Trump's 'unusual' attack on reporters for Air Force One story floors expert: 'Troubling'

Robert Davis
July 12, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as he tours the VC-25B aircraft gifted by Qatar that will be used as Air Force One, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., June 19, 2026. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz

A media expert was floored on Sunday by reporting on the Trump administration's latest effort to silence reporters after they broke a story about Air Force One last week.

Brian Stelter, a CNN media expert, discussed the Trump Department of Justice's subpoena to a pair of New York Times reporters who broke the story that President Donald Trump landed in the United Kingdom to change from his Qatari-donated Air Force One to the regular Air Force One on his way home from a NATO summit in Turkey. The report indicated that administration officials made the call because of threats against the president's plane.

Stelter told CNN's Omar Jimenez on "CNN Newsroom" that the subpoena is "very troubling" for several reasons.

"That is a highly unusual, very aggressive, and very troubling step forward, or a reassertion of the government's powers here because ultimately, a subpoena to a journalist is an attempt to compel them to testify, to reveal anonymous sources," Stelter said. "And in this particular case, the anonymous sources are officials inside Trump's government who contradicted him, who said that the security concerns were the reason why the plane was not taken back from Turkey."

Stelter also noted that the Times plans to fight the subpoenas. He read a statement from Joseph Kahn, the outlet's executive editor.

"The Trump administration, with its impulsive subpoenas, used vague pretenses of a threat to national security to try to compel our reporters to appear before a grand jury. But the law protects news gatherers from this sort of retaliatory abuse of prosecutorial power. It is essential that the courts reaffirm that protection and quash this overreach, and we are confident that they will do so," the statement reads.

Stelter also noted that judges have struck down the Trump administration's previous attempts to force journalists to reveal their anonymous sources. The key difference between those cases is that "this is all happening within a matter of days of the story being published in the first place," he added.

Trump administration subpoenas New York Times journalists over Air Force One story




The New York Times said on Saturday that the US Department of Justice had ​ordered several of its journalists to testify before a federal grand jury after they reported on security concerns involving President Donald Trump's new Qatari-donated Air Force One.


Issued on: 11/07/2026
By: FRANCE 24

The Department of Justice has subpoenaed New York Times journalists after they reported on security concerns involving the new, Qatari-gifted Air Force One, marking a dramatic escalation of President Donald Trump’s campaign against the media that has drawn condemnation for eroding a fundamental freedom of American democracy.

The new jet, a present from the US ally that the administration spent $400 million on to retrofit and upgrade, entered service last week. But Trump used an older model Air Force One jet to leave a NATO summit in Turkey and later referenced threats against him made by Iran.

The subpoenas seek to force the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury in Manhattan next week, the Times said, adding that federal agents delivered some subpoenas to the reporters at their homes.

WATCH MOREGlobal press freedom falls to lowest level in 25 years, RSF warns

They were issued after FBI Director Kash Patel and other Justice Department officials met at the White House on Friday to talk about the matter, according to a person familiar with the discussions who was not authorised to discuss the issue publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The journalists subpoenaed included Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager and Eric Schmitt, the Times reported.

“The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects,” David McCraw, a lawyer for the Times, said in a statement.

Bruce D. Brown, president of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said Trump's “war on the press is looking for another victim”.

He said in a statement that the subpoenas "break from longstanding Justice Department practice to protect the public interest and press independence by requiring prosecutors to only seek information from reporters as a last resort when all other avenues have been exhausted”.

The department said that "to be clear, reporters are not the targets, those leaking classified information are.”

Its statement said, "we value and appreciate the important role that the press plays in this country, but DOJ also plays an important role to make sure that the people entrusted with our nation’s secrets do what they’re supposed to do with that information, which means not sharing classified information.”

While recognising “there may always be natural tension there”, the department said "we are not going to ignore the law and stop investigating the people who work in the administration and think it’s okay to leak classified information impacting national security.”

Issuing subpoenas represents further ramping up of Trump's effort to threaten independent news organisations by leveraging the power of the federal government against them.

It is also part of a systematic pattern by the Republican president to attempt to undermine press freedom in order to shield him from negative coverage.

Earlier this year, the Justice Department issued subpoenas seeking to compel testimony from reporters at The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal. In both cases, the department later withdrew the subpoenas, though.

'Chilling message to journalists'

In January, FBI agents searched the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who has been covering Trump’s transformation of the federal government, as part of a leak investigation into a Pentagon contractor accused of taking home classified information.

Adam Steinbaugh, senior attorney for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said Friday's subpoenas and the prospect of “hauling reporters before grand juries sends a chilling message to journalists and whistleblowers alike: Watch what you say, or expect a knock on the door.”

“These tactics are becoming more common,” Steinbaugh said in a statement. “That doesn’t make them normal.”

During his first term, Trump suggested that the press constituted an “enemy” of the American people.

Since returning to the White House, he has waged an aggressive campaign against the media unlike any in modern US history.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)

Fox News host blasts Trump for bullying reporters: report

U.S. President Donald Trump reacts as he welcomes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (not pictured) at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 29, 2025. REUTERS Kevin Lamarque

Adam Lynch

July 11, 2026

ALTERNET

Fox News Chief National Security Correspondent Jennifer Griffin is calling out President Donald Trump’s administration for issuing subpoenas to four New York Times reporters for daring to do the news, according to Mediaite

After the Times embarrassed Trump with an article revealing that security flaws kept Trump from flying his new $400 million luxury plane (gifted from Qatari leaders) his politicized Department of Justice subpoenaed four journalists including reporters Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager and Eric Schmitt on Friday.

The Times blasted the subpoenas as an intimidation move, noting that in some instances the legal documents were administered by federal agents who showed up at the reporters’ homes.

“The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects,” the Times wrote. “… our journalists report the facts and advance the American public’s right to know how their government is operating and their taxpayer dollars are being used. This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs.”

But Griffen had her own criticism of the DOJ’s behavior.

“This action by the US government to subpoena reporters for reporting legitimate news on security concerns about Air Force 1 should alarm every American,” Griffen wrote on X.

Other critics joined in under her post, with one demanding: “Why can’t the federal government, regardless who is president, not allow the press to exercise its First Amendment rights?”

Another posted on X that it was “good to see” an honest reaction from a Fox News reporter.

“Welcome to our new police state,” quipped another X user.

“It’s time Republicans grow a pair and stop this nonsense!” howled a fourth. “We have a Constitution to follow, not allow Trump to destroy it!”

Similarly, a statement from the Washington DC-based National Press Club said federal prosecutors’ subpoena of journalists should alarm every American “because it threatens the public’s constitutional right to an independent press.”

The White House remains extremely sensitive about the endangered status of the Qatari gift. White House communications director Steven Cheung also singled out MS NOW reporter Carol Leonnig's social media post about the plane on X last week.

“Carol Leonnig is a liar and this article is complete Fake News. She has no idea what she is talking about,” posted Cheung on X. “She says the White House declined to comment. Not true. We gave comment to The New York Times and many other outlets. Carol is not a real journalist. A complete fraud.”

As Iran buries Khamenei, it shifts from 'a theocracy to a nationalistic military leadership'


Issued on: 09/07/2026 - FRANCE24

Khamenei's marathon funeral is coming to an end as the coffin arrives in Mashhad, following a week of mass processions across Iran resonating with revenge slogans against Trump. It comes as strikes between of US and Iran have started up again. The funeral is also being used as a way to project to the world a regime that has managed to withstand the war. FRANCE 24's Angela Diffley tells us more.

Video by: Angela DIFFLEY

Iran claims US strike hit near nuclear power plant

Issued on: 10/07/2026 

FRANCE24

The United States and Iran are continuing to trade strikes on July 9 for a second straight day after President Donald Trump said the ceasefire between the two countries was "over". According to Iran's health ministry, the two days of US attacks have killed at least 14 people and injured more than 70. In response, Tehran said it had resumed its targeting of US assets in Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar.

Video by: Carys GARLAND

Surprise alliance hands anti-independence bloc control of New Caledonia Congress

The anti-independence bloc has won control of New Caledonia's deliberative assembly, after securing the backing of a small party – despite the two sides holding sharply different views on the future of the French Pacific territory.


Issued on: 10/07/2026 - RFI

Milakulo Tukumuli, head of Eveil Oceanie party that's become kingmaker in New Caledonia's Congress. AFP - THEO ROUBY

The victory came less than two weeks after pro-France parties won the wealthy and most populous Southern Province in provincial elections held on 28 June.

In a vote on Friday, Virginie Ruffenach, of the Les Loyalistes and Le Rassemblement party, one of the hardline branches of the non-independence movement, was elected president of the Congress – the territory's elected assembly – securing 28 of the 54 votes.

Her opponent, Dominique Fochi, backed by the pro-independence bloc "Kanaky for All", got 26 votes.

The pro-France bloc initially held 24 seats in the assembly but a deal with the four lawmakers of the Eveil Océanien (Oceanian Awakening) party enabled it to form a majority.

Ruffenach said the "governance" coalition had been formed to help rebuild New Caledonia after a difficult period.

Deadly unrest in May 2024, sparked by planned changes to voting rights, left 14 people dead and caused more than €2 billion in damage.

Virginie Ruffenach (centre) was elected president of New Caledonia's Congress on Friday. AFP - DELPHINE MAYEUR


Alliance of convenience

Oceanian Awakening was founded in 2019 to represent the interests of New Caledonia’s Wallisian and Futunian community

"We do not share the same vision with Oceanian Awakening on the island's institutional future," Ruffenach said. "But we have put that aside to build a majority for recovery and reconstruction at what is probably the most difficult period in New Caledonia's recent history."

Oceanian Awakening said it had first tried to form a majority with the independence bloc, led by the Kanak Socialist Liberation Front (FLNKS), but had failed.

"We believe the conditions for stability within the independence bloc are not in place," the party's president, Milakulo Tukumuli, said.

Questions over durability

The new partners say they expect the alliance to last for the full five-year term.

However, the Congress elects its president every year, leaving open the possibility that the balance of power could change.

The coalition agreement does not include long-term political projects, including the issue of the archipelago's institutional future, which is still to be debated between New Caledonia's political parties and the French government.

New Caledonia has rejected independence from France in three successive referendums, laid down as part of the 1998 Noumea accord, which set out a roadmap for greater autonomy for the territory.

However, the third and final referendum in December 2021 took place during Covid restrictions and was boycotted by the pro-independence camp.

Fifteen years of independence for South Sudan, but still little to celebrate

South Sudan, the world's youngest country, on Thursday marks the 15th anniversary of its independence, following decades of war with Sudan, a 2005 peace agreement and a 2011 self-determination referendum in which almost 99 percent of voters backed statehood. But the hopes that came with it have given way to renewed conflict, economic collapse and political deadlock.


Issued on: 09/07/2026 - RFI

South Sudan, the world's youngest country, will again not be marking its independence. AFP - TIZIANA FABI


For several years now, the government of President Salva Kiir has cancelled large Independence Day celebrations, saying they are too expensive and the authorities have other priorities.

"Fifteen years after independence, the country is almost at a dead end," Daniel Akech, a researcher at the International Crisis Group, told RFI. "We have a financial crisis, which is really the main reason as to why they cannot celebrate."

He added: "And the country has not transitioned to what was expected... people are frustrated. People need to see some kind of transition, a peaceful democratic transition. Independence was meant to improve things. That achievement has not been realised. The country is risking basically disintegration”.

According to the International Monetary Fund, South Sudan was the sixth-poorest country in the world in 2025, with a GDP per capita of $470.

Oil revenues, the country's main source of income, have fallen in recent years – mainly because of the war in neighbouring Sudan, through which South Sudan's oil exports pass.

Edmond Yakani, director of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization, told RFI that the country's civil servants received their first salary in two years last week.

Just 8 percent of the population has access to electricity, and South Sudan is ranked alongside Somalia as the most corrupt country in Africa.
Short-lived jubilation

Akech says the people feel they are being held hostage by the ongoing conflict between Kiir and his former vice-president Riek Machar.

Kiir and Machar both fought for South Sudan's independence from Khartoum as members of the armed group, the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army.

After decades of war with the north, South Sudan became an autonomous region in 2005. Kiir was appointed president and Machar vice-president. They remained in those positions as the country officially became independent on 9 July, 2011.

In Juba, there was jubilation. People who had long been marginalised within Sudan saw the day as the culmination of more than half a century of struggle.

South Sudan's independence day celebrations in 2011. © Reuters

Relations, however, between Kiir and Machar were difficult from the start. Rivalry, ambition, and mistrust quickly caught up with the two men.

In 2013, just two years after independence, Kiir dismissed his vice-president, accusing him of wanting to take his place as head of state. War broke out again.

The conflict lasted five years, during which 400,000 South Sudanese people were killed and more than half the population was displaced.

The international community and countries in the region put pressure on both sides. Several ceasefires were signed and later broken.

In 2018, the two men signed the Revitalised Peace Agreement, which was meant to begin a transitional period. Machar returned as vice-president.

Key parts of the Revitalised Peace Agreement are still yet to be implemented. The integration of Machar's forces into the national army, the demobilisation of militias, and the organisation of the country's first elections – originally scheduled for 2015 – have all been postponed several times.

Mistrust between the two men has continued to grow and their struggle for power has intensified. To strengthen their support, both leaders have relied on ethnic divisions – Kiir is Dinka, the country's largest ethnic group, while Machar is Nuer, the second largest.

From refugee to red carpet, the remarkable journey of Amine Benrachid
Peace agreement collapses

In March 2025, an attack on a government military base shattered an already fragile political peace.

The Nuer White Army, a militia linked to forces loyal to Machar, attacked in Upper Nile State and captured a military base in Nasir. More than 250 government soldiers were killed.

In the aftermath, Kiir ordered the arrest of several opposition figures. Machar was placed under house arrest before being removed from office.

He was accused of orchestrating the attacks on the national army and charged with treason, murder and crimes against humanity, alongside seven senior members of his party, the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-in-Opposition.

Machar’s party says the case is politically motivated and intended to remove him from politics.

By the end of last year, heavy fighting had resumed between government forces and militias close to the opposition, mainly in Jonglei State. Millions of South Sudanese have once again been displaced.

"There is an ongoing war, as we speak," said Akech – even if much of the international community is reluctant to use the term.

Machar sits in the dock with seven others charged with murder, treason, and crimes against humanity at Freedom Hall in Juba, 24 September, 2025. AP - Florence Miettaux

Despite the resumption of war and the trial of Machar, the government in Juba announced a few months ago that elections will be held at the end of this year, on 22 December.

For Yakani, however, this announcement is intended only to quell public anger. And the lack of celebrations on Thursday speaks volumes.

“Independence Day is now being described by citizens with bitter words instead of sweet words – like corruption, manipulation, lack of human rights, absence of rule of law, deadly violence. The beauty, the sweetness of independence is fading every year."

This article has been adapted from the original version in French by Alexandra Brangeon.

INTERVIEW

Capital punishment in Pakistan: 'Islam does not promote the death penalty'

Around the world, a total of 47 countries still retain capital punishment – including Pakistan. Barrister Sarah Belal founded the Justice Project Pakistan in 2009 to represent the most vulnerable Pakistani prisoners facing the death penalty, at home and abroad. RFI met her in Paris.

Issued on: 11/07/2026 - RFI

By:Zeenat Hansrod

RFI: You are a barrister and the executive director of Justice Project Pakistan. How do you reconcile your work on the abolition of the death penalty while operating in Pakistan, an Islamic state?

Sarah Belal: I don’t find the two to be contrary [to each other]. Islam does not promote the death penalty, and it is not banned under international law. It says the death penalty can only be prescribed for the most serious crimes.

Actually, under Islam the Quran only prescribes the death penalty for two offences, which broadly match the international human rights standard – intentional killing and Fasad-Fil-Arz, which covers various violent crimes including crimes against humanity. So, they’re not at odds with each other at all. You’ll see that international human rights law standards match with the Quranic ones.

Islam's concept of Tazkiyah al-Shahood is a very high evidentiary standard to determine the competency of a witness. Yet, in Pakistan, these standards are never upheld in court where witnesses regularly perjure themselves while never being held accountable.

RFI: Although capital punishment is legal in Pakistan, there hasn't been an execution since 2019. What does this say about the direction the country is taking?

SB: I think it's going in the right direction. This halt in executions shows that the various governments Pakistan [has had since then] have realised that there's a severe lapse in justice in who we are executing, and are trying to correct the system.

If you're going to have the ultimate punishment, you need to have the ultimate justice system. We come from a country that's plagued by a lot of problems.

One of my favourite quotes is from a visiting American professor who worked on the death penalty in the United States.

He said: "This is incredible to me how vibrant and dynamic the Pakistani society is. But, you know, since I've been here, I've seen the electricity go several times [due to load shedding] and I've seen the distrust that people have in paying their taxes because they don't trust the government to use their money in the right way. Yet we have this ultimate faith in the government that they can determine somebody's innocence or guilt to an extent that they can determine who gets to live or not. It seems to be a very paradoxical kind of a view."

RFI: There are 3,646 people on death row in Pakistan, their ages ranging from 16 to 70. What are the most common offences which lead to a death sentence?

SB: It fluctuates over time, but the top two crimes are murder and people convicted under the Anti-Terrorism Act.

RFI: What led you to create the Justice Project Pakistan in 2009?

SB: I was one year out of law school in Pakistan when I came across a letter from a death row prisoner. His name was Zulfiqar. He had written saying he was going to be executed in a week, and he was worried about his two girls who were going to grow up without a father. His wife had died while he was in prison.

He had spent nearly 16 years on death row. He educated himself and hundreds of other prisoners. He was actually called Dr. Zulfiqar Ali.

That letter really changed my life. I went on to represent him. He was executed in 2015. It was the first time I ever saw [an execution], and there were hundreds of people there.

What was beautiful was that in his mercy petition, 600 of the prisoners that he had educated wrote letters to the president saying, "this man deserves to live". He was a source of inspiration and a guiding light for how and why we are doing this work.

RFI: Among all the prisoners on death row you have met throughout your career, is there one whose story has stayed with you?

SB: All the people we represent are incredibly important to us – the clients that we've lost and the clients that we have now. To me personally, Zulfiqar is important because he was my first client and my entry into this field, and so he remains very close to me.

But there are so many. There are those who were wrongly sentenced to death as juveniles when clearly the law does not allow [it]. So, I'm thinking of Azam and Munawar, who are in prison in Sindh on death row, waiting for decades – 28 years for Azam, 24 years for Munawar – for the Supreme Court to revisit their decision.

They were under 18 at the time that they were convicted of the offence, but because they were incredibly poor and were represented by an inadequate state council, they were never able to bring evidence to prove that they were wrongly convicted. They are waiting for their mercy petitions to be accepted, or for the courts to take their case up again and commute their sentences.

RFI: When prisoners are being jailed for decades, how does this help their rehabilitation?

SB: It doesn't help. Prison is hyper-violent. Everyone comes out of prison with PTSD. It is not a place built to rehabilitate. It's just designed to punish and forget people.

I don't see any rich people in prison at all. And what does that say about the system? Do rich people not commit crimes?

I work in a country that purports to be a Muslim country, to uphold Muslim values and principles. Criminal justice in Islam focuses on the people and questions the responsibility of the State. Are you providing the social services that are necessary to ensure that your citizens are able to live good and dignified lives? It considers the circumstances when determining culpability and sentence.

When you look at women in prison in Pakistan, most of them are in prison for drug offences. When you do a profile of why these women are selling drugs, these are not high-level traffickers. These are women who, out of desperation, are forced to engage in this activity just so their children and themselves could survive.

Why is that being punished again and again? These are non-violent offenders. And why is our state and our community not looking at how can we better take care of these women and their children? But we spend an insane amount of money on building new prisons.

 

Sweeping victory for Europe as 15 nations top climate scoreboard – see the full list

Copyright Aleksandr Klepikov via Unsplash.

By Liam Gilliver

Published on 12/07/2026 - EURONEWS

Europe has come top in the latest Environmental Performance Index, partly due to the boom in renewables. But experts warn that more progress is needed.

Europe has dominated new global sustainability rankings, but experts warn that all nations are “still far from critical goals” to tackle climate change.

The Environmental Performance Index (EPI) – produced by researchers at Yale and Columbia University – is released every two years and ranks countries from around the globe on their commitment to sustainability.

It focuses on 47 different indicators which are split into 12 categories, including climate change mitigation, air quality, forests, water resources, waste management and biodiversity.

Using data from major research institutions, international organisations and other information collectors such as the World Resources Institute and the EU’s Copernicus, each country is scored from zero to 100.

Estonia tops the climate leaderboard

Estonia topped the leaderboard, largely due to its substantial reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in power generation over the past decade.

In recent years, Estonia has lowered its reliance on electricity generation from domestic oil shale, an energy-rich sedimentary rock.

While oil shale remains the main energy source in the country, a boom in renewables is helping Estonia wean off fossil fuels – primarily through the power of solar.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), Estonia is aiming to accelerate its clean energy transition with a target to cover 100 per cent of annual electricity with renewables by 2030. It’s part of the country’s wider target to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.

Estonia also won out thanks to efforts to bolster biodiversity and ecosystem protection. More than 50 per cent of its land mass is covered by forests and protected wetlands – making it home to more than 300 bird species.

Relate

At a conference held yesterday (9 July) in New York by the United Nations University - Centre for Policy Research (UNU CPR), Andres Sutt, Estonia’s Minister of Energy and the Environment said he was “very proud” that the country’s sustainability drive was being recognised.

However, Estonia only achieved 75 points out of a possible 100, showing that even as the winner – it is far from where it needs to be.

“If countries aim to maintain a trajectory toward net-zero emissions by 2050, they will need to continually achieve large emissions reductions which will require additional policies in the future,” says Zach Wendling, lead author of the report.

Yale’s global environmental ranking – see full list

Luxembourg came a close second, scoring 74 points, followed by the United Kingdom (72), Finland (71) and the Netherlands (71).

In fact, European countries hold all but one of the top 20 positions in this year’s ranking – despite many EU nations scoring low in the agricultural sustainability category.

At the bottom of the league tables is Laos, followed by India, Bangladesh, Mali and Vietnam. Experts warn that all of these nations face “serious environmental degradation that represents a direct threat to human health and critical ecosystems”.

At the conference yesterday, experts said that India could be doing so much better – but it ranked second to last due to its struggle to deal with ambient particulate matter. These tiny droplets, which come from fuel combustion, construction, dust, and natural sources like wildfires and sea salt, can cause major respiratory and cardiovascular issues.

The Environmental Performance Index 2026

1. Estonia, 75
2. Luxembourg, 74
3. United Kingdom, 72
4. Finland, 71
5. Netherlands, 71
6. Germany, 70
7. France, 70
8. Norway, 69
9. Sweden, 69
10. Austria, 67
11. Denmark, 67
12. Spain, 66
13. Greece, 66
14. Slovenia, 65
15. Switzerland, 64
16. Japan, 63
17. Czechia, 63
18. Portugal, 63
19. Slovakia, 62
20. Poland, 62

The US slips to 27th place

The report warns that China and the United States – the world’s biggest greenhouse gas emitters – look likely to “fall far short” of the global target of net-zero GHG emissions by 2050.

The US ranked 27th place, just behind Australia (25th) but ahead of Canada (29th). However, the rankings use data up to 2024, representing the last part of Joe Biden’s presidency rather than Donald Trump’s.

Since returning to the White Office, Trump has consistently tried to boost polluting coal, stop the expansion of offshore wind farms, and pulled the US out of several key UN climate targets.

The US score reflects strong results on environmental health issues, but under-performance on biodiversity protection and climate change metrics.

 The Environmental Performance Index 2026 

China came 129th, due to poor outcomes on climate change measures despite improving indoor air pollution, water sanitation and solid waste management.

A list of wealthy nations?

While Europeans may celebrate topping the leaderboard, wealthier nations tend to have more access to capital to improve their environmental credentials – such as investing in large-scale green energy projects.

Low-income countries are contributing less to climate change, despite facing greater consequences of global warming, and may struggle to build funds to accelerate the green transition.

Many wealthy countries also offshore their manufacturing and waste to other countries, skewing their true progress. In 2022, for example, the EU exported 12.4 million tonnes of waste to Türkiye and 3.5 million tonnes to India.

Earlier this year, the bloc also announced it will start allowing countries to cut five per cent of their emissions based on “high-quality international credits”. You can read more about how the scheme will work, and why experts are sceptical, here.

France must speed up climate action, as watchdog warns current efforts fall short

France is not prepared for the pace and scale of climate change, the country’s climate watchdog has warned in a report that calls for a significant acceleration of both emission reduction efforts and adaptation policies, as the country faces its third heatwave since May.


Issued on: 10/07/2026 - RFI

A construction worker resurfaces a road in Bordeaux during the heatwave in May when temperatures hit record highs across France, 28 May 2026. © Alice Sacco/Reuters

France must rapidly expand the ambition, scope and speed of its response as the effects of global warming become more severe, the High Council for Climate (HCC), an independent body created in 2018 to assess the government's climate policies, said in its annual report published on Thursday.

Mainland France and Corsica have warmed by 2.2C between the periods 1900-1930 and 2016-2025, the report said.

Summer temperatures have risen even more sharply – by 2.9C – contributing to increasingly frequent and intense heatwaves, like the one currently hitting large parts of the country.

'Dangerous range'

"We are entering a tragic period,” JCC president François Soussana said at the presentation of the report, referring to the heat waves in May and June this year, which caused thousands of additional deaths in France.

Climate researcher Valérie Masson-Delmotte said France has entered what she called a "dangerous range", with temperatures above 40C now affecting large parts of the country on a regular basis.

France must “increase the scale of the amount, scope, reach and speed of implementing adaptation measures”, said the report.

The HCC says heatwaves are just one result of climate change, with droughts, wildfires and extreme rainfall also becoming more common, bringing increased health, social, economic and environmental consequences.

France unprepared for new climate

The country’s infrastructure, land planning and economic activity “had been developed and were set up for a climate that no longer exists”, said Masson-Delmotte, who worked on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN climate science panel.

The HCC says current adaptation measures are inadequate to face the new climate reality, as homes become dangerously hot, students at schools and universities are unable to study and cities have too few cool public spaces for vulnerable people to seek relief.

The agricultural sector has yet to make climate adaptation a sufficient priority despite repeated climate-related shocks.

“Current adaptation efforts favour incremental, technology-based solutions that address some impacts while worsening or shifting risks onto others, creating a recurring, systemic risk of maladaptation,” said Masson-Delmotte.

Recommendations

The watchdog offers six recommendations that the government must respond to within the next six months.

These include extending the time frame for official heatwave plans, to cover May through to September, as well as introducing a temperature and humidity threshold beyond which outdoor work would become unsafe.

Other proposals include modifying energy performance certificates for buildings to include assessments of summer comfort, instead of just recording heat loss in winter.

The report also recommends upgrading hospitals, care facilities, schools and universities with shaded and greener outdoor spaces, improved ventilation, window coverings, ceiling fans and permanent cooling systems where appropriate.

While air conditioning may be necessary in some cases, the HCC says the priority should be on installing heat pumps to “reduce unwanted consequences”.

Decarbonisation is key

But adaptation alone will not be enough. Cutting greenhouse gas emissions remains essential to limit future climate impacts.

Without decarbonisation efforts, “heatwaves could become five times more frequent in 2050 and ten times in 2100, which would be intolerable,” warned Soussana.

Ten years after the Paris Climate agreement, in which countries agreed to cut emissions to keep global temperatures under 2C higher than pre-industrial levels, France has made progress, but “it is completely insufficient”, said Soussana.

Emissions in France fell by 2.1 percent in 2025, a slower rate than the previous year, and not nearly fast enough, according to the HCC, which says annual reductions will need to exceed over 4 percent to remain on track.

Current climate policies will not get France there, according to the HCC. There is not enough funding and some recent policy reversals, particularly on water management and land development, risk undermining progress.

The report calls for stronger guarantees that the investment needed for the green transition will be delivered, including doubling funding for decarbonisation and expanding the green fund, which was established in 2023 to support local energy transition efforts.

Sector-specific policies should be brought into line with climate goals, while promoting greater restraint in transport and agriculture, the two top sources of emissions in France, accounting for 34 percent and 21 percent, respectively.

The HCC also calls for a "fair transition" to avoid widening inequalities and climate vulnerabilities.

Support schemes such as MaPrimeRénov', which helps homeowners improve energy efficiency and France's social leasing scheme for electric vehicles are too small to meet demand.

(with AFP)

French farmers race to adapt as repeated heatwaves hit crops and livestock

After weeks of sweltering heat and drought, farmers and analysts fear France's maize crop could be down by a third this year – making it the smallest in 35 years. Poultry farmers are also counting their losses as many as 3 million broiler chickens died within a few days in in June. The damage is a result of three heatwaves that have already hit France this year, and is only set to intensify as climate change disrupts agriculture across Europe.


Issued on: 11/07/2026 - RFI

An irrigation sprinkler sprays water on a corn field in Parigne-l'Eveque near Le Mans on 8 July, 2026, as drought worsens in Sarthe department during a heatwave affecting a large part of the country. © Benoit Tessier / REUTERS


Temperatures have climbed above 40C in parts of France and elsewhere in Europe, affecting both crops and livestock.

Harvests have started much earlier than usual in several regions, reflecting a longer-term trend linked to global warming.

"The weather station on the farm is showing 38.8C," says David Vincent, who grows almost 200 hectares of cereals in the southern department of Aude.

"The heatwaves since May have accelerated the end of the growing cycle for all our crops. So we started harvesting 15 days earlier than we used to. Clearly, our yields are down today," he told RFI.

Winter rainfall helped replenish soil moisture, allowing crops to grow normally through spring. But the rain stopped in April.

The harvest could potentially have been good at the beginning of May, Vincent said, but "by June, when we started harvesting, it was down by 10 percent to 30 percent in my area".

Vincent grows a wide range of crops – durum wheat, soft wheat, barley, protein peas, sorghum, maize, sunflower and rapeseed.

He said diversifying crops had become the best way to adapt to increasing climate uncertainty in the southern Occitanie region.

'I thought I was ready'

Livestock farmers have also been badly affected. Agriculture Minister Annie Genevard told the Senate that 9,127 tonnes of dead animals, mainly poultry, had been collected by the state after the heatwave at the end of June.

The worst-hit livestock farms are in western France, and with a third heatwave now affecting much of the country, many farmers fear further losses.

Pig farmer Bertrand Feugnet, from Rouillac in western France, said he had been anxious when temperatures of 43C were forecast.

"It's true that 15 days ago, when they announced 43C – which we did get – I was really worried about how the animals were going to react."

He said one neighbouring farmer lost 17 sows while they were giving birth in buildings where temperatures reached 34C. Thanks to a cooling mist system that lowered temperatures inside his buildings, Feugnet himself lost only three of his piglets.

Organic cattle farmer Éric Germon, who raises Limousin cattle, said even his more traditional farming model was no longer protected from extreme heat.

"I thought I was ready for 2050 and I realise that even I am suffering. But we'll still have a head start, we'll suffer less than others," Germon said.

His working day now starts at 5:30 in the morning so he can move his cattle before temperatures rise. Although he rests during the afternoon, he said the long days were becoming exhausting.


'We'll face shortages'

Extreme weather including flash droughts and torrential rain is expected to become more common as the climate warms, said Inaki Garcia de Cortaza Atauri, an agronomist and research director at the French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE).

"Within five or 10 years, these types of events are going to become more and more the norm and if we don't adapt, we're going to have problems, such as plants stopping growing," he said. "The quality of harvests will deteriorate, and production in general. At some point, we'll face shortages."

He said farmers would need to diversify crops, change crop rotations, alter growing cycles and improve soils so they retain water for longer.

The challenge, he said, is to spread those practices as widely as possible so farming can continue despite rising temperatures.

Firefighters work to extinguish a fire near a farm in Grand-Auverné, in the west of France, 30 June 2026. @ REUTERS - Stephane Mahe

A Europe-wide issue

The European Union estimates that recent heatwaves have caused 3,500 excess deaths.

Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said productivity had fallen, schools had closed, harvests had been damaged, hospitals had come under pressure and roads and railways had been damaged.

On Wednesday, the European Parliament debated the EU's response to increasingly frequent wildfires. Beyond emergency measures, the bloc is also reviewing how it adapts to climate change.

The EU has activated its Civil Protection Mechanism nearly 20 times in recent months to respond to wildfires linked to heatwaves. It is also funding projects including urban greening to reduce heat in cities.

The European Environment Agency says Europe is the fastest-warming continent and faces 36 major climate risks covering ecosystems, food, health, infrastructure, the economy and finance.

The EU's 2021 climate adaptation strategy, which is not legally binding, is due to be replaced in 2026 by an integrated climate resilience framework. It is expected to include recommendations for protecting workers during periods of extreme heat.

After oat milk, Europe turns to pea milk: the Greek scientist leading the way

By Symela Touchtidou

Published on 11/07/2026 - EURONEWS

Angeliki Triantafyllou, winner of the 2026 European Inventor Award, explains to Euronews why the future of plant-based food lies not in diet fads but in products with high nutritional value and a smaller environmental footprint.

How will the planet be fed in the coming decades, as the global population keeps growing and natural resources become scarcer?

The answer to that question lies at the heart of European research into next-generation foods. The goal is not simply to develop more plant-based substitutes, but to create products that combine high nutritional value with a smaller environmental footprint.

This need is becoming increasingly urgent, since the production of cow’s milk is among the most resource-intensive forms of agriculture in terms of land, water and feed consumption, and is also accompanied by significant greenhouse gas emissions.

One of the scientists at the forefront of this effort is Greek biotechnologist Angeliki Triantafyllou, president of Cerealiq AB and winner of the European Inventor Award 2026 in the “Industry” category. Triantafyllou was a co-founder of Oatly, the world’s largest producer of oat-based drinks, and for more than 20 years she led the company’s research.

The patented enzymatic method she developed significantly improved the taste, colour, texture and foaming ability of oat drinks, while at the same time increasing their nutritional value compared with previous technologies.

This innovation played a decisive role in transforming oat drinks from a niche product into a global market.

Today, however, her research is focused on a new product: pea milk.

As she reveals to Euronews, her team is developing a technology that uses the whole pea, preserving all its nutrients, instead of relying only on isolated protein as is the case in most current applications:

“Our method, with our enzymatic technology, preserves all the properties and the full nutritional value of the pea. And of course it is an environmentally friendly method.”

No more food fads

Angeliki Triantafyllou believes that the future of plant-based foods does not lie in indiscriminate market expansion or in chasing the next trendy product.

The challenge now is to ensure good quality across the entire range of animal and plant-based products. We should not be following fads, but creating foods that genuinely have high nutritional value and a real reason to exist.

 Αγγελική Τριανταφύλλου 

Biotechnologist, Winner of the European Inventor Award 2026

As an example, she indirectly refers to products that have enjoyed great commercial success (such as almond milk) without offering comparable nutritional value.

By contrast, she argues that new plant-based raw materials should be chosen for their nutritional profile and for how much they contribute to more sustainable food production.

Angeliki Triantafyllou won the European Inventor Award 2026 in the “Industry” category European Patent Office

Why we need plant-based alternatives

According to Triantafyllou, plant-based products are not intended to completely replace animal products, but to cover part of the nutritional needs of a planet that will have to feed billions of people over the coming decades:

“Animal production cannot increase indefinitely to meet the needs of a constantly growing population.”

As she explains, peas contain high-quality protein, while oats provide valuable beta-glucans and dietary fibre, which most people consume in quantities far below the recommended levels.

At the same time, plant-based crops generally require fewer natural resources and can offer solutions in regions that already face problems such as water scarcity, soil degradation and the impacts of climate change.

 

Obesity drugs bring weight loss but not better quality of life, study finds

Copyright Cleared/Canva

By Marta Iraola Iribarren

Published on 09/07/2026 - EURONEWS

Obesity drugs are growing in popularity worldwide, but a new study has found that, beyond the weight-loss results, most of these medications do not bring broader quality-of-life benefits after one year of use.

Millions of people have used weight loss drugs such as Ozempic and Mounjaro in the past year — but a new study suggests that lifestyle benefits may not extend much further than the number on the scale.

Published in The BMJ, the study analysed 262 clinical trials involving around 100,000 participants and 19 different drugs.

The researchers found that greater weight loss was consistently associated with higher rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuation.

“Most agents [active ingredients] do not improve quality of life meaningfully and few show cardiovascular benefits,” the authors of the study wrote.

In the trials, participants completed standard health‑related quality‑of‑life questionnaires. Researchers compared how much these scores changed with the weight‑loss drugs versus lifestyle changes alone and found that across the main treatments there were no clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life.

Out of all the treatments studied in the clinical trials, tirzepatide — the active ingredient in Mounjaro and Zepbound — and CagriSema — which is not currently approved for clinical use — provided the greatest reductions in body weight among drugs for overweight adults.

Subcutaneous semaglutide — used in Ozempic and Wegovy — currently has the strongest evidence for reductions in mortality and major cardiovascular events, the study found.

However, both tirzepatide and semaglutide were also linked to a harmful reduction in lean mass, the total weight of the body minus fat mass. Low lean mass has been associated with a higher risk of falls, bone fractures, and early death.

Related

• Study sheds light on why some people benefit more from weight-loss drugs than others

The study's authors noted that most of the trials analysed had short follow-up periods and that more research is needed into newer drugs to fully understand their long-term impact.

Researchers not involved in the study warn, however, that findings on quality of life require particularly careful interpretation, as the way it is measured can vary widely.

“Quality of life is complex and varies between individuals. While standardised measures provide valuable information, they may not capture all aspects of treatment experience that matter to people living with obesity,” noted Marie Spreckley at the University of Cambridge.

Treating obesity is more than losing weight

Obesity is increasingly recognised as a complex chronic disease, and relying on weight loss alone as a measure of treatment success may oversimplify its benefits and harms while reinforcing stigma around the condition, the authors warned.

“The study fits with what we already knew: some medications lead to substantial weight loss, but losing weight does not automatically mean improving every aspect of health,” said José M. Ordovás at Tufts University, who did not participate in the study.

“The scale tells part of the story, but not all of it,” he noted, adding that in obesity, success should not be measured only in kilos but in health, function, and quality of life.