reintroduce the bankers’ bonus cap, and has locked the party into keeping arbitrary fiscal rules that spell continuing austerity. In comments on Gaza, Starmer said that Israel had a right to cut off water and energy; he later said that he did not believe that. He has presided over mass resignations and sackings of opponents, and he sabotaged an SNP motion condemning Israel for collective punishment.

Labour’s support is soft and superficial, driven almost entirely by revulsion at the Tories’ calamitous spell in office. We can see in Germany and the US how similar political projects came to power with the promise of offering stability, but both countries face acute political crises. And so the left – hounded by the Labour leadership as it is – needs to make tough decisions. Does it wait for either the likes of Galloway or the far right to fill the vacuum when mass disillusionment with Starmer’s government inevitably kicks in? Better to start asking some tough questions about what to do next.



Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist


Opinion  George Galloway

George Galloway stands accused of profiting from the pain of Gaza – and rightly so. But he is not the only one

The new Rochdale MP is hardly unique. He is just highly adept at swimming in the toxic swamp that is so much of our politics


Jonathan Freedland
THE GUARDIAN 
Fri 1 Mar 202


You’re going to hear a lot of talk about George Galloway in the coming days, much of it negative and almost all of it true. But there will be one charge thrown at the new member for Rochdale – winner of a byelection victory yesterday as sweeping as the triumph he recorded in Bradford West more than a decade ago – that will be false and unfair.

Start with the accusations that stand up. Galloway poses as a man of the left – his latest vehicle is called the Workers party of Britain. But he backed Nigel Farage’s Brexit party (now Reform) in 2019 – the pair had appeared together, during the 2016 referendum campaign, laughing and smiling – and the Conservatives in Scotland in 2021. You did not misread that sentence: George Galloway voted Tory only three years ago.

The right are more comfortable with Galloway than you might expect. In Rochdale, he won the warm endorsement of Nick Griffin, the former leader of the British National party. “George Galloway isn’t just right on keeping us out of Zionist wars,” wrote Griffin. “He also understands the position of working class white Brits on immigration.” Offered the chance to reject that support on Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday, Galloway’s deputy – the former MP Chris Williamson, who was suspended from Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party over comments he made about antisemitism – pointedly refused. You may also have seen the photographs of Galloway apparently bonding with Steve Bannon, a one-time Trump lieutenant and current peddler of online conspiracy theories.

Others will remind you of Galloway’s employment history, and those facts will also be true. He did serve as a well-remunerated presenter for Press TV and Russia Today (RT), mouthpieces of Tehran and Vladimir Putin respectively – hardly a surprise given his admiration for a string of tyrannical regimes. In 1994, he stood before Saddam Hussein of Iraq, the man who had jailed, tortured and killed so many of his own people, and declared: “Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability.” In 2002, he told this newspaper that “the disappearance of the Soviet Union is the biggest catastrophe of my life.” When an estimated 1,300 Syrians were killed by chemical weapons in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta, Galloway did not, as most did, blame Bashar al-Assad – who he had long praised for his “dignity” – but rather pointed the finger at an imagined, if improbable, alliance of al-Qaida and … Israel. He offered no evidence, but that was his “theory”.

Indeed, given his determination to cast himself as a defender of Muslims – a pitch that paid great dividends in Rochdale – it’s striking how often he lines up behind those who kill, maim or oppress Muslims, even in their hundreds of thousands. In 2020, Galloway used his platform on RT to dismiss the copious evidence of China’s persecution of an estimated one million Uyghur Muslims: “There are no concentration camps in China,” he said, merely “re-education centres” for terrorists that humanely seek to draw them away from the path of extremism.

So he should not be confused for any kind of progressive. Doubt over that question was surely set aside in 2012 when he defended Julian Assange, then facing allegations of rape, by announcing that any accusation would be rendered absurd if there had first been an act of consensual sex. As he memorably put it, “I mean, not everybody needs to be asked prior to each insertion.” If campaigners against sexual violence disliked that, LGBTQ+ advocates might similarly recoil from some intriguing lines that appeared in Galloway’s election literature in Rochdale. “I believe in family … I believe in men and women. God created everything in pairs.”

He likes to boast that he is an implacable foe of racism. Yet he was fired by Talk Radio in 2019 over a tweet the station deemed antisemitic. After Tottenham, a north London club with a strong Jewish following, lost in the Champions League final, Galloway posted: “No #Israël flags on the Cup!” (Note the umlaut with its whispered hint of Germany, scarcely a shock from a man who’s long been fond of comparing Israel to the Nazis – a comparison that is specifically cited in the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism.)

In short, much of what you hear about Galloway from his detractors will be true. Where, then, is the falsehood? What is the unmerited charge laid against him?

It is the claim that he is somehow uniquely guilty of exploiting the pain of Gaza for political gain. Don’t get me wrong, he is certainly using that agony for his own advantage. He targeted the Muslim voters of Rochdale, sending them a flyer that did not mention re-opening the local maternity hospital, securing the future of the local football club or luring Primark to the town – all of which featured on the leaflet aimed at everyone else – but instead focused solely on Gaza. No, the flaw in the claim is the notion that Galloway is unique in what he’s doing.

He’s louder than others and his rhetoric is more florid – but the grim truth is that, when it comes to using the horror of the Israel-Hamas war, and all the fear and loathing that has stirred up in this country, Galloway is far from alone.

The former Conservative party deputy chair Lee Anderson was playing the same game when he baselessly accused Sadiq Khan of being so in thrall to his Islamist “mates” that he was failing to police pro-Palestinian demonstrations in London sufficiently harshly. Anderson was trying to whip up anti-Muslim sentiment, following a lead set by Suella Braverman when she spoke of “hate marches” and “mobs” – and followed again, if codedly, by Rishi Sunak in his address outside Downing Street late on Friday. He, too, attacked the marchers, warning against the threat extremism and bigotry pose to democracy – a bit rich given his indulgence of extremism and bigotry within his own party and his inability to call Anderson’s anti-Muslim prejudice by its name. Still, the prime minister can glimpse some favourable battlelines for the coming general election campaign and didn’t want to let the opportunity slip. Sunak, Braverman and Anderson all affect to have the purest motives – offering themselves as protectors of British Jews in particular, as that community faces a record surge of antisemitism – but, like Galloway, they’re in the exploitation business. Others’ pain is their gain.

They are the crudest practitioners, but they are not the only ones. The MPs of the Scottish National party are, of course, sincere in their outrage at the plight of Gaza. But few would argue that the ceasefire motion they tabled last week – which triggered such ructions in the Commons – was aimed solely at helping Palestinians in need. It was also designed to expose and widen the rift within the ranks of their electoral rivals, Labour. Meanwhile, Labour and the Conservatives plotted their own procedural moves thinking less of the Middle East than of the great Westminster game.

As it happens, this week a few members of the Commons foreign affairs committee sat in a modest room and took evidence from Israelis and Palestinians about how Britain might actually do something useful to end the bloodshed. The discussion was serious and practical – and delivered precisely zero attention or political benefit to those involved. If you want to profit from all this death and destruction, it seems the trick is not to try to solve the problem – it’s to capitalise on it, to take all that grief and heartache and trade on it.

So, yes, Galloway has a record that brims with poison. But he is not quite the outlier we might wish him to be. He was always a demagogue and a populist, and now our politics is crammed with such people: “Make Rochdale Great Again” was his slogan, a knowing, admiring nod to Donald Trump. As for what looks like a habit of swooping down to prey on those in pain, pitting community against community – well, maybe that once set him apart. But vultures are all around us now.


Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist


Being anti-Labour doesn't put Galloway on the left
 28 February, 2024 - Author: Simon Nelson



The Trade Union and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) and the Socialist Party have endorsed George Galloway in the Rochdale by-election. Galloway’s former allies and bag-carriers in Respect, the SWP, have refused to do so.

Already, in 2022, the TUSC steering committee gave “observer status” to the Workers’ Party of Britain (WPB), formed as an alliance between Galloway and the Stalin-Society-supporting Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist). They have since fallen out.

Former MP Chris Williamson had already been wooed by the SP when he had his own vehicle, Resist. He is now in the WPB.

Clive Heemskerk of the SP and TUSC notes that “some on the left” criticised TUSC when the WPB gained observer status. Workers’ Liberty supporters in the RMT union, which was then affiliated to TUSC, had also criticised TUSC for taking in Williamson and Sian Bloor, a conspiracy theorist from Resist. RMT disaffiliated from TUSC in 2022 (and had been little involved for a while). SP and TUSC seem desperate to find others to link up, as bad as Galloway and Williamson, as long as they are anti-Labour.

Very little of what the WPB stands for is in tune with the SP’s proclaimed policies. The WPB is “for the workers not the wokers”, a tagline that can only put candidates on the wrong side of the “culture wars” on trans rights or the “Black Lives Matter” protests. It offers up “a migration policy that reflects the anxiety felt among the working class about an influx of migrants which appears to be out of control”. It warns against “apocalyptic Green hysteria that floods our media” and says there is “no need to be rushed” into a green economy.

The Socialist Party repeats the idea that Galloway is an “anti-war” candidate. What about Ukraine or Syria?

The SP claims a victory for Galloway would send an important message to the pro-capitalist parties in Westminster. Galloway himself confesses to a lavish lifestyle, pocketing hundreds of thousands when he was on an MP’s salary. He is far from the “workers’ MP on a worker’s wage” as which TUSC national chair Dave Nellist won respect.

The SP endorsement also comes dangerously close to backing the very same conspiracy theory as Azhar Ali used while still a Labour candidate, endorsing the idea that Israel deliberately had lax security at the Gaza border before 7 October in “the hope of a pretext to go to war”.

Charging Netanyahu with overconfidence and complacency before 7 October is one thing: this claim is quite another. It suggests that the SP is falling into the sphere of influence of Williamson and Galloway further than they realise.

Who is George Galloway?


20 February, 2024 -Author: Simon Nelson



As we go to press, George Galloway is the bookmakers’ favourite for the Rochdale by-election (29 February), and has been backed by the Socialist Party. But he is not fit to become an MP yet again.

He first became an MP for Labour in 1987. He was at best soft-left, by no means an outstanding rebel, with a strong Stalinist tinge such as had been relatively common among MPs for some time. As he has developed a distinctive individual profile as an “anti-imperialist”, he has become a bad smell the left seems unwilling to get rid of.

While on a delegation of European MPs to Iraq in 1994 he spoke the words that should follow him to his death, to Iraqi dictator and butcher Saddam Hussein. “Sir, we salute your courage, your strength and your indefatigability.” While presenting Hussein with a pennant from Palestinian youth in the West Bank he added “we are with you” and then in Arabic, “Until Victory! Until Jerusalem”.

We called for his local Labour Party to dump him. But he and others portrayed his pro-Saddam war-mongering rhetoric as a matter of being a great fighter for the Palestinians and a trenchant critic of Bush’s 2003 invasion of Iraq.

In reality Galloway has been a mercenary self-promoter, serving different imperialisms of his choice against others: Iraq and Iran against Israel and the US. Russia against Ukraine.

From 1996 he got money from two successive Pakistani governments to run a newspaper in London (East) aimed to back Pakistani policies in Kashmir. The paper folded after a Newsnight exposé.

He was kicked out of the Labour Party in 2003 for calling for troops to defy orders in Iraq. In 1998 he had launched the Mariam Appeal, notionally to pay for the cancer treatment of an Iraqi child and then provide other medications to Iraq. Galloway was able to spend much of the money raised on overseas trips by himself, which included Christmas lunch with Saddam Hussein’s foreign minister Tariq Aziz. When challenged about the funding, he said that most of it came from the United Arab Emirates or from a businessman trading with Iraq, and he didn’t know the businessman got money from the Iraqi regime.

Even before he became an MP, his time as general secretary of War on Want, 1983-7, ended with criticism of his spending. Later, when he became MP for Bradford West (2012-5) he pocketed another £265,000 from TV presenting. He earnt £150,000 from a previous appearance on Celebrity Big Brother.

His prominence in the Stop the War coalition was at its height in 2003, and then he helped to break up the Socialist Alliance, a short-lived coalition of almost the whole radical activist left. The SWP, which was the biggest component in the Alliance, wooed Galloway. Workers’ Liberty denounced that wooing. At the time, almost all other left groups denounced us as “sectarian” for doing so, but we believe we have been vindicated.

With a new electoral vehicle, Respect, or rather, “Respect (George Galloway)”, Galloway won Bethnal Green and Bow in the 2005 general election. He turned against the SWP, which had provided foot-soldiers for Respect, in 2007. The rump Respect which he ran after that wound up, after scandals, in 2016.

While a Bradford MP he also suggested that Julian Assange could not have been guilty of rape because these allegations were not rape, “as anyone with an sense can possibly recognise it”. He added: “I mean, not everybody needs to be asked priort to each insertion”. He has long been opposed to abortion rights and has proudly used his stance to show that he is “not as left wing as you think”.

He had paid little attention to Bradford or to parliament since being elected. Losing the seat to Labour in the 2015 general election. He has been active as a media figure on RT, the Russian state international broadcaster, and since 2019 as the head of the “anti-woke”, Stalinoid Workers Party of Great Britain.

We hope he will not be able to reactivate his parliamentary career from Rochdale. Whatever about that, he has no place in the left.



The Alliance for Workers’ Liberty: who we are, what we do

Contact us
Alliance for Workers' Liberty
20E Tower Workshops
Riley Road
London SE1 3DG
Phone: 020 7394 8923
Email: awl@workersliberty.org

What we stand for

Today one class, the working class, lives by selling its labour power to another, the capitalist class, which owns the means of production.

Capitalists’ control over the economy and their relentless drive to increase their wealth causes poverty, unemployment, blighting of lives by overwork; imperialism, environmental destruction and much else.

The working class must unite to struggle against the accumulated wealth and power of the capitalists, in the workplace and wider society.

The Alliance for Workers’ Liberty wants socialist revolution: collective ownership of industry and services, workers’ control, and a democracy much fuller than the present system, with elected representatives recallable at any time and an end to bureaucrats’ and managers’ privileges.

We fight for trade unions and the Labour Party to break with “social partnership” with the bosses, to militantly assert working-class interests.

In workplaces, trade unions, and Labour organisations; among students; in local campaigns; on the left and in wider political alliances we stand for:
• Independent working-class representation in politics
• A workers’ government, based on and accountable to the labour movement
• A workers’ charter of trade union rights — to organise, strike, picket effectively, and take solidarity action
• Taxing the rich to fund good public services, homes, education and jobs for all
• Workers’ control of major industries and finance for a rapid transition to a green society
• A workers’ movement that fights all forms of oppression
• Full equality for women, and social provision to free women from domestic labour. Reproductive freedoms and free abortion on demand.
• Full equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people
• Black and white workers’ unity against racism
• Open borders
• Global solidarity against global capital — workers everywhere have more in common with each other than with their capitalist or Stalinist rulers
• Democracy at every level of society, from the smallest workplace or community to global social organisation
• Equal rights for all nations, against imperialists and predators big and small
• Maximum left unity in action, and full openness in debate




CEASEFIRE NOW!
Israeli public 'wants to see end to war', polls indicate opposition would 'win handily' in elections


Issued on: 01/03/2024 -

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu repeated his rejection of what he called "delusional" demands by the Islamist group Hamas as efforts continued to reach a pause in the fighting in Gaza. As the war enters its fifth month, FRANCE 24's François Picard is joined by Itamar Rabinovich, former Israeli Ambassador to Washington and founding President of the Israel Institute.


06:54 Video by:François PICARD



Biden announces US aid air drops in Gaza

Washington (AFP) – President Joe Biden said Friday that the United States would start to deliver relief supplies from the air into Gaza, a day after the deaths of more than 100 Palestinians at an aid convoy.



Issued on: 01/03/2024 
US President Joe Biden speaks during a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in the Oval Office of the White House on March 1, 2024
 © SAUL LOEB / AFP

"We need to do more, and the United States will do more," Biden told reporters at the White House at the start of a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.

"In the coming days we're going to join with our friends in Jordan and others in providing air drops of additional food and supplies," the 81-year-old Biden said in the Oval Office.

The announcement comes as negotiations continue for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, amid a humanitarian crisis in Gaza which has been under siege since Hamas's October 7 attacks on Israel.

Biden has pushed Israel to reduce civilian casualties and allow aid in, while at the same time he has maintained military assistance for the key US ally.

Biden said later he was "hoping" for a deal on a six-week ceasefire by the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which will start on March 10 or 11, depending on the lunar calendar.

"We'll get there but we're not there yet -- we may not get there," Biden added, without elaborating, as he headed to his helicopter to spend the weekend at the presidential Camp David retreat.

Ceasefire talks have been complicated by Thursday's incident in which dozens of desperate Palestinians were killed rushing an aid convoy in northern Gaza, where the UN has warned of famine.

An Israeli source acknowledged troops had opened fire on the crowd, believing it "posed a threat."

Calls for probe, ceasefire follow Israeli gunfire near Gaza aid convoy

Issued on: 01/03/2024 - 

World leaders called on Friday for an investigation and a ceasefire nearly five months into the Gaza war, a day after dozens of desperate Palestinians were killed rushing an aid convoy. Israeli troops opened fire as Palestinian civilians scrambled for food supplies during a chaotic melee on Thursday which the Hamas-run territory's health ministry said killed more than 100 people in Gaza City. FRANCE 24's Andrew Hilliar reports.

02:51  Video by: Andrew HILLIAR


IT'S NOT A WAR IT'S GENOCIDE

'Terrible war'

"Innocent people got caught in a terrible war, unable to feed their families. And you saw the response when they tried to get aid in," Biden said as he announced the air drops.

US President Joe Biden speaks to  the press before he departs the White House in Washington, DC, for the presidential retreat in Camp David, Maryland 
© SAUL LOEB / AFP

The US president added that he would "insist" that Israel let in more aid trucks, while it would also look at a possible "marine corridor" to deliver large amounts of aid into Gaza.

Biden had been planning air drops for some time but Thursday's incident "certainly underscored for the president" the need to find other ways to get aid in, White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said.


The United States planned to carry out multiple air drops that would last weeks, said Kirby, adding that it would not be "one and done."

But it was also a "tough military operation" that required careful planning by the Pentagon for the safety of both Gazan civilians and US military personnel.

"It is extremely difficult to do an airdrop in such a crowded environment as is Gaza," said Kirby.

The United States also had to manage the risks to its own personnel.

"This is a war zone. So there's an added element of potential danger to the pilots in the aircraft," he added.

Kirby said Israel was meanwhile "seriously" investigating the aid convoy deaths.

However, Washington would continue to support Israel militarily despite the growing humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, Kirby said.

"We are still helping Israel with their needs to defend themselves," he said.

FROM WHAT?

© 2024 AFP


'Last resort': Donors hope to offer Gaza lifeline with air drops

Gaza Strip (Palestinian Territories) (AFP) – With the humanitarian situation in Gaza increasingly desperate, the United States said Friday that it would join some of its Arab and European allies in delivering emergency relief from the sky.


Issued on: 01/03/2024
Foreign militaries have air dropped supplies over Gaza, sending a sea of humanitarian aid supplies floating down 


The amount of aid brought into the territory by truck has plummeted during nearly five months of war, and Gazans are facing dire shortages of food, water and medicines.

A frenzied scramble for food from a truck convoy delivering aid to northern Gaza left more than 100 people dead on Thursday, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry, after Israeli forces opened fire on the crowd.

With most aid convoys halted, some foreign militaries have air-dropped supplies to Gaza instead, sending long lines of aid pallets floating down into the war-torn territory on parachutes.

Jordan has been conducting many of the operations since war broke out on October 7, with the support of countries including Britain, France and the Netherlands.

Egypt sent several military planes on an air drop Thursday together with the United Arab Emirates.

Imad Dughmosh from Al-Sabra in central Gaza told AFP he managed to get some food and water from the aid drops, but there hadn't been enough for everyone waiting.

"In the end, I took bags of pasta and cheese, but my cousins were not able to get anything," the 44-year-old said.

"I was happy because I took some food for the children, but it was not enough."
Humanitarian crisis

 

Gazans are facing dire humanitarian conditions and food shortages © - / AFP

Deliveries into Gaza have been reduced to a trickle since the war began on October 7 with an unprecedented Hamas attack on southern Israel that resulted in the deaths of about 1,160 people, mostly civilians, Israeli figures show.

Israel's retaliatory offensive against Hamas has killed 30,228 people, mostly women and children, according to the health ministry.


In northern Gaza, where Israel began its ground operation, many residents have been reduced to eating animal fodder.

Ten children have died of "malnutrition and dehydration", the health ministry said Friday.


As well as the risks of dropping parcels onto crowded camps and cities, residents of the coastal territory told AFP many aid pallets had ended up in the Mediterranean.

"Most of the aid fell into the sea today, and also the parachutes that fell on Thursday and Wednesday all fell into the sea, except for a very small number," said Hani Ghabboun, who lives in Gaza City with his wife and five children.

He said Gazans need "hundreds of tonnes of aid to confront the famine and feed the people."


'Extremely challenging'


Jens Laerke, spokesman for the UN humanitarian office OCHA, said Friday that there were "many issues" with air drops, which are better for small, specific missions.

"Aid that comes in in that way is a last resort," he said, adding that it was "not the solution that we prefer" for Gaza.

The UN has said there are 'many issues' with air drops 
© - / Jordanian army/AFP

"Overland transfer is simply better, more efficient, more effective and less costly."

But he warned: "If something doesn't change, a famine is almost inevitable on the current trends."

The United Nations has accused Israeli forces of "systematically" blocking access to Gaza, which Israel denies.

But Biden said on Friday that he would "insist" Israel let in more convoys by land. "No excuses, because the truth is aid flowing to Gaza is nowhere near enough."

He also said the United States would study a possible "marine corridor" to deliver large amounts of supplies into Gaza.

Aid groups, including the UN agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA, say safe road convoys are the best solution for the scale of need in Gaza.

A spokesman for the UN chief Antonio Guterres told reporters that nearly 1,000 trucks are waiting at the Egyptian border and ready to move.

"Air drops are extremely challenging," Stephane Dujarric said at a briefing this week. "(But) all options remain on the table".

Jeremy Konyndyk, president of Refugees International, said air drops can only "help on the margins".

One plane can deliver the equivalent of two truckloads of aid, but at 10 times the cost, he told the BBC World Service on Friday.

"Rather than dropping food from the air, we should be putting immense pressure and using leverage on the Israeli government to allow aid in through more traditional channels that actually deliver at scale."


© 2024 AFP








America's biggest pharmacy chains announce abortion pill rollout

Washington (AFP) – America's two biggest pharmacy chains said Friday they will begin dispensing prescription abortion pills in a limited number of states where it's legal.


Issued on: 01/03/2024 -
A CVS spokesperson told AFP: "We'll begin filling prescriptions for the medication in Massachusetts and Rhode Island in the weeks ahead and will expand to additional states, where allowed by law, on a rolling basis" © Patrick T. Fallon / AFP/File

The move greatly broadens availability of mifepristone, even as a legal case over whether the drug was properly approved two decades ago now rests before the Supreme Court.

A CVS spokesperson told AFP: "We'll begin filling prescriptions for the medication in Massachusetts and Rhode Island in the weeks ahead and will expand to additional states, where allowed by law, on a rolling basis."

Walgreens "expects to begin dispensing within a week" in New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, California, and Illinois, the company said on its website.

"But in the interests of pharmacist and patient safety, we will not disclose the number of sites per state nor identify the pharmacies that are dispensing," it added.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized pharmacies to carry mifepristone in January 2023, with Friday's announcements the result of a long certification process.

Mifepristone was initially restricted to use at in-person locations, but was broadened to include mail-delivery during the Covid pandemic.

It works to block a pregnancy and is authorized for use through ten weeks of gestation, while a second drug, misoprostol, provokes bleeding to empty the uterus and was already widely available in pharmacies.
Election battleground

The news was hailed by President Joe Biden, who has made protecting reproductive rights a key part of his re-election campaign against the likely Republican candidate Donald Trump.
Walgreens "expects to begin dispensing within a week" in New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, California, and Illinois, the company said on its website © Michael M. Santiago / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File

Trump tipped the balance of the Supreme Court during his own presidency and paved the way for reversal of the national right to abortion.

"With major retail pharmacy chains newly certified to dispense medication abortion, many women will soon have the option to pick up their prescription at a local, certified pharmacy -- just as they would for any other medication," Biden said in a statement.

"The stakes could not be higher for women across America. In the face of relentless attacks on reproductive freedom by Republican elected officials, Vice President Harris and I will continue to fight to ensure that women can get the health care they need."

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life, a major anti-abortion group, slammed the move, while the Expanding Medication Abortion Access (EMAA) Project called for other major retailers to quickly follow suit.
Improves access for women

The US Supreme Court overturned the nationwide right to abortion in 2022, allowing each state to pass its own laws governing the procedure.

Twenty-one states have since banned or moved to restrict abortions to limits tighter than before Roe v Wade, the case law that previously upheld the constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy.

Abortion pills remain illegal in states where the procedure is prohibited. But women who decide to travel to a state where abortion is legal may now find a pharmacy much closer than an abortion clinic.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on March 26 in a case brought by anti-abortion groups to restrict access to mifepristone, first approved in the year 2000 and used by more than 5.6 million Americans since.

Abortions administered as pills sent in the mail are just as safe and effective as those provided in person, a study published in Nature Medicine found in February.

It looked at data from more than 6,000 abortions using pills supplied by online clinics in 20 states between April 2021 and January 2022, finding there were no "serious adverse events" in 99.8 percent of these medical abortions and no follow-up care was needed in 98 percent of cases.

Polls repeatedly show a clear majority of Americans support continued access to safe abortion, even as conservative groups push to limit the procedure -- or ban it outright.

© 2024 AFP
'Very worried': Scientists 
 as Antarctic sea ice dwindles

ON BOARD THE ARC SIMON BOLIVAR (Antártida) (AFP) – Sea ice levels in Antarctica have registered historic lows for three consecutive years, portending grave consequences for life on Earth as we know it.


Issued on: 02/03/2024 - 
View of Livingston Island in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica on January 26, 2024 
© Juan Barreto / AFP/File

But looking out over the southernmost continent, scientist Miguel Angel de Pablo laments that humanity seems to be oblivious to the warnings.

"We (scientists) are very worried... because we don't see how we can solve it ourselves," the Spanish planetary geologist told AFP on Livingston Island in the South Shetland Antarctic archipelago.

"The more alerts we send out... to make society aware of what is happening, it seems we are not listened to, that we are (perceived as) alarmist" despite the evidence, he said.

The US National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC) reported Wednesday that minimum Antarctic sea ice extent came in at under two million square kilometers (772,000 square miles) for a third consecutive February -- the height of the southern summer thaw season.

Minimum sea ice cover for all three years were the lowest since records began 46 years ago.

Melting sea ice has no immediate impact on ocean levels, as it forms by freezing salt water already in the ocean.

Spain's Juan Carlos I scientific base in Antarctica
© Juan BARRETO / AFP/File

But the white ice reflects more of the sun's rays than darker ocean water, and its loss accentuates global warming while exposing the on-land freshwater ice sheet, which could cause a catastrophic sea level rise if it melts.

"Even though we are far from any inhabited part of the planet, in reality what happens in Antarctica affects everything" in the rest of the world, said De Pablo.
'Not easily undone'

A study last year found that nearly half of Antarctica's ice shelves -- floating sheets attached to the landmass -- have also reduced in volume in the past 25 years, releasing trillions of tons of meltwater into the oceans.

This has implications not only for sea levels but also for ocean salinity and temperature, said De Pablo.

Some scientists say evidence for climate change impact on sea ice melt in Antarctica -- known for significant annual variations in its summer thaws and winter freezes -- is less clear than in the Arctic north pole.

What is not in doubt is that continued global warming caused by human emissions of greenhouse gases will affect these patterns in future.

De Pablo, who has devoted 16 years of his life to studying Antarctic ice, told AFP it may already be too late to stop the trend.

"The problem is that these degradations are not easily undone," he said.

"Even if today we (changed) the rhythms of life that we have in Western societies, tomorrow the glaciers would not cease to degrade nor the frozen soils to be lost," with all that entails.

Scientists estimate global temperatures are already 1.2 degrees Celsius hotter overall than pre-industrial levels. The 2015 Paris Agreement had set out to limit warming to 1.5 C (2.7 Fahrenheit) by curbing planet-warming emissions.

"We have to ask ourselves whether the manner in which we live our daily lives is truly worth it because in the end we will lose our planet," said De Pablo.

"There is no second planet" Earth, he added.

© 2024 AFP
ANTI-HUMAN RIGHTS
Reactions following passage of controversial anti-LGBTQ bill in Ghana
Issued on: 01/03/2024







Ghana's parliament voted to pass a controversial bill to severely restrict LGBTQ rights on Wednesday in a move condemned by activists. The bill still has to be validated by the president before becoming law, which observers believe is unlikely before a general election in December.




03:01
 



On the troll trail: Uncovering Russia's vast disinformation networks

Issued on: 01/03/2024 

The Russian disinformation campaign has increased its scope and presence in recent months and has turned much more complex after the August 2023 death of Wagner boss Yevgeni Prigozhin. FRANCE 24's Internet team, in partnership with France 24’s sister radio station, RFI, has published a special investigative series on Russia’s global disinformation campaign. To tell us more on what they covered and uncovered, Leela Jacinto has the details.


05:12  Video by: Leela JACINTO

 

French cyber experts reveal vast network of Russian disinformation sites

French military and cybersecurity experts have uncovered an extensive network of Moscow-based fake news sites spreading Russian propaganda and disinformation across Western Europe.



Issued on: 13/02/2024 - 
The European Commission, NATO, and UN agencies have said disinformation should be viewed as a significant threat to democracy in 2024. 
AFP - SEBASTIEN BOZON

By:RFI

Dubbed "Portal Kombt”, the campaign consists of 193 websites targeting audiences in Ukraine, the EU, Britain and the US.

It was exposed by investigators from Viginum, a French government agency that identifies foreign digital interference.

A report by Viginum warned the online manipulation surge by Russia was intended to influence crucial upcoming votes, including the European elections.

The network is mostly focused on shaping the narrative around the conflict in Ukraine, portraying the Russian invasion positively while denigrating Ukraine and its leaders as “corrupt”, “Nazis”, or “incompetent”, Viginum said.




However instead of producing original material, the sites flood the internet with content from Russian and pro-Russian figures on social media, Russian press agencies, and other accounts loyal to Moscow.

Viginum said the network used various channels – including a French Telegram mobile and desktop messaging app, where a pro-Russian channel publishes up to nine articles per hour.

Despite massive content distribution, automation and search engine optimisation, the network has achieved limited success, with an average traffic of 31,000 visits on the five portals in November 2023.

The French-targeted portal was the least visited, Viginum added.France claims Russian interference over Star of David graffiti in Paris
Proliferation of fake news fuelling divisions, global tensions: RSF
Tip of iceberg

French officials describe Portal Kombat as the tip of the disinformation iceberg connected to the rise of digital platforms and the surge in social networks.

The network, Viginum said, underscored the complexity of the ecosystem used to disseminate pro-Russian narratives among Russian-speaking and European populations.

The continued dissemination of pro-Russian stories, it warned, creates a tangled network of news sites and sources that helps hide the identities of those behind disinformation and influence campaigns.

The European Commission, NATO, and UN agencies have said disinformation should be viewed as a significant threat to democracy in 2024. MEPs have called for “urgent protection” of the June polls.

The World Economic Forum, held in Davos in January, ranked disinformation and propaganda as “the second biggest risk the world is going to face this year”.

Presenting a recent EU report on disinformation, chief diplomat Josep Borrell described it as “one of the most significant threats of our time”.

Words and ideas were not “a bomb that can kill you”, he said, but “a poison that can colonise your mind”.
HAITI'S FAUX PM
Haiti, Kenya sign agreement on police deployment to tackle gang violence

Kenya and Haiti signed a "reciprocal" agreement on Friday to deploy police from the East African country to lead a UN-backed law and order mission to the gang-plagued Caribbean nation, Kenyan President William Ruto said.


01/03/2024 - 
Haitian Prime Minister Ariel Henry receives a gift from the Principal Secretary, State department for foreign affairs Dr. Abraham Korir Sing'Oei at a university in Nairobi on March 1, 2024. © Simon Maina, AFP


Ruto said he and Haitian Prime Minister Ariel Henry had "discussed the next steps to enable the fast-tracking of the deployment", but it was not immediately clear whether the agreement would counter a court ruling in January that branded the deployment "illegal".

Haiti's government has pleaded for international help to confront violence that has cost thousands of lives, as armed gangs take over entire swathes of the country, leaving the economy and public health system in tatters.

Read moreGangs in Haiti attack Port au Prince neighbourhood, torching homes

Kenya had previously said that it was ready to provide up to 1,000 personnel, an offer welcomed by the United States and other nations that had ruled out putting their own forces on the ground.

But a Nairobi court said the decision was unconstitutional, in part because the two countries had not signed a reciprocal agreement on the issue.

On Friday, Ruto said he and Henry had "witnessed the signing" of a reciprocal agreement in Kenya's capital Nairobi. Details of the document have not been made public.

"I take this opportunity to reiterate Kenya's commitment to contribute to the success of this multinational mission. We believe this is a historic duty because peace in Haiti is good for the world as a whole," Ruto said in a statement.

The UN Security Council had approved the multinational mission in early October but the Kenyan court ruling threw its future into doubt.

Opposition politician Ekuru Aukot, who had filed the petition against the deployment, told AFP on Friday that he would lodge a case "for contempt of court".

"What is emerging is that William Ruto does not care about the rule of law or the constitution of this country," he said.

"We will question the validity of this secretive agreement."

'A helping hand'

In the face of criticism, Ruto had described the Kenyan undertaking as a "mission for humanity", in step with its long record of contributing to peacekeeping missions abroad.

Haiti, the Western hemisphere's poorest nation, has been in turmoil for years, and the 2021 assassination of President Jovenel Moise plunged the country further into chaos.

No elections have taken place since 2016 and the presidency remains vacant.

Thousands of protesters have demanded Henry's resignation in line with a political deal that required Haiti to hold polls and for him to cede power to newly elected officials by February 7 of this year.

The prime minister, who is on a visit to Nairobi, told an audience of university students on Friday he aimed to "have elections as soon as possible".

"We need elections to stabilise the country," he said, but offered no specific timeframe for the polls.

On Thursday, the Caribbean Community bloc said Henry had agreed to hold elections by 31 August 2025 following a regional summit this week in Guyana.

In January alone, more than 1,100 people were killed, injured or kidnapped in Haiti, according to the UN.

"In October 2022, we asked the world to give us a helping hand. President Ruto was the first one to agree to come to Haiti and we want to say thank you to him," Henry said.

"We thank Kenya for its active solidarity."

The multinational mission – initially approved for one year – had envisioned Kenyan police on the offensive with their Haitian counterparts, who are outnumbered and outgunned by gang members.

Five countries have agreed to join the Kenya-led multinational policing mission, including the Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Benin and Chad.

Last year saw nearly 5,000 homicides counted in Haiti, more than double the number in 2022, according to a UN report.

(AFP)
Op-Ed: Propagandizing Millennial wealth — You’re all billionaires, right?

By Paul Wallis
DIGITAL JOURNAL
February 29, 2024

Inside the Oculus at the World Trade Center in New York City. — © Digital Journal

They’re at it again. Everything’s great, according to somebody. Millennials will be the “wealthiest generation”. It’s Boomers versus Millennials in the housing market. Nothing happens outside of market samples.

Yeah, sure.

I’ve been watching stats and spin like these for decades. They’re always upside and always wrong. There are no gigantic socioeconomic disasters, just happy media, telling it like it isn’t.

Let’s translate the drivel:

Millennials will be the “wealthiest generation”. There is no massive disparity in wealth in that generation, unlike all others in recorded history. Everybody’s a billionaire.

Median incomes start at $50K No they don’t when you start at nothing or slightly less per hour.

Boomers versus Millennials in the housing market. Those who accidentally have capital vs those who are in a position to buy anything.

Nothing happens outside of market samples. No, it doesn’t, if you’re prepared to ignore all cost-of-living factors, massive homelessness, and evaporation of assets as a result of those things.

What’s wrong with this effervescent view of selective stats is that it’s entirely wrong. What’s worse is that it promotes political insularity. Decades of economic disasters starting with “trickle-down economics” and continuing with a total refusal to even mention core issues are the results.

Occasionally you’ll see a dissenting story among the hype. Something like “Millennials don’t want kids because they’re too expensive,” which doesn’t exactly vindicate the “richest generation” myth, does it?

Then there’s the very mixed bag of information about Millennial poverty. As usual, the media meeting-dwellers try to sanitize this nasty subject, but the contrary information is always there somewhere.

The question is why any of the “rich Millennials” stuff flies at all. Talking about questions, let’s ask some of the tonnage the wealth propagandists don’t:

Is wealth distributed equally?

Are the majority of any age demographic on Earth wealthy?

Do all Millennials come from rich families?

Can they all afford the qualifications they need to become rich?

Can they afford the health they need to stay alive?

Where are they supposed to live, while being so theoretically affluent? Mars? Because things are getting a bit pricey on Earth, y’know. People are having to innovate to keep a roof over their heads. …Or couldn’t our China hutch pundits be bothered finding out?

Do people making under $50K even get on the radar for this seemingly endless guided tour of Narnia? (There are a lot of those people.)

Millennials are the largest age group in the US workforce. Therefore, they’re all incredibly prosperous and have to use snow shovels to get the money out of the way before they can drive to work, right?

Most people with more than one job are trying very hard to make ends come anywhere near each other, if not meet. According to one set of stats for global Millennials, 26% of them have 2 or more jobs. Wealthy, you say?

The “rich” American Boomers are becoming homeless at rates not seen since the Great Depression. How’s that stat doing in Fantasyland?

The way I see it, none of these stats can survive for long, even if they were believable. This vision of unrestrained generational prosperity is ridiculous at best. Costs are rising so fast and for so long that there is no reason to believe that Millennials or anyone else is safe from them.

Here’s a theory – Propaganda doesn’t pay bills.


Op-Ed: ‘Rich renters’ — The new plague making it harder to rent

By Paul Wallis
DIGITAL JOURNAL
February 25, 2024


Even New Yorkers lucky enough to live in rent-stabilized apartments -- approximately one million units and two million tenants, according to city data -- are not immune to the growing housing crisis in their city. 

If you’re rich, renting is easy, right? Well, in theory. You’re spending a lot of money, but less than you would if you bought a house, right? You don’t mind being an easy target in an overheated market, either. Cute.

We’re not talking about the super-rich upper-bracket penthouse dwellers. These are middling to rich people who’ve moved into the mainstream rental market. They’re slowly but literally pushing everyone else out onto the street.

Rich renters are taking up a surprising amount of space in the global rental market. They used to be very much a minority. Now they’re pushing everyone else out of the market and prices are rising simply because they’re in the market.

Add to this the simple logic that people will usually pay a lot for their social pretensions. They like to live the image. There you have the basis of a market very like a drift net scouring the ocean floor.

A few points here:

Paying top dollar does NOT mean you’re getting a good deal by definition.

Leases and fees can be complex. You want a law degree to go with that condo? Maybe not.

Landlords, corporations, and their agents are not charities. You can get gouged as easily and as often as someone earning 5% of your salary.

Why exactly are you paying the equivalent of someone’s annual gross wage, and for what? If you answered, “Because I’m rich and I need to impress myself”, you’re well on the way to being a rich naïve broke person. Fools and their money are usually parted as soon as possible on that basis.

Having said that – It makes sense in terms of commercial realities for landlords. Who would you rather rent to, a rich person or someone who’s just scraping by? When was the last time you heard anyone say, “We’d like to make a lot less money this year”?

As a landlord, if you also don’t mind excluding yourself from the rather turgid mainstream rental market, it’s a good move, in theory. That’s not to say that someone pretending to be a rich renter won’t send you broke with non-payments, but hey, you need the excitement, don’t you?

Belong examined Census Bureau data to see which metros have renters who are putting the largest share of their income toward rent. – Photo Illustration by Stacker // Canva

Of course, the property market image of itself is rarely related or even connected to the reality. This is a very greedy market. There’s a gibbering lunatic behind every spreadsheet in this market. Renters can often be on the wrong end of that endearing little phenomenon.

For instance – You’ll be hit for minor damage to anything and everything. You have to guess about the quality of the premises, regardless of looks. The floor may be held up more by innuendo than by support beams. Maintenance is likely to be an expensive issue. You’ll be surrounded by other rich people, with all the unmitigated bliss that entails. Want your bond back? Good luck. These are just the basics of any rental market, translated into rich-speak.

There is one aspect of rich renting that makes far more sense. It’s about staying out of the highly combustible property market. You could spend a not-very-high $240,000 a year on rent, for example. That’s the equivalent of a small price move in some of the upper echelons of the US property market.

The endless fluff about rising property prices isn’t entirely an illusion, but it’s truly expensive. Getting the price you want when you buy, or sell, isn’t something you can take for granted. Buying and selling in an overheated market isn’t too much fun. Renting is a less dangerous and far less expensive option.

The property markets have been going berserk for a very long time. Most of humanity now finds buying a house unaffordable. That can’t last, and it won’t. A lot of people are expecting a crash. Why buy a house for top dollar if you can wait for a much better deal?

You can afford it. You can also afford to haggle. Rich renters are in a much safer market position as buyers. They’re also safer as renters because they’re far less likely to be kicked out. They’re cash cows that can afford to be cash cows.

Meanwhile, inevitably, the rich renters have also scrambled the entire rental market for everyone else. They can outbid everyone else. Nobody else can dictate to this market, but they’re different.

They’re also renting from the rich, and the corporate sector, those saints who see them as ready-made revenue. The market caters for them, unlike any other renters.

The trouble with this idyllic scenario is that the rental market is now fully geared to achieving the worst possible social outcomes. Rich renters are helping keep rents high and indirectly property prices as well.

Mass homelessness isn’t a theory. It’s an obscene fact, worldwide. The sheer amount of money being gouged out of the economy is also destroying spending options. Costs of living at this level destroy savings and financial options.

Just one more thing – As a rich renter you may be sitting pretty relative to the poor, but that’s about all. You’ve signed up as a renter who’ll pay big money. Feeling lucky?

Read more: https://www.digitaljournal.com/world/op-ed-rich-renters-the-new-plague-making-it-harder-to-rent/article#ixzz8TInhpxuu



Mexico election race heats up as two women vie for presidency

AFP
February 29, 2024

Opposition hopeful Xochitl Galvez (L) and ruling party candidate Claudia Sheinbaum (R) are the frontrunners in the race for the Mexican presidency 
- Copyright AFP/File Rodrigo Oropeza, CLAUDIO CRUZ

Sofia Miselem with Jean Arce in Mexico City

Campaigning officially begins Friday for elections likely to produce Mexico’s first woman president — a watershed for a nation with a long tradition of macho culture.

Rival rallies were planned as the race heats up for the June 2 vote, including an opposition gathering after midnight in one of the country’s most violent states.

Former Mexico City mayor Claudia Sheinbaum, a close ally of outgoing President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, known by his initials AMLO, is representing the ruling Morena party.

Public opinion surveys show the 61-year-old scientist by training enjoys a significant lead with 63 percent support, according to a poll of polls by the Oraculus research firm.

Her main rival Xochitl Galvez, the 61-year-old candidate for an opposition coalition, has 31 percent support, while Jorge Alvarez, 38, of the Citizens’ Movement party is a distant third with just five percent, polls show.


“Sheinbaum is in a very strong position, with a significant lead in the polls over Galvez,” analyst Michael Shifter of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank in Washington told AFP.

“Although nothing is impossible in politics, with just over three months to go before the election, it is highly unlikely that Galvez will be able to gain enough ground to make it a competitive race. AMLO is too popular, and the government and party machinery is too formidable,” he added.

Sheinbaum is a staunch supporter and confidant of Lopez Obrador, a leftwing populist who enjoys an approval rating of nearly 70 percent according to Oraculus, but who is required by the constitution to leave office after one term.

The granddaughter of Bulgarian and Lithuanian Jewish migrants, Sheinbaum has vowed to continue Lopez Obrador’s policy agenda.

She is due to address supporters on Friday afternoon in Mexico City’s square, the heart of the city she governed from 2018 until last year when she stepped down to run for president.

– Focus on insecurity –

Galvez, a 61-year-old outspoken businesswoman with Indigenous roots, opted to put the focus on the country’s insecurity with a planned rally shortly after midnight in the city of Fresnillo in violence-wracked Zacatecas state.

She said that the choice of location was to send a “message of hope to all Mexicans that this long night of violence will end because we’re going to confront the criminals.”

It will be the first of several planned stops in cities considered by their residents to be among the most unsafe in Mexico, to highlight what Galvez says is the government’s failure to tackle spiraling violence.

Nearly 450,000 people have been murdered across Mexico since the government deployed the military in the war on drugs in 2006, according to official figures.

Lopez Obrador angrily denied recent claims in US media that drug traffickers helped fund his first presidential campaign in 2006, and that US law enforcement officials spent years examining allegations that people close to him took millions of dollars from criminal gangs.

Shifter thinks the accusations “certainly raise important questions but will probably not get much traction with most Mexicans and will not cut into Sheinbaum’s comfortable lead in the polls.

“On the contrary, AMLO could even get a boost by making the case that he is being persecuted by the foreign press,” he added.

Galvez represents an opposition coalition made up of the Institutional Revolutionary Party — which ruled the country for more than 70 years until 2000 — the conservative National Action Party and the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution.

But her background sets her apart from the traditional conservative opposition — she wears Indigenous clothing, uses colloquial language peppered with swear words and is known for traveling around Mexico City by bicycle.

Victims of Denmark’s adoption scandal demand answers


AFP
February 29, 2024

May-Britt Koed with her adoption papers in Copenhagen, Denmark 
- Copyright AFP/File Marty MELVILLE
Camille BAS-WOHLERT

“I don’t even know when I was born,” said May-Britt Koed, a Copenhagen restaurant owner and one of the quarter of a million South Korean babies sent abroad for adoption since the 1950s.

Her adoption files contain two different birth dates months apart, which Koed suspects means she may have been exchanged for another baby that did not survive.

Experts say even the chubby baby picture sent to her Danish adoptive parents may not have been of her.

All the 47-year-old knows for sure is that “I arrived in Denmark on May 17, 1977”.

Koed’s case is far from isolated. The growing scandal over falsified records has prompted South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission to look at hundreds of cases from the country’s “baby farm” adoption industry during the decades of dictatorship that ended in the late 1980s.

Koed said her Danish Korean Rights Group has seen hundreds of files containing falsified documents, with some babies arriving in Denmark six centimetres (two inches) shorter than they were in their South Korea files.

A January report for Denmark’s social affairs ministry found that some adoption agencies, operating under Danish state control, knew their South Korean partners were changing children’s identities in the 1970s and 1980s.

More worrying still, “it’s been documented that letters were being sent from (birth) parents who didn’t know where their children were”, said Marya Akhtar of the Danish Institute for Human Rights.

– ‘Why didn’t anything happen?’ –


“And allegedly it looks like they were in the possession of authorities in Denmark,” she added.

“Why didn’t anything happen? We call for a thorough examination,” Akhtar told AFP.

Danish adoption agencies also reportedly paid some 54 million kroner ($7.9 million) to Korean orphanages and other bodies over the years to facilitate the adoptions, according to media investigations.

Denmark suspended all international adoptions in January amid serious concerns over babies also brought from other countries including India and South Africa.

“It’s like opening Pandora’s Box,” Koed told AFP.

“We are at a point where we can see that the Danish government has been involved,” said Koed, whose group has called for an independent Danish commission into the trade.

“Everybody deserves to have that truth, especially the adoptees that are trying to piece together their own history,” she said.

“I haven’t searched for a biological family, I’m not sure I’m going to. I am doing this to discover the truth of what happened to all of us and to find out who is responsible,” she added.

Time is of the essence for those who want to trace their biological families, with some already learning that their parents are dead, she added.

Copenhagen’s freeze on international adoptions came after the last agency operating there closed down amid revelations of financial pressure and fraudulently acquired consent — not only in South Korea but also in India, Madagascar and South Africa.

Brothers and sisters were separated and sometimes adopted to different countries.

Danish social affairs minister Pernille Rosenkrantz-Theil said there was “too high a risk of human trafficking or child theft”.

Last year she promised an inquiry into the history of international adoption procedures.

Legal expert Klaus Josephsen, a lecturer at the University of Aarhus, said there “hasn’t been enough control” of the system in Denmark.

“We have a private organisation, which has handled and taken care of those adoptions. They found children then created the papers and sent them to the Danish authorities,” he added.

“We will not see those organisations anymore, because the government doesn’t trust them. So I think we will get a new system, where the state will be active,” Josephsen said.