Wednesday, November 08, 2023

ALBERTA SEPERATIST WANTS TO JOIN U$A
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith to share stage with former Fox host Tucker Carlson




CALGARY — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is set to share a stage in January with a right-wing news commentator who has defended a white-supremacist theory and spread misinformation about the war in Ukraine.

Tucker Carlson, who was fired by Fox News earlier this year, is scheduled to appear at a sit-down luncheon at the Telus Convention Centre in Calgary on Jan. 24.

An itinerary posted on Carlson's website said he will make remarks before being interviewed by a local businessman and having a conversation with Smith.

The premier's office confirmed Tuesday that Smith plans to attend Carlson's event in Calgary.

"The premier participates in a variety of public and private events and does interviews with dozens of reporters, broadcasters and podcasters from across the political spectrum," press secretary Sam Blackett said in an emailed statement.

"Obviously, she does not subscribe to every view of every interviewer or reporter she speaks with whether that's the CBC, the Toronto Star, or Tucker Carlson. 

"The premier aims to share Alberta's message with as many people as possible whether they're from Alberta, Canada or around the world."

Opposition NDP Leader Rachel Notley said Carlson has attacked Ukraine, made disparaging remarks about women and endorsed an attempted uprising related to the presidential election in the United States.

"He is not a credible figure," Notley told reporters at an unrelated news conference in Edmonton.

"The fact that our premier believes it's appropriate to normalize the things this person would say by appearing on a stage with him demonstrates a profound lack of judgment on her part."

Notley said it also damages Alberta's reputation on an international level at a time when the province is trying to attract investment dollars.

"I would call on the premier to immediately cancel that planned appearance, because Albertans deserve better from their leadership," she said. 

"They deserve responsibility. They deserve a measured form of leadership — and appearing with that character on stage is not that."

Smith doubled down on her office's statement when asked about the event during question period later Tuesday.

"We're talking about an individual who has the largest podcast audience probably in the world. That's an opportunity for us to tell Alberta's story," she said.

"I don't agree with everyone who interviews me."

Carlson was ousted from Fox in late April, less than a week after the company agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems nearly $800 million to settle a defamation case. The network provided no explanation for the firing, but reports of damaging text messages and other statements Carlson made during his time at Fox have since piled up.

After leaving Fox, Carlson started a "Tucker on Twitter" series — arguing that Twitter, now known as X, was "the only" major remaining platform allowing free speech and he denounced news media.

He had been Fox's top-rated host before his firing. His grievances and political theories grew to define the network over recent years and made him an influential and widely controversial force in American politics.

Carlson had previously come under fire for defending a white-supremacist theory that claims white people are being "replaced" by people of colour, as well as spreading misinformation about issues ranging from the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol to Russia's war in Ukraine.

He has also occasionally targeted Canada and its federal Liberal government on his show and was a vocal supporter of last year's "Freedom Convoy" movement.

— With files from Dean Bennett in Edmonton and The Associated Press

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2023.

Colette Derworiz, The Canadian Press

Government defends hiring consulting firm KPMG to find ways to save money


ONE WORD:ENRON
Story by Elizabeth Thompson  • CBC

 The federal government is defending a contract it awarded to international professional services company KPMG, saying the company helped the Natural Resources department identify ways it could save money on real property and information technology.

"There are times when you actually need an external perspective to help you to think about how to find cost efficiencies … There are times where organizations are actually used to doing things in a certain way and an external perspective can help you find efficiencies," Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson told reporters Tuesday on his way into cabinet. 

"And that was what this was all about, to actually help us reduce costs."

Wilkinson's comments came in the wake of news reports saying the government paid KPMG nearly $670,000 to find ways to save money — and after the the Trudeau government announced an initiative to tighten spending and reduce its reliance on outside consultants.

Wilkinson said KPMG's contract predates that initiative.

"The contract was issued well before budget 2023, which was the commitment around reducing consulting," he said. "So it happened a long time ago and the focus was actually on helping us reduce costs on real property and IT."

Miriam Galipeau, spokesperson for the Natural Resources department, said the contract was awarded in July 2022 "to produce analyses on cost-saving opportunities, specifically in IT and real property."

She said the department was also able to leverage its pre-existing contract with KPMG to "support [the department's] proposal to the Treasury Board due in October 2023."

She said between the work done by KPMG and the department's own internal analysis and assessment of programs, Natural Resources was able to come up with proposals that could see potential savings of $5 million a year starting in 2026.

In the House of Commons, NDP MP Gord Johns tabled a question asking for details of any contracts awarded to outside firms for help in identifying spending cuts. In response, Natural Resources provided details of two tasks assigned to KPMG — one valued at $325,000 that was due Aug. 25, 2023 and another at $344,650, due Oct. 31, 2023.

The first task was to find ways to optimize IT costs; it produced three reports related to cost reduction opportunities in areas such as IT contracting, desktop cloud-based computing and software asset management.

Titles for the second task were marked simply "TBD" (to be determined).

No other government department indicated that it had hired an outside company to help it find cost savings.


Treasury Board President Anita Anand says details of how the government plans to cut costs will be tabled soon.
(The Canadian Press/Adrian Wyld)© Provided by cbc.ca

Anita Anand said she has taken steps since being named Treasury Board president to reduce the government's reliance on outside consultants and issued guidance for government departments on outsourcing.

She said the guidelines "require anyone considering using external consultants to ensure that they follow those guidelines, including undertaking a review of whether those services can be performed within the Government of Canada, and also to ensure that this is absolutely necessary within the context in which it is being proposed.

"All in all, what we are trying to do is to ensure that we take a risk-based approach to the use of external consultants."

Anand said details of how the government plans to reduce its spending will be tabled soon in the House of Commons.

Kevin Dove, spokesperson for KPMG, declined to comment


Finance.yahoo.com

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/22-years-63-billion-enron-173348320.html

Jul 26, 2023 ... Deloitte, PwC, KPMG, and EY did not respond to Fortune's requests for comment. 'Completely unacceptable'. For audits conducted by all accounting ....


Ft.com

https://www.ft.com/content/95a0c80b-1262-42c3-ac5b-bb693e06d3c4

Dec 8, 2021 ... KPMG's 10% jump in revenue takes aggregate turnover at top firms to $167bn for 2021.

Theguardian.com

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/may/29/the-financial-scandal-no-one-is-talking-about-big-four-accountancy-firms

May 29, 2018 ... Just four major global firms – Deloitte, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), Ernst & Young (EY) and KPMG – audit 97% of US public companies and all ...



BEING MAD AT ISRAEL IS ANTISEMITIC
Head of federal public service union resigns as antisemitic social media posts circulate

Story by Christopher Nardi • 

Camille Awada resigned as president of the federal public service union Canadian Association of Professional Employees on Monday.© Provided by National Post

OTTAWA – The head of the third-largest federal public service union resigned suddenly Monday, reportedly after a series of antisemitic social media posts began circulating that namely called Israel “the root of all evil.”

In a terse statement posted on its website Tuesday, the Canadian Association of Professional Employees (CAPE) — which represents 23,000 civilian members who namely work at the RCMP, Statistics Canada and the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s office — announced that its president Camille Awada resigned from the top job on Monday.


The statement made no mention of a reason, but Le Droit newspaper reported Tuesday that the resignation happened as antisemitic social media posts dating back to 2018 and 2019 began circulating amongst union membership.

“The European Zionists are the true Aryan race. They look down at the world as if we are cattle. Israel is the illegitimate Zionist terrorist apartheid state that is the root of all evil!,” Awada published on Facebook in January 2019, according to a screenshot obtained by Le Droit.

His post was accompanied by a Forbes article on a report claiming Israel forcibly injected African immigrants with birth control.

In another post just days earlier, Awada wrote that the “illegitimate Zionist lunatic terrorist apartheid state” was “showing its true colors”. He finished the message using the hashtag #terrorisrael.

The messages reportedly began circulating recently as war rages between Israel and Hamas after Hamas terrorists launched a deadly attack against Israel on Oct. 7.

Awada did not immediately respond to a request for a comment sent to his LinkedIn account.

In its statement, CAPE said vice-president Scott Crawford would take over the presidency as the union.

“CAPE management and the President will ensure a smooth transition and CAPE’s work for its members will continue as planned,” reads the statement.

Union representatives did not immediately respond to questions about when they were informed about Awada’s social media posts and if they are linked to his resignation.

Awada’s resignation comes as CAPE, the third-largest federal public service union, was already in the midst of an election for a new president after its previous head, Greg Phillips, resigned in controversy earlier this year.

Police across Canada have reported concerning rises in antisemitic incidents since the war between Israel and Hamas began last month. On Tuesday, Montreal police confirmed they were investigating the firebombing of a Jewish synagogue and community centre.

This is not the first time a leader of a major public service employee is in hot water for posting or supporting antisemitic messages.

On Monday, National Post reported that Jewish members of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) filed a human rights claim against their union alleging discrimination and antisemitism, including recent messages seen as cheering for the deadly Hamas attacks on Israel.

Although triggered by social media posts by a CUPE local and CUPE Ontario’s president Fred Hahn after the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks in Israel, the complaint to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario by about 25 Jewish members of CUPE alleges antisemitic incidents spanning at least five years by Canada’s largest labour union.

“The respondents have collectively engaged in systemic discrimination against the complainants by promoting and engaging in antisemitism,” says the complaint, filed Monday.

“This has caused the complainants to feel isolated, unwelcome, scared, silenced, discriminated against, threatened and harassed.”

— With additional reporting by Adrian Humphreys.


Rep. Rashida Tlaib censured by House over Israel-Hamas comments

Opinion

The House of Representatives voted to censure Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib on Tuesday night, despite her emotionally defending herself, as Republicans and some members of her own party voted for a resolution that claimed she had been "promoting false narratives regarding the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and for calling for the destruction of the state of Israel." The tally was 234 yes votes to 188 no votes.

This was the second time Tlaib faced a censure resolution over her criticism of Israel.

Tlaib became emotional on the House floor earlier Tuesday as she defended her views on the deadly conflict.

MORE: Mother of Uvalde victim loses mayoral election

Tlaib rose to speak during debate on the resolution, which had been introduced by Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga.

Tlaib's critics have pointed to her use of the phrase "from the river to the sea," which is considered by some as a call for ending Israel's existence. Tlaib, however, has said it's "an aspirational call for freedom, human rights, and peaceful coexistence, not death, destruction, or hate."

Surrounded by some of her progressive Democratic colleagues, Tlaib said earlier Tuesday she would not be "silenced" and accused members of distorting her words.

"I can't believe we have to say this, but Palestinian people are not disposable," she said before she broke down in tears for several seconds earlier on Tuesday. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., stood to comfort Tlaib before she continued.

"We are human beings just like anyone else. My sity, my grandmother -- like all Palestinians -- just wants to live her life with freedom and human dignity we all deserve," she said. "Speaking up to save lives no matter faith, no matter ethnicity should not be controversial in this chamber. The cries of the Palestinian and Israeli children sound no different to me. What I don't understand is why the cries of Palestinian children sound different to you all. We cannot lose our shared humanity."


Rep. Rashida Tlaib holds up a photo of her grandmother as she speaks on the House floor on Nov. 7, 2023, in Washington, D.C.© House of Representatives TV


An attempt by House Democrats to table, or effectively kill, the McCormick resolution failed on Tuesday afternoon. The House debated the censure resolution Tuesday and voted on Tuesday night.

A vote to censure a member of Congress does not hold power beyond a public condemnation of the member's behavior. It does not deny privileges in Congress or expel the member. A simple majority is all that is needed for a censure resolution to pass.

Censures are relatively rare -- only 25 House lawmakers had been censured in history.. Tlaib becomes the 26th.

Tuesday’s vote was the second attempt in as many weeks looking to condemn Tlaib, the first Palestinian-American member of Congress, for her controversial comments about Israel amid its response to the deadly Hamas terror attack. The U.S. has designated Hamas a terrorist organization.

In Israel, at least 1,400 people have been killed and 6,900 others have been injured since the surprise attack on Oct. 7, according to Israeli officials. In the neighboring Gaza Strip, where Israel Defense Forces are deepening its operational activities, more than 10,000 people have been killed and nearly 26,000 have been injured, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry.

The first resolution, brought by Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene last week, was killed by House Democrats with the help of some Republicans. The House rejected the Georgia congresswoman's effort by a vote of 222-186.

Tlaib first drew ire of some colleagues for refusing to apologize for blaming Israel for a deadly hospital blast in Gaza that U.S. officials believed to have been caused by a Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket.

More recently, she's faced pushback for calling for a cease-fire as the Israel-Gaza war rages on. She's gone as far as to accuse President Joe Biden of supporting a Palestinian "genocide" over his administration's resistance to a general cease-fire, though Biden has called for temporary pauses in the fighting to allow humanitarian aid to enter and for civilians to leave.

MORE: Rep. Rashida Tlaib draws fire for not apologizing for saying Israel caused Gaza hospital blast

Tlaib defended her views during her five-minute speech on the House floor.

"Let me be clear: my criticism has always been of the Israeli government and Netanyahu's actions. It's important to separate people and governments, Mr. Chair, no government is beyond criticism," Tlaib said. "The idea that criticizing the government of Israel is antisemitic sets a very dangerous precedent and it's being used to silence diverse voices speaking up for human rights across our nation."


Rep. Ilhan Omar comforts Rep. Rashida Tlaib as she speaks on the House floor on Nov. 7, 2023, in Washington, D.C.© House of Representatives TV

She also again took aim at President Biden, specifically over his past comment questioning the death toll statistics provided by the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry as well as his resistance to an overall cease-fire.

"Seventy-one percent of Michigan Democrats support a ceasefire. So, you can try to censure me, but you can't

Rogers launches 5G mobile plan for low-income Canadians


 by MobileSyrup


Rogers announced a new program that aims to make 5G service accessible for more than 2.5 million low-income Canadians.

The company’s ‘Connected for Success 5G Mobile Plan’ will allow eligible low-income Canadians to get a $25/mo plan with 3GB of 5G data (speeds of up to 250Mbps) with unlimited use at reduced speeds of up to 512Kbps beyond the allotment. Additionally, the plan includes unlimited Canada-wide talk and text, and unlimited international text and picture/video messaging sent from Canada.

Alongside the plan, Rogers will offer a ‘no-cost’ Samsung Galaxy A14 or Motorola G 5G smartphone to eligible low-income Canadians. The phones usually cost $386 or $364, respectively, but Rogers will offer them for $0/mo financing (after a bill credit) and $0 down on approved credit with the Connected for Success 5G plan.

Rogers confirmed to MobileSyrup that the program is its own and isn’t connected to a government initiative.

Rogers isn’t the only carrier offering a plan tailored to low-income earners, though it appears the company’s is the only one to have 5G speed.

Telus’ ‘Mobility for Good’ program has a similar $25/mo 3GB plan for low-income seniors. However, Telus’ plan only specifies “high-speed data,” and instead of a free phone, Telus offers a $75 discount off the purchase of a phone from Mobile Klinik. The company also has a program for youth leaving foster care — the plan includes the same data and calling options but is free for two years.

MobileSyrup was not able to find a similar program offered by Bell and has reached out to the company to learn if it offers one.

To put the plan in perspective, there are few in-market offers from wireless providers that come close to matching the $25/3GB plan Rogers has, and none of them include 5G data or a free phone:

Rogers’ Connected for Success program also offers internet and TV options for low-incoming Canadians.

To access the program, Canadians need to receive eligible support for provincial and/or federal governments. In Ontario, for example, eligible support programs include the Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP), Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), Connecting Families Program, Rent geared to income (RGI), Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP), or Ontario Works (OW). You can learn more about eligible programs here.

In a press release about the program, Rogers highlighted its other affordability efforts, including the company’s program offering 48-month device financing through its credit card. Rogers markets this as a way to lower monthly phone payments “by up to 50%,” but the program appears to be a way to bypass the CRTC’s restrictions on phone contracts that are longer than two years.

You can learn more about Rogers’ Connected for Success 5G Mobile Plan here.

Header image credit: Shutterstock

Telus ‘assessing’ CRTC’s fibre internet decision, company exec tells Canadian Telecom Summit 


Provided by MobileSyrup


Telus says it’s still assessing the impact of a decision forcing it to provide competitors with wholesale access to its fibre network.

On Monday, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) ruled that Bell and Telus have six months to provide internet service providers (ISPs) in Ontario and Québec access to their fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) networks.

Bell responded quickly, stating it would cut over $1 billion from its 2024 and 2025 capital expenditure plans.

While Telus has yet to take an official stance, its silence doesn’t necessarily equate to a positive reaction.

Stephen Schmidt, the company’s vice president of telecom policy and chief regulatory counsel, was critical of the CRTC and singled the commission out for “doing things that no other regulator on earth is left doing.”

“Time has moved on for peer regulators, and they’re focusing on privacy, on 6G, on AI, on digital markets, etc. But the commission is a quarter century into doing something that’s a quarter century old,” Schmidt said during a panel at the Canadian Telecom Summit (CTS) Tuesday.

Several organizations looked at the decision with a bittersweet sentiment. Matt Hatfield, the executive director of OpenMedia, a non-profit group that, in part, focuses on internet affordability, called the decision “a lifeline for small ISPs.”

However, the CRTC’s decision was too late to save several such companies.

“Finally making the right decision today can’t bring the small ISPs we’ve lost back — all the more so if it proves to be only temporary, local relief,” Hatfield said. “Much more is needed.

ISPs currently serve 47 percent fewer customers than they did two years ago, the CRTC said in its decision.

In the last two years, Telus took over ISPs Start.ca and Altima. Bell acquired Ebox and Distributel. Cogeco, which is not subjected to the CRTC’s decision at this time, acquired Oxio

A second issue with the decision is its focus on Ontario and Québec.

Samer Bishay, the CEO of Iristel, said the decision provided more questions than answers.

“This is not going to change the landscape. It’s not going to provide affordable internet service to Canadians,” Bishay said on the CTS panel. “This looks to me like maybe a step, a baby step, in the right direction, but it’s nowhere near what was needed to be done many years back.”

The ruling is part of a larger wholesale internet review the commission launched in March.

Image credit: Shutterstock  

Loblaw raises the affordability alarm as grocery code of conduct nears completion

MONOPOLY CRIMINAL CAPITALI$T WHINES

 The Canadian Press











































































As the grocery code of conduct nears completion, the Canadian industry's biggest player is raising concerns the guidelines could add fuel to the food inflation fire.

Loblaw Companies Ltd. said it’s worried the code could "raise food prices for Canadians by more than $1 billion" in a letter sent to members of both the steering committee developing the code and the industry sub-committee on Nov. 1, and obtained by The Canadian Press. 

The grocer cannot endorse the code in its current form, wrote chief financial officer Richard Dufresne in the letter, requesting a special meeting of the industry sub-committee to address Loblaw's concerns.

In a statement, Loblaw spokeswoman Catherine Thomas said the draft code has "a number of challenges," which the grocer believes could risk product availability and increasing food prices. The Loblaw statement also mentioned the potential "$1 billion in costs," which Thomas said refers to extra costs for Loblaw customers. 

Loblaw isn’t the only grocer to express concern about the code. Walmart Canada spokeswoman Sarah Kennedy said in an email in late October that the company supports initiatives benefitting customers but it’s "conscious of adding unnecessary burdens that could increase the cost of food for Canadians, especially during inflationary times."

Grocers have been under pressure from the federal government to stabilize food prices after a run of high inflation and a series of interest rate hikes have eaten into household budgets. 

Michael Graydon, CEO of the Food, Health & Consumer Products of Canada association and co-chair of the steering committee developing the code, urged the two companies to give the code a chance. Without them on board, the code will be less effective, he said. 

"Sign on, be active participants, be engaged," Graydon said, noting the code will be reviewed after its launch.

"But to just continue to sit on the sidelines and throw rocks at the process ... it’s not in the best interest of the industry."

The code is near completion, Graydon said, with plans to have it and the non-profit organization overseeing it up and running by the end of the first quarter of 2024. 

Loblaw’s letter mentions specific sections of the draft code, saying it would make it harder for retailers to hold suppliers accountable, create a lack of certainty in the supplier-retailer relationship, and pose risks to prices, availability and discount programs.

Graydon said the committee doesn’t want to negotiate the points of Loblaw’s letter in the media, and would prefer to discuss it directly with them in an upcoming meeting. 

However, he and Gary Sands, senior vice-president at the Canadian Federation of Independent Grocers and a member of the committee, pushed back on the $1-billion figure cited by Loblaw. 

“There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the code would either raise food prices or negatively impact retailers’ ability to meet consumer needs,” said Graydon. 

Sands said if he thought the code would be inflationary, he would raise the alarm too — but “we just don’t believe that that’s true.”  

The committee developing the code was created in response to calls from the industry to address fees that large grocery retailers charge suppliers, an issue that surfaced publicly in 2020. That year, Walmart Canada announced a fee hike, and a national buying group representing Metro Inc. told suppliers it would expect the same. Not long after, Loblaw also raised its fees.

Michael von Massow, a food economy professor at the University of Guelph, said it’s not surprising to see two of the biggest names in the market — one the largest Canadian grocer, the other a major U.S. player — voicing concerns over the code of conduct.

“They, frankly, probably have the most to lose,” he said. 

Metro and Empire Co. Ltd., which owns Sobeys, affirmed their commitment to adopting the code in statements Monday. Costco Canada did not respond to a request for comment. 

If in the end, Loblaw and/or Walmart Canada decide not to sign on to the code, Graydon said another route may be necessary to address the sector's issues. 

“I think we will need to have some very interesting conversations with a number of governments around regulation,” he said. 

Quebec’s agriculture and food minister André Lamontagne, who co-chaired a working group announced in 2020 to look at the fees charged to suppliers by retailers, said it’s taken several years of rigorous work to get the code to the point it’s at today. 

A report by that group in July 2021 noted a regulated or legislated approach to dealing with these fees would require provincial action, but that this could lead to a patchwork approach.

Lamontagne wouldn’t say whether Quebec will step in if the grocers don’t all agree to the code. 

“I am always an optimist,” he said in an interview, conducted in French. 

The federal food minister, too, wouldn’t comment on whether regulation might be necessary. 

“In July, Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Ministers were briefed on the significant progress made during industry consultations held in May 2023, and remain united in calling for all key players in the industry, including large retailers, to participate in and support the operation of the Code,” said agri-food minister Lawrence MacAulay in an email.

But Von Massow said there has been, and likely still is, political appetite to step in with regulation if the code falls apart.

“I think that the current environment increases the appetite for doing that, and provides the perception that governments are doing something about affordability,” he said. 

Graydon thinks with all the pressure on retailers to stabilize food prices and the accusations of ‘greedflation’ from consumers and politicians alike, it could also be a bad move for the grocers to say no to the code. 

“I think it will be a public relations disaster for them,” he said. 

— With files from Brett Bundale 

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2023.

Companies in this story: (TSX:L, TSX:MRU, TSX:EMP.A)

Rosa Saba, The Canadian Press