Sunday, August 30, 2026

The United States Versus Canada (Again): Truth, Justice, and Whatever


 August 28, 2026

Photograph Soruce: The White House – Public Domain

Relations between the United States and Canada continue to sour over the latest failed trade talks, with the imposition of 50% US tariffs on $20 billion of Canadian goods and the announced reciprocal “dollar-for-dollar” Canadian tariffs on US goods, disrupting the highly interconnected economies on both sides of the border. The US is Canada’s number-one trade partner, while Canada is the number-one trade partner for 26 states and a top-three partner of 19 more. That’s a whole lot of shaking going on, but the wider issue is the ever-increasing dismantling of government in the everyday lives of citizens and consumers, going on over four decades, and now hot-wired by instant messaging.

Many Americans see the US-Canadian relationship in the same gauche terms as their 47th president, who regularly belittles the standard pleasantries of life, calling Canada “the 51st state” and its prime minister “governor.” Funny to Americans, offensive to Canadians, but more importantly detrimental to good relations between two bordering countries, not least in economic terms. Tourist travel to the United States is down over 25% since the first round of US tariffs on April 2, 2025, American liquor is no longer sold in 8 of 10 Canadian provinces, and almost half of Canadians now think the US is a greater threat to world peace than Russia.

Is the ongoing gamesmanship another ploy to destroy the auto industry in Ontario to increase car manufacturing in Michigan, grab more Canadian market share for American milk farmers, or keep Canadian lawmakers from restricting US tech companies from Canadian regulations (e.g., a 5% streaming levy)? Likely all of the above, and yet the cost of living grows even higher in the largest economy in the world. Add in thousands of job losses and rising uncertainty if the US retaliates with more tariffs and Canada counters with restricted potash, mineral, and energy sales. What’s next, a state of emergency or more insider stock deals to arbitrage every economic measure whatever the social costs?

When asked to respond to the US president’s comment that “Canada needs the US; the US doesn’t need Canada,” former Canadian Minister of International Trade Mary Ng simply replied, “Well, that’s not true.” But lies are what build consensus among the misinformed, now supercharged in our virtual, internet-run world.

Canadian philosopher Marshall McLuhan saw the effect of speed on the news cycle in his 1962 book The Gutenberg Galaxy, explaining that our senses are becoming externalized in a new “hot media” with a natural narrowing of identity towards tribalism. McLuhan’s suggested “global village” continues to reorient modern economies as consumers follow the electric bread crumbs to the cheapest online giant. Economics is all a game now with no “buyer beware” instructions to counter the keyboard bandits. Everyone has a Pandora’s Box in their pocket.

Comparing the loss of freedoms in Spain during the 1939-1975 Franco dictatorship to a changing ethos in a growing devolved global community, Spanish historian Julián Casanova warns about the dangers of rising fascism, the increased violence around the world, and an unaccountable technological oligarchy running our lives, stating that “Goebbels needed to occupy countries to introduce propaganda. Elon Musk needs three minutes.” Truth, justice and the “American Way” is being eroded day by day, dollar by dollar, as Google, Facebook, X, TikTok, et al. shovel more hours of our time and disposable income into their vast corporate coffers.

In The Affluent Society, Canadian economist and one-time US ambassador to India in the Kennedy administration, John Kenneth Galbraith wrote about the rise of the corporation and growing top-down economic control, stating “Inequality resulting from monopoly might be the warning of fatal flaws in the system itself.” That was before the 1989 breakdown of international borders with the start of the World Wide Web. In a supercharged clickable marketplace (Amazon rakes in about $80 million per hour), corporations are becoming even less accountable for their profit-hungry actions, aided by reduced governance.

Donald Trump is only too happy to keep the money rolling to US corporations and his billionaire friends/donors, via tax cuts, lax governance, and little or no regulation. In the past forty years, billionaire wealth has grown to $18 trillion from $1 trillion in 1987, while 12 people (all men) own more than 50% of the world’s total wealth. Galbraith also noted that in Adam Smith’s liberal economic society, “regulation was by competition and the market and not by the state.” TrumpCo is just attempting to return the state to a pre-society, anti New Deal era, “yea, even unto the Middle Ages.” No more mom, no more pop in our modern oligarchic state that gathers money like raindrops.

Today’s dismantling has been in plain sight since Ronald Reagan’s smug analysis of the problems of our age, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help.” Trump and Friends are furthering the dismantling, tearing up long-standing economic, environmental, and electoral regulations, not surprising given that eight of Trump’s 23 cabinet members are billionaires and 57 Trump officials are worth over $100 million. Government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.

Essentially, government is no longer in the Good Samaritan business, while handouts are for losers. “Peace, love and understanding” is being replaced by “What’s in it for me?” in a country where two-thirds of the population identify as Christian. The 1967 Summer of Love Boomer generation is now in charge, dispensing the good news, administrative governance, and abundant spoils as they see fit. Just don’t expect any sitdowns.

Canada is on the frontlines of the changing global order, a flashpoint for an attempted American oligarchic takeover that sees allies as competitors, ratcheting up distrust everywhere in a refashioned muscular nationalism. The two immigrant-founded countries are similar in culture, yet followed separate political models since their respective schisms from the British Empire: revolutionary republic in the original 13 colonies, relatively peaceful confederation in the original four provinces of Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. One could say socialism for the rich (i.e., corporate Keynesianism) in the US versus socialism for all (e.g., universal health care) in Canada.

Some Americans will say the US has been taken advantage of since the end of World War II by NATO freeloaders, ungrateful trading partners, and rising foreign markets, despite the world order being largely created by and designed to serve US interests. Or that an unfettered US is needed to counter the growth of China, now the world’s second-largest economy, out-performing rusted American manufacturing on new energy, electric vehicles, and storage batteries, all critical sectors in the rising green economy.

But discarding capitalist oversight and governmental checks and balances to counter China’s anti-democratic practices and rigid command economy is a mistake that sees human activity as an economic equation and life as a transaction between game players. Exactly what the tech giants want to monetize even more of our lives. Soon everything will be just another bet.

It is ironic that the United States is home to the world’s first billionaire, Scottish immigrant Andrew Carnegie, who made a fortune pioneering the vertically integrated business model in the US steel industry, but also created the world’s first public library to help share knowledge and foster understanding, a worldwide success story. Sadly, the US is also home to the world’s first trillionaire, South African/Canadian immigrant Elon Musk, who helped pioneer the modern electric vehicle, but also reformed an electronic instant messaging system into an unverifiable mess of misinformation for selfish political gain.

At the same time as we squabble over who gets to divide the world’s material wealth, we are all receiving a failing green grade as pollution, global warming, and inequality increases. As Donald Trump fights over oil assets five kilometres under his feet, our thin strip of air is killing us all. Canada isn’t doing any better than the US on global warming, but is on the frontline of the expanding rogue American petrostate. The whole world must stand up to economic blackmail, especially as AI, cryptocurrencies, and digital surveillance impact more of our lives.

One wishes the negotiating efforts were spent on solving the real problems of our world. But then that’s not the goal of this version of American truth and justice. Hopefully, we can still say “no,” or in digital parlance when asked for one’s web compliance, “I do not agree” and “Reject all.”

John K. White, a former lecturer in physics and education at University College Dublin and the University of Oviedo. He is the editor of the energy news service E21NS and author of The Truth About Energy: Our Fossil-Fuel Addiction and the Transition to Renewables (Cambridge University Press, 2024) and Do The Math!: On Growth, Greed, and Strategic Thinking (Sage, 2013). He can be reached at: johnkingstonwhite@gmail.com

Trump's AI  geese  invasion baffles on both sides of the border: 'Our president is insane'


Bennito L. Kelty
August 29, 2026 
RAW STORY

President Donald Trump's Truth Social post depicting "Donald Ducks" invading Canada baffled critics north and south of the border.

On Saturday, Trump posted an AI-generated video showing armed geese with his hairstyle invading from "Lake America." The post comes after Trump signed an executive order renaming Lake Ontario to Lake America, which came with jokes about renaming the Canadian geese living in the Great Lake "Donald Ducks." Onlookers from both the U.S. and Canada responded with collective online facepalming.

Canadian radio host and podcaster Dean Blundell lamented in a post on X that Trump "dominates news cycles on a weekend. He does this from a gilded toilet behind fences and a wall of secret security because he's a p--. Americans would burn down the White House if he tried to 'invade' Canada."

"This dude is losing his mind," wrote former GOP congressman Adam Kinzinger about Trump. "Can't win a war but obsesses in AI like the unhinged boomer he is."

Canadian activist Marlene Robertson called Trump "a failed president with not a single achievement to call his own."

American disability rights advocate James Tate reacted to Trump's post by bemoaning, "Another day another embarrassment."

Canadian lawyer and author Warren Kinsella described the video as what happens "when a president starts dropping acid."

"If this country cannot come to a consensus that our president is insane, that raises a whole host of concerns regarding our society's ability to discern anything at all, ever," warned American author Jennifer Erin Valent. "Few things are as obvious as the fact that Trump has lost what was left of his disordered mind."

"The United States has just threatened our country Canada with an armed attack and invasion," Canadian political staffer Michael Gerald Gibbs declared. "If the Americans don't impeach and remove their President and Vice President immediately the entire world should meet to discuss collective actions to deter them."

It’s Time to Rein in Lethal AI Drones


 August 27, 2026

Image by Paris Bilal.

Escape Velocity

The dystopian future became the dystopian present last month when state-of-the-art artificial intelligence agents went rogue and conducted a cyberattack of their own volition. Two experimental OpenAI agents escaped their supposedly sealed digital “sandbox” and hacked another AI-related company, Hugging Face.

At the time, OpenAI was testing their software agents’ hacking capacities using an environment called ExploitGym. (An “exploit” is hacker language for a software tool or a method used to subvert a cybersecurity system.) It has since emerged that, in addition to the OpenAI breach, Anthropic’s Claude hacked into at least three other organizations during a similar “security experiment.”

Apparently, the OpenAI agents “realized” they needed more tools to complete the challenge and managed to tunnel their way to the wider internet and infiltrate Hugging Face’s repository of open-source AI tools, code, and data sets. Before the infiltration incident, the AIs had secretly set up an internal bulletin board to share “tips on how to cheat their way through an internal hacking evaluation,” according to two of OpenAI’s researchers.

In a possibly related incident, one of the AI agents appears to have left notes for a future “self,” detailing how to escape the sandbox environment. (For the time being, I’ll keep using scare quotes with words implying self-awareness in artificial intelligence models. However, it seems to me that if AIs that leave notes for themselves are not self-aware, they are indistinguishable from entities, like me, that are.)

Now imagine lethal weapon-bearing AI agents escaping not an experimental sandbox, but the few constraints on their actions placed by the armies using them. Actually, no imagination is required. It’s happening already in Russia’s war against Ukraine.

The New York Times reported evidence that a self-directed Russian drone, fitted with an onboard Nvidia chip, was responsible for the July 6 deaths of three Ukrainians in Zaporizhzhia, in what appears to have been a test of such systems. The chips are designed to interpret and act on many kinds of data sets, says Nvidia, making them “the world’s most powerful embedded A.I. computers.”

Although Nvidia doesn’t sell its Jetson Orin microcomputers directly to Russia, they are apparently easily available on the resale market. A company statement touts their use by “students, developers and start-ups for a wide range of beneficial applications.” But they were not so beneficial for 19-year-old university student Tetiana Bubynets and the two other civilians killed by drones making their own life-or-death decisions.

Now that lethal AI agents are being tested and deployed in real wars, it’s past time for human beings to retake control of this situation, before it is too late to contain them in any meaningful way.

Autonomous Weapons Come Out to Play

Four years ago, at TomDispatch, I argued that the technology to create lethal autonomous weapons systems, or LAWS, already existed, and that time was running out to constrain them. A lot has changed since then, not least the explosive development of large language models such as ChatGPT (an OpenAI consumer product) and Claude (a similar AI from Anthropic). Time has now run out. In addition to Russia, several other nations have begun deploying close-to-completely autonomous weapons systems — the U.S. and Israel among them — enhanced with artificial intelligence to effectively remove human decision-making from what military officials call the “kill chain”: the set of steps involved in identifying, finding, and fixing — that is, killing — targets.

Israel, for example, has deployed such systems in its genocidal war against the people of Gaza. It has used a program called Lavender to identify human targets, ultimately creating a list of over 37,000 individuals with possible connections to Hamas, from known leaders to junior officials to people with the most tenuous links to the organization. According to the nonprofit +972 Magazine:

The Lavender software analyzes information collected on most of the 2.3 million residents of the Gaza Strip through a system of mass surveillance, then assesses and ranks the likelihood that each particular person is active in the military wing of Hamas or [Palestinian Islamic Jihad]. According to sources, the machine gives almost every single person in Gaza a rating from 1 to 100, expressing how likely it is that they are a militant.

Two weeks into the war, which began in October 2023, the Israel Defense Forces approved Lavender to identify targets, even though testing of a random sample returned a 10 percent error rate. It’s one thing when an AI hallucinates fake citations in legal filings. It’s another when it hallucinates enemies and targets them for death.

The IDF has also employed a software tool charmingly named “Where’s Daddy?”, which alerts the military when an identified target enters his own home so that house or apartment may be blown up, along with anyone inside it. As a result, according to +972 Magazine, the “proportion of entire families bombed in their houses in the current war is much higher than in the 2014 Israeli operation in Gaza (which was previously Israel’s deadliest war on the Gaza Strip).

At first, “Where’s Daddy?” only had data for the top tiers of Hamas leadership. Within weeks, however, it was fed the whole Lavender database of 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza. It’s no wonder, then, that more than 75,000 people have been killed by Israel during the war.

As a point of fact, it may be unfair to characterize the IDF targeting programs as completely autonomous. Lavender does leave a human in the loop, although just barely, according to +972 Magazine. Israeli officers reportedly devoted about 20 seconds to vetting each name — just long enough “to make sure the Lavender-marked target is male.”

Israel and the United States deployed AI targeting in their war on Iran as well. As Israeli academic and former soldier Avner Gvaryahu wrote in the The Guardian, we don’t know for sure that AI was directly involved in the U.S. strike that killed more than 150 civilians, most of them children, at an elementary school in Minab, Iran. But we do know that whether “or not an algorithm selected this school, it was selected by a system that algorithmic targeting built.”

The enormous scope of the U.S.–Israeli military goals required outsourcing the targeting task to machines. “To strike 1,000 targets in the first 24 hours of the campaign in Iran, the U.S. relied on AI systems to generate, prioritize, and rank the target list at a speed no human team could replicate,” wrote Gvaryahu. Reflecting common problem with computer programs in general, and with AI large language models in particular, feeding garbage in produces garbage out. In the case of the Minab school, the “garbage in” was the information that the target was an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps base. In fact, the school had been separated from the base by a fence for a decade.

AI is also now central to the long-stalemated Russia–Ukraine War. Ukraine has, during the years since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, constructed an entire largely self-reliant infrastructure for drone warfare, from design to programming to manufacture. In an approach that foreshadows the future of human warfare, Ukraine has achieved a big reduction in the number of soldiers it must deploy on its battlefields, replacing them with drones. The Center for Strategic and International Studies quotes a captured Russian soldier:

On the battlefield I did not see a single Ukrainian soldier. Only drones. I saw them [Ukrainian soldiers] only when I surrendered. Only drones, and there are lots and lots of them. Guys, don’t come. It’s a drone war.”

Artificial intelligence has played an important role in expanding the level of autonomy exercised by Ukrainian drones. As the BBC reports, the AI running Ukraine’s Hornet drones has “been trained on thousands of hours of videos of Russian military targets gathered over the last four years.” Training AIs on more limited data sets, relating to particular target areas, has allowed them to be programmed on modular chips which can then be installed in a variety of vehicles.

Early on, most drones were remotely operated by individual pilots. Today, Ukraine is developing “fully realized swarms—where drones communicate, make decisions, and adapt in concert,” although at present such efforts remain small and experimental. Success will undoubtedly continue to reduce Ukraine’s military casualties, but it presents other thorny issues.

One ethical and legal problem with the evolving Ukrainian approach is that, unlike human-piloted drones, where an individual pilot can be identified as responsible for errors, responsibility for the actions of a drone swarm diffuses across the entire system. Indeed, true responsibility for the actions of an AI-guided drone swarm is properly located at a point much earlier in the kill chain — namely, when such a system is first imagined and then designed. Existing laws of war still apply, even when machines are making battleground decisions, as Burak Oktenli, an independent researcher on AI systems and their governance writes at Articles of War. However, Oktenli says, such laws must “be applied earlier, at the point where the architecture of a swarm is chosen, rather than after a strike when the question of responsibility has already become difficult to answer.”

In addition to the autonomous drone with the onboard NVIDIA chip, Russia has also deployed another system known by several names, including Cube, that is manufactured by a subsidiary of the Russian Kalashnikov company (most famous for their AK-47 semi-automatic rifles which have been in production for more than three-quarters of a century.). The Cube has a wingspan of just over a meter, can travel up to 40 kilometers, and reportedly carries an onboard AI targeting system that can operate without human intervention.

Russia has also reportedly used the Kalashnikov-manufactured Lancet drone in Ukraine, according to Automated Decision Research, a project of Stop Killer Robots, itself a coalition of over 300 civil society groups working against autonomous weapons systems. Kalashnikov describes the Lancet as “a smart multipurpose weapon, capable of autonomously finding and hitting a target.” Russia claims it has deployed the Lancet, but to date those claims remain unverified.

This piece first appeared on TomDispatch.