Saturday, July 01, 2023

World’s oldest newspaper prints final edition after 320 years

Story by Donna Ferguson • 3h ago

Photograph: Alex Halada/AFP/Getty Images© Provided by The Guardian

The world’s oldest newspaper has printed its last daily edition almost 320 years after it began.

Wiener Zeitung, a Vienna-based daily newspaper, will no longer print daily editions after a recent law change meant it had ceased to be profitable as a print product.

The law, which was passed in April by Austria’s new rightwing coalition government, ended a legal requirement for companies to pay to publish public announcements in the print edition of the newspaper, terminating Wiener Zeitung’s role as an official gazette.

This change resulted in an estimated €18m (£15m) loss of income for the publisher, according to Der Spiegel, and has forced the paper to cut 63 jobs, including reducing its editorial staff from 55 to 20.

It will continue to publish online and is hoping to distribute a monthly print edition, although that plan is reportedly still in development.

The newspaper, which is owned by the Austrian government but is editorially independent, began publishing in August 1703 and has seen out 12 presidents, 10 kaisers and two republics.

In its first edition, it said it would provide a straightforward account of the news “without any oratory or poetic gloss”.

In 1768 it reported on a concert starring an “especially talented” 12-year-old. His name was Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.


When Austria was defeated in the first world war, the paper published a special edition with the abdication letter of the last Habsburg emperor, Kaiser Karl.

In its last daily print edition on Friday, it ran an editorial blaming the government’s new law for the end of its print run and said: “These are stormy times for quality journalism … On more and more platforms, serious content vies for attention with fake news, cat videos and conspiracy theories.”

In April its circulation was just 20,000 on weekdays, although this figure doubled at weekends.

Arnold Schwarzenegger was one its final interviewees, along with the former Austrian chancellors Franz Vranitzky and Wolfgang Schüssel.

The EU commission vice-president Věra Jourová told the Austrian news agency APA that she was “not happy with the situation” at the newspaper. “I think the Wiener Zeitung played a good role in informing people over the years,” she said.

During its three centuries of printing, the newspaper had only one forced break. After Austria was incorporated into Hitler’s Germany, the paper was shut down by the Nazis in 1939. In 1945, while Austria was still under allied occupation, it began printing again.

The world’s oldest surviving newspaper is now thought to be the German publication Hildesheimer Allgemeine Zeitung, which was first published in 1705.
The UN's scientific and education organization votes to readmit the United States
Story by The Canadian Press • Yesterday

The UN's scientific and education organization votes to readmit the United States© Provided by The Canadian Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United Nations' scientific, educational and cultural organization has agreed to readmit the United States as a member.

UNESCO’s governing board voted 132-10 on Friday to accept the U.S. proposal to rejoin the Paris-based agency. America's membership will become official once Secretary of State Antony Blinken or a designee formally accepts the invitation, according to Biden administration officials.

Russian, Palestinian and North Korean representatives had held up consideration of the U.S. proposal on Thursday with hours of procedural delays. That session was adjourned due to fatigue on the part of UNESCO interpreters.

In addition to Russia, North Korea and the Palestinians, those that voted against readmitting the U.S. were Belarus, China, Eritrea, Indonesia, Iran, Nicaragua and Syria.

The Biden administration had announced in early June that it would apply to rejoin the organization mainly because it was concerned that China was filling a gap left by the U.S. absence from the body. The 193-member UNESCO plays a major role in setting international standards for artificial intelligence and technology education around the world.

The Trump administration in 2017 announced that the U.S. would withdraw from UNESCO, citing anti-Israel bias. That decision that took effect a year later.

The U.S. and Israel stopped financing UNESCO after it voted to include Palestine as a member state in 2011.


The Biden administration has requested $150 million for the 2024 budget to go toward UNESCO dues and arrears. The plan foresees similar requests for the ensuing years until the full debt of $619 million is paid off.

That makes up a big chunk of UNESCO’s $534 million annual operating budget. Before leaving, the U.S. contributed 22% of the agency’s overall funding.


Israel has long accused the United Nations of anti-Israel bias. In 2012, over Israeli objections, the state of Palestine was recognized as a nonmember observer state by the General Assembly. The Palestinians claim the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip — territories captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war — for an independent state. Israel says the Palestinians’ efforts to win recognition at the U.N. are aimed at circumventing a negotiated settlement and meant to pressure Israel into concessions.

The United States previously pulled out of UNESCO under the Reagan administration in 1984 because it viewed the agency as mismanaged, corrupt and used to advance Soviet interests. It rejoined in 2003 during former President George W. Bush's presidency.

___

Associated Press writer Angela Charlton in Paris contributed to this report.

Matthew Lee, The Associated Press
Legacy of Canada's ban on Chinese immigration lasted longer than the law


Story by The Canadian Press • July 1,2023


OTTAWA — When Matthew Yan looks at the stoic and determined expression on his father's face in the black and white photo affixed to the identification papers he carried for decades, he mostly feels pity.

The photo features Bing Sun Jun in borrowed clothes: a grown man's suit sagging on his adolescent shoulders, making him look far older than his 13 years.

The boy's jaw is set and his eyes are focused, as if he's trying to be the man he's been dressed up to be.

It's the face of a person Yan scarcely got to know.

"My heart just feels sorry for him, alone all his life," said Yan, now 74, reflecting on the photo more than a century after it was taken.

The date typed neatly on the bottom of the certificate reads Dec. 23, 1920, just three years before Chinese people would be banned from entering Canada.

This Canada Day, the country marks 100 years since the federal government introduced legislation to ban Chinese immigrants from Canada.

Thousands of Chinese workers arrived in Canada before that period, and were crucial in the construction of the western leg of the Canadian Pacific Railway. They were paid far less and given far more dangerous tasks than white workers. Hundreds died from accidents, illness, malnutrition and the cold.

When the railway was completed in 1885, they faced widespread discrimination from the government and the public.

The Chinese Immigration Act, which is sometimes known as the Chinese Exclusion Act, was the culmination of the racist anti-Chinese sentiment that followed.

It not only prevented migration, but forced those already in the country to be registered and carry identification, like the C.I. Certificate, or risk detainment or deportation.

The act was "really designed to limit the possibilities of Chinese migrants settling permanently in the country and, related to that, establishing families and therefore generations of descendants," said historian Laura Madokoro, an associate professor of history at Carleton University.

"The impact of this is across the generations."


As Canadians celebrate on July 1, many are also reflecting on the legacy of that law, which lives on in families, communities and policy.

A dutiful first-born son, Jun left his family at a young age, and immigrated to provide income for his family back home. He was subjected to a head tax, a fee to designed to dissuade Chinese migrants from coming to Canada.

"He told me that 'They locked me in (a small house) over there until somebody bring $500 for the head tax, and then they let me out,'" Yan said.

"Five hundred dollars, at that time, is big, huge money."

Jun first worked in kitchens as a dishwasher before becoming a cook. He lived in a hotel on Pender Street in Vancouver for 51 years, sending what money he made home to China to provide for the family he was separated from.

"I asked him, 'How come you stay in the hotel for so long?'" Yan recalled during an interview from his home in Calgary. "He said, 'Because I'm alone. I was alone.'"

The Canadian government largely believed Chinese immigrants to be bachelors, said Madokoro, but many like Jun had families in China.

His family relied on him. Over the years, he sent home enough money to build two houses for them in China.

He returned home periodically, and eventually married, but he wasn't able to bring his wife to Canada. Because she could not write, sending letters was difficult.

Madokoro said the Canadian government displayed a sort of wilful ignorance about severing family ties through its immigration ban.

"It was going to sort of wreck any opportunity for families to be together," she said.


cbc.caImmigration drives Canada's population to 40M
1:52


cbc.caChinese Canadians say they don’t need public hearings to tell them what they already know
8:10



Yan believes his father's formative years were long and lonely, and that didn't end when the legislation did.

When his first wife died, Jun married Yan's mother in China. Their daughter was born in 1940.

He returned to China for the last time in 1948, the year after the Chinese Immigration Act was repealed. He stayed long enough to see Yan's birth in December 1949, but by that point Communists had taken over the country.

Jun caught the last ship to Canada just two days after Yan was born.

"After that, I never ever met my dad until I came to Canada when I was 21," Yan said wistfully. His sister never saw their father again.

It shouldn't have taken that long — the Chinese diaspora in China had challenged the immigration ban and won. But the Communist revolution robbed many families of the ability to reunite after the Chinese Immigration Act was no longer in effect, Madokoro said.

"The combination of factors meant that the impact of this is across the generations, and for some people it's because they got stranded in the People's Republic of China and were unable to be reunited," she said.

It's impossible to know how many families were prevented from being together again — in most cases, there are no records of the spouses, children and parents who never made it to Canada.

Yan and his mother arrived in Hong Kong in 1961 when he was nearly 12, just a little younger than his father was when he first left for Canada.

Yan didn't have a birth certificate, so he was interrogated in a Canadian immigration office to prove he was his father's son before he was allowed to immigrate.

"To face a Canadian was so scary," Yan recalled. He was grilled about how many houses there were in his village, which direction the window in his room faced and where they got their water.

When his answers didn't match the ones his father gave, his immigration application was denied.

Jun and Yan lived apart another 10 years after that, and Yan never saw so much as a photo of his dad.

"The government was really mistrustful that people were who they said they were," Madokoro said. "But of course, we know that bureaucracies aren't perfect, and people got stuck."

The two were finally united in 1971 after a blood test confirmed their family ties.

Yan got a first glimpse of his father at the airport. He was 68 years old, dressed up in a suit and hat.

He opened his mouth to greet his father as Dad, but he felt no bond between them. "I try, but I can't," Yan remembered. "I can't call him 'Dad.' It was really hard."

"I know he loved me so much. So I feel sorry. I'm sorry," Yan said.

In the few years they spent together in Canada, Jun told his son about the discrimination he endured.

"I asked him 'Why do you dress up in a two-piece suit and put the hat, put a tie on? You're working in a kitchen,'" Yan said.

He remembered the answer all these years later: "I don't want people to look down on me."

Former prime minister Stephen Harper officially apologized in 2006 for the discriminatory laws and policies that tore families like Jun's apart, after decades of community campaigns demanding redress.

Symbolic payments were made to surviving head-tax payers and to the spouses of those who had already died.

Still, the legacy of those policies isn't over, Madokoro said.

Examples of anti-Asian hate, particularly anti-Chinese, flared up when the pandemic struck in 2020.

"To the best of my knowledge, there's never been overt legislation since 1923 that says an entire group cannot stay permanently in the country," Madokoro said. "We do, however, have different structures or different hierarchies when it comes to immigration."

She pointed to the temporary foreign worker program as an example.

"We still have an immigration system that privileges and prioritizes certain people for permanent migration and accepts, without too much question, the idea that other people are only suitable for their temporary labour," she said.

She said it's important not to think of the Chinese Immigration Act as a "dark chapter" that has closed, but rather to understand the stories of Jun and Yan — and countless others — as a continuing part of Canada's collective history.

It is still a part of the story of Yan's family.

He said he has forgiven Canada and is thankful for the life he enjoys in Calgary, where he has two daughters of his own.

When he looks at photos of his father, he doesn't see a man he knows well. But he does see a good man, who did what he could for a family he scarcely knew.

For that, Yan is grateful.

"That's why I tell young people, 'You take good care of your family,'" Yan said. "Nothing, nothing is more important than family."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 1, 2023.

Laura Osman, The Canadian Press


SEE
Ocasio-Cortez slams Alito for ‘corruption’ over student loan decision
Story by Jared Gans • Yesterday 


Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) slammed Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito for alleged “corruption” following the court’s rulings on President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program.

The court struck down the debt relief plan in a 6-3 ruling Friday, with the majority finding that the Biden administration had not received authorization from Congress to issue the thousands of dollars in loan forgiveness for many borrowers.

Alito has recently faced criticism surrounding an ethical controversy about a flight he took that was paid for by a major Republican donor. Progressives called on Alito to recuse himself from the two cases concerning the loan forgiveness program, as an organization that the donor leads filed an amicus brief supporting the challenges against the program.

“Justice Alito accepted tens of thousands of dollars in lavish vacation gifts from a billionaire who lobbied to cancel the student loan forgiveness,” Ocasio-Cortez said Friday following the ruling. “After the gifts, Alito voted to overturn. This SCOTUS’ corruption undercuts its own legitimacy by putting its rulings up for sale.”
Alito caught in crosshairs of latest Supreme Court scandal

Amid ethical controversies surrounding gifts that Justice Clarence Thomas accepted but did not publicly disclose, ProPublica published a report earlier this month that Alito went on a luxury fishing trip in 2008 with Paul Singer, a billionaire hedge fund leader and GOP donor who has had business before the court.

Alito admitted to accepting a seat on a private jet that Singer paid for and participating in cases in which a subsidiary of Singer’s hedge fund was involved, but he denied any wrongdoing.

Singer is the chairman of the Manhattan Institute, a conservative-leaning think tank that filed a brief along with the Cato Institute in support of the states that were challenging the forgiveness program. Student debt advocates called on Alito to recuse himself from the case as a result.

Democrats have responded to the ethical controversies surrounding Thomas and Alito by calling for new ethics reforms for the members of the court.

Ocasio-Cortez also argued that the court’s ruling does not take away Biden’s ability to pursue student loan forgiveness. She said Biden could use the Higher Education Act of 1965, which allows the education secretary to waive student loan repayment requirements.

“The Biden Admin can use the HEA (Higher Ed Act) – our position from the start – to continue loan forgiveness before payments resume. They should do so ASAP,” the New York lawmaker tweeted.

Biden is set to announce new actions Friday in response to the court’s ruling against his forgiveness program.

Canada forcing Northern communities to 'go back in time,' warns NWT premier

Story by Catherine Cullen • CBC


While many in the Arctic can no longer afford to feed themselves and others leave the North altogether, some federal cabinet ministers are only pretending to listen to the concerns of Northern Canadians, says the premier of the Northwest Territories.

"We're at a critical point. So it's nice to say that you care, but we need action behind those words. It's time for Canada to show they care about the most marginalized people," said Caroline Cochrane in an interview with CBC Radio's The House.

The stakes go beyond the well-being of the people who live in the North, according to the premier. In order for Canada to continue to assert sovereignty over the Arctic, people need to live, and stay, in the region, Cochrane said.

"The price of living in the Northwest Territories has gotten so high because of the supply chain issues that we're seeing. People are leaving," she said.

"We need people to move to the North so that we can ensure that the Arctic is safe … you can't talk sovereignty without having people in the land."

But that's a struggle with the high cost of food and lack of infrastructure such as hospitals, schools, roads and telecommunications.

Cochrane cited conversations she had on a recent trip to an Arctic community.

"They're telling me they can't feed their children, that they don't have enough money to make it, that the opportunities, the food and the stores are too expensive," she said.

"The traditional hunting that we're used to is disappearing because of climate change."

Cochrane has brought those concerns to federal ministers, but says at times "they pretend they listen, but they don't really hear. Then it's more than frustrating."

Cochrane said there's a funding issue, in particular because the Northwest Territories receives federal money based on population. She said that while a community like Grande Prairie, Alta. — with a population of just over 60,000 — will receive funding for a single municipality, her territory — with a population of approximately 45,000 — needs to spread funding across 33 municipalities.

"We are not getting ahead. In fact Canada is actually forcing us to go back in time," she said.

"People are hungry, the cost of living has hit everyone in Canada, and unless there's substantial funding to the North, then I'm worried about what's going to happen to families up there, because we can't afford to be there any longer."

Some of the concerns about the federal government ring true for Natan Obed, leader of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, a nonprofit that represents Inuit in Canada.

"There are times when I have seen leadership from the prime minister and ministers of this government all the way down to officials within federal departments who, if they so choose, can move these issues forward," he said.

Related video: Provinces, territories sign on to national climate adaptation strategy (cbc.ca) Duration 2:02 View on Watch

"And then on the other side, you can use bureaucracy to stall and to say that there isn't money there, things aren't possible," he said.

Obed said that while Ottawa has made some progress on issues affecting Inuit in recent years, the work is far from over — and the stakes are high for the country. He called on the government to do more to support housing and infrastructure in Inuit communities.

"What we see in the housing crisis, and what we see with the idea of Arctic sovereignty — Canada is an unfinished space. It is a country that is still growing into itself, and sometimes, for ease, the government of Canada imagines that that process is already complete," he said.

"We are the bedrock of Arctic sovereignty for Canada, and it just never has really sunk in for the government or those who make the decisions in relation to defence."

'We have not done enough,' minister says

The minister for Northern affairs, Dan Vandal, told The House that he is listening to concerns Northerners are raising, but he said the challenges faced by the North will take decades to address.

"We have not done enough. I think if you talk to every minister, every minister will, and every MP will realize we have not done enough," he said.

"But at the same time we've done more than any government in history in investing in northern issues as well as investing in partnership with Indigenous governments and Indigenous peoples all over the north."

Vandal said that when he travels to the region, people most often mention housing, infrastructure and food security as the most pressing issues.


Northern Affairs Minister Dan Vandal said in an interview with The House that addressing issues facing the north, such as a lack of housing, will take decades. (David Gunn/CBC)© Provided by cbc.ca

He added that the government knows meeting those needs will be a challenge, but said Ottawa is up to the task.

"We've been doing everything we possibly can over the last two years, but it's going to take substantial, long-term investments and partnership with Indigenous governments, with territorial governments, with local leaders and local citizens to really turn that corner,"

"It's going to take longer than four or five years. It'll take 20 years, but we are committed to continue doing this work as long as we possibly can."

Mining critical minerals is a potential source of prosperity for the Northwest Territories.

But, Cochrane said, a lack of infrastructure is stifling that opportunity in her territory, which has a long history of mining.

"We don't have road systems to get to those critical minerals," she said.

"If you have to fly everything into the mines, if you can't get the infrastructure, clean energy into the mines, then I'm afraid we're going to be left behind in that as well."

While building the necessary roads will be expensive, Cochrane said it will pay off over the long-term.

"If Canada's talking about reconciliation, if Canada's talking about arctic sovereignty and arctic safety, then they need to make sure that they are doing their part to protect people in the North, to give us the same opportunities as people in the south," she said.

"It's time."








The Intersection of First Nation Treaties and Metis Self-Government
Story by The Canadian Press • 1h ago






(ANNews) – On National Indigenous Peoples Day (NIPD) the Federal Government introduced Bill C-53 or Recognition of Certain Métis Governments in Alberta, Ontario and Saskatchewan and Métis Self-Government Act in the House of Commons. This piece of federal legislation is intended to enshrine recent self-government agreements enacted by various Metis organizations.

The Act utilizes a general application of the inherent right to self-government that exists within the Supreme Court of Canada’s definition of s.35, a right which was born from the outfall of the 1995 Quebec separatist referendum. During that tumultuous time, First Nations in Quebec took opposition to the province’s unilateral claim to their lands and resources. This opposition was strengthened by Quebec’s long-standing contestment of the Constitution Act of 1982, and its claim that they had never entered into Confederation, one of the tools that other provinces have relied upon to undermine Aboriginal title.

With the introduction of Bill C-53, we seem to be poised for another Constitutional conflict in Indian country. Over a number of years, in an attempt to gain further legitimacy and partnership with the Federal government, Metis organizations have been completing self-government processes. These processes involve management of membership outside of Federal determinations of metisness, as well as the ability to enter into claims processes like the problematic Specific Claims Policy imposed upon First Nations.

For First Nations leaders, the Act is seen as another affront to their negotiations regarding long-standing land disputes and past harms. In numerous press releases and statements, First Nations leaders like the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs (UBCIC) were clear to state that their opposition of the legislation is not directed towards Metis individuals, but rather what has been coined as “Metis Colonization.” For many, they see these new agreements as another process to carve out lands and resources, as well as allow other governing organizations to add to an already detrimental consultation regime and process.

Related video: Ann's Eye: military members join First Nations for a powwow (cbc.ca)
Duration 2:35  View on Watch


In Alberta, the issue becomes even murkier when one is aware of the background of prominent Treaty arrangements, like Treaty No. 8. It is a little known fact that when the Treaty was entered into in 1899 on the shores of Lesser Slave Lake, scores of what the government described as Metis people were admitted to the Treaty. It was approximately 40 years later that the government attempted to rectify this issue by establishing a commission and removing Metis individuals from Treaty rolls – an action that only added to the confusion and created real legal questions.

These legal questions will continue to make their way through the Court with members of the Wabun Tribal Council filing a judicial review of the Metis Nation of Ontario’s self-government agreement in March of this year – with the next hearing set for August 8 & 9, 2023. However, with Bill C-53 having received its first and second reading, it remains a possibility that the Federal Government passes this legislation before then. If that is the case, there is little doubt that First Nations will continue to push their opposition forward, with the ultimate decision resting with the Supreme Court of Canada.

In any event, the conflict and disagreements at present may also highlight a failure of governments past and present to properly negotiate with Indigenous peoples. It may also signal a failure of the Court to provide the clarifications necessary to ensure obligations outlined in agreements like the numbered Treaties are upheld by all parties. There are serious questions regarding which side of the Treaty people sit on, and who they owe obligations to. Questions which are fundamental to determining exactly what Canada is and whose land is it anyway.

Rob Houle, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Alberta Native News
Maine governor vetoes proposal sought by tribes to ensure they benefit from federal laws


AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — Democratic Gov. Janet Mills delivered a setback to Native American tribes seeking greater sovereignty in Maine, vetoing a proposal on Friday that aimed to ensure many federal laws apply to them despite a state land claims settlement that dates back decades.

The governor said she doesn't want the tribes in Maine to be unfairly excluded from federal benefits enjoyed by other tribes across the country. But she argued that the bill sponsored by Democratic House Speaker Rachel Talbot Ross is vague and confusing — and will lead to protracted litigation.

Expressing distrust of the governor's motives, Penobscot Nation Chief Kirk Francis urged lawmakers to disregard her arguments, some of which he called “disingenuous.”

"I’m confident in our friends and allies to make sure that we continue to work hard to get this over the finish line," Francis told reporters on Friday. Both the Maine House and Senate approved the bill with bipartisan majorities that were big enough to override the governor's veto.

The administration contends the bill could “modify” Maine laws governing public health, safety and welfare on tribal lands. The administration also says just a few federal laws don’t apply to the tribes in Maine — only four or five — but the tribes haven't been interested in engaging with negotiations on a case-by-case basis.

There have been lengthy lawsuits even when the law, in the attorney general’s view, is clearly spelled out under the settlement.

For the tribes, it has been a long, frustrating journey since they traded some rights to the state under an $81.5 million settlement that was signed by President Jimmy Carter in 1980.

The settlement for the Passamaquoddy, Penobscot and Maliseet, along with a 1991 agreement for the Mi’kmaq, stipulates they’re bound by state law and treated like municipalities in many cases.

That means tribes in Maine get some state benefits like education dollars. But they’re treated differently than the other 570 federally recognized tribes across the country that deal directly with the federal government. This has led to disagreements over issues like water rights and environmental issues.

On Thursday, Mills urged the tribes, the attorney general and other parties to work together to craft a better proposal that is “clear, thoroughly vetted, and well understood by all parties.”

Francis, the Penobscot Nation chief, said he thinks the governor wants “to protect an old guard and old mindset” by maintaining the status quo. He predicted she would be Maine's last governor to impede tribal progress.

The tribes received a key endorsement from state Senate President Troy Jackson, who urged fellow lawmakers to think about their legacies and “stay true to the original vote”

“With all due respect to the chief executive, the time has come and passed for us to rectify our laws and honor the inherent sovereignty of the Wabanaki Nations,” he said in a statement. The Wabanaki tribes are the Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Mi’kmaq and Maliseet in Maine.

To ensure broad support of the legislation, the proposal specifically carved out certain federal laws including the Clean Water Act, Indian Mineral Development Act, Water Quality Act and Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. But the governor contends the bill’s language conflicts with the stated goal of exempting those laws.

Republican Rep. John Andrews said the bill is a “basic liberty issue” and urged Republicans to overturn the veto. Maulian Bryant, president of the Wabanaki Alliance and Penobscot Nation ambassador, noted an outpouring of support and said “Mainers understand fairness and equity.”

In March, tribal leaders in Maine used their first address to the state Legislature in two decades to call for greater autonomy after a broader sovereignty proposal stalled last year.

___

Follow David Sharp on Twitter @David_Sharp_AP

David Sharp, The Associated Press
Canada calls on Israel to reverse thousands of West Bank settlement approvals

Story by CBC/Radio-Canada • Yesterday 

A view of the Israeli settlement of Kedar, in the West Bank, on Monday. Israel's far-right government on Monday approved plans to build thousands of new homes in the occupied West Bank, a move that threatened to worsen increasingly strained relations with the United States.
© Ohad Zwigenberg/The Associated Press

The Canadian government has joined a chorus of allies condemning Israel's approval of more than 5,700 settlement units in the occupied West Bank, a move that comes amid surging violence in the region.

In a joint statement with her Australian and U.K. counterparts Friday, Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly says she is gravely concerned by the move.

"The continued expansion of settlements is an obstacle to peace and negatively impacts efforts to achieve a negotiated two-state solution," says the statement.

"We call on the government of Israel to reverse these decisions."

On Monday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right coalition government approved more than 5,700 new settlement units in the West Bank.

Much of the international community sees the settlements, built on land captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war, as illegal and inflammatory.

Their presence is one of the fundamental issues in the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The temperature has been on the rise over the past 15 months amid Palestinian street attacks and Israeli settler aggression.

"The cycle of violence in Israel and the West Bank must be broken," said Friday's joint statement.

"We are also deeply troubled by the continued violence and loss of life in Israel and in the West Bank."

The statement says the three countries "unequivocally condemn" the terrorist attack on June 20 in Eli targeting Israeli civilians and the "reprehensible and ongoing settler violence targeting Palestinians."

Earlier this week the U.S. also condemned the new settlements.

Peace talks aimed at establishing a Palestinian state in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza collapsed in 2014.

Australia, Canada, UK ‘deeply concerned’ over Israeli settlements

The continued expansion of settlements is an obstacle to peace, the three countries said in a joint statement.

A billboard advertising housing projects hangs on a hill in the West Bank Jewish settlement of Ariel near the Palestinian town of Nablus 
[File: Ariel Schalit/AP Photo]

Published On 1 Jul 2023

The governments of Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom have said they are “deeply concerned” about recent events in the occupied West Bank, including Israel’s decision to expand its illegal settlements there amid rising violence, saying they “further reduce the prospects for peace”.

“The continued expansion of settlements is an obstacle to peace and negatively impacts efforts to achieve a negotiated two-state solution. We call on the Government of Israel to reverse these decisions,” the foreign ministers of the three countries said in a joint statement released on Saturday.

Israel’s defence ministry planning committee that oversees settlement construction approved more than 5,000 new settlement homes on June 26. Settlements are considered illegal under international law.

US ‘deeply troubled’ by major settlement expansion in Israel

The foreign ministers’ statement also expressed concern about the changes to the settlement approval process approved on June 18, in which far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich was given sweeping powers to expedite their construction, bypassing measures that have been in place for 27 years.

The settlement expansion plans have occurred as violence in the region has intensified in recent weeks.

On June 19, Israeli forces stormed the Jenin refugee camp, deploying the use of helicopter gunships in the occupied West Bank for the first time in 20 years. That raid killed seven Palestinians and injured 91 others.
Palestinian gunmen then targeted Israelis, while Israeli settlers carried out a string of attacks on Palestinian villages.

The Australian, Canadian and British governments condemned violence targeting both Israelis and Palestinians.

They also welcomed the joint statement by Israeli security chiefs equating the Israeli settler attacks to “nationalist terrorism”.

Nearly 750,000 Israelis live in 250 illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, built on land captured by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War.


SOURCE: AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES
LIKE AN OLD TESTAMENT KING
Ex-aide: John Kelly was disgusted as Trump wondered what it might be like to have sex with Ivanka

Story by Tatyana Tandanpolie • Wednesday

Donald Trump Ivanka Trump 1413601062Bill Tompkins/Getty Images© Provided by Salon

Former President Donald Trump committed acts of "naked sexism" and made lewd comments about women — including his own daughter — working in his administration, according to the former aide who in 2018 anonymously published a scathing op-ed about Trump in The New York Times.

Miles Taylor, a former chief of staff in the Department of Homeland Security, detailed several incidents of the former president's behavior in his forthcoming book "Blowback: A Warning to Save Democracy from the Next Trump," an excerpt of which was obtained by Newsweek.

"Aides said he talked about Ivanka Trump's breasts, her backside, and what it might be like to have sex with her, remarks that once led John Kelly to remind the president that Ivanka was his daughter," Taylor writes in the "Blowback."

"Afterward, Kelly retold that story to me in visible disgust. Trump, he said, was 'a very, very evil man," Taylor added

Related
"It was really bad": Two ex-aides say they witnessed Trump's sexual harassment in the White House

The revelations in Taylor's book follow other former staffers telling media last month that they witnessed and reported Trump's inappropriate behavior toward women while at the White House. Last month a New York jury also found Trump liable of sexually abusing and defaming columnist E. Jean Carroll. Trump has denied any wrongdoing in the case and is appealing the jury's judgement.

"There still are quite a few female leaders from the Trump administration who have held their tongues about the unequal treatment they faced in the administration at best, and the absolute naked sexism they experienced with the hands of Donald Trump at worst," Taylor told Newsweek.

In the book, Taylor described witnessing Trump's "undisguised sexism" toward women of varying ranks in his administration, several instances occurring in meetings with the former president and former Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen.

"When we were with him, Kirstjen did her best to ignore the president's inappropriate behavior," Taylor writes. "He called her 'sweetie' and 'honey,' and critiqued her makeup and outfits."

In those moments, he claims Nielsen would whisper to him. "Trust me, this is not a healthy workplace for women."

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

He also recounted how Kellyanne Conway, who served as a senior counselor, once characterized Trump as a "misogynistic bully" following a meeting where he berated several female officials of his White House. A source familiar with the March 2019 meeting told Newsweek that Trump had snapped at Nielsen and other staffers about the border.

"That is a lie," another source, who works in Conway's office, told the outlet. "Despite trying to resuscitate the 15 minutes of fame, Miles Taylor should have stayed 'Anonymous.'"

In another instance, Taylor recalled how Trump commented on then-press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders' appearance when he mistakenly thought he saw her standing outside the room during an Oval Office meeting.

"Whoops," Trump responded when he realized the person was one of his assistants, according to Taylor. "I was going to say, 'Man, Sarah, you've lost a lot of weight!'"

Trump has a documented history of making what many say are inappropriate comments about his daughter going as far back as the early-to-mid-2000s. In a 2006 appearance on the The View alongside Ivanka Trump, the former president said that "if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her. Isn't that terrible? How terrible? Is that terrible?"

"She's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father...," he reportedly said in a September 2015 interview with Rolling Stone.

But Ivanka Trump defended her father in a 2016 interview with CBS News, asserting that he is "not a groper," has "total respect for women" and "believes ultimately in merit."

Taylor said he fears Trump, who is the current frontrunner for the GOP nomination, and his behavior could be much worse if elected to a second term.

"He's a pervert, he's difficult to deal with," the source told Newsweek. "This is still the same man and, incredibly, we're considering electing him to the presidency again."
Arizona is running out of water. Big Tech data centers are partly to blame.

Story by insider@insider.com (Alistair Barr) • Yesterday 


Sun City, Arizona. halbergman/Getty Images© Provided by Business Insider

Arizona is running out of water.

Governor Katie Hobbs plans to limit construction in and around Phoenix due to a lack of groundwater.
The area has several data centers that use lots of water. Google is planning yet another big one.

I fell in love in Arizona in the early 1990s. If I close my eyes, I can still see my girlfriend (now wife) hiking through the Superstition Mountains east of Phoenix wearing a half top.

The other thing I remember is how damn hot and dry it was.

So it surprised me, years later, when I heard Google was planning a massive data center in Mesa, just east of Phoenix. The deal guaranteed Google 1 million gallons of water a day to cool the facility, and up to 4 million gallons a day if it hit project milestones. (That's a lot of water. Arizona residents each use about 146 gallons a day). I was an editor at Bloomberg at the time and we wrote about it here.

Since then, the Phoenix metro area has been dubbed "THE data center destination" by locals. Microsoft opened one in 2021 in Arizona. Meta is expanding its facility in Mesa.

These huge data centers use incredible amounts of water because the computing gear inside gets really hot when it processes all those YouTube videos, Zoom meetings, and mobile app sessions. Water is often used to cool the equipment.

Google has started disclosing data on this. In 2021, all the company's data centers consumed 4.34 billion gallons of water. That's so much, the company tried to put it all in context by comparing itself to that bastion of environmental stewardship: Golf courses. Google noted that 4.34 billion gallons are equivalent to the annual water footprint of 29 golf courses in the southwest US.

This brings us back to Arizona. The state is running out of water. A few weeks ago, the governor unveiled a plan to limit construction in areas around Phoenix after finding that the groundwater can't support the current pace of building.

There are many reasons for this. But these data centers have a part to play in Arizona's water shortage. And that doesn't even include Google's Mesa facility, which hasn't been finished yet. So more water will probably be sucked out of the state soon.

The governor's new limits exclude thousands of already approved developments, so Google will probably get its facility done if it wants it. I asked the company about this and it said the project is still alive. "While we do not have a confirmed timeline for development for the site, we want to ensure we have the option to grow further, should our business demand it," Google stated.

Why do big tech companies build data centers in the middle of a desert? It would be better to place them in colder areas that have more water, right?

Unfortunately, speed often trumps the environment here. Putting data centers close to large populations is more important. The closer you are to users, the faster your internet services respond. Faster means more usage, which means more digital ads and cloud services sold, and higher revenue.

The Phoenix metro area has 5 million residents and has been growing fast, so the data centers follow. Even if there's not enough water.

Google, Microsoft, and Meta are working to find more sustainable ways to cool their data centers. They are also spending real money and effort on water conservation projects. But there's only so much you can do to fight the reality of blisteringly hot, dry Arizona days.

Microsoft said in 2021 that its Arizona data centers would use "zero water" for cooling using adiabatic cooling, which uses outside air instead of water. That only works, though, when temperatures are below 85F. It's going to be 113F in Phoenix this weekend — a little too hot for a hike.