Tuesday, July 14, 2020

 UK faces largest GDP decline in 300 years

THE UK economy might not recover from the coronavirus crisis until 2024, the fiscal watchdog has warned.
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) said the ‘UK is on track to record the largest decline in annual gross domestic product (GDP) for 300 years’, warning that the economy could shrink by as much as 14.3 per cent in 2020.
In its latest set of financial forecasts, it said a worst-case scenario would also not see GDP recover to pre-crisis levels until the third quarter of 2024.
Government measures to address the impact of the virus will also result in an ‘unprecedented peacetime rise in borrowing’ this year, to between 13 per cent and 21 per cent of GDP, with the OBR currently predicting borrowing of £322billion.
UK GDP is set to fall by 10.6 per cent in even its most optimistic projection, the OBR said.
However, this scenario also projects that GDP could recover to its pre-virus peak by the first quarter of next year.
In its middling scenario, the OBR suggests GDP could fall by 12.4 per cent, before returning to its pre-virus level by the end of 2022, with ‘elevated’ levels of unemployment and business failures
Earlier on Tuesday, the ONS said that UK GDP grew by 1.8 per cent in May following the easing of the lockdown but remained a quarter below its pre-pandemic levels.
James Smith, research director at the Resolution Foundation, said: ‘The OBR’s forecasts reiterate the scale of the hit to our economy and public finances from the pandemic.’

Weak recovery could make unemployment worse than 1980s levels, warns OBR

Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts UK’s biggest peacetime deficit in 300 years and permanent ‘economic scars’



Richard Partington Economics correspondent
Tue 14 Jul 2020

A pedestrian passes a sale sign outside a store in central London, 10 July 2020. Britain’s high street is continuing to feel the impact of the lockdown caused by the coronavirus, with job losses almost a daily occurrence. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

Hopes for a rapid economic rebound from Covid-19 have been dealt a severe blow after official figures revealed a lacklustre return to growth in May with the government put on notice about persistently higher levels of unemployment.

Sounding the alarm over the growth outlook as job losses across the country rapidly mount, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) – the Treasury’s independent forecaster – warned unemployment could rise beyond the levels seen in the 1980s while the country struggles to regain its pre-virus footing.

Faced with a weak recovery and the rapid rollout of government spending to cushion the blow, it said public borrowing was on track to reach £322bn this year, in what would be the UK’s biggest peacetime deficit in 300 years.

The intervention from the OBR comes after official figures showed the UK economy returned to growth in May more slowly than expected, with gross domestic product (GDP) rising by 1.8%.


After the biggest collapse in activity since records began in April, when the economy shrank by a fifth, experts had expected some recovery in May as the government eased restrictions on movement, enabling some construction sites and factories to reopen. However, the bounce back was weaker than growth of 5.5% forecast by City economists.

Issuing a downbeat assessment of the country’s prospects after the disappointing official growth figures, the OBR warned the chance of lasting economic “scarring” was rapidly mounting.

Less than a week after the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, attempted to light the blue touch paper on a rapid economic rebound with £30bn of tax cuts and fresh spending measures, the forecaster said GDP was on-track to fall by 12.4% this year. That would compare with growth of 1.5% in 2019.

Publishing three scenarios in its annual fiscal risks report, it said GDP in the best case would still shrink by 10% before a recovery next year. In the worst-case scenario, GDP would fall by about 14%, marking the deepest recession in three centuries.

In a reflection of the lasting damage from persistently higher levels of unemployment, scrapped business investments and weaker consumer spending, the main scenario included GDP remaining 3% smaller after five years than would have been the case without Covid-19.
If you have been affected or have any information, we'd like to hear from you. You can get in touch by filling in the form below, anonymously if you wish or contact us via WhatsApp by clicking here or adding the contact +44(0)7867825056. Only the Guardian can see your contributions and one of our journalists may contact you to discuss further.
Tell us

Concerns are mounting over the pace of Britain’s economic recovery as the government prepares to wind down its furlough scheme from next month. Labour, business leaders and trade unions have warned that Britain’s road to recovery could be longer and more challenging than hoped, requiring more government support to save jobs than promised by Sunak last week.

Although the OBR said it was not given enough time by the Treasury to include Sunak’s spending measures in its latest analysis, it said it anticipated a sharp rise in job losses as the government winds down its furlough wage subsidy scheme.

At least 10% and as much as a 20% of the 9.4m jobs furloughed on the scheme will be made redundant, it said, as state subsidies are reduced from the start of August and removed entirely by the end of October.

Under every scenario, it said unemployment would more than double from pre-Covid levels, with the jobless rate in Britain hitting a peak of 12% before Christmas under its main forecast. At levels surpassing the hit to jobs caused by the 2008 financial crisis, the unemployment rate last peaked close to 12% in 1984. The current jobless rate is 3.9%.

Anneliese Dodds, the shadow chancellor, said the analysis showed the government needed to listen to calls from Labour, business groups and trade unions for more support to be given to the hardest-hit firms through the furlough scheme.

“Instead of withdrawing support across the piece, he must target it to sectors where it’s needed most. If he doesn’t act, even more people run the risk of being thrown into the misery of unemployment and our economy will continue to suffer,” she said.

Although there are hopes that a stronger recovery could take hold as the government rolls back lockdown restrictions, initial attempts to get more people back to work in May resulted in a weaker bounce back than hoped for.

Manufacturing and construction grew strongly as building sites and factories began to reopen, although service sector firms – including those in retail, hospitality and leisure – continued to struggle due to lockdown restrictions and reduced demand.

Suren Thiru, head of economics at the British Chambers of Commerce, said: “The pickup in output in May is more likely to reflect the partial release of pent-up demand as restrictions began to loosen, rather than evidence of a genuine recovery.Sign up to the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

“While UK economic output may grow further in the short term as restrictions ease, this may dissipate as the economic scarring caused by the pandemic starts to bite, particularly as government support winds down.”

Faced with the sharp increase in borrowing to pay for its Covid-19 response and the smaller size of the UK economy in future, the OBR said the government would need to find an additional £64bn a year from tax rises or a return to austerity to put the public finances back on a sustainable trajectory.


Sunak said the growth figures from the Office for National Statistics underlined the scale of the challenge the government faced.

“I know people are worried about the security of their jobs and incomes. That’s why I set out our plan for jobs last week, following the PM’s new deal for Britain, to protect, support and create jobs as we safely reopen our economy,” he said.
Italy Returns Stolen Banksy Piece in Memory of Bataclan Shooting to France


© AP Photo / Domenico Stinellis

14.07.2020
MOSCOW (Sputnik) - A piece of art attributed to famous street artist Banksy in commemoration of the 2015 Paris terror attacks has been returned to France after it was stolen and discovered in Italy, media reported on Tuesday.

The so-called Gate of Banksy was painted in 2018 on an emergency exit door of the Bataclan theater, where 90 people were killed by terrorists during a concert three years prior. It was stolen in 2019, before being discovered by Italian law enforcement officers in the Abruzzo region.

"This work has high artistic value, it witnessed the massacre, and many people were saved through this emergency exit door. In addition, this shows the brilliant cooperation between France and Italy," French Ambassador in Rome Christian Masset said, as quoted by the Italian newspaper La Repubblica.

A transfer ceremony took place at the French embassy in Rome, as France celebrates Bastille Day.

The painting remains in good condition despite the theft. According to a police reconstruction, the thieves used grinders to cut away the emergency exit door before escaping with the artwork.

On 13 November 2015, terrorists launched a series of coordinated attacks in the French capital, including in Bataclan, that killed a total of 130 civilians. Daesh terrorist group (banned in Russia) claimed responsibility for the attack.
MORE HINDUTVA: POLITICAL HINDU NATIONALISM
Campaign brewing to get Hindu god Brahma off popular beer

Brahma beer is displayed at a bar that's open for deliveries only amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Brasilia, Brazil, Tuesday, July 14, 2020. An interfaith coalition is pressuring the world’s largest brewer to remove the name of the Hindu god, saying the name is offensive to Hindus, who worship Lord Brahma, the religion's god of creation. An Anheuser-Busch InBev brewery spokesman says the beer actually was named to honor Joseph Bramah, an Englishman who invented the draft pump handle, and the spelling was changed to adapt the name to the Portuguese language. (AP Photo/Eraldo Peres)

An interfaith coalition is pressing the world’s largest brewer to remove the name of a Hindu god from a popular beer that dates to the late 1800s — a dispute the beermaker insists is a case of mistaken identity.

The group, which includes representatives of the Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu and Jain religions, is calling on Belgium-based brewing giant Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV to rename its Brahma line, a favorite in Brazil.

Brahma was first produced in 1888 by Companhia Cervejaria Brahma, a Brazilian brewery now owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev, whose massive lineup of 500 brands includes Budweiser, Bud Light, Corona and Stella Artois. Beers sold under the Brahma name include a lager, a double malt, a wheat beer and a chocolate stout.

“It is the right time to fix an old wrong — the trivializing of the faith of our Hindu brothers and sisters for about 132 years,” coalition spokesperson Rajan Zed told The Associated Press on Tuesday.

Lord Brahma, the god of creation in Hinduism, is a highly revered figure who should be worshiped in temples or home shrines, “not misused as a ‘toasting tool,’” Zed said.

He said the coalition also objects to what it calls “raunchy” marketing of the brand by using the image of a scantily clad woman to promote the beers.

“Anheuser-Busch InBev should not be in the business of religious appropriation, sacrilege and ridiculing entire communities,” the coalition said in a statement, calling on the company to “prove that it cares about communities by renaming its Brahma beer.”

But Lucas Rossi, head of communications for Anheuser-Busch InBev’s Latin America subsidiary, said Tuesday the beers were named in tribute to Joseph Bramah — an Englishman who invented the draft pump valve — and not for the Hindu deity. The spelling was changed, he said, to make the name work better in the Portuguese language.

“We deeply respect all religions, faiths and their histories,” Rossi said in a telephone interview. Hindus are a tiny minority in Brazil, where the Brahma brand is “very important to the culture of the country,” he added.

The name offends regardless of its origins, Zed said.

“The stated history behind the name does not reduce the pain of the Hindu devotees when they see their creator god on alcohol cans,” he said.

Zed, who is based in Nevada and is the president of the Universal Society of Hinduism, has campaigned against what he considers the misuse of Eastern religious imagery for commercial purposes for several years. In 2019, he extracted an apology from a Virginia brewery that brewed a beer named for another Hindu deity, saying that associating Lord Hanuman with alcohol was disrespectful.

Last month, the interfaith coalition launched a separate campaign aimed at pressuring Foundation Room and House of Blues nightclubs in Boston and other cities to stop using sacred Buddhist and Hindu imagery as decor. The upscale watering holes are managed by Beverly Hills, California-based Live Nation Entertainment, which apologized and said it was removing some statues from the clubs.

Brahma chicken - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Brahma_chicken

The Brahma is an American breed of chicken. It was developed in the United States from birds imported from the Chinese port of Shanghai, :78 and was the ...

Safaripedia | Brahma Bull - Safari Ltd.
https://www.safariltd.com › safaripedia › brahma-bull

The odd-looking Brahma bull has been mainly used in the United States to improve existing beef breeds. Many beef breeders in hot climates will buy a Brahma .. .

33 Best Brahma Bulls images in 2020 | Brahma bull, Bull cow ...
https://www.pinterest.com › nanjohnsto › brahma-bulls

The Brahman is a breed of hump-shouldered cattle with drooping necks and large, floppy ears. In the United States, Brahmans are sometimes called Brahman
Ladies' BRAHMA® Ropers, Buckaroos & Spongys®. with treated leather or Vibram soles. Vibram logo.png. BISON.gif. Granite Everest. 12" quarters. Treated ...
Brama (fish) - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Brama_(fish)

Eight recognized species are in this genus: Brama australis Valenciennes, 1838 (southern Ray's bream) Brama brama (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Atlantic pomfret) Brama caribbea Mead, 1972 (Caribbean pomfret)

Brahma Kamal - rare, legendary & mythological plant of India ...
https://wiki.nurserylive.com › brahma-kamal-rare-legendary-mythological-...

The flower starts blooming after sunset from 7 p m onwards and takes about two hours to full bloom,about 8 inches in diameter and remain open through out night.
Trump bristles at question about police killing Blacks


President Donald Trump listens during roundtable with people positively impacted by law enforcement, Monday, July 13, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump bristled Tuesday at a reporter’s question about police killing African Americans and defended the right to display the Confederate flag as he continued to play into racial divisions in an interview.

In the interview, Trump seemed taken aback when asked why African Americans are still dying at the hands of police.

“And so are white people. So are white people. What a terrible question to ask. So are white people,” Trump told CBS’s Catherine Herridge. “More white people, by the way. More white people.”


There is no national database tracking police-involved shootings. But studies have shown that Black Americans are much more likely to be killed by police, even though more whites — who represent a larger portion of the population — are killed. One study that examined the use of lethal force by law enforcement from 2009 to 2012, for instance, found that, while victims were a majority white (52%), they were disproportionately Black (32%) with a fatality rate 2.8 times higher among Blacks than whites.
In the interview, Trump also defended the use of the Confederate flag, despite saying in 2015 that he believed the flag belongs in a museum.
“All I say is freedom of speech. It’s very simple. My attitude is freedom of speech,” Trump responded. “Very simple. Like it, don’t like it, it’s freedom of speech.”
Asked whether he understood the flag is a painful symbol to many because it is a reminder of slavery, Trump responded that some “people love it,” adding: “And I know people that like the Confederate flag and they’re not thinking about slavery.”
UPDATED
‘Mythbusters’ star Grant Imahara dies from brain aneurysm
FILE - In this Aug. 16, 2014 file photo, Grant Imahara arrives at the Creative Arts Emmys in Los Angeles. Discovery Channel says the longtime "Mythbusters" host died from a brain aneurysm Monday at the age of 49. The network said he was one of the few trained operators for the famed R2-D2 droid from Star Wars and engineered the Energizer Bunny's popular rhythmic beat. (Photo by Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP, File)


LOS ANGELES (AP) — Grant Imahara, the longtime host of Discovery Channel’s “Mythbusters,” died from a brain aneurysm, the network said Tuesday.

Imahara died Monday at the age of 49.

“We are heartbroken to hear this sad news about Grant,” the network said in a statement. “He was an important part of our Discovery family and a really wonderful man. Our thoughts and prayers go out to his family.”

Along with his “MythBusters” fame, Imahara was known for starring on Netflix’s “White Rabbit Project.” He became popular in Hollywood for his talents in electronics and recently showcased his creation of a fully animatronic Baby Yoda.


Discovery said on its website that Imahara dedicated his life to using his skills to make people smile. The network said he was one of the few trained operators for the famed R2-D2 droid from the Star Wars franchise and engineered the Energizer Bunny’s popular rhythmic beat.

Former “MythBusters” co-host Adam Savage delivered a heartfelt message about Imahara on social media.

“I’m at a loss. No words,” Savage on Twitter. “I’ve been part of two big families with Grant Imahara over the last 22 years. Grant was a truly brilliant engineer, artist and performer, but also just such a generous, easygoing, and gentle PERSON. Working with Grant was so much fun. I’ll miss my friend.”

Kari Byron and Tory Belleci were co-hosts with Imahara on “Mythbusters” and “White Rabbit Project.” Both said they are heartbroken and stunned by the recent death of their colleague and friend.

“Heartbroken and in shock tonight. We were just talking on the phone. This isn’t real,” said Bryon on Twitter. She posted a series of photos of Imahara and said the two just had a phone conversation.

“I just cannot believe it,” Belleci said. “I don’t even know what to say. My heart is broken. Goodbye buddy.”






"Mythbusters" Host And Electrical Engineer Grant Imahara Is Dead At 49

The electrical engineer and reality show host died suddenly on Monday.


Ellie HallBuzzFeed News Reporter

Posted on July 14, 2020,



Gotpap / gotpap/STAR MAX/IPx, Discovery Channel / Via go.discovery.com

Electrical engineer and host of the science shows Mythbusters and White Rabbit Project Grant Imahara is dead at 49, the Discovery Channel said Monday.

"We are heartbroken to hear this sad news about Grant," the network said in a statement. "He was an important part of our Discovery family and a really wonderful man. Our thoughts and prayers go out to his family."

The host's cause of death has not been publicly revealed, but according to the Hollywood Reporter, he "died suddenly following a brain aneurysm."

Imahara began his career as an electrical engineer at Lucasfilm THX in 1993. In 1996, he moved to Lucasfilm's Industrial Light and Magic division. In his eight years at ILM, Imahara rose to the position of lead modelmaker, specializing in robotics and electronic and radio control. He was a chief architect of the technology behind the robot R2-D2 during the development of the Star Wars prequel films and one of only three people in the United States authorized to operate the robots used for filming.


Grant Imahara@grantimahara
This #fbf in honor of #StarWarsRogueOne: my career with @starwars, working on R2-D2 and Episodes 1-3.08:18 PM - 16 Dec 2016
Reply Retweet Favorite


Imahara joined Mythbusters, a popular reality television show where the hosts used science to disprove urban legends, in its third season in 2005. As a member of the show's "Build Team," he used his expertise in engineering and robotics debunk myths for nine years, appearing in more than 200 episodes.

In 2016, Imahara and two of his Mythbusters cohosts, Kari Byron and Tory Belleci, starred in a Netflix show with a similar premise, called White Rabbit Project.

His colleagues and friends expressed shock and disbelief on social media in the wake of the news.


Tory Belleci@ToryBelleci
I just cannot believe it. I don’t even know what to say. My heart is broken. Goodbye buddy @grantimahara05:14 AM - 14 Jul 2020
Reply Retweet Favorite



Kari Byron@KariByron
Somedays I wish I had a time machine. ⁦@ToryBelleci⁩ ⁦@grantimahara⁩11:32 PM - 13 Jul 2020
Reply Retweet Favorite


Adam Savage, who worked with Imahara at Lucasfilm and the Discovery Channel, said he had "no words" after learning the news.



Adam Savage@donttrythis
I’m at a loss. No words. I’ve been part of two big families with Grant Imahara over the last 22 years. Grant was a truly brilliant engineer, artist and performer, but also just such a generous, easygoing, and gentle PERSON. Working with Grant was so much fun. I’ll miss my friend.03:52 AM - 14 Jul 2020
Reply Retweet Favorite

On Reddit, thousands of Imahara's fans paid tribute to his legacy, with many people commenting that watching him on Mythbusters inspired them to pursue careers in science.

"The engineering community has lost a big light today," wrote one commenter.
"[Mythbusters] would not have been anywhere near the success it was without him, and for me he embodies everything about both the show's ethos and what a true engineer should represent."


Reddit / Via reddit.com


Ellie Hall is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in Washington, DC.


R.I.P. Grant Imahara from MythBusters



As reported by The Hollywood Reporter, former MythBusters host Grant Imahara has died. The news was confirmed by a statement from a Discovery representative, referring to Imahara as an “important part of our Discovery family and a really wonderful man.” A cause of death was not given, but THR’s sources say he died suddenly from a brain aneurysm. Imahara was 49.

Grant Imahara was born in 1970 and studied electrical engineering and robotics at the University Of Southern California, which he managed to turn into a visual effects career by landing a job with Lucasfilm after college. He worked with the THX and Industrial Light And Magic, working on effects for major movies like the Star Wars prequels (where he somewhat famously updated and operated the R2-D2 robots used in filming), the Matrix sequels, and cult classic Star Trek homage Galaxy Quest. He was also a competitor on BattleBots, helped design the modern Energizer Bunny, and built Craig Ferguson’s robot sidekick Geoff for The Late Late Show.

It was through ILM that Imahara met Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage, who invited Imahara to join them on the MythBusters team in the show’s third season. Along with co-hosts Kari Byron and Tory Belleci, Imahara was part of the “Build Team” and constructed machines and robots to test myths and—in a nod to his other career—recreate stunts and effects from movies and TV to see how viable or realistic they were. The playful banter and bickering between Hyneman and Savage was the highlight of the MythBusters segments they hosted, but Imahara, Byron, and Belleci brought an infectious enthusiasm and passion to everything they touched on the show. The three of them left MythBusters in 2014, shortly before the show itself came to an end. In 2016, Imahara reunited with Byron and Belleci for the one-season White Rabbit Project on Netflix.

On Twitter, Savage said that Imahara was a “truly brilliant engineer, artist, and performer, but also just such a generous, easygoing, and gentle person.” Earlier today, possibly coincidentally, Kari Byron posted a photo of herself with Imahara and Belleci along with the caption “somedays I wish I had a time machine.” She has since shared several other photos of Imahara from the MythBusters days.



The US Government's Own Experts Say Separating Immigrant Families During The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Add To Their Mental Trauma

Separating families during the pandemic is "nothing less than willful endangerment,” an attorney for the medical experts said.


Hamed Aleaziz BuzzFeed News Reporter

Posted on July 14, 2020

Eric Gay / AP
Asylum-seekers hold hands as they walk across the ICE South Texas Family Residential Center on Aug. 23, 2019, in Dilley

A group of medical experts hired by the Department of Homeland Security says separating immigrant children from their parents would “exacerbate the physical and mental trauma to detained families who know they are unable to protect themselves from the deadly, rapidly spreading pandemic.”

The group of doctors — Scott Allen, Pamela McPherson, and Josiah Rich — are professors and medical and mental health experts for the department’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, which inspects the care of those in government custody. They described their opposition to any potential policy that would separate families on Tuesday in a letter to Congress that was obtained by BuzzFeed News.

The letter comes after immigrant children were ordered released from ICE detention centers across the country, which advocates worry could lead to scenarios in which they could be separated from their parents.

“We are writing to you, members of Congress responsible for overseeing DHS, because we have a professional obligation to raise our grave concerns about DHS’s reattempt to separate children from their families in response to a federal court order to release the children when it is within ICE discretion to release the families intact,” the medical experts wrote. “We advocate for the release of immigrant detainees who present no threat to communities to prevent both the harm of family and children separation and the risk of spread and infection of COVID-19.”


The doctors said they shared their “concerns about the serious medical and mental health risks associated with the detention of families, exacerbated by the coronavirus spreading in congregate settings” with the lead official in charge of the DHS civil rights division last week.

Allen, professor emeritus of medicine at the University of California Riverside School of Medicine, and McPherson, who teaches fellows at the LSU Health Sciences University in Shreveport, Louisiana, have been outspoken on the issues of immigrant children in custody and the policy that led to separation of families at the border in 2018.

"That ICE is considering repeating one of the darkest moments of this administration — separating children from their families — knowing this will cause serious medical and psychological harm to children is nothing less than willful endangerment,” said Dana Gold, senior counsel at the Government Accountability Project and attorney for Allen, McPherson, and Rich. “That DHS’s own medical and mental health experts need to speak up to try to prevent this agency from inflicting imminent harm on innocent children is another grotesque example of the government ignoring its medical experts. If we’ve learned anything over the past few months, this is a recipe for disaster."

As of Thursday, there were 319 immigrants — at least 157 of them children — in custody at the three family detention centers. At the Karnes County Residential Center in Texas, there are 24 current cases of COVID-19 among immigrant families detained there. There have been 35 total cases at the facility. There have been no positive cases at the other two ICE family detention centers.

Last week, US government officials told a federal judge that immigrant families should not be released from custody. Attorneys for the Trump administration said the court should deny a motion for a preliminary injunction to promptly release all families in ICE detention. Immigrant advocates said the filing sets up a potential separation of children from their parents in custody as the government looks to comply with a separate order to release the children.

Attorneys for ICE have denied allegations that it was incapable of protecting immigrant families from contracting COVID-19. Government attorneys also pushed back against the claim that immigrant families face irreparable harm in being forced to choose between family separation or continued detention of children who have been ordered to be released.

Last month, US District Judge Dolly Gee, who oversees a 1997 court settlement known as the Flores agreement that says the government can't detain children for more than 20 days, ordered the release of immigrant minors at ICE facilities by July 17. Previously, an independent monitor tasked with tracking how children in family detention centers are treated as part of the court agreement said the risk of immigrant minors and families contracting coronavirus inside one of the facilities continued to grow because some staffers failed to wear masks or observe social distancing requirements.

“Despite the overwhelming warning and recommendation of the medical community, DHS has ignored the advice of its own experts, continuing to keep children in detention for months, above and beyond the court-mandated 20-day limit,” the doctors wrote. “DHS has also failed to release most of the immigrants from detention facilities around the country, contrary to the advice of medical and public health efforts. Worse, DHS is now attempting to reinstate the practice of family separation using a federal court order as justification.”

Adolfo Flores contributed reporting.


MORE ON IMMIGRATION
The Trump Administration Told A Judge ICE Should Not Release Parents And Children Who've Been Detained Together
Hamed Aleaziz · July 9, 2020
Hamed Aleaziz · June 24, 2020

Adolfo Flores · July 2, 2020



Hamed Aleaziz is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
The Trump Administration Has Reversed Its Ban On Foreign Students Taking All Classes Online

The controversial policy had sent thousands of international students into a panic as they risked being deported in the fall.

Hamed Aleaziz BuzzFeed News Reporter
Last updated on July 14, 2020, 

Steven Senne / AP
A runner passes through an arch on the campus of Boston University on May 20.

The Trump administration on Tuesday rescinded a controversial policy that would have revoked legal status for international students who planned to take classes entirely online in the fall as university campuses remain largely closed during the coronavirus pandemic.

Details of the administration’s rollback came during a court hearing over a challenge brought by Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in federal court on Tuesday. According to a court order, both sides had reached an agreement to rescind the policy, which was announced by Immigration and Customs Enforcement last week, sending thousands of students into a panic.

The Trump administration’s decision is a rare one. Government officials have repeatedly defended controversial immigration policies in court during the past three years, refusing to alter their decisions unless forced to. In this case, however, droves of major universities had lined up to challenge the policy in court. The Associated Press counted more than 200 universities that had agreed to support the Harvard challenge. International students in the US also spoke up on social media as politicians railed against its necessity.

International students reached by BuzzFeed News Tuesday said they were grateful for the decision.

“I'm extremely relieved on a personal note. I won't have to compromise my health or education,” said Siobhan, a 25-year old Irish college student in New York studying biochemistry. “But I think this very clearly shows that we can't take anything about our legal status for granted, and that we should be really vigilant about future attempts to do something like this.”

ICE had previously said students on F-1 and M-1 visas in the US could transfer to a school offering in-person classes to maintain their legal status. Otherwise, they risked being deported.

Under existing federal regulations, students on F-1 visas may take a maximum of one class or three credit hours online. Under the proposed policy some students taking a combination of online and in-person classes will be allowed to take more than the maximum currently allowed by federal regulation, as long as schools certify the program is not entirely online.

The Department of Homeland Security's Student and Exchange Visitor Program previously instituted a temporary exception for online classes in the spring and summer semesters in response to schools going online because of COVID-19.

Adolfo Flores contributed reporting.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates and follow BuzzFeed News on Twitter.

MORE ON IMMIGRATION
Harvard And MIT Sued To Block Trump's Plan To Bar International Students From The US If Classes Are Online-Only
Adolfo Flores · July 8, 2020
Hamed Aleaziz · 


Hamed Aleaziz is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
Data Collection And State Surveillance Put LGBTQ People At Risk Online And Off
Apps that harvest data, dark web marketplaces, and state surveillance are just some of the dangers LGBTQ people have to think about online.

Posted on July 14, 2020

Martin Bureau / Getty Images

A new report outlines the minefield of online threats LGBTQ people have to navigate online, from overt state surveillance to tracking via facial recognition to dating app information that gets shared with data brokers and advertisers.

Recorded Future, a cybersecurity company, released a detailed look at what queer communities outside North America have to grapple with. The idea, senior director Maggie McDaniel said, was to better understand where deeper security research is needed.

“It's kind of daunting,” said Evan Akin, associate intelligence consultant who spearheaded the report. “It just shows how difficult it is to navigate between all these different apps, these different states, different regions. There's not just security issues. There's data privacy issues. There are issues with traveling to these different regions. You don't know what the laws are, you don’t know how extensively they’re enforced.”

Based on existing and new research, the results of the report are grim. Even in the few places where LGBTQ people are under less of a threat of state surveillance, the dating apps they may be using still collect data and share it with data brokers or advertisers. This includes sensitive information like sexual orientation, location, drug use, and even HIV status.

Researchers looked at Tinder, OkCupid, Grindr, Scruff, and Her. Scruff was the only app that offered reasonable protections for its users by limiting the information the app collects and shares. The rest of the apps build data sharing into their business models. This creates an inherent threat even as apps introduce protections for their users, like notifications if they’re entering a country with anti-homosexuality laws, because that information can be passed on without users’ knowledge.

“What we're finding is that even if they don't use their name, even if they don't use their phone number, they're still having enough of that information being collected to be identified,” said Akin.

Log-in credentials for the dating apps are a hot commodity on dark web marketplaces, too, creating an additional risk for anyone who reuses passwords. Over the last year, OkCupid and Tinder were key targets for cybercriminals.

These issues have come up before and Grindr was briefly deemed a national security threat by the US when a Chinese company bought it. The company was forced to sell back to US ownership, but that still doesn’t mean it’s completely safe to use, due to the sensitive data it collects.

“If the US government is worried about the data being collected on Grindr, so should you,” Akin said.

The data that’s collected by advertisers across dating apps “can pretty much identify people's daily routines,” Akin said.

“It really facilitates the ability to target individuals and then potentially prosecute them under different laws or statutes,” said McDaniel.

She pointed to findings from cybersecurity firm FireEye that showed the Russian government targeting LGBTQ activists online. Earlier this month, a referendum that made same-sex marriage illegal passed in the country.

Other governments have also weaponized the internet to target LGBTQ people, the report shows. A February 2018 study by human rights organization Article 19 showed Egypt, Lebanon, and Iran have all used apps and social media to track and entrap users. In 2014, the Israeli army reportedly identified gay Palestinians in order to blackmail them, in part through surveillance.

“The capability and technology that powers a lot of the surveillance software companies is growing and getting more powerful every year,” Akin said.

These technologies include facial recognition companies and data analytics, which have become more powerful in the last few years and frequently partner with governments or sell their services to law enforcement.


“This highlights the need for a lot of the companies behind these apps and services geared towards the LGBTQ community to maybe step up their game and make it more of a public effort — to try harder — to protect and offer options to their users,” Akin said, “so that they feel a little bit more safe and protected.”


Jane Lytvynenko is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in Toronto, Canada. PGP fingerprint: A088 89E6 2500 AD3C 8081 BAFB 23BA 21F3 81E0 101C.
Contact Jane Lytvynenko at jane.lytvynenko@buzzfeed.com.
Universal COVID-19 testing in nursing homes may limit transmission


Registered nurses with the Florida Department of Health perform a specimen collection on a patient at a nursing home in Florida on May 1. "Universal" testing can help better spot COVID-19 outbreaks in long-term care facilities, a new analysis finds. Photo by Sgt. Michael Baltz/Flickr
July 14 (UPI) -- "Universal" testing of nursing home and assisted living residents is "critical" to identifying asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 and curbing virus transmission, according to the authors of an analysis published Tuesday by JAMA Internal Medicine.

The assessment of coronavirus testing protocols at 11 long-term care facilities in Maryland revealed that checking only those residents with symptoms of COVID-19 -- cough, diarrhea, fever and shortness of breath -- yielded 153 confirmed cases within a population of 893, said researchers at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

However, subsequent testing of all 893 residents of these care homes -- regardless of whether they had symptoms of COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 -- identified another 354 confirmed cases, the researchers said.

"We are getting more and more evidence that universal screening, particularly in congregate living facilities where there are identified cases or exposures, is incredibly important to stem transmission," Dr. Morgan Katz, assistant professor of infectious disease medicine at Johns Hopkins, told UPI.

"We have underestimated the burden of people who are asymptomatic with SARS-CoV-2 because our testing has thus far been focused only on people with symptoms," she said.

On Tuesday, the American Health Care Association and the National Center for Assisted Living wrote to the National Governors Association to warn of imminent outbreaks at nursing homes and assisted-living facilities.

Given spikes in new cases in several states across the country, the organizations pointed to "serious" personal protective equipment shortages and significant delays in obtaining test results for long-term care residents and staff members.

RELATED Nursing home doctors, nurses say they still lack PPE

"We are asking governors and public health agencies to help expedite the delivery of test results and work toward a solution to provide on-site testing with rapid results," the groups wrote.

Universal testing for an infectious disease essentially entails testing an entire population, regardless of whether symptoms are evident.

Although the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initially mandated testing only people with symptoms of COVID-19, several states implemented universal testing of long-term care facility residents after multiple case clusters popped up.

RELATED 20% of ER visits are for people older than 60, CDC analysis finds

Through the end of June, more than 126,000 residents of long-term care facilities -- including nursing homes and assisted-living complexes -- across the country tested positive for COVID-19, and well over 35,000 have died from the disease, according to the CDC.

Overall, as of Tuesday morning, nearly 3.5 million Americans have been infected and nearly 136,000 have died, based on estimates from Johns Hopkins University.

Katz and her colleagues identified 507 total cases -- 153 on symptomatic testing plus 354 on universal testing -- at the 11 nursing homes they assessed. Two-week follow-up data was available for 177 of the positive cases confirmed via universal testing, the researchers said.

Of these, 154 were asymptomatic at testing, they said. But 20 eventually became sick enough to require hospitalization and seven died within 14 days of testing, according to the researchers.

"My suggestion would be to supply facilities with a cache of rapid turnaround tests that they can have on site to respond to any potential exposure [to a] symptomatic resident," Katz said.

"If this broad based testing yielded any positives, I would then follow with universal testing of the entire facility."
States ask teens to staff polling places on Election Day

By  Shirin Ali, The Fulcrum

Poll workers wears protective equipment as they organize ballots in a special election for Maryland's 7th Congressional District on April 28. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI | License Photo

July 14 (UPI) -- Recruiting enough workers to staff the more than 200,000 polling places across the country has been a longstanding struggle. Now, the coronavirus is making the problem even worse -- because older people, who are the majority of poll workers, are also at the greatest risk of getting the infection.

In response, states are getting creative, increasingly asking their younger populations -- including some not yet old enough to vote -- to step up and play an essential role in the election process. While it's not widely known, people younger than 18 can be poll workers in 45 states and the District of Columbia

Recruiting members of Generation Z has become critical this year because aging Baby Boomers are especially vulnerable to COVID-19. But long before the pandemic transformed the country -- and the way elections are run -- in a matter of weeks, keeping up the supply of election workers has long been a sore subject for election officials. And it has been getting worse.

Even in a year when the share of ballots cast remotely is sure to shatter past records, election officials are generally promising to keep a reasonable number of polling stations open for those who prefer them as well as those who require them, like many disabled or homeless voters. And that means several hundred thousand people will be needed to check in voters, verify their identities, register people in states where that's allowed on Election Day and then answer questions about voting equipment -- which is brand new this year in thousands of locations.
engers
The shortage is likely to be particularly acute in Texas and other states that have not done much to promote mail voting despite new surges of coronavirus. Handfuls of polling places have been shuttered in Fort Worth and San Antonio for Tuesday's primary runoffs, for example, because of a lack of people willing to staff them. Wisconsin infamously had to call out the National Guard to replace no-shows for its April primary.

The surge in the number of cities and counties struggling to find sufficient help on Election Day is made plain in the surveys of election officials taken after every election by the federal Election Assistance Commission. The number of jurisdictions reporting at least some difficulty in filling their poll worker jobs rose from only about one-third a decade ago to 70 percent in 2018.

The poll found that for every general election going back at least to 2010, fewer than one in five poll workers was 40 or younger. The surveys also consistently found about one-fourth of poll workers were 71 or older -- results that make intuitive sense, because older people are likelier to be retired and have fewer weekday commitments while people in their 20s and 30s are generally working and committed to family obligations.

Trouble recruiting election workers during the pandemic is magnified by demographics: Three in five poll workers in 2018 were older than 61, an age group at high risk of COVID-19, while just one in five was younger than 40. One way to expand the pool: Grow the share (4 percent last time) not yet old enough to vote, something most states allow.

To help solve its version of the problem, Minneapolis implemented a Student Election Judge Program in the early 1990s and has since seen immense success with recruiting a bilingual, tech-savvy and ethnically diverse corps of high school students to work in its polling centers. The city partnered with local schools to help enlist teenagers, even establishing volunteer advisers at some schools to help advocate for the program and coordinate recruiting. The law in Minnesota, which usually has the strongest voter turnout of any state, permits high school students to work at polling centers after they turn 16.

The coordinator of the program, Caryn Scheel, says that over the years, Minneapolis has received far more applications than it needs -- more than 800 in a typical year, when only about 400 students are needed on Election Day. She estimates that between one-fifth and one-quarter of the city's polling centers have high school students at work.

"They leave really inspired about what it's like to be part of a community during an election," Scheel said. "They really take it seriously, this idea that they are there to help voters to do what they can within the legal process to help people vote. And they find that very empowering."

Three years ago, the EAC singled out the Minneapolis program in a competition for recruiting, training and retaining election workers. Hamilton County, Ohio, won the same award in 2016 for its Youth at the Booth program, which recruits Cincinnati high schoolers older than 17 to work at the polls.

The effort extends to older students, too. Members of the Election Law Society at William & Mary's law school recently started looking for a way to contribute their expertise during the current election, especially in light of the pandemic.

The result, formally launched last week, is ASAP -- the Alliance of Students at the Polls. The nonpartisan program plans to recruit fellow law schools across the country to build an online database of local resources related to voting and the electoral process. The organization also plans to recruit law students to be poll workers either on campus or at home, where many will be studying online this fall.

"Having every state that has in-person voting be a part of our database and have resources available to people that want to volunteer in that state, if we can pull that off, I will consider this a huge success, in terms of just providing access and hopefully recruiting enough poll workers to open some more precincts across the country," said Max Weiss, co-president of the Election Law Society.

Poll work compensation varies widely, although about a quarter of states dictate a flat fee that's often less than the minimum wage for what is sometimes a 12-hour (or longer) day. Other states offer the minimum wage or allow local jurisdictions to pay more.

The National Council of State Legislatures has also promoted the idea of youth poll workers, pointing out that these digital natives have a willingness to operate electronic poll books and other voting technology.

Having more young people part of the electoral process, serving as poll workers or election judges, may motivate a younger voting bloc to cast their own ballots once they turn 18.

Scheel, of Minneapolis' Student Election Judge program, said surveys of participants show students are much more likely to vote as a result of being part of her program.

"You look at research that has been done on youth voter participation and you find that the earlier people get involved, the more likely it is that they'll stay involved," she said.

The notion of using poll worker jobs to promote high school civic engagement crosses ideological lines. The most recent state to allow teens to do the work was reliably Republican Alabama, which made the switch last year.

This article originally appeared at The Fulcrum.

upi.com/7021758