Saturday, October 03, 2026

 

Russia leads world in cat ownership — yet has 2.8 million strays

FILE; An elf cat at an international cat show in Sochi, 29 January 2022
Copyright AP Photo

By Irina Aleksandrova
Published on

Nearly 59% of Russian households own at least one cat, the highest rate globally, but the 2022 mobilisation order left hundreds of thousands of animals abandoned when owners fled the country or were sent to the front in Ukraine. Up to 98% of Russia's stray cats and dogs were once domestic pets.

Russia has the highest rate of cat ownership in the world, with nearly 59% of households keeping at least one cat — and an estimated 2.8 million stray cats living on its streets, a number that rose sharply after the 2022 mobilisation order sent thousands of pet owners fleeing the country or to the front amid Russia's ongoing all-out war in Ukraine

According to a 2024-2026 study by analytics platform Seasia Stats, Russia ranks first globally for cats as pets. Romania ranks second in Europe at 48%, followed by Poland at 41%, Latvia at 37% and Hungary at 35%.

Outside Europe, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, New Zealand and the US also make the top 10. The Seasia Stats findings are consistent with a 2023 study by insurer Ingosstrakh and the Financial University, in which 58.8% of Russian respondents described themselves as cat owners.

A woman walks a cat on a lead in Moscow, Wednesday, 11 March 2026. Pavel Bednyakov/Copyright 2026 The AP. All rights reserved.

The stray figures come from a separate study by the Centre for Animal Nutrition and Well-being Studies, the Nika animal charity and research firm Ipsos.

They put the total stray animal population in Russia in 2025 at nearly 3.6 million, of which 2.8 million are cats and 800,000 are dogs.

Of those, around 170,000 were in shelters at the time of the study, while the rest were living on the streets. Researchers say up to 98% of stray cats and dogs were once domestic pets abandoned by their owners.

A cat living in the basement of the State Hermitage Museum in St Petersburg, Russia, 10 April 2024. Kirill Zarubin/AP

Animal welfare organisations recorded a sharp increase in abandonments after Russia announced partial mobilisation in September 2022.

Men who received call-up papers were either leaving the country or preparing for deployment and in many cases could not arrange care for their animals or find shelter places.

On classified advertising websites, owners threatened to have pets put down if no one took them. Shelter volunteers reported similar ultimatums from people surrendering animals in person.

Russia has 819 shelters, the overwhelming majority privately run, alongside hundreds of charities and tens of thousands of volunteers. Together they care for between 170,000 and 250,000 animals — no more than 5–7% of the estimated stray population.

A woman hugs a performer in a cat costume next to a portrait of Russian President Vladimir Putin on Palace Square in St Petersburg, Russia, 21 May 2023. Dmitri Lovetsky/Copyright 2023 The AP. All rights reserved

The popularity of cats in Eastern Europe has historical roots: before industrialised agriculture, cats served a practical function on farms, where their presence and scent deterred rodents.

In Southeast Asia, researchers link rising ownership to urbanisation and the growth of a middle class.

Cats have lived alongside humans for around 10,000 years. Today, they are human companions of choice, alongside dogs.

 

Spain faces housing protests in more than 50 cities after parliament rejects tenant protections

Protest are expected in Madrid and other major cities
Copyright AP Photo


By Simon Ormiston
Published on

The eviction of an 87-year-old woman has turned anger over rents that have nearly doubled in ten years into a threat to Pedro Sánchez's minority government.

Demonstrators are set to march in more than 50 Spanish cities on Saturday, a day after parliament voted down two government decrees meant to give tenants stronger protection.

The Tenants' Union, which has been coordinating the protests, called the demonstrations. "There is an irreparable disconnect between what the people want and what the parties vote for," it said in a statement.

In Madrid, marchers are due to leave from several points around the city at noon and converge on Plaza de Cibeles in the centre. Activists have already been camped for about a week in Puerta del Sol, one of the capital's main tourist squares.

The anger was triggered by the eviction of 87-year-old Maricarmen Abascal, who was carried out on a stretcher from the Madrid flat where she had lived for around seven decades. Housing campaigners say an investment company had bought the property and sought to raise her rent by 275 percent. After the backlash, the new owners agreed to let her return at a low rent.

Calls for a general election

The government drew up its measures in response to the nationwide protests that followed. The package rejected on Friday would have renewed rental contracts automatically when they expired and restricted evictions of vulnerable tenants. It also took aim at so-called vulture funds, investment firms that buy properties cheaply in pursuit of higher returns.

The decrees needed the votes of the Catalan separatist party Junts, which opposed them on the grounds that they lacked rigour.

The defeat is a further setback for Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. It has revived doubts over whether his minority government can last until the next scheduled general election in 2027.

Alberto Núñez Feijóo, leader of the conservative Popular Party (PP), the main opposition, urged Sánchez after the vote to "call elections as soon as possible". After eight years in power, he said, the prime minister had the backing of "neither the streets nor parliament". Recent opinion polls have generally put the PP ahead of the Socialists.

Housing has been a leading concern for Spaniards for years, with supply falling short of demand and costs soaring, as they have elsewhere in the European Union. Average rents have almost doubled over the past decade and asking prices for homes are up about 90 percent, according to the real estate website Idealista.


 

Sánchez begins reflection on early election as protesters call for general strike

Activists protest at Madrid's Puerta del Sol in Spain on Friday, 2 October 2026.
Copyright Foto AP/Manu Fernández


By Christina Thykjaer
Published on


Spanish Prime Minister will decide this weekend whether to call early elections after his two housing decrees were rejected, as housing activists prepare fresh protests and consider a general strike as the next step.

Pedro Sánchez enters a period of reflection. The Prime Minister will use this weekend to decide whether to bring forward the general election after Congress on Friday threw out two housing decrees put forward by his Socialist government.

The parliamentary defeat leaves the government facing a new scenario and Sánchez having to decide on the future of the legislature. According to government sources cited by several national media outlets, the prime minister will, over the coming days, consider whether to call elections before the end of the year.

Hours before the votes, the government had played down that possibility and insisted that an early election was not on the table because "hoy no toca" (today is not the day). After the result unfolded, the executive said it would analyse the situation without ruling out any option.

The two decrees were rejected after more than four hours of debate. The first fell by 178 votes to 172, with the Popular Party, Vox, Junts, and UPN all voting against. The second was defeated by 184 votes to 166, after the PNV and Canary Islands Coalition joined the 'no' camp.

Sánchez's political future hanging

While Sánchez's political future hangs in the balance, the reaction outside Congress has been immediate. Protesters who had been camped out for days in Puerta del Sol marched to Congress on Friday to follow a vote they regarded as crucial to their demands.

Once the rejection of the first decree was confirmed, some of the protesters headed back to Sol chanting "general strike". A general assembly was scheduled for the afternoon to decide the next steps in the movement and the future of the camp itself.

The Confederation of Tenants' Unions has also called demonstrations this Saturday in more than 50 Spanish cities and is already signalling an escalation in protest: "the next step is a general strike", the organisation said.

The spokesperson for the Tenants' Union, Alicia del Río, had already on Friday called for a general strike over housing and warned that the mobilisation would not end with the vote in Congress.

A weekend with two unknowns

The fall of the decrees opens a weekend marked by two key questions. The first will be answered in the political arena: whether Sánchez chooses to continue the legislature or bring forward the general election.

The second lies on the streets. Protests will continue this Saturday in dozens of cities, and housing campaign groups will have to decide how far to step up their mobilisation and how to put into practice their call for a general strike.

Two very different responses to the same vote, which has put on hold both the government's next move and that of a housing protest which, for now, shows no sign of ending.



Spanish Congress rejects housing laws despite Sánchez's warning: 'They'll be judged sooner than they think'


By Rafael Salido
Published on

Spanish Congress rejects two key housing measures aimed at quelling public uproar over housing affordability. The bills' rejection after last-minute talks leaves Pedro Sánchez's government without two key housing measures and exposes its struggle to win support in Congress.

Spain's parliament on Friday rejected two housing decree-laws promoted by the government of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, aimed at tackling a housing crisis that has spurred nationwide protests.

The two votes are a heavy political blow to Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and went ahead as hundreds of protesters gathered outside parliament.

These rejections, delivered in a voice vote, represent a parliamentary setback for the executive and came after a sitting marked by last-minute negotiations and uncertainty over the support of its parliamentary partners. Sánchez spoke for a few minutes before the vote to urge MPs to "do the right thing or history will judge you sooner than you think and more harshly than you can imagine."

After the first of the decrees was rejected by 172 votes in favour and 178 against, a demonstration marched to Madrid's central Puerta del Sol square, chanting "General strike!" The second decree was then also voted down.

Housing affordability crisis

The government decrees were intended to quell a public uproar following the televised eviction of an 87-year-old woman last week in Madrid that sparked protests and a camp-in that has occupied Madrid’s most important square ever since. Barring a surprise, the progressive coalition of Sánchez will suffer a costly legislative defeat that will likely fan the flames of the protests.

The average rent in Spain has almost doubled in the past 10 years. The average price per square meter has risen from €8.20 in 2016 to €15.1 this year, according to the real estate website Idealista.

The elderly woman whose eviction sparked the protests, Maricarmen Abascal, has become a symbol for the fight for lower housing costs in the southern European country, where many people are priced out of buying a home and are being squeezed by a small rental market.

The company that evicted her finally caved under immense public and political pressure this week and said that she can return to the apartment. Abascal is currently in a hospital since being removed from her home on a stretcher, but her lawyer said she is happy to know she will be going home.

Crushing votes

The vote came after a morning of speeches in which the housing minister, Isabel Rodríguez, urged the different groups to back the measures, having explicitly asked Junts per Catalunya to vote in favour or abstain, after the pro-independence party announced on Thursday night that it would oppose both texts and submit its own proposal to the government. In the end, Sánchez's PSOE, Spain's social democratic party, refused to withdraw the two decrees, as the Catalan party had demanded.

Rodríguez told the chamber that one of the two decrees incorporated many of the proposals (source in Spanish) put forward by Junts. "Ninety per cent of what they handed to the prime minister is now set out in the Official State Gazette," said the housing minister, who pledged to process the decrees as a bill so that "clarifications or technical corrections" requested by the groups could be incorporated later.

The minister also warned in her speech about the consequences of the vote and appealed to MPs' sense of responsibility. "With this vote, we are deciding whether we do not want another eviction or are willing to face the next one," Rodríguez said, while hundreds of people gathered outside the Congress of Deputies, Spain's lower house of parliament, to demand a solution to the housing crisis gripping the country.

Diverging positions

The sitting began at 11:00, after Sánchez was greeted with an ovation from the socialist benches on his arrival at Congress. During the debate, the groups stuck to the positions they had set out in the preceding hours, albeit with different nuances.

The PNV, the Basque Nationalist Party, announced that it would support one of the decrees "with many doubts". Its spokesperson, Maribel Vaquero, lamented that it had not been possible to reach the minimum agreement her party had called for.

The Canarian Coalition party, a regionalist centre to centre-right party, for its part, confirmed its favourable vote on the first decree because it sees it as "a starting point."

Spain's far-left party Podemos confirmed its four votes in favour of both texts, although its secretary-general, Ione Belarra, criticised the government for having "chopped up" the measures. "It's just another excuse. People don't want excuses; they want solutions," she argued during the sitting.

EH Bildu, another Basque nationalist party leaning left, also expressed its displeasure during the debate. Its MP Oskar Matute said he was "deeply angry" at the prospect of particular interests prevailing over the measures proposed to tackle the housing problem, brought into sharp focus by Maricarmen's eviction and which culminated last weekend in a protest camp in the central Puerta del Sol square.

Opposition from conservative parties PP and Vox, together with Junts' rejection, had left the government facing particularly tight parliamentary arithmetic. The coalition executive needed to win support from different parties to get the initiatives through a chamber in which socialist parties PSOE and Sumar do not have an absolute majority.

Possible early election

The vote on the housing decrees had also sparked, within the PSOE and the government, a debate about the possibility of bringing the elections forward if Congress rejected the initiatives.

Sánchez's office insists that no decision has been taken, although government and PSOE figures had floated the possibility of Sánchez calling elections if the decrees were voted down. At the same time, other socialist leaders have urged caution and argued that the consequences of any eventual call need to be carefully weighed.

The issue is therefore tied to the outcome of a vote the government has presented as a test of the chamber's ability to reach agreements on one of the main problems facing Spanish society. Sánchez had already urged the parliamentary groups to show "a sense of perspective" in backing the measures and argued that housing should be kept out of "partisan confrontations."

While the sitting was underway, around a hundred people gathered outside Congress, mobilised by the Tenants' Union. Protesters chanted slogans against PP, Vox, and Junts and also held a banner critical of PSOE and Sumar. Police had deployed a large security operation around the chamber.

 

UAE says FlyDubai co-pilot attacked captain with axe in “terrorist” act

An FlyDubai plane carrying Israeli passengers who had earlier been aboard another FlyDubai aircraft that made an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia approaches near Tel Aviv.
Copyright Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

By Peter Barabas & Jane Witherspoon & Toby Gregory
Published on

The FlyDubai co-pilot who nearly crashed the Tel-Aviv bound flight is an Omani national named Hamam al-Hammami. He was barred from flying by Oman amid concerns he showed signs of extremist views. The incident threw the already hard-hit regional travel industry into crisis.

The co-pilot accused of attacking the captain of an Israel-bound FlyDubai flight used a crash axe against the captain and “attempted to carry out a terrorist attack”, the United Arab Emirates’ prosecutor general said on Saturday. A crash axe is a tool in the cockpit for the pilots to use in an emergency.

Prosecutor general Hamad Saif al-Shamsi said the co-pilot of FlyDubai flight FZ1073 tried to take control of the aircraft and that the investigation continues “to uncover all the circumstances of the incident, its motives, and related connections, in addition to completing technical examinations and examining physical and digital evidence”, according to UAE state news agency WAM.

The co-pilot who nearly crashed the Tel-Aviv bound flight with 182 people aboard is an Omani national named Hamam al-Hammami, according to Associated Press’ sources who also reported, alongside the Wall Street Journal, that he was banned from flying by Oman over concerns that he held radical ideological views.

The co-pilot was then hired by UAE-based airline FlyDubai, a source told the Associated Press. It was not immediately clear to what extent the co-pilot was vetted when hired.

The co-pilot was born in the UAE and worked with Oman’s national airline but was removed from flying because of concerns that he showed signs of extremist views. He was moved to an administrative job at Oman Air, officials said. Little else was immediately known about the co-pilot’s background. His Instagram account was active until the day of the flight and then deleted.

How the co-pilot managed to be working in the cockpit on Wednesday morning is a central question for investigators. Israel says has it has agreements with foreign carriers to keep pilots from flying into the country if they are citizens of nations that don’t maintain diplomatic relations with it. Israel and Oman do not have formal diplomatic relations.

Security agencies from four regional countries were working to establish the co-pilot’s motives, aided by the United States and other Western governments, according to the AP.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday said the co-pilot had undergone “Islamist radicalization,” but provided no evidence. There was no immediate comment Saturday from Israel’s government.

The FlyDubai captain, Indian national Smit Machchhar told India’s Prime Ministe Narendra Modhi in an emotional video from his hospital bed in Saudi Arabia on Thursday that he used his remaining energy while being attacked to unlock the cockpit door, allowing passengers and crew to come in, subdue the co-pilot and stabilise the plane.

Hailed as a global hero for saving the passengers, Machchhar said "I was fighting for my life," adding that "when I was lying on the floor I could feel the aircraft was going down. I knew exactly that this would be the last push. I told myself that if I didn't get up, there would be a problem. I managed to open the door, and then everyone else came in."

UAE presidential advisor Anwar Gargash said “the Indian pilot at Flydubai, Smit Machchhar, deserves every bit of appreciation, for he embodied the meaning of courage and responsibility in the face of a dangerous terrorist act and a potential disaster. His professionalism and moral sense in the darkest of circumstances make him a true hero.”

“Far from the easy reduction of what happened or the adoption and promotion of conspiracy theories, vigilance and caution remain essential in confronting the risks of extremism and terrorism,“ Gargash added.

Amid shock and disbelief within the UAE’s sprawling pilots community, the attack left the region’s travel industry in crisis, raising questions about aviation security and further unsettling a Middle East already shaken by the US-Iran war.

The UAE cancelled all flights to Israel, while Israel’s El Al airline cancelled its scheduled flights to the UAE following the incident. Israel and the UAE agreed on repatriation flights to bring back passengers.

The Empty Chair: Why Asia’s Youth Still Show Up – OpEd





Key Takeaways:

The essay traces India’s Cockroach Janta Party to a May 2026 chief-justice remark and NEET leak anger: spoon-and-plate sit-ins, empty chairs for students who died, and Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan’s July resignation plus compensation and a pledge not to prosecute protesters.

It sets that beside other youth flashpoints—Myanmar since 2021, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh 2024, Nepal’s 2025 revolt, the southern Philippines, Indonesia’s meal-program cut—as separate stories sharing disappointment that effort does not beat proximity to power.

A second wager is World Youth Day in Seoul in August 2027 (“Take courage”), a minority Catholic event; the author says Delhi’s empty chair is a memorial and Seoul’s an invitation, and that showing up is not proof it will work.


(UCA News) –It started, more or less, with an insult. In May 2026, India’s chief justice made an offhand remark in open court about young people who can’t find work, likening them to cockroaches.

He later said he had meant something narrower — people entering professions with fake degrees — but the word was already loose in the world.

A 30-year-old postgraduate student in Boston felt something snap and posted a question online: what if all the cockroaches came together? Within days, there was a website, a mascot and a name that parodied the ruling party’s name.


The Cockroach Janta Party began as a joke and quickly became the most serious youth movement India has seen in years.

What kept it going was not the joke. It was an exam. The national medical entrance test, NEET, the exam that helps determine who becomes a doctor and who does not, had been dogged by allegations of leaks and other irregularities. Anger settled on one demand: Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan should resign.

At sit-ins in Delhi, protesters banged spoons against steel plates — an echo of the gesture Prime Minister Narendra Modi once asked citizens to make for frontline workers during the pandemic, now directed against him. Organizers also asked people to bring candles for students who had taken their own lives after failing exams they said were rigged.

That detail tends to stop people mid-scroll. Being angry about a leaked test is one thing. Grieving over one is another.

At Jantar Mantar, protesters began leaving a steel plate and an empty chair at the edge of the sit-in — places for students who would never take another exam.


The protests eventually achieved one of their central demands. Pradhan resigned in July, after weeks of demonstrations over the NEET controversy. The government also accepted other demands from the protesters, including compensation for families of students who had died and a pledge not to pursue legal action against protesters.

But the story did not end there.

None of this occurs in isolation. Across South and Southeast Asia, a string of Gen Z‑led uprisings has reshaped politics since 2021.

The story begins in Myanmar, where the military’s 2021 coup triggered mass protests, a brutal crackdown, and a grinding civil war. Five years on, youth‑led People’s Defence Forces fight alongside ethnic armed groups, while the junta relies on air raids, conscription and foreign support to regain ground.

In Cambodia, a government assault on civil and political rights has seen record arrests for speech and activism in 2025–26, even as garment workers — many of them young — strike over unpaid wages, union discrimination and a minimum wage that does not cover rising living costs.

In Sri Lanka, mass protests in 2022 against economic collapse and elite rule helped topple a president and, two years later, brought a leftist coalition to power — yet young people still face high unemployment and austerity.

In Bangladesh, a 2024 student movement ended Sheikh Hasina’s long rule and restored a mainstream opposition party, but the underlying grievances — jobs, corruption, authoritarian habits — remain.

In Nepal, the Sept. 2025 “Gen Z” revolt began over social media bans and swelled into anger at corruption, nepotism and blocked opportunities. It forced a prime minister’s resignation, led to an interim government and fresh elections, and produced a ten‑point agreement on free education and healthcare, employment guarantees and digital rights — though activists marking the one‑year anniversary say many promises are unfulfilled and youth unemployment hovers near 20%.


Old insurgencies in the southern Philippines keep reigniting despite treaties meant to end them.

Indonesia has quietly trimmed its free meal program, a cut that will land hardest on families with the least room to absorb it.

These are not the same stories wearing different costumes; they are separate ones that happen to share a mood. That is a smaller and more honest claim than the grand, sweeping narratives op‑eds often reach for.

The mood, if it must be named, is disappointment rather than rage. Rage tends to burn out; this has not.

A leaked exam does more than cheat students who studied honestly. It signals, in plain terms, that integrity was optional and they weren’t told.

That is a bitter lesson at 20, just when people are supposed to learn whether effort or proximity to power pays. Disappointment is what you feel when the chair you were promised is still empty, and no one will say when it will be filled.

And yet none of this reads as despair.

Despair does not organize. It does not turn a judge’s insult into a movement with spokespeople sitting across from government ministers. Nothing was resolved in those early meetings in Delhi, but people showed up. Those who have truly given up stay home. The ones still in the streets are betting that noise works, even when the evidence for that bet is thin.

Halfway across the region, a quieter gathering is making a stranger version of the same wager.

In August 2027, Seoul will host World Youth Day, the global Catholic gathering that has never before landed in a country where Christians are a minority.

Only about one in ten South Koreans is Catholic, and roughly half describe themselves as having no religion at all, which makes the choice of venue almost provocative on its own terms.

Preparations began in November 2024, when young Koreans received the event’s traveling cross and a Marian icon from Portuguese pilgrims inside St. Peter’s Basilica, on the feast celebrating Christ the King.

The theme, borrowed from the Gospel of John, is short and pointed: “Take courage; I have overcome the world.” It reads less like a slogan and more like something said to someone who is, in fact, currently losing.

In Seoul, the cross will move through a city where most people have no religion; the pews will be full for a week, then empty again. The wager is the same: set a place, show up, and hope someone sits. But there is a difference. In Delhi, the empty chair is a memorial to futures stolen by leaks and lies. In Seoul, the empty chair is an invitation: a minority church, born in secrecy and martyrdom, is betting that a week of song, prayer and shared meals can make a dent in a secular, hyper‑competitive society where young people are among the most stressed and least hopeful on earth.


I don’t imagine the protesters in Delhi and the pilgrims in Seoul would recognize themselves in one another. Most have never heard of one another and never will. But both are staking something on the same unfashionable idea: showing up still matters even without much proof that it does. That is a strange kind of courage — no guarantees attached, no way of knowing whether it will be worth it. In both cities, someone is arranging chairs: one row for the dead, one row for the living.

Governments may respond to this particular wave, or they may not. Trust, once spent, does not refill itself through silence. And I do not think anyone involved — protester, pilgrim, or minister — actually knows which way this one goes.

Neither do I.



The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official editorial position of UCA News.


About Dr. Fr. John Singarayar
Dr. Fr. John Singarayar, SVD, is a member of the Society of the Divine Word, India Mumbai Province, and holds a doctorate in Anthropology. He is the author of seven books and a regular contributor to academic conferences and scholarly publications in the fields of sociology, anthropology, tribal studies, spirituality, and mission studies. He currently serves at the Community and Human Resources Development Centre in Tala, Maharashtra.
View all posts by Dr. Fr. John Singarayar →















Who Is Really Responsible For The Fall Of The West? – OpEd


The author treats “the West” as a racialised, colonial construct and says slogans about invasion, replacement, and “saving the West” (naming Trump, Meloni, Farage, and Musk) shift blame for unemployment, poverty, and the cost of living onto migrants.

The essay argues migrants staff hospitals, transport, care, teaching, and other services and pay taxes; it blames ruling elites, deindustrialisation, and wealth transfer—not Muslims or migrants—for the decline it describes, including Brexit conditions.

The prescribed alternative is working-class unity against what the author calls a racist, capitalist ruling order; that is a political claim, not a documented finding.


The ‘West’ or ‘Western World’ continues to be a contested conceptualisation, temporalised and impregnated with the history of uncivilised wars and territorialised in the form of countries in Western Europe, North America and Australasia, which falsely claim a cultural unity based on Christianity, colonial modernity and racialised capitalist and colonial progress with limited democracy—four core values of othering and the foundation of white supremacist ruling ideology in the contemporary Western world.

Racist bigots in politics, journalism and academia, along with reactionary commentators and half-baked right-wing intellectuals, peddle white supremacist ideology in the name of protecting Western values and society. They do so by promoting a restless, concocted and reactionary nationalist campaign across the Western world that advances ideas such as ‘the West is falling’, ‘the West is in Crisis’ or ‘the crisis of the West’, ‘threat to Western values’, ‘death of the West’, ‘failed West’, ‘liberal West’, ‘too soft west’, ‘saving the West and Western values’, ‘death of Europe’, ‘Muslim and migrant invasion’, ‘boat invaders’, ‘the great replacement’, ‘historical shift’ and ‘London is a foreign country’, etc.

Therefore, flag-waving reactionary and right wing political campaigns calling for ‘Making Britain Great Again’, ‘Making America Great Again’, ‘Europe for Europeans’, ‘Restore Europe’ and ‘Reform Britain’ are in full swing, while people in the Western world are struggling with various forms of crisis, from rising youth unemployment to child poverty, and from homelessness to debt and destitution due to the rising cost-of-living crisis. The political leadership, instead of providing solutions to these problems, outsources them by othering the non-white population in the West. Political leaders from Trump to Meloni and Nigel Farage, and corporate trillionaires like Elon Musk, spread the messages of these campaigns on an everyday basis.


But who is responsible for the fall of the West? Muslims and migrants are not responsible. They work in hospitals as doctors and nurses; sustain public transportation as bus, train and taxi drivers; work as school teachers, college lecturers and university professors. Migrants work in care homes, hotels, hospitals and educational institutions as cooks and cleaners; they pay their taxes and bills and sustain local, regional and national economies. Migrants from different parts of the world work as engineers, researchers, bankers and consultants to sustain public infrastructure and the private mobility of capital. Migrants work as workers and managers in supermarkets. Migrants run libraries, coffee shops and airports. All bed-and-breakfasts would shut down in the West without migrant workers. The West can’t survive a day without depending on the labour, skills, knowledge and creativity of migrant workers, who come from all religious, national and racial backgrounds, forming a social rainbow of a multicultural and multiethnic society in the West.

However, despite all their contributions, migrants are demonised on an everyday basis as welfare scroungers and a threat to so-called Western values—a contested and philosophically unfounded expression. So, who is responsible for the fall of the West? It is not migrants, people of colour and white working people. It is the bourgeois ruling classes and elites in the West, whose wealth comes from slavery and who therefore promote modern slavery in different forms of capitalism and exploit people and the planet on a daily basis. These governing elites promote policies that transfer wealth from working people to their secure tax havens. They promote policies for quick profit by shutting down sources of livelihood, employment and income for working people, who can then be used as a reserve army of low-paid workers defined by national minimum wages, while the superrich enjoy unlimited wealth at their disposal for leisure and pleasure.


Migrants did not destroy Western European unity, but undemocratic European Commission created conditions for referendum in Britain to exit united Brussels. Migrants did not close down the industries, factories, hospitals, train stations, mines, council housing, public parks, playgrounds, schools and universities. The Western ruling elites, with their shopkeeper mindset of making quick profit, decided to shut down the economic engines of growth based on employment and replace them with jobless growth, generating unemployment, poverty and homelessness. Migrants suffer like anyone else in the West, while ruling and non-ruling elites enjoy their lives in leisure and pleasure.

The failed ruling classes in Western world outsource their failures to migrants, who face relentless racist discrimination in offices, violence in the streets and abuse in police stations because of the anti-migrant and racist propaganda spread by reactionary, right-wing politicians and their media and other mouthpieces of power, privilege and plunder. These forces plunder public resources at the cost of working people and create propaganda that turns working people against one another, undermining their own unity and interests. These strategies of the ruling classes are not confined to the West; they are a worldwide phenomenon aimed at weakening the united struggle of the working class and its empowerment and emancipation.

The plunderous, racist, colonial, imperialist and capitalist ruling classes, their ideologies and policies are responsible for the fall of the West. It is time to expose authoritarian ruling-class propaganda and the exploitative political, economic and policy regimes that survive by exploiting people and nature. The Western ruling classes are the real scroungers; they survive on the blood, sweat, creativity and labour of working people. Blaming migrants, the working classes, the poor and the vulnerable is not an alternative. The only alternative is to start a united struggle against the ruling classes and their racist, white supremacist ideology and capitalist system which is responsible for the fall of the West and many other sufferings in the world. Working class unity and solidarity can not only revive the West but also provide the path of peace, prosperity and progress of people across the world.

About Bhabani Shankar Nayak
Bhabani Shankar Nayak works as Professor of Business Management, Guildhall School of Business and Law, London Metropolitan University, UK.
View all posts by Bhabani Shankar Nayak →

Global Life Expectancy Bounces Back To Near Pre-Pandemic Levels, WHO Says




Key Takeaways:

  • WHO Global Health Estimates put global life expectancy at 73.3 years in 2023, almost back to 73.4 in 2019; healthy life expectancy recovered more slowly, to 62.8 years, still 0.4 years below 2019.
  • Noncommunicable diseases caused 74% of deaths in 2023 (58% in 2000); in low-income countries, communicable diseases fell below half of deaths for the first time. Ischaemic heart disease alone caused about 9.5 million deaths.
  • Dementia rose from the 19th to the 5th leading cause of death since 2000, with deaths tripling; diabetes risk rose, especially in South-East Asia, and age-standardised healthy-life loss from depression and anxiety jumped about 20% and 45% between 2019 and 2023.

People around the world are living longer again, with global life expectancy almost fully recovered from the disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) said on Friday.

According to the UN health agency’s latest Global Health Estimates, life expectancy reached 73.3 years in 2023, just shy of the 73.4 years recorded in 2019.

“Living longer is one of the great achievements of public health,” said Dr. Alain Labrique, Director of WHO’s Department of Data, Digital Health, Analytics and AI.

The estimates, which cover trends in death and disability worldwide by region and by country from 2000 to 2023, draw on various sources including national vital registration data and estimates from WHO technical programmes alongside UN partner organizations.

Healthy life expectancy – the years people live in good health – has recovered more slowly, reaching 62.8 years in 2023, still 0.4 years below its 2019 level.

“The next challenge is to ensure that those additional years are lived in good health, while health systems are equipped to respond to the changing needs of populations,” Dr. Labrique said.

Milestone for low-income countries

The estimates also point to a long-term shift in what people die from.

In 2023, for the first time, communicable diseases – one that spreads from one person or animal to another, or from a surface to a person – accounted for less than half of all deaths in low-income countries, a further step in what WHO calls the “global  epidemiological transition”

Worldwide, noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) caused 74 per cent of deaths in 2023, up from 58 per cent in 2000, and eight of the world’s 10 leading causes of death were NCDs.

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death and disease burden. Ischaemic heart disease alone caused approximately 9.5 million deaths in 2023 and the loss of 210 million years of healthy life.

Many parts of the world have made substantial progress in reducing that burden since 2000, though individual risk increased in Western Pacific and Southeast Asia regions, highlighting persistent inequalities.

Rising burden of dementia

Other chronic conditions are becoming more prominent. Dementia rose from the 19th leading cause of death globally in 2000 to the fifth in 2023, with deaths from the condition tripling over the period. 

The risk of dying from diabetes has also risen substantially since 2000, particularly in South-East Asia.

Between 2019 and 2023, the global age-standardised rate of “healthy life” lost rose by about 20 per cent for depressive disorders and nearly 45 per cent for anxiety disorders. 

For drug use disorders, the Americas recorded the largest increases in risk of death and healthy life lost between 2000 and 2023, while the Western Pacific saw substantial declines.

Diagnosis points to cure

“The value of these estimates is not only in the numbers themselves,” Dr. Labrique said. “By showing how causes of death and disease burden are changing over time and across populations, they give countries evidence to help shape health policies and priorities.”