Sunday, November 15, 2026

 

Deeper straw incorporation helps protect maize from ear rot and fungal toxins






Maximum Academic Press

Analysis of maize disease and mycotoxin contamination.

image: 

Analysis of maize disease and mycotoxin contamination.

view more 

Credit: Agricultural Ecology and Environment





A research team has found that burying maize straw deeper in the soil can reduce ear rot and fungal toxin contamination while improving soil quality. In a three-year field experiment in northeastern China, incorporating straw at depths of 20–40 centimeters reduced ear rot incidence by 33.3%–66.7% compared with shallow incorporation. The findings suggest that adjusting the depth of an established farming practice could help growers manage disease, support beneficial soil microorganisms, and produce safer maize, with 20–30 centimeters emerging as a promising practical option.
 

Returning crop straw to farmland is widely used to replenish organic matter, recycle nutrients, and improve soil conditions. Research also shows that soil microorganisms influence plant growth and disease, making them important partners in sustainable agriculture. However, crop residues can carry pathogens, and their effects depend on how they are managed. Most previous studies have emphasized soil fertility and crop yield or compared broad tillage systems. Less is known about how specific straw burial depths alter microorganisms around and inside maize roots, or how those changes relate to ear rot and the accumulation of harmful fungal toxins in grain.

A study (DOI: 10.48130/aee-0026-0019) published in Agricultural Ecology and Environment on 18 August 2026 by Yanpo Yao's team, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, found that deeper straw return improved soil conditions and shifted microbial communities toward potentially protective groups, alongside lower disease incidence and toxin contamination.

Working in Gongzhuling, Jilin Province, the researchers compared four straw incorporation depths: 0–5, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–40 centimeters. Each treatment had three replicate plots, and the experiment included two maize varieties, Fumin 985 and Xianyu 335, with contrasting disease susceptibility. Investigators assessed ear rot incidence and severity, measured deoxynivalenol and zearalenone in kernels using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, and examined soil physical, chemical, and microbial properties. DNA sequencing characterized bacterial and fungal communities in bulk soil, soil surrounding roots, and internal root tissues. Quantitative PCR independently measured the abundance of Fusarium and Aspergillus, while network analysis and structural equation modeling explored relationships among soil conditions, microorganisms, and crop health. The measurements revealed substantial changes under deeper incorporation. At 30–40 centimeters, total soil pore area increased by 162.5%, organic carbon by 22.5%, and available phosphorus by 152.1% relative to shallow return. The soil quality index was approximately four times higher, although bulk density also rose modestly. Microbial indicators contributed more than 35% of the index under the deepest treatment. Sequencing showed enrichment of groups containing beneficial microorganisms, including Trichoderma and Enterobacteriaceae, under deeper treatments. PCR confirmed lower absolute abundances of Fusarium and Aspergillus around roots and within root tissues. Microbial networks also showed altered organization and more positive associations, consistent with a potentially more resilient community. These changes accompanied reductions of 20.0%–50.0% in the ear rot disease index under the two deepest treatments. The deepest treatment kept both measured toxins below the food safety thresholds used in the study. Importantly, some visually healthy kernels contained elevated toxin levels, showing that appearance alone cannot establish grain safety. Statistical modeling supported an indirect pathway linking incorporation depth to improved soil conditions, microbial shifts, and reduced disease and contamination, although the proposed biological mechanisms require further experimental testing to establish specific causal microbial roles.

Overall, the research connects residue management with soil ecology and grain safety. The authors propose 20–30 centimeters as a useful balance between disease control and the likely additional energy demands of deeper tillage, rather than a proven economic optimum. Further work should test performance across environments, quantify costs, and sample deeper soil layers to clarify how buried straw influences the wider root zone.

###

References

DOI

10.48130/aee-0026-0019

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.48130/aee-0026-0019

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2025M773816), the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program (Grade C) of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. GZC20251849), the National Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Risk Assessment Project (Grant No. 20254019), the Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Grant Nos ZHJGCGX202507; CAAS-ZDRW202416), and the Project of Science and Technology Program of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (Grant No. 2025YFHH0180).

About Agricultural Ecology and Environment

Agricultural Ecology and Environment (e-ISSN 3070-0639) is a multidisciplinary platform for communicating advances in fundamental and applied research on the agroecological environment, focusing on the interactions between agroecosystems and the environment. It is dedicated to advancing the understanding of the complex interactions between agricultural practices and ecological systems. The journal aims to provide a comprehensive and cutting-edge forum for researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and stakeholders from diverse fields such as agronomy, ecology, environmental science, soil science, and sustainable development.

GLOBAL WAR ON LGBTQ RIGHTS

Perceiving greater discrimination in healthcare, the LGBTQIA+ community delays seeking medical appointments




University of Córdoba
Perceiving greater discrimination in healthcare, the LGBTQIA+ community delays seeking medical appointments

image: 

reserachers who carried out the study

view more 

Credit: University of Cordoba





Perceiving greater discrimination in healthcare, the LGBTQIA+ community delays seeking medical appointments

A University of Córdoba study compares the perceived discrimination in healthcare among young people ages 18 to 40 forming part of the LGBTQIA+ community and their cisgender peers

People in the LGBTQ+ community face extra barriers in their daily lives due to their sexual orientation or gender identity. One of the areas where these individuals sometimes suffer discrimination is in healthcare. In fact, a survey by the State Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Trans, Bisexual, and Intersex People found that more than 20% of the trans people surveyed had felt discriminated against when visiting primary care providers.

In this context, researchers Andrea Miranda and Judith Velasco, along with their colleague Francisco Javier Sanmartín, with the Department of Psychology at the University of Córdoba (UCO), sought to conduct research on young LGBTQ+ individuals' perception of discrimination by exploring several questions: Do these individuals feel more discriminated against than cisgender individual? Does this affect their trust in healthcare providers and cause them to attend appointments less often?

"We conducted a study combining both quantitative and qualitative approaches," explained researcher Francisco J. Sanmartín. "The quantitative data, gathered through closed-ended questionnaires, showed us that gay, bisexual, lesbian, and trans individuals reported higher rates of perceived discrimination than cisgender individuals, although the latter also felt discriminated against," continued researcher Judith Velasco. Specifically, 217 people between the ages of 18 and 40 took part in the study.

It was in-depth qualitative interviews with 23 of these individuals that brought the issue to light: while cisgender people felt discriminated against because their explanations were overlooked,  or because of the clash between medical authority and their personal experiences, members of the LGBTQIA+ community perceived higher levels of discrimination, which they linked directly to their sexual orientation or gender identity. The main discriminatory experiences suffered by these individuals included the use of "dead names" for trans people (the ones they had before transitioning), the incorrect use of pronouns despite an explicit request to use the appropriate ones, and the application of biases related to promiscuity, paternalism, or moral judgments toward gay, lesbian, and bisexual people.

"Perceived discrimination was associated with greater psychological distress and lower trust in healthcare professionals," Velasco noted. Thus, this perceived discrimination led these individuals from the community to seek medical consultations less often and also to resort to strategies such as concealing their sexual orientation or gender identity. This concealment can lead to misdiagnoses or less effective treatments, but people also associated the visibility of these issues during consultations with prejudices, biases, and the linking of pathologies to their identity or orientation without exploring other issues. Thus, the study demonstrates that delays in LGBTQ+ individuals seeking medical care can lead to worse prognoses for their illnesses, whether physical or psychological.

For the research team, this study highlights a lack of training, as "medical staff do not act with ill intent; rather, there is a lack of training and of updated protocols that promote sensitivity toward these individuals and ensure that they receive individualized care," concluded Sanmartín. According to the team, this training should begin in the university setting, with content that cuts across all subjects, with a view to improving healthcare later at the doctor's office.

Reference:

Miranda-Tena, A., Sanmartín, F.J. & Velasco, J. Perceived Healthcare Discrimination and Its Impact on Mistrust and Delayed Care Among Sexual and Gender Minority Young Adults in Spain. Arch Sex Behav 55, 2817–2828 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-026-03516-z

 

 

Is camouflage a form of communication?



New theory proposes that camouflage is a communication “signal”




Tokyo Metropolitan University

Masquerading as camouflage.

image: 

Masquerading as camouflage. The Uropyia meticulodina (a type of moth) looks much like a dead leaf. The act of adopting the appearance of an inedible object is known as masquerading.

view more 

Credit: Hidemori YAZAKI/Tokyo Metropolitan University





Tokyo, Japan – A researcher from Tokyo Metropolitan University has proposed a new interpretation of camouflage in nature. Most theories dismiss it as a form of communication, since there is no apparent “signal,” but rather a lack of one. Here, in an information-theoretic approach, it is shown that camouflage can be framed as an “information-masking” signal, one which disrupts the flow of information. The same idea might be applied to the wider field of communication, where signals may be present which proactively do not convey information.

 

Camouflage is a ubiquitous part of the natural world, from octopuses to chameleons, where creatures adopt colors and behaviors that help them blend into the background. This can help them avoid detection from predators or even be an essential hunting strategy. A conventional understanding of camouflage would suggest that there is not much to connect camouflage to communication. After all, it is all about adopting states which do not convey anything to other creatures.

In a challenge to orthodoxy in the subject, Assistant Professor Minato Asari from Tokyo Metropolitan University proposes that this is not the case. Existing definitions of what constitutes a “signal” for communication suggest that it needs to be detected by other creatures and modify their behavior; since camouflage is used to avoid detection, this disqualifies it as a signal. In a departure from this framework, the new research suggests that a closer investigation of detection is required. The key idea is that other creatures do, in fact, detect the camouflaged animal, but as a signal which it chooses to ignore or treat as something else. Existing theories which suggest that camouflage is the absence of a signal may be overly simplistic.

Recent experiments cited in the work support this view. For example, a group of chickens was given some exposure to twigs, while others were not. When they were given caterpillars which camouflage themselves as twigs, the group which had prior exposure to twigs took significantly longer to attack the caterpillars. Thus, the act of ignoring them is a learned behavior; the act of camouflage is therefore modifying the behavior of predators, qualifying it as a signal.

This changes how the problem of communication is treated from the perspective of information theory. On top of an information-transmitting signal, there is also an information-masking signal. This is distinct from deception or misinformation; while deception is all about sending a signal which contains the wrong information, camouflage is about ensuring that the true information remains concealed.

While Dr. Asari’s work has been presented to study camouflage, he proposes that the concept of an information-masking signal can be adopted into the wider study of communication. This extends beyond animal signaling to how information theory can be applied when information is being both transmitted and masked.

This work was supported by the Suntory Foundation’s “Grant for Groundbreaking Young Researchers” and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25K21835.

 

Prescription by subscription: the hidden risks of online healthcare





Adelaide University






Whether it’s a last-minute script, medical certificate or weight-loss treatment, many Australians are turning to online commercial health platforms for their healthcare. But while this model of care is quickly becoming big business, it also raises some significant ethical and policy issues, including risks to patient safety and consumer protection, according to new Adelaide University research.

Analysing the multi-billion-dollar online commercial health platform sector, bioethicists identified how online platforms are blurring the lines between patient and customer, potentially weakening patient care while increasing the risk of fragmented or inappropriate treatment.

They warn that because of the sector’s rapid evolution, regulation has struggled to keep pace, raising concerns about insufficient oversight, unsafe prescribing practices and the unethical influence of commercial interests on treatment decisions.

It’s a timely push, especially with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care announcing it has been tasked with developing national safety and quality standards for virtual care.

In 2025, more than 11 million Australians had a telehealth consultation, illustrating just how embedded virtual care and telehealth has become in Australia.

But these commercial online health platforms go well beyond the type of telehealth people might get from their local GP or public healthcare system and often sell questionable products and supplements alongside medications.

Generally sitting outside the traditional healthcare system, online-only services typically market themselves as one-stop shops for expensive private prescriptions – for example, weight loss injectables such as Wegovy or Mounjaro, hair loss medications, or even controversial peptide and testosterone treatments spruiked by influencers.

Lead researcher and bioethicist Dr Hilary Bowman-Smart from Adelaide University’s Australian Centre for Precision Health warns that while online commercial health platforms may provide convenient healthcare, they’re also creating risks.

“There’s no doubt commercial online health platforms are responding to a demand,” Dr Bowman-Smart said.

“These platforms can offer care that feels fast and convenient, especially with people facing increasingly long waits and rising costs for their healthcare. However, this doesn’t always mean it’s high-quality, appropriate or affordable care.

“Many of these platforms get people to sign up to ongoing subscriptions or memberships, similar to Netflix or Amazon Prime. That’s not what we think safe and ethical healthcare should be about.

“If people turn to these platforms because they don’t have or can’t get in to see a regular GP, this can create risks for people taking multiple medications or who have more complex healthcare needs.

“Our concern is that many people’s healthcare could become brief phone consults with a doctor they’ve never met before, or patients just filling out a form or clicking through an online quiz without details being double-checked or verified.  

“Additionally, when people log on to a platform selling a specific ‘solution’, doctors can feel a lot of pressure to prescribe the solution that the patient wants or that the platform promotes, even if they don’t feel it’s right.

“There’s also the risk that important parts of a patient’s history or medical records get missed with short consults and the fact that many platforms don’t routinely use My Health Record.

“This can harm patients – such as a patient with an eating disorder being prescribed a weight loss injectable – but it can also make doctors feel a loss of professional identity and values, and like they’re just reduced to ticking boxes. That’s bad for both sides of the equation.”

Conducted in partnership with the University of Wollongong, the team of bioethicists were also concerned about the growing influence of commercial interests on healthcare.

Dr Patti Shih from the University of Wollongong said with some platforms used familiar online shopping tactics such as product bundles and discount codes to sell prescription medicines alongside supplements and other wellness products.

“With this model of care, evidence-based treatments can be used as a type of ‘Trojan horse’ to sell people add-on wellness products and supplements,” Dr Shih said.

“For example, someone who is prescribed a hair loss medication may also be sold a ‘tailored’ plan with daily vitamins and shampoo products for ‘optimal results’, without those add-ons necessarily having the same medical evidence.”

With reports of overdosing, inappropriate prescribing and adverse health effects, researchers say national standards for the sector couldn’t come sooner.

“We know this sector is growing, but without good evidence and national standards, we risk profit coming at the expense of high-quality and appropriate care,” Dr Bowman-Smart said.

“People need to understand that these online commercial health platforms are very different from traditional healthcare.

“We hope the development of national standards and the upcoming introduction of a National Medicines Record will certainly go some way, but there’s still so much we don’t know about how this sector is operating and what further safeguards may be needed to protect patients.

“In the meantime, Australians need better information about when online care is appropriate, what to look out for and when they need more comprehensive care.”

The research team is now building on the findings through an auDA Foundation-funded project, working not only with the general public, but especially young Australians and people in regional, rural and remote communities to gain better understand their experiences of online healthcare.

The project will include community dialogue groups, a national survey and consultation with healthcare professionals, and will inform a plain-language Health Online Toolkit for consumers and an Action Paper for policymakers, professional bodies and advocates.

 

Notes to editors:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Media contact:

Dr Hilary Bowman-Smart, School of Public Health, Adelaide University.
E: hilary.bowman-smart@adelaide.edu.au

Annabel Mansfield, Senior Media Adviser Adelaide University. M: +61 479 182 489
E: Annabel.Mansfield@adelaide.edu.au

 

Elephants found to be increasingly isolated, leading to fractured social networks



With a troubling decline in the population, researchers warn of a tipping point for the highly social animals




University of California - San Diego

Social elephants

image: 

UC San Diego researchers studied more than 400 elephants at the Udawalawe National Park in Sri Lanka.

view more 

Credit: Credit: Udawalawe Elephant Research Project, CC BY-ND





Humans and many other social animals thrive in well-established community networks. Asian elephants are one example of a species that flourishes in groups that work together to access food and care for their young, among other social bonds.

University of California San Diego scientists in the School of Biological Sciences studying the intricacies of Asian elephant community structures have documented a troubling downturn in the population of the animals resulting in fractured social communities. Their study is published November 12 in Science.

Analyzing the social dynamics of more than 440 wild female Asian elephants over 12 years at the Udawalawe National Park in Sri Lanka, the researchers studied key shifts in the demographics of the elephants that seemed to trigger social communities becoming smaller and more isolated.

“We found that gradual accumulation of losses from turnover preceded sudden change in the social networks among females in a wild population of Asian elephants,” the researchers explained in the study, which was led by Postdoctoral Researcher Anastasia Madsen from the laboratory of Associate Professor Shermin de Silva in the Department of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution. de Silva also serves as president and founder of the conservation nonprofit Trunks & Leaves Inc.

The researchers’ analysis indicates a social structure tipping point. As the number of elephants in the population decreased over time, due to a combination of likely deaths, permanent emigrations of elephants and fewer incoming individuals, the population as a whole appears to have crossed a critical threshold that resulted in a shift from large, densely connected social communities, to smaller and less-connected social groupings.

“We see individual elephants leaving and possibly dying at accelerating rates, but new individuals are not coming into the population,” said Madsen. “With fewer individuals in the population, those who are left will naturally have fewer relationships. However, the remaining elephants are also changing their relationships with each other.”

This new dynamic is a cause for concern, says Madsen, since the animals leverage their social groups and connections to forage, acquire information and raise young.

“We can probably all relate to the feeling of social isolation brought about, paradoxically, with the advent of digital communications that seem to remove the physical constraints of needing to be in the same place at the same time,” said de Silva. “But for many social species, which includes ourselves as much as elephants, we have to remember that social connectivity is very much a matter of sharing space and building relationships throughout our lives. Crucially, in order to have resilient communities, we need to be able to replace the relationships that are lost over time.”

Many elephant populations are already impacted through deaths resulting from poaching and conflicts with humans. Other contributing factors may be disruptions in habitat connectivity and less food available for the elephants as ecological conditions change across the 119-square-mile park and surroundings.

The new social fracturing structure observed by the scientists may not be easily repaired, the researchers warn.

“In general, we need to be more aware of these types of tipping points where we see sudden shifts after changes have been slowly building up,” said Madsen. “Once we move past the tipping point, it’s much harder to go back to previous states.”

The new findings will serve future studies seeking to understand shifts in animal society structures, how to detect such tranformations and the factors responsible for vulnerabilities. The study also stimulates ongoing discussions for conserving elephant populations as humans expand into areas where elephants historically thrived.

“We are gaining more evidence that studying social patterns is an important tool for us to see when things are going wrong in natural populations and, hopefully, to be able to do something about it,” said Madsen.