Thursday, September 17, 2026

 

Hedgehog coronaviruses may threaten cats more than humans, new study finds




Washington State University






PULLMAN, Wash. — Washington State University researchers have discovered how a group of coronaviruses circulating in hedgehogs invades host cells, a key to understanding their potential to jump between species and their risk of causing a pandemic in humans.

Known as Erinaceus coronaviruses, or ErinCoVs, the viruses have concerned scientists because of their close relation to the one that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, a severe respiratory disease that spreads mainly from camels to humans and kills about one-third of infected people. The researchers found the hedgehog viruses are unlikely to infect humans without first undergoing multiple genetic mutations, but they may pose more immediate risks to other animals, including cats. The findings were published in Nature Microbiology.

“Scientists have been aware of these viruses for a while, but for the first time, we were able to figure out how they infect cells,” said Michael Letko, a virologist in the WSU College of Veterinary Medicine’s Paul G. Allen School for Global Health and senior author of the study. “That’s a crucial step for understanding what they can and can’t infect.”

Since first being detected more than a decade ago, the viruses have been found in high numbers of sampled hedgehogs in Europe and Asia, with studies finding infections in anywhere from about 10% in the United Kingdom to around 60% in Germany and Italy. The viruses don’t appear to cause serious disease in hedgehogs, but their widespread circulation increases the chances they could evolve over time.

Scientists have struggled to study the viruses because they have been unable to grow them in laboratory conditions. Using genetic data and laboratory models, the WSU-led team was able to recreate harmless but key parts of the viruses – like their spike proteins – and test how they interact with cells, without working with live viruses.

Like other coronaviruses, ErinCoVs rely on spike proteins to attach to receptors on the surface of host cells. The researchers identified aminopeptidase N, or APN, as the receptor used by the viruses to gain entry. It is the first time the receptor has been shown to be used by a betacoronavirus, the same group that includes MERS and SARS-CoV-2, the strain of coronavirus that causes COVID-19.

Once the receptor was identified, researchers tested versions of APN from about 30 species to see where the viruses could gain entry. They found the viruses could not use the human version of APN, but they were able to use APN from a small number of other species, including cats, rats and elephant shrews – mouse-sized mammals native to Africa.

“When we see viruses that can get into multiple species, that’s something we pay attention to,” Letko said. “Each jump into a new host gives the pathogen more opportunities to pick up mutations that could change what it can infect.”

Significant mutations would still be needed for the viruses to use human receptors.

“In humans, there are multiple barriers at that receptor level,” said Victoria Jefferson, a co-first author on the study and a postdoctoral fellow studying in Letko’s Laboratory of Functional Viromics. “Those differences make it much harder for the virus to enter cells.”

While the risk to humans remains low, Letko and Jefferson said transmission between hedgehogs and other animal species could give the viruses opportunities to adapt over time. Cats could represent one possible pathway. In regions where hedgehogs are common, the animals frequently interact, creating opportunities for transmission. While infections in cats have not been confirmed, the findings suggest it is biologically plausible.

The study involved collaborators from 10 institutions worldwide, including Yale University, the National Institutes of Health’s Vaccine Research Center, the University of Toronto and several research institutes in Italy.

 

Tiny beach-dwelling crustaceans are big-time sand movers, shaping the California coast




University of California - Santa Barbara





(Santa Barbara, Calif.) — Stand on the damp sand on a California beach and chances are you’re standing on top of an active earthworks site. Sand hoppers (Megalorchestia spp.), the tiny, shrimp-like creatures commonly found eating away at kelp on the shore, have been found to move massive amounts of sand, excavating up to 50 kg (110 lbs) of sand per meter of shoreline per day.

“They have one of the highest rates of bioturbation of anything on the planet,” said UC Santa Barbara marine scientist David Hubbard, referring to the process of displacement of sediment by living organisms. 

The sheer volume of sediment moved by these crustaceans, according to Hubbard and fellow coastal researchers, puts these amphipods on par with coastal longshore processes and some major Southern California rivers. Their findings, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, puts new perspectives on the roles of these and other sand-dwelling creatures in the physical processes that shape the coast.

The sandy beach’s tiny engineers

Though they may look stationary, sandy beaches act like rivers of sediment, constantly moving sand transported by waves, winds and currents along the coast. The beach is but one part of a bigger system called a littoral cell that cycles sediment from its sources, such as cliffs and dunes that back some beaches, or rivers and streams that carry sediment from coastal watersheds, or onshore processes that push sand from nearshore to the beach. Beaches serve as reservoirs for sand as it continues its way along the coast.

While coastal sediment transport processes are well known, the impact of the animals that live in this highly dynamic environment is less understood. It became an intriguing question for Tim Baxter, a physical geographer interested in interactions between wildlife and their physical environment in the coastal zone. When he moved from the UK to UCSB a few years ago to complete his postdoctoral work with geography professor Ian Walker, Baxter found in marine scientists Dave Hubbard, Kyle Emery and Jenny Dugan a complementary curiosity about sand hoppers. These tiny crustaceans burrow 10-30 cm (4-12 inches) into the sand, or hide under washed-up seaweed, emerging after dark to feed on kelp wrack.

“We combined our interests and started thinking about the abundance of sand hoppers around UCSB, but also across California,” said Baxter, who is now a research fellow at the University of Oxford. “That got us asking, how much are they digging? What are they contributing to the sediment system and sediment transport on these beaches?”

To find out, they devised a simple field experiment at Isla Vista Beach, a bluff-backed stretch of shore adjacent to the UCSB campus. After high tide on a summer night, when the waves had smoothed the sand and the tide had begun to recede, they sectioned off an array of sampling plots with metal frames in the sand hoppers’ preferred burrowing zone.

“They don’t like saturated sand that’s like liquid — their burrows collapse immediately,” Hubbard explained. “They don’t like the powdery dry sand above the high tide line. They like the Goldilocks sweet spot in between where the burrow will stay intact because the moisture in the sand is just right.” According to the paper, unlike burrowing animals that create a single burrow and reuse it, sand hoppers create fresh burrows every day in search of the perfect sand moisture, excavating sand that has been recently reworked by wind or wave action.

After waiting overnight to let the sand hoppers do their thing, the team went back to their plots to check on the mounds of sand left by all the burrowing action.

“When we came back in the morning, we couldn’t even see some of the frames,” Hubbard recalled. “They were completely buried, and we were so glad we had put flags next to them just in case.” Despite all the years studying these creatures close up, he was still slightly shocked at how much sand they could move overnight, he added.

After collecting and weighing the excavated sand, the researchers calculated that the sand hoppers had moved up to 50 kg of it, making these centimeter-long crustaceans among the most active sediment movers in the animal world.

“It was quite impressive and we weren’t really expecting that,” Baxter said. “I think for me that was the biggest shock.”

The findings add another dimension to the role of sand hoppers in the California coastal environment. Not only are they a fundamental part of the food web, eating kelp wrack and in turn becoming food for shorebirds and fish, their burrowing habits also cycle nutrients into the deeper layers of sand.

“There’s a huge churn,” Hubbard explained. “If food like kelp or carrion gets deposited on the beach, it’s going to get buried by them, which makes it available to a different group of organisms.” Additionally, the burrows aerate the sand, providing oxygen for aerobic microbial processes, he said.

The excavations also make the sediments more available for erosional processes, Baxter added, loosening the sand to be borne away by wind or water. “It potentially increases the roughness of the surface of beaches, which has implications for the formation of landforms such as coastal sand dunes.” Coastal dunes have lately become an important nature-based strategy for dealing with coastal flooding and sea level rise, as the self-building, self-healing landforms are able to take the force of increased wave and storm action.

The sheer amount of sand displaced by the sand hoppers, the researchers found by extrapolating their results across 25 kilometers (15.5 miles) of Southern California coastline, is comparable to the daily sediment loads of some major Southern California rivers and to longshore drift processes that move sand along the intertidal beach, Baxter said. While the field of biogeomorphology — which studies interactions between living things and their landscapes — has been gaining momentum in the last few decades, the activity of animals and plants on the landscape has still been relatively understudied compared to natural processes, he added.

“I think part of that is the influence of animals on these processes is seen as quite temporary, quite localized and small,” Baxter said. “What we are trying to show in this study is that actually these activities and interactions are operating on a lot larger scale and that their impacts are really worth highlighting.”

 

Dogs show human-like brain activity when they restrain themselves



When we tell a dog “no”, and it resists temptation, what happens in its brain?



Eötvös Loránd University

Dog EEG

image: 

When we tell a dog “no”, and it resists temptation, what happens in its brain? New research from the Department of Ethology at ELTE and the HUN-REN Research Centre of Natural Sciences suggests that dogs may do more than respond automatically: when they restrain their behaviour, their brains show a pattern of activity resembling the human neural signature of self-control.

view more 

Credit: Photo: Gáti Oszkár Dániel





When we tell a dog “no”, and it resists temptation, what happens in its brain? New research from the Department of Ethology at ELTE and the HUN-REN Research Centre of Natural Sciences suggests that dogs may do more than respond automatically: when they restrain their behaviour, their brains show a pattern of activity resembling the human neural signature of self-control.

Survival and adaptation are not only about what we do, but our ability to stop ourselves at any given moment can also be almost as important. Think of a mouse that stops moving when a predator is nearby or a human who successfully gives up smoking after years of torturing their own health.

These examples illustrate that the capacity to stop a behaviour or resist a temptation can be achieved by different mechanisms. The freezing response of the mouse is ancient and automatic, whereas when a human gives up smoking, they must invoke conscious effort and willpower. In humans, this kind of self-control relies on the youngest part of the brain’s self-control system – the frontal lobes. When neural activity is measured with electroencephalography (EEG), their involvement is reflected in increased frontal “theta” waves.

What happens in dogs’ brains when their owner commands them to stop and restrain themselves? Dogs can learn not to grab things within reach even when they are interesting or to their taste. But do their brains solve this problem automatically or deliberately? Researchers from Budapest, Hungary, decided to tackle this question using awake, non-invasive EEG measurement.

“We measured 226 short EEG recordings, each around half a minute long, from fourteen dogs who for the duration of a recording were either obeying a command or idle” explains  Iotchev from the HUN-REN Research  Centre of Natural Sciences, “this data was then analyzed to see if within and across dogs, theta waves are more pronounced for recordings in which the animals were obeying the restraint command. The absence of such an effect would have left open the possibility that dogs obey commands automatically, but what we observed does not align with this interpretation -- during self-control situations, we instead observed EEG activity that resembles human theta in both frequency and localisation.”

The study was conducted under the supervision of Anna Kis and Márta Gácsi, who have investigated for many years how dogs could help us understand human conditions like ADHD or obesity. “Dogs live and age faster than humans but move in the same environments and adapt to the same social and physical challenges,” explains Gácsi. “This means that developmental and age-related factors associated with pathological conditions can be examined more time-efficiently than in human populations.”         

Kis adds, “In humans, failures in the function of the frontal lobes play a role in both ADHD and abnormal weight gain. The ability to measure the EEG correlates of frontal lobe involvement in dogs will allow us to investigate just how close these conditions in dogs resemble their human counterparts and allow us to extrapolate better predictions for humans, too.”Iotchev places the findings within a bigger picture: “The frontal lobes of a dog have received surprisingly little attention so far, given how many people believe that their pawed companions have a rich inner life. We know a lot more about this part of the brain as it operates in the rat. As we have demonstrated that non-invasive EEG, which is cheaper and easier to implement than the fMRI measurement, can also be of use, this opens the door to many more future studies on mental processes and their neural substrate in the dog.”

The study is published in Animal Cognition, where it first appeared online on the 11th of August https://rdcu.be/fzvNa

 

Weeping whales: stillborn humpback whale grieving documented





Griffith University

Stillborn whale

video: 

*May cause distress to viewers* This video, taken in 2025 off the southern Queensland coast in Australia, shows a humpback whale mother returning to the seafloor to her stillborn calf. 

view more 

Credit: Andy Mulville






Humpback whale mothers may experience grief when their calves die, a rare research observation led by Griffith University and Sea World Foundation has found.

In 2025, a female humpback whale – along with an escort whale – was observed off the southern Gold Coast who had given birth to a presumed deceased calf and remained with it for several hours and possibly even days.

Dr Olaf Meynecke, from Griffith University’s Whales and Climate Research Program, said post-mortem attentive behaviour in cetaceans had been documented predominantly amongst toothed whales and delphinids (known as odontocetes), but remained largely absent from research published on baleen whales, such as humpback whales.

"Unlike reports of toothed whales where mothers have been observed lifting their dead calves to the surface, this humpback whale mother showed prolonged post-mortem behaviour and attention towards her deceased calf under the surface,” Dr Meynecke said.

“She remained close to the calf, maintaining eye contact and positioning herself next to her calf over several hours and maybe even days.

“These observed behaviours were consistent with care-giving or nurturing actions and post-mortem attentive responses documented in socially complex mammals, and indicated an inherent, strong maternal attachment to the calf.”

Cetaceans were some of the most charismatic marine species receiving regular widespread public attention.

Rescue Boat Captain Andrew Mulville from Sea World Foundation, who witnessed the event, said: “When I actually worked out what was happening, I was totally surprised.”

“At first sight, I thought it was just two whales resting on the surface, but their behaviour was unusual.

“It was definitely not what I was expecting to see out at sea that day.”

Dr Meynecke said while this observation in 2025 and others with deceased calves were incredibly sad, they were rare and added to the limited current understanding of the cognitive and emotional dimensions of death-related responses in baleen (filter-feeding) cetaceans.

“This case study highlights the need for continued systematic documentation of rare neonatal mortality events to better understand the cognitive, emotional, and evolutionary significance of post-mortem behaviour in large whales,” he said.

“Understanding how non-human animals responded to death provides insight into their emotional lives, social bonds, and cognitive capacities.”

The study ‘First documentation of humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) post-mortem attendance of a still born’ has been published in Discover Animals.