Friday, October 02, 2026

Dear Doug Burgum: The Soul of Our Nation Is Not for Sale

We cannot allow our shared natural heritage to be bulldozed, defunded, and sold off by men who look at a majestic forest and only see square footage for server racks.

US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum speaks during an event with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on October 06, 2025 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Brock Butler
Oct 01, 2026
Common Dreams


For most of my life, I’ve had a guitar in my hands and a melody in my head. Traveling this country as a musician, with Perpetual Groove and The Brock Butler Band, has allowed me to share music with people from all walks of life, and I know firsthand the profound power music has to bring us together. Being fortunate enough to travel as much as I have has also meant the opportunity to see a lot of this beautiful country firsthand.

I’ve become more aware and informed about the most corrupt administration in history, and its attempts (failed and successful) to develop public lands with everything from data centers to golf courses (as long as it’s not windmills, I guess?). I grew up in a rural area of Virginia and the thing I enjoy most about my visits home is the tranquility. I find my grounding out under the open sky. I’m lucky that where I grew up remains relatively intact. If a data center got plopped in the woods behind my home I’d be devastated. Everyone should have the opportunity to get grounded in lovely and peaceful places.

The quiet majesty of our public lands should remain unadulterated. I find profound inspiration in the vast, open spaces and the sheer awesomeness of nature. These places are where we go to breathe, to reflect, and to remember who we are. Whether you’re a hiker, a painter, or someone who loves to pick an instrument around a campfire, whatever your reason and intention to get out in nature might be, it should not be limited or compromised by easements and condominiums.

It seems like anything not nailed down is finding its way into the pockets of a handful of billionaires. And this includes our sacred public spaces.

That’s why every day the news is like torture: war, poverty, sickness—and through it all a looting of the public. It seems like anything not nailed down is finding its way into the pockets of a handful of billionaires. And this includes our sacred public spaces. I get told in comment sections often enough I should just stick to music.

So when my dear friend Alex Lawson, executive director of Social Security Works, asked if I was interested in helping to expose Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum’s ongoing pilfering of our public lands through song, I jumped at the opportunity. Because while music can unite us, sometimes it needs to be wielded to shine a light on the wrongdoings of the powerful. And right now, no one is doing more wrong by our public lands than the man who defines the phrase “All Hat, No Cattle.” That man is US Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum.

Burgum is treating our sacred landscapes like an industrial lot for tech billionaires. He has earned the moniker “Secretary AI” for his huddles with data center heavyweights, spending the last year taking a string of meetings with data center investors just as his agencies start handing over our lands for development. He is actively plotting to hand over more public lands to AI developers. We are witnessing an aggressive push to build data centers on public lands, with the administration considering more proposals than previously known. You only have to look at the massive facility—five times bigger than Meta’s—planned for public land near Boise, to see the scale of the threat, promptin
g leaders like Rep. Jared Huffman to lead the charge against this industrialization.


- YouTube

But Burgum isn’t just giving away our land; he is deliberately dismantling the infrastructure meant to protect it. After installing right-wing operatives, his Interior Department has blocked tens of millions in national park funds. Meanwhile, his highly touted national park fee scheme has raised only a quarter of what he promised.

The sheer volume of cancelled projects and defunded parks is staggering. Over the past month, local and national news have painted a devastating picture of what Burgum’s tenure looks like on the ground:The administration blocking $25 million in national park projects, while Oregon’s Senators are questioning where the money is even going
The feds rejected over 130 park projects last month, hitting California the hardest
Vital funds have been slashed everywhere: Yellowstone lost $428K for cultural resource projects, and Nevada’s parks are losing millions after federal funding blocks
The Interior Department is actively clawing back NPS money to fund Trump’s projects, allowing national park maintenance work to be sidelined as the “Freedom 250” takes precedence
Utah’s national parks are drowning in a $350 million maintenance backlog without federal help
Public land agency contractors have suffered a devastating $1.3 billion dip
Internally, the agencies are in crisis. The National Park Service is poised for an overhaul, spring buyouts have eaten into the Interior Department’s ranks, and staff fear a major agency shakeup.

The New York Times summed it up best: it’s a story of “gold statues and staff cuts” disrupting America’s parks

We cannot allow our shared natural heritage to be bulldozed, defunded, and sold off by men who look at a majestic forest and only see square footage for server racks. Protecting our public lands is like protecting the soul of the nation—and that is sorely needed at this time.

And I hope my little musical contribution helps save the soul of our nation, check it out at AllHatDougBurgum.org.





Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Brock Butler
Known as the Positive Vibe Technician for Perpetual Groove, Brock “The Rev” Butler founded the band with Adam Perry while attending SCAD (Savannah College of Art and Design) in 1997.
Full Bio >


Conservation Groups Ramp Up Fight Against ‘Despicable’ Trump Assault on Endangered Species


One campaigner warned that the administration’s effort “to legalize most killings of endangered wildlife would essentially mean open season on species already on the brink of annihilation.”


A federally endangered Catalina Island fox watches a mule deer fawn drinking water at a feral cat feeding station behind the Descanso Beach Club in Avalon, Catalina Island, California, on October 31, 2023.
(Photo by Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Oct 01, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Conservation groups that sued this summer over President Donald Trump’s administration rescinding the regulatory definition of “harm” in the Endangered Species Act updated their legal challenge on Thursday after yet another attack on the landmark law.

The coalition’s supplemental complaint explains to a federal court in Seattle that since the lawsuit was first filed in July, administrative leaders have directed various agencies to interpret the ESA to mean that only intentionally killing or wounding a protected species is illegal—a shift that critics condemned as “an all-out war on America’s wildlife.”

As the “harm” rescission took effect on September 14, US Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik issued a related memorandum with that interpretation—effectively allowing “incidental” killing. John Luce, general counsel at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, sent the same directive to eight sections of NOAA.

These memos “violate the plain language and overarching purpose of the ESA; they also lack any reasoned basis, are arbitrary and capricious, and failed to comply with applicable notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements,” the new filing argues, citing the Administrative Procedure Act. The coalition is asking the court to vacate the memos and bar the agencies from using their interpretations of the 1973 law.

“This despicable effort to legalize most killings of endangered wildlife would essentially mean open season on species already on the brink of annihilation,” said Noah Greenwald, endangered species co-director at the Center for Biological Diversity, in a Thursday statement. “It’s the most serious attack on imperiled animals since the Endangered Species Act was passed more than 50 years ago.”

“Without protection against the daily assaults of our modern world, Florida manatees, spotted owls, snowy plovers, and so many other animals that bring color to our world won’t stand a chance,” he warned, noting that “habitat destruction is the single biggest cause of species endangerment and extinction” in the United States and beyond.

Greenwald added that “with this destruction, the perils faced by plants and animals have grown exponentially. Such peril doesn’t come down the barrel of a gun, but it’s still a deadly threat, and the Endangered Species Act can and must protect our imperiled wildlife from this kind of careless killing.”

In addition to the center, the coalition behind the case includes Columbia Riverkeeper, Conservation Law Foundation, Conservation Northwest, Friends of the Wild Swan, Oregon Wild, Sierra Club, Swan View Coalition, and WildEarth Guardians, with legal representation by Earthjustice.

After the memos were exposed last month, Earthjustice attorney Ben Levitan declared that “the government’s new legal position is a prescription for extinction.”

“It says that as long as you claim you didn’t mean to kill an endangered species, the law can’t and won’t stop you,” he stressed. “That’s ridiculous—and a totally illegal, active misreading of the Endangered Species Act. We’ll see the Trump administration in court about this.”



Groups Call Senate Permitting Deal a ‘Blatant Giveaway to Big Oil and Big Tech’

“If it comes to pass, this deal would bulldoze America’s most important wildlife law,” said one campaigner.


Green-winged teals are seen flying over water at Seedskadee National Wildlife Refuge in Wyoming on April 25, 2019.
(Photo by Tom Koerner/US Fish and Wildlife Service/flickr/cc)

Brett Wilkins
Sep 30, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


A bipartisan Senate proposal to overhaul federal permitting rules drew fierce opposition Wednesday from environmental and wildlife advocates, who warn that the legislation could significantly weaken the Endangered Species Act and other key protections in service of boosting President Donald Trump’s pro-fossil fuel and artificial intelligence agenda.

Senate negotiators—chiefly Democrats Martin Heinrich (NM) and Sheldon Whitehouse (RI) and Republicans Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.) and Mike Lee (Utah)—reportedly reached an agreement Monday on the text of a sweeping permitting package intended to speed construction of energy and infrastructure projects.

While the full legislative text of the “Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026” had not been publicly released as of Wednesday, reported provisions have prompted alarm among conservation groups, who warn that the proposal would weaken endangered species protections, shift federal authority and responsibility to states, limit scientific review and judicial oversight, and exempt some projects from key environmental consultations.

“If it comes to pass, this deal would bulldoze America’s most important wildlife law,” Defenders of Wildlife president and CEO Andrew Bowman said Wednesday. “We can build the infrastructure America needs without sacrificing the wildlife we have a responsibility to protect and that Americans cherish. Development should not come at the expense of science, accountability, or the ability of America’s most imperiled wildlife to survive.”

Oil Change International called the proposal “a blatant giveaway to Big Oil and Big Tech.”

“This ‘dirty deal’ threatens to raise electricity prices for working families by accelerating the buildout of energy-guzzling AI data centers and liquefied natural gas export projects,” said Oil Change International US campaigns manager Collin Rees. “Our recent research shows that the Trump administration’s support for reckless AI development and greater gas exports drives up energy costs for households.”

Brett Hartl, government affairs director at the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), said that “this is a climate kill shot that condemns our most vulnerable communities to suffer decades more fossil fuel pollution.”

“It’s absurd to ensure our planet chokes with greenhouse gases, gut endangered species protections, and eviscerate the Clean Water Act for what seems to be a nearly meaningless victory against Trump’s war on offshore wind,” Hartl continued. “The minor benefits for renewable energy corporations are massively dwarfed by the gifts to the fossil fuel industry.”

“If this grotesque legislation becomes law, the paltry increases in renewable energy will be instantly devoured by AI data centers,” he added. “The only winners here are Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, tech oligarchs, and the shareholders of fossil fuel companies.”

According to CBD:
Today’s package contains numerous provisions that lock in thousands of fossil fuel projects, including oil and gas pipelines, [liquefied natural gas] export terminals, and expanded fossil fuel drilling onshore and offshore approved by President Trump over the past two years. It also ensures that future fossil fuel pipelines and methane gas-generated electricity can never be challenged in court.

Additional provisions gut parts of the Clean Water Act, including the Section 401 authority of states to protect their rivers and streams from the impacts of building pipelines and the [Environmental Protection Agency’s] Section 404(c) permit veto authority, which has been used to stop projects like the Pebble Mine in Alaska.

The legislation weakens the National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal consultations, leaving most Tribal nations with no meaningful way to protect their sovereignty when faced with potential fossil fuel projects on their lands.

Furthermore, CBD noted, “the legislation guts the Endangered Species Act by allowing states to take over the Section 7 consultation process with minimal safeguards, turning one of the law’s strongest provisions into a state-run rubber stamp of dangerous projects.”

The Western Environmental Law Center described the proposal as a “five-alarm fire,” warning that it could weaken the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, [National Environmental Policy Act], and other safeguards.

“The permitting deal is a betrayal of public lands, water, and wildlife, and environmental justice values that Westerners depend on,” said Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, the group’s executive director, who warned that the measure could ultimately “hobble the ability of future administrations to enact an ambitious climate and conservation agenda.”

Hartl called out Democrats Heinrich and Whitehouse for “giving away our most cherished environmental laws based on fantastical models that project a renewable energy utopia.”

“They’re rewarding a ruthless fossil fuel industry that will always put its quarterly profits ahead of a livable planet and future generations,” he said. “Trump promised fossil fuel companies that he’d do everything in his power to assist them in his second term, and Sen. Heinrich and Sen. Whitehouse seem hell-bent on helping Trump fulfill that promise.”

Bowman contended that “Congress should be looking for ways to make permitting more efficient rather than a Trojan horse to weaken the Endangered Species Act.”

“Efficiency and conservation are not opposing goals,” he added. “A durable permitting bill should deliver both. Congress should not lock in permanent damage to the Endangered Species Act simply to get a deal today.”


Conservationists Vow Court Fight as DHS Lifts Pause on Big Bend Border Construction

“We won’t let them destroy the wildest place in Texas without a fight,” the Center for Biological Diversity vowed.



Construction of the Trump administration’s border barrier project procedes at Mariscal Mountain in Big Bend National Park in Texas on August 15, 2026.
(Photo by Laiken Jordah/Clenter for Biological Diversity)

Brett Wilkins
Sep 30, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The Trump administration on Wednesday allowed a temporary pause on border construction in and around Big Bend National Park in Texas to expire, prompting renewed vows from conservationists and other opponents to fight the contentious project in court.

Laiken Jordahl, the national public lands advocate at the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), posted a court document stating that US Customs and Border Protection (CBP)k “will lift the pause on ground-disturbing activities” related to the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) plan to build border barriers and other destructive infrastructure across one of the most remote and environmentally sensitive stretches of the US-Mexico border.

The government said Tuesday in a court filing that CBP is “actively considering adjustments” to the project “that would reduce its scope and avoid or minimize potential impacts, based on input received from the National Park Service and other stakeholders.”




However, those possible changes did not assuage opponents of the project, who span the political spectrum.

“We are disappointed, and urge the Department of Homeland Security to extend this pause,” Emily Thompson, executive director of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks, said Wednesday. “Continuing with construction of border barriers, roads, and associated infrastructure inside Big Bend National Park will do unprecedented damage to the park.”

Thompson continued:
Big Bend National Park stands out for its unique desert landscape. With more nesting bird species than any other national park, towering canyon walls, and the largest international dark sky reserve in the entire world, Big Bend is an integral addition to our nation’s natural heritage. The Trump administration’s plan to build a border wall through the park threatens all of this, heightening flood risk, inundating the skies with lights, and cutting off migration patterns for wildlife. Building in Big Bend would be mutilating an extraordinary landscape at a massive cost to the taxpayer—with little ultimate benefit.

Bob Krumenaker, chair of Keep Big Bend Wild and a former Big Bend National Park superintendent, asserted that “border security already works” in the park “without the need for intrusive construction.”

“The Border Patrol, the National Park Service, and local sheriffs already operate an effective surveillance system with ground and aerial patrols and unobtrusive, wireless sensors,” he noted. “The rugged terrain, huge distances, and harsh desert weather in the national park and in Mexico across the Rio Grande make this the least active section of the entire southern border for illegal crossings.”

CBD and other plaintiffs are already seeking a preliminary injunction in federal court. US District Judge Kathleen Cardone—an appointee of former President George W. Bush—is scheduled to hear testimony and evidence Friday in El Paso on the request to halt construction while the groups’ lawsuit proceeds. The plaintiffs argue that the Trump administration unlawfully waived dozens of federal laws to accelerate construction.

Indigenous peoples and their advocates have criticized DHS for waiving laws, including the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act, to enable the project’s construction.

In a statement issued Wednesday, CBD described some of the damage already done by construction in service of Trump’s deadly immigration crackdown:
Bulldozers started tearing into Big Bend National Park near the iconic Santa Elena Canyon in early August and were documented plowing new routes for vehicle barriers into both the east and west sides of Mariscal Mountain. Contractors have stockpiled heavy equipment across the Big Bend region, where staging yards have been cleared, worker camps built, and water wells drilled.

“We’ll be in court... in El Paso demanding a permanent halt to the destruction,” CBD said. “We won’t let them destroy the wildest place in Texas without a fight.
After Two Botched Attempts, UN Experts Urge Tennessee Not to Try to Execute Christa Pike Again

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk also argued that “the death penalty has no place in any society.”



Christa Pike survived two botched execution attempts in Nashville, Tennessee on September 30, 2026.
(Photo via Cornell Law School)

Jessica Corbett
Oct 01, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

United Nations human rights experts on Thursday joined the growing chorus of people around the world outraged by Tennessee’s two botched attempts to execute Christa Pike and called on the state to refrain from trying again to kill the 50-year-old woman.

After a last-minute legal battle, the US Supreme Court allowed Tennessee to execute Pike for the 1995 murder of Colleen Slemmer. The state tried to do so at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville on Wednesday night—with two injections of pentobarbital, each of which was supposed to be lethal—but she survived and was transported by ambulance to a hospital.



‘Inhumane, Barbaric, Torturous’: Christa Pike Survives Twice-Botched Execution in Tennessee



A doctor interviewed by WSMV 4 Nashville’s Steve Mehling suggested that an IV could have been placed incorrectly—and, as the journalist summarized: “Pike may suffer from a flurry of long-term effects. This includes skin necrosis, permanent scarring, functional impairment, compartment syndrome, chronic neuropathic pain, and pigmentation change at the injection site.”

As of Thursday afternoon, Pike’s attorneys said that she was still alive, but in critical condition, “and receiving lifesaving medical care,” according to The Washington Post. Republican Gov. Bill Lee, who had previously declined to grant clemency in this case, has since halted executions in Tennessee and ordered an investigation into the state’s second botched killing of an inmate this year.

Several UN special rapporteurs and members of the Working Group on Discrimination Against Women and Girls had urged US authorities to commute Pike’s sentence last month, saying that her “execution would mark the culmination of a trajectory of severe physical and psychological suffering marked by childhood abuse and nearly three decades of solitary confinement on death row.”

After Wednesday’s botched attempts, some of the same experts weighed in again: “Christa Pike was denied clemency. One hour before her execution, a court halted it. The Supreme Court then lifted the stay. She was injected twice with lethal drugs and survived. Forcing a person to face death, have it suspended, and then face it again within hours amounts to barbaric and torturous punishment, compounded in this case by decades of psychological torture on death row.”

“The state of Tennessee must immediately and irrevocably end this cruelty by commuting Christa Pike’s death sentence,” said Morris Tidball-Binz, special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions; Margaret Satterthwaite, special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers; Pau Pérez-Sales, special rapporteur on torture; Mariângela Batista Galvão Simão, special rapporteur on the right to health; Reem Alsalem, special rapporteur on violence against women and girls; and working group members Claudia Flores, Ivana Krstić, Dorothy Estrada-Tanck, and Haina Lu.




United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk went even further, arguing against capital punishment.

“The case of Christa Pike lays bare multiple reasons why the death penalty should be abolished,” said a statement from his office. “The prolonged suffering—physical and mental—arising from multiple failed execution attempts is abhorrent, and cruel. And there are key fair trial questions still unresolved.”

Türk is calling on “state authorities not to pursue any further attempt to execute Pike,” his office said. “We are also troubled by the increase in the number of executions in the United States. The death penalty has no place in any society.”


‘Inhumane, Barbaric, Torturous’: Christa Pike Survives Twice-Botched Execution in Tennessee

“This event is the worst we’ve seen and unlike any other botched execution in the modern era,” said Robin Maher, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center. “There is no precedent.”



Abraham Bonowitz speaks during a March 4 Mercy protest against the death penalty at the Tennessee State Capitol in Nashville ahead of the Sept. 30 scheduled execution of Christa Pike.
(Photo: George Walker IV/AP Photo)

Jon Queally
Oct 01, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The botched execution of Christa Pike in Tennessee on Wednesday night was met with disgust and outrage by death penalty opponents who have long argued that not only is murder by the state morally wrong, but the government’s inability to carry out such punishments humanely has been shown time and time again to result in horrific human rights violations and barbaric scenes of cruelty inside the nation’s prison walls.

Pike, sentenced to death in Tennessee over the 1995 murder of 19-year-old Colleen Slemmer, survived two otherwise lethal injections of pentobarbital on Wednesday while strapped to a gurney by prison officials at the Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville.

“Tonight the State of Tennessee once again failed to carry out a lawful execution,” said Pike’s attorneys—Randy Spivey and Kelly Gleason from the TN Office of the Post Conviction Defender, and Stephen Ferrell and Luke Ihnen from Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee—in a statement late Wednesday.




“We take no pleasure in being right,” her lawyer’s continued, “but the concerns raised by Ms. Pike proved to be true: difficult vein access, blown veins, degraded pentobarbital, no emergency medical care available when things inevitably go wrong, all under a protocol that remains veiled in secrecy. Christa is being treated at a nearby hospital. We have not been informed as to her condition.”

Pike’s legal team said she remained alive after two rounds of the lethal injection, with witnesses reporting confusion after the first dose resulted in Pike raising her head to speak to those who administered the drug and falling into a deep sleep, but audibly snoring and still alive, after the second.

“This event is the worst we’ve seen and unlike any other botched execution in the modern era,” said Robin Maher, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center. “There is no precedent.”

It was the second botched execution in Tennessee this year, reports The New York Times. According to the newspaper:
The apparent failure came after dueling court rulings delayed the execution of [Pike] by about nine hours. The state had raced to go ahead with the execution before the day ended and to avoid having to reschedule.

In a pair of emergency legal filings, Ms. Pike’s lawyers said that while two syringes of pentobarbital, the lethal drug, had been administered, Ms. Pike had not lost consciousness. She still had a heartbeat, they said, and was audibly snoring.

The execution of Pike, who court records show was subject to pervasive abuse throughout her childhood and was only 18 years old when she carried out the brutal crime, had been put on hold earlier Wednesday only to be reinstated by the US Supreme Court later in the day.

Amnesty International USA condemned the treatment of Pike and called for an end to all capital punishment in the United States.

“Tennessee’s botched attempt to execute Christa Pike, as witnessed by her attorneys, demonstrates why the death penalty truly is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment,” the group said. “All execution methods are inhumane and unacceptable. The death penalty must be abolished, everywhere.”

Republican Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee announced after the botched execution that the state’s other remaining execution for 2026 would be put on hold and ordered “a comprehensive, third-party review to determine exactly what occurred” in the attempted killing of Pike.


Pike, said human rights advocate Evad HaAm, “survived a completed lethal-injection attempt. That is not a stay. It is a botched execution.”

While Pike’s current medical status and chance for survival remain unknown, further attempts by the state to kill her, he argued, “would violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.”


Federal Appellate Court Halts Tennessee’s Planned Execution of Christa Pike

“So much of Ms. Pike’s experience reflects widespread and systemic failures that surface in death penalty cases,” said an Amnesty International USA researcher, urging an end to capital punishment “in Tennessee and beyond.”



A panel from the US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit halted Tennessee’s planned execution of Christa Pike on September 30, 2026.
(Photo via Tennesseans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty)


Jessica Corbett
Sep 30, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

A federal appellate court on Wednesday morning temporarily blocked Tennessee from executing Christa Pike, as witnesses had already gathered at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville for the state’s first execution of a woman in centuries.

A panel from the US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled 2-1 to halt the state-sanctioned killing, after Republican Gov. Bill Lee and the US Supreme Court declined to do so. The 50-year-old, found guilty of murdering Colleen Slemmer in 1995, when Pike was 18, could still be executed on Wednesday if the nation’s top court allows it.

Republican state Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti’s office said: “We will continue to advocate for the lawfully imposed sentence as the courts work through this technical issue. It is common in capital cases for the defense to raise last-minute objections following decades of litigation in numerous courts. We are asking the Supreme Court of the United States to lift the stay.”

Judges Jane Stranch and Karen Moore, both appointees of Democratic presidents, concluded early Wednesday that “a short stay of execution” is in order due to arguments related to the sexual abuse Pike suffered as a child—which clinical psychologist Dr. Bethany Brand described as “truly extreme,” writing in 2023 that “the level of trauma she was subjected to as a preschooler through her 18th year, when she was arrested, is almost impossible to grasp because it is so severe.”

As the 6th Circuit’s order details, Pike points out “that the state recently reversed its litigation position that she is a liar who fabricated sexual abuse. Pike contends that the state’s concession of her history of child sexual abuse and rape ‘erodes the foundation’ of her state court proceedings. Pike ties this erosion to defects in the federal court proceedings because... the district court was required to give strong deference to the state court’s findings of facts.”

“Pike also cites scholarly authority supporting her argument that the state’s representations about her history of sexual abuse tainted the state court proceedings and the subsequent federal ones by introducing damaging stereotypes of survivors of sexual assault,” the filing says.



Pike was “subjected to drugs and alcohol while she was still in her mother’s womb” and “first sexually abused by her grandmother’s boyfriend, who would orally rape her before she was in kindergarten,” the Nashville Banner’s Steven Hale recently reported, citing Brand’s findings. “After living through periods of physical and emotional torment by extended family members and one of her mother’s husbands, Pike was later raped by a known predatory neighbor.”

“She was hospitalized at the age of 12 after overdosing on pills during a suicide attempt,” then sexually assaulted by one of her mother’s boyfriends, who had “moved into the family’s home and brought with him violence and depravity,” Hale continued, noting that the perpetrators who abused Pike often faced limited consequences. “When she was 17 in January 1994, Pike was sexually assaulted again, by a man who saw her walking to the store in Carrboro, North Carolina.”

Hale was among the journalists at the prison in Nashville on Wednesday morning. He said on social media that “I’m told the state has until midnight to carry out the execution. Still unclear what happens next, but prison officials are bringing those of us witnessing the execution inside now to be ready.”

The journalist added just after noon Central Time that “prison officials have brought us back outside now while we continue to wait for news from the Supreme Court.”



Following the 6th Circuit’s decision, the ACLU—whose Capital Punishment Project works to repeal the death penalty in the United States—took to social media, urging the public to “tell Gov. Lee to respect the court’s decision and call off her execution NOW.”

“Gov. Lee’s 615-741-2001 mailbox is full—contacting him through this form is the quickest way to reach his office,” the legal group explained, sharing a link to the relevant page on the state government’s website.

Lee had said Monday that “after deliberate consideration of Christa Gail Pike’s request for clemency, and after a thorough review of the case, I am upholding the sentence of the state of Tennessee and do not plan to intervene.”

Attorneys for Pike—Stephen Ferrell, Kelly Gleason, and Randy Spivey—responded that they were “deeply saddened and heartbroken by Gov. Lee’s decision to deny clemency,” emphasizing that “throughout her childhood, Christa was failed by people and institutions that should have shown her care and meaningful intervention.”

“The 18-year-old girl suffering from severe mental illness and near-debilitating trauma no longer exists,” the lawyers said. “Christa is a 50-year-old remorseful woman who understands her actions, receives proper treatment for her mental illness, and provides for and guides fellow incarcerated women.”

“With this decision, the state of Tennessee is ignoring what both science and our legal system have decided: An 18-year-old brain is not an adult brain, and 18 is too young to face execution. This decision also leaves unanswered vital questions about Tennessee’s execution protocol,” they added. “We will continue to support Christa through every remaining avenue and advocate for a system that is transparent for the people of Tennessee.”



Among the organizations that have pressured Lee to block the execution is Amnesty International USA, whose deputy director of research, Justin Mazzola, recently said that “so much of Ms. Pike’s experience reflects widespread and systemic failures that surface in death penalty cases.”

“She endured profound abuse and trauma as a child and had serious mental disabilities that were never adequately addressed nor treated,” he highlighted. “Due to inadequate legal representation, these issues were not fully presented to the jury. Knowing all that, it is unthinkable that Gov. Lee would even consider moving forward with this execution.”

Mazzola—whose group opposes capital punishment under all circumstances—also stressed that “this issue is about more than one person. Amnesty International members are speaking out because the use of the death penalty remains a human rights failure. As its use continues to decline globally, the United States remains an outlier. It is well past time to abolish the death penalty once and for all, in Tennessee and beyond.”

The US National Domestic Violence Hotline can be reached at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233), by texting “START” to 88788, or through chat at thehotline.org. RAINN’s National Sexual Assault Hotline can be reached at 1-800-656-HOPE (4673) or by texting “HOPE” to 64673. Both offer 24/7, free, and confidential support. DomesticShelters.org has a list of global and national resources.



Trump eyes move that would lock in his gilded Oval Office makeover for future presidents


Travis Gettys
October 1, 2026 
RAW STORY


Decorations at the Oval Office, during meeting of U.S. President Donald Trump with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun at the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Donald Trump is eyeing a move that would lock in the changes he's made to the Oval Office for future presidents.

The 80-year-old president told Time magazine reporters in a lengthy interview published Thursday that Secret Service officials suggested demolishing and rebuilding the chief executive's White House office, which he claims to have rejected, but the Washington Post flagged another detail in those comments.

"'Sir, we think the Oval Office should be taken down, and we'll build a new one, sir,'" Trump said, quoting the official. "I said, 'My a--, you can't build a new one. This is a special place.'"

The White House declined to comment further, and the Secret Service did not immediately respond to questions about the president's account.

The current Oval Office dates to Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency, and Trump has filled it with gold decor as part of a broader overhaul of the White House. He has followed Secret Service advice on other security projects, including plans for a permanent fence around Lafayette Square, the park across from the White House.

Trump also told Time he wants a new federal designation for the Oval Office, saying it could protect the room from demolition and preserve the changes he has made.

"I've been asking Susie for six months to give me a statement. Will we save this room? Will we make it a federal landmark?" Trump said, referring to chief of staff Susie Wiles.

The White House already holds National Historic Landmark status. However, Congress exempted it from the National Historic Preservation Act, which lets presidents make major changes to the building without the usual review.

Trump was asked whether his successor would be allowed to change his gilded decor if the Oval Office was designated as a federal landmark.

"No," he stated.
DESANTISLAND
Fox forced to cut away from JD Vance's speech as protesters repeatedly heckled him



David Edwards
October 1, 2026 
RAW STORY


US Vice President JD Vance speaks during a midterm campaign rally to support the GOP gubernatorial candidate Byron Donalds in Lakeland, Florida, US, October 1, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

Fox News sister network Live Now from Fox cut away from Vice President JD Vance after hecklers repeatedly interrupted his speech at a rally boosting Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) campaign for Florida governor.

The network was streaming Vance live Thursday from a Lakeland, Florida, midterm rally paid for by the Trump 47 Committee, according to the event listing. The rally was held to boost Donalds and Sen. Ashley Moody (R-FL), who both spoke before Vance.

Vance was praising Moody when a man in the crowd began heckling him.

"She wants…" Vance said as the man shouted over him.

"She wants to make sure…" he tried again.


"We got a clown over here, ladies and gentlemen," Vance said as the crowd booed.


"We…" Vance started, before the man shouted again and the audience jeered.

"You know, you always have to laugh at these protesters, because that guy, you know, he pretends like he just broke out into an emotional protest, but he made sure to bring his cell phone at the end of a pole," Vance told the crowd.

"This is not a representative voter from the state of Florida. That guy is a Democrat plant who wants… he wants to raise your taxes and release illegal aliens on the streets of Florida," the frustrated vice president continued. "Well, we kicked him out just like we're gonna kick out the rest of the Democrats who wanna do the exact same thing!"

Vance had moved on to Donalds and his push to help Florida homeowners when a woman began shouting.

"Byron Donalds…" Vance said. "Byron Donalds is fighting to protect…"

The vice president increased his tempo as he struggled to finish the sentence.


"...Florida parents every single day," Vance said quickly.

"USA! USA!" the crowd chanted over the boos as Live Now from Fox cut away from the speech.

"And there you have it, another protester being led out of this rally right here," Live Now from Fox anchor Christina Evans told viewers. As she spoke, the network's footage showed a protester being escorted from the building.

The network soon cut back to Vance as the crowd's "USA! USA!" chant continued.

Within seconds, another woman began yelling.

"And here's the thing," Vance said. The woman kept yelling for several more seconds as boos rose again.


"Now what… What that woman is yelling is that she wants… is left-wing bureaucrats in control of your schools," Vance said, speeding up again to finish over her.

"But Byron thinks you ought to be in control of your kids' schools," Vance said as the crowd cheered and the yelling went on.



Kimberly Guilfoyle 'unfit' to serve after her overseas antics were exposed: lawmakers

Bennito L. Kelty
October 1, 2026 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: Greek Minister of the Environment and Energy, Stavros Papastavrou, U.S. Ambassador to Greece Kimberly Ann Guilfoyle, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, Vice President New Ventures at Chevron, Gavin Lewis, Chief Executive Officer Hellenic Hydrocarbon Resources Management S.A. Aristofanis Stefatos react, after signing Chevron-led consortium contracts for gas exploration off Greece, in Athens, Greece, February 16, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki/File Photo


President Donald Trump's ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle, faces calls for her removal after reportedly pulling a lobbyist into meetings with foreign officials.

Guilfoyle, a former Fox News host who was once engaged to Donald Trump Jr., was confirmed to the post last year. The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that top lawmakers on the House and Senate foreign affairs panels have pressed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to examine her conduct. They cited a recent Journal investigation into her campaign to promote natural gas deals involving a Greek company across southeastern Europe.

"If these reports are accurate, Ambassador Guilfoyle is unfit to represent the United States abroad and should be removed from her position," Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) wrote in a Wednesday letter to Rubio.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), who supported Guilfoyle's confirmation, sent her own letter Thursday. "Such actions do not serve U.S. credibility overseas and risk undermining U.S. diplomacy," she wrote.

The lawmakers want records of every meeting attended by Christos Marafatsos, a registered lobbyist for Aktor Group. Aktor's joint venture with a Greek state-backed energy firm signed a 20-year agreement last fall to buy American liquefied natural gas from Venture Global. They also asked about Guilfoyle's financial interests and her travel on private jets, including one flight covered by Aktor's chief executive. Former embassy staffers told The Journal that ambassadors rarely fly private and need explicit approval to do so.

The Journal previously reported that Guilfoyle clashed with Greece's energy minister at a March dinner in Athens. Referring to Romania's government, which was then nearing collapse, she allegedly said, "We can do that to any country we want. We can do that here." Her lawyer disputed that account, per The Journal. Romania's government fell in a no-confidence vote in May.

A U.S. Embassy official in Greece said Guilfoyle "continues to follow all State Department ethical guidelines" and that "any insinuation that she was operating outside of ethical guidelines are categorically false."

A lawyer for Aktor told The Journal, "The Ambassador has been consistently promoting U.S. interests."

Trump's approval rating plunges to 'extremely rare' level as midterm message flatlines

Matthew Chapman
October 1, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump looks at media members after returning to the White House from Scotland, Britain, in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 29, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas

President Donald Trump's handling of inflation has become a defining liability of his presidency, with new polling showing roughly 8 in 10 Americans disapproving of his approach to the cost of living.

A new AP-NORC poll released Thursday found Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of cost-of-living issues by a staggering 82 percent to 17 percent margin. Reuters-Ipsos and Marquette Law School polls also put his approval in the high teens, while Marquette and CNN separately found disapproval at 80 percent. Such a level of unity against the president, wrote CNN's Aaron Blake, is "extremely rare" in American politics.

Even within Trump's own coalition, cracks are showing, with at least half of Republicans disapproving across four separate polls, 29% of self-identified MAGA Republicans souring on his handling per Fox News polling, and between 63 percent and 72 percent of white voters without college degrees, historically among his strongest supporters, expressing disapproval as well.

Few issues in recent presidential history have generated this kind of consensus. Economic troubles came close for past presidents; George W. Bush faced heavy criticism over the 2008 financial crash, and Jimmy Carter dealt with similar backlash amid runaway inflation and unemployment decades earlier, but neither reached quite the same depths Trump is seeing now.

Past scandals offer a similar contrast. Ronald Reagan weathered serious backlash over Iran-Contra, and Richard Nixon faced widespread public anger during Watergate, yet both stayed below the threshold Trump has now crossed on economic frustration alone. Even Gerald Ford's deeply controversial decision to pardon Nixon didn't generate disapproval this severe.

The closest Trump himself previously came to matching these numbers was over his decision to pardon violent January 6 defendants, which also fell a few points short of where his inflation numbers sit now.

Despite the historic unpopularity, Trump pushed back in a new Time magazine interview published Thursday, insisting Americans shouldn't blame him for affordability struggles and pointing fingers at Biden instead, even though inflation is currently running higher than when Trump took office. Polling suggests that messaging isn't landing: a clear majority of Americans hold Trump's own policy choices responsible for today's high prices, a far larger share than blamed Biden's policies at a similar point before the 2022 midterms.
Reporter spots nefarious plot behind Trump's exclusive crypto dinner


Matthew Chapman
October 1, 2026 
RAW STORY


President Donald Trump's latest crypto dinner looks like a predatory scheme to steal money from investors, Russ Buettner of The New York Times told CNN's Anderson Cooper on Thursday.

It isn't the first round of shady crypto dealings, he noted, as the whole enterprise has made Trump and his family vastly wealthier.

"Overall, this past year of crypto wealth and Donald Trump's life, I think, has been more income, pure profit than anything else," said Buettner. "Probably the sum total of his entire life and business before ... absolutely more than his inheritance, and the money from 'The Apprentice' and his best business deals all combined."

The other notable aspect, he said, is that "they were so roundly criticized for the first go-round because they offered these coins as he was entering office; 58 people bought them. We can't tell who bought a lot of them and sold them immediately. The period when they owned it raised the price a lot. Those people made all more than $10 million each. Almost everybody else who bought it after that lost a ton of money, I think to the tune of $700 million."

"Which is just incredible when you think about it," said Cooper.

Buettner agreed.

These tokens, he added, are "essentially a baseball card where you don't get the baseball card. It's just a piece of electronic, ephemeral. And it doesn't have any value unless somebody else wants to pay you more for it. You can't use it, typically, to buy other things. And they were really roundly criticized even by the crypto industry for doing what's called a rug pull, which is the equivalent of, like, a pump-and-dump scheme."


BUYING ALASKA VOTES

US ally shoots down Trump's $50 billion investment boast: 'Far beyond what was agreed'

Tom Boggioni
October 1, 2026
RAW STORY


US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick speaks about an energy infrastructure project in Alaska as US President Donald Trump and US Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK) listen in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, September 30, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

A $50 billion investment deal touted by President Donald Trump during a Wednesday Oval Office event is running into pushback from the ally he says agreed to it.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters South Korea would invest more than $50 billion in the long-stalled Alaska LNG pipeline project, plus another $120 billion in U.S. nuclear power plants, as part of a "broader trade package."

That earned applause in the Oval Office on Wednesday.

Sen. Dan Sullivan, an Alaska Republican who has pushed the pipeline for years, celebrated on X: "Alaska LNG is happening thanks to a $50 billion+ investment from South Korea that we announced today at the White House. This project will deliver low-cost energy for Alaskans for generations and create 10,000+ good-paying jobs. A historic day for our state!"

But South Korea's government says the celebration is premature, the Wall Street Journal reported early Thursday morning.

Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan pushed back on the U.S. framing, saying "the announcement went far beyond what was agreed, as the countries agreed to proceed with the Alaska project only on the premise that commercial reasonableness is guaranteed," according to the Korea Times.

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung echoed the objection, insisting no blank check had been written.

"We agreed to begin working on the Alaska LNG project on the conditions that, first, its commercial viability is confirmed and, second, it complies with Korea's legal procedures," Lee said.

According to the Journal, Seoul has reportedly secured "a $20 billion annual investment ceiling and a $200 billion overall cap" as part of the broader trade framework, guardrails that leave the specific Alaska pipeline commitment far from finalized despite Wednesday's applause line.


"The clashing versions add another twist to protracted, and often contentious, talks between Washington and Seoul over last year’s trade pact. South Korea has pledged $350 billion in U.S. investments, plus an additional $100 billion for American energy purchases, in exchange for dropping tariffs on most goods from 25% to 15%," the Journal reported.
Trump's trade war wrecked industry he swore he was defending: 'Everyone is losing'

Bennito L. Kelty
October 1, 2026 
RAW STORY




President Donald Trump's trade war with Canada is battering the American dairy producers he has repeatedly claimed to be protecting.

In a Thursday article for "The Bulwark," economics editor Catherine Rampell said U.S. dairy "was supposed to be the one industry President Donald Trump was actually helping." Instead, she wrote, "American dairy farmers are now saying: Please, stop helping."


Trump often points to dairy as proof that Canada cheats the U.S. on trade, and he has put Canada's dairy tariffs at 250 percent or 400 percent, depending on the day. Rampell noted that those steep rates apply only to sales above a tariff-free quota set under the USMCA, the trade deal Trump negotiated in his first term. Citing the International Dairy Foods Association, she reported that U.S. producers have never come close to hitting that cap. The U.S. also sells roughly three times as much dairy to Canada as it buys.

Mateo Kehler, CEO of Vermont's Jasper Hill Farm, told Rampell his Canadian customers disappeared almost overnight last year as tariffs, counter-tariffs and boycotts piled up. His farm's Winnimere cheese recently won Best of Show from the American Cheese Society.

"I can't figure out who's winning here," Kehler said. "Everybody I know is losing."

He added that he doesn't fault Canadian shoppers.

"Honestly, if I were a Canadian consumer, I would not be buying anything from the U.S. either," he said. "This is a time for resistance, and I applaud Canadians for voting with their dollars."

The pressure has grown in recent weeks. Canada began imposing a 25 percent tariff on U.S. cheese last month, and this week Trump banned some Canadian dairy imports, mostly whey products, along with Canadian motorcycles and alcohol, according to Rampell.

Pete Hardin, longtime editor of the Wisconsin dairy publication the Milkweed, said two Wisconsin cheese-plant owners told him their large Canadian orders had been canceled.

"The notion that for dairy, Canada is a problem to the U.S. is a joke, in my opinion," Hardin said.

Rampell had a blunter view, writing that "whatever the f— Trump is doing now is making things worse. For everyone."
Trump started a fight that's giving his rival 'unthinkable' popularity: WSJ

Tom Boggioni
September 30, 2026 
RAW STORY



U.S. President Donald Trump speaks with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at a working lunch with leaders of G7 and the Middle East, in Evian-les-Bains, France, June 16, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/Pool/File Photo

At the same time Donald Trump's approval numbers are hitting lows never seen before, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is enjoying a burst of popularity that's letting him push his agenda through with little resistance.

The reason? His refusal to be bullied by the American president has Canadians and political rivals lining up behind him as his party adds new members.

Carney is barreling forward with "a rewiring of Canada's economic, national-security and foreign policies" that, in some cases, would once have been "unthinkable" and unpopular, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.

A political novice until he won the premiership last year, Carney has vanquished opposition that might have felled his predecessors thanks to a confrontation with Trump that has given him "unthinkable" popularity.

Polls show Carney's Liberals would win a majority if an election were held today.


According to the Journal, "Polls show that Carney’s Liberals would win a majority if an election were held today. A survey released Tuesday from Nanos Research found that Carney was the preferred choice for prime minister of more than 60% of respondents, the highest level it has recorded for him."

That has lawmakers from "across the political spectrum" defecting to the Liberals over the past year, and his opponents are struggling to land a punch; Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has spent recent months fending off critics in his own party."


Even in Alberta, a conservative stronghold, people view Carney more favorably than Poilievre or Premier Danielle Smith, according to the report.

"I cannot remember, in my adult life, a prime minister having this good an 18 months," said Darrell Bricker, chief executive of Ipsos told the Journal. "There has been very little pushback against any of the things that he's proposed."

Lori Turnbull, a political scientist at Nova Scotia's Dalhousie University, said Carney likely wanted to pursue many of these policies regardless, but the conflict with the U.S. "gives him a logic, gives him a narrative that might make more sense to people."

She added: "The way he's describing it is essentially we're in an emergency situation, we're in a kind of something that's similar to a war. He's made this about our sovereignty, and so it all kind of fits together."