Saturday, November 07, 2026

 

Scientists give hard-to-recycle wind turbine blades a second life





Cell Press

Wind turbine

image: 

A wind turbine being decommissioned in China. Researchers have developed a new method to turn hard-to-recycle wind turbine blades into valuable materials.

view more 

Credit: Bing Deng





From intense UV radiation and extreme temperatures to wind gusts and lightning strikes, wind turbine blades are engineered to withstand some of the harshest conditions. But that durability becomes a problem at the end of their lives, because the blades are also difficult to break down and recycle. 

Reporting November 6 in the Cell Press journal Chem Circularity, researchers found a way to give discarded wind turbine blades a second life. By subjecting the blades to a brief burst of intense heat, they transformed the waste into silicon carbide and graphene, two valuable materials for manufacturing. The method could cut up to 83%–92% greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional recycling strategies while also turning a profit. 

“Wind turbines typically have a service life of around 20 years,” says senior author and chemical and environmental engineer Bing Deng of Tsinghua University, China. “As aging turbines are decommissioned, especially in China, where wind power has expanded rapidly, much of the waste has ended up in landfills. It’s a waste of resources.” 

The team’s method takes advantage of the blades’ own chemical makeup. Wind turbine blades are usually made from silica-containing fiberglass and carbon-rich polymer resin. Using a technique called flash Joule heating, the researchers heated the waste to about 2000°C (3632°F) in seconds. At this temperature, carbon can react with silica to form silicon carbide, a hard, heat-resistant material. Meanwhile, carbon can also reorganize into graphene, a material known for its strength and ability to conduct heat and electricity.  

The researchers found that adding the broken-down blades to other materials made the materials more useful in several contexts, including for new wind turbines. Just 0.3% by weight of the recovered materials made resin stiffer and stronger and improved its resistance to deformation by 27% under tension and 9% when bent. At 0.1% concentration by weight, the materials increased the resin’s thermal diffusivity by 41%, allowing heat to spread through more quickly. 

“The mixture of silicon carbide and graphene can be incorporated back into resins for new wind turbine blades, improving their mechanical and thermal properties,” says Deng. 

Beyond creating valuable new materials, the process could offer a cleaner and more economical alternative to conventional recycling techniques such as pyrolysis, which uses heat to break down polymers into oil and gas, and chemical dissolution, which uses solvents to separate resin from glass fibers. The new method could cut greenhouse gas emissions by about 83% and 92% compared with pyrolysis and chemical dissolution, respectively. 

“With conventional recycling methods, you have to spend money to process the waste. But our method could actually turn a profit of about $80 per ton because the recovered silicon carbide and graphene are valuable,” says lead author and environmental engineer Hao Bi of Tsinghua University. “By comparison, pyrolysis costs about $460 per ton, while chemical dissolution costs about $1,800 per ton.” 

The team is working on ways to scale up their process and is hoping to collaborate with partners in the industry. Their method could also be adapted to process other durable materials used in aerospace, automotive manufacturing, electronics packaging, and construction.  

“This is more than recycling. It’s upcycling,” says Deng. “We’re turning something that has little value into something that’s worth much more.” 

### 

This work was supported by funding from the Fundamental and Interdisciplinary Disciplines Breakthrough Plan of the Ministry of Education of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, and the Central Leading Local Science and Technology Development Fund. 

Chem Circularity, Bi et al., “Upcycling of waste wind turbine blades by electrothermal reduction toward circular resin composite applications” https://www.cell.com/chem-circularity/fulltext/S3051-2948(26)00197-0

Chem Circularity (@cp-chemcircularity.bsky.social) is a Cell Press journal focused on cutting-edge research in pursuit of sustainable and circular systems across disciplines, with an emphasis on reduction, redesign, reuse, and recycling. The journal publishes insights and innovations to ensure responsible production and consumption of the chemicals and materials that underpin our world. Visit https://www.cell.com/chem-circularity/home. To receive Cell Press media alerts, contact press@cell.com.  

 

Knowledge and misinformation regarding autism risk factors in a survey of US adults




JAMA Health Forum





About the Article: 

Results of this survey study of more than 30,000 US adults found that about one-quarter of respondents endorsed childhood vaccination or acetaminophen use during pregnancy as autism risk factors. These beliefs were more common among individuals with certain sociodemographic characteristics and political affiliations, whereas greater trust in scientific and medical institutions was associated with lower rates of endorsement. Results of this survey study suggest that non–evidence-based beliefs about autism risk were prevalent among US adults and were strongly associated with sociodemographic differences and political affiliation. Limiting public health impact of such non–evidence-based information will likely require targeted interventions that recognize the heterogeneity of such beliefs.


Corresponding Author: Roy H. Perlis, MD, MSc, Center for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 (rperlis@mgh.harvard.edu).

10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.4105

To access the embargoed study: Visit our JAMA Network Media Center at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

Link to the article in your story
We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.4105?guestAccessKey=01ed8553-b31a-447d-9ec3-0f4a26b5db9b

Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

 

Higher grocery prices linked with worse food insufficiency, mental health


Behavioral Coping With Food Price Inflation: Patterns Among U.S. Households



Penn State






UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — As grocery prices continue to rise, a study by researchers at Penn State found that in addition to increased spending, the price hikes also are associated with higher risk of food insufficiency and worse mental health conditions.

The study, published in the journal Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, used data from the Household Pulse Survey, a large-scale, nationally representative survey collected by the U.S. Census Bureau. Designed to measure how emergent issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic disruptions, affect U.S. households, the survey data provided the researchers with information on how households cope with increased prices at the grocery store.

Their analysis revealed that households could be sorted into four distinct profiles, characterized by not changing shopping habits; minor adjustments like swapping brand name for cheaper, generic products; comprehensive adjustments across financial obligations to increase the grocery budget; and going without despite significant need.

While exact effects varied from group to group, the researchers found that households in all four profiles experienced increased food spending, higher risk of food insufficiency and worse mental health.

Yizao Liu, associate professor of agricultural economics and lead author of the study, said the findings could help policymakers better identify which households are facing hardship and suggest that household well-being is shaped by multiple factors.

“Previous work has suggested that when deprivations overlap in this way, effective policy typically requires coordinated interventions instead of isolated programs,” she said. “Bundled support — such as combining food assistance, rent relief and mental health resources — may be most effective at addressing the complex nature of inflation-related distress.”

Recent factors like the COVID-19 pandemic, climate-related supply disruptions and rising energy costs have resulted in food prices that keep rising, the researchers said. In the United States, grocery prices rose by more than 20% between 2020 and 2024, outpacing overall inflation.

While there has been a great deal of attention to rising food prices and the economic forces behind them, the researchers added, less is known about what households actually do when those higher prices start putting pressure on their budgets.

Liu explained that those responses can take very different forms. Some households may switch to generic brands, look for sales, use coupons or eat out less. Others may be forced to make much harder choices, such as buying more affordable but less healthy food, delaying medical care, working more hours, using credit, reducing savings or cutting back on utilities.

“We thought it was important to study these behaviors together because households rarely use just one strategy,” she said. “The combination of strategies can tell us a great deal about the level of pressure a household is experiencing and whether those coping efforts are actually protecting their well-being.”

For the study, the researchers looked at data on four main variables: weekly household spending on food and groceries, weekly household spending on prepared meals, household food insufficiency, and respondents' mental health.

The team found that households fall into four very different patterns when responding to rising prices.

About 44% of households, which the team dubbed "minimal responders," reported relatively few changes in the way they shopped. Another 28%, called "price-sensitive substituters," made common adjustments such as switching to generic products, shopping at lower-cost stores and cutting back on dining out.

About 20% of households were "comprehensive adjusters," using a wider range of strategies to cope including reducing food-related spending, delaying major purchases and — in some cases — delaying medical treatment.

The final 8%, called "resource-strained sacrificers," made some of the most drastic trade-offs. These included taking on additional work, relying on credit or loans, reducing savings or retirement contributions, and cutting back on utilities such as heating or electricity.

Inflation was associated with increased food spending and a higher chance of experiencing food insufficiency and anxiety, but the specific risk levels were different among the groups. For example, the resource-strained sacrificers experienced some of the smallest increases in food insufficiency and anxiety.

“It could be that this group was already at such risk for anxiety and food insufficiency prior to inflation that the needle doesn’t move much with inflation,” Liu said. "These findings suggest that different coping strategies act more as markers of vulnerability than as effective shields against the effects of food price hikes."

Additionally, price-sensitive substituters may use strategies that lower spending but come with more anxiety. Meanwhile, comprehensive adjusters and resource-strained sacrificers try drastic strategies only to remain highly vulnerable to food insufficiency and mental health issues.

“Some strategies, such as switching brands or shopping at cheaper stores, may help control spending in the short run,” Liu said. “But households that started using more intensive coping strategies still showed high levels of food hardship and anxiety. So, in many cases, these behaviors are not signs that a household has successfully adapted. They are signals that the household is already under significant pressure.”

The researchers said that in the future, additional studies could examine how families move between different coping patterns over time and whether certain policies can help prevent households from moving into more severe forms of hardship.

Yuxiang Zhang, doctoral candidate in energy, environmental and food economics at Penn State, co-authored the paper.

 

Mindfulness therapy assisted by ketamine may strengthen body awareness to reduce opioid cravings



New findings suggest ketamine may enhance mindfulness therapy by helping people better recognize and respond to internal body signals tied to craving and emotional regulation.





University of California - San Diego

Garland Mindfulness Therapy

image: 

New research from UC San Diego provides new insight into how ketamine-assisted psychotherapy may enhance addiction treatment.

view more 

Credit: UC San Diego Health Sciences





Researchers from University of California San Diego School of Medicine have found that adding ketamine to a mindfulness-based treatment for opioid use disorder may strengthen people’s ability to recognize and respond to signals from their bodies — changes that may help reduce opioid cravings. The study, published on Nov. 5, 2026 in the Journal of Psychopharmacology, provides new insight into how ketamine-assisted psychotherapy may enhance addiction treatment.

“Addiction can make it extraordinarily difficult for people to recognize what is happening inside their bodies and respond in ways that support recovery,” said Eric Garland, PhD, professor of psychiatry at UC San Diego School of Medicine and senior author. “Our findings suggest ketamine combined with mindfulness may create an opportunity for people to become more attuned to those internal signals and, importantly, learn how to respond to them more skillfully rather than automatically reacting to cravings.”

The new findings build on a randomized clinical trial published in Nature Mental Health in March 2026 (titled: Ketamine-assisted Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for opioid use disorder: a randomized controlled trial). The trial included 68 adults with opioid use disorder who were taking buprenorphine, one of the most effective medications for treating opioid use disorder. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) alone or MORE combined with two sessions of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy.

MORE is an eight-week, evidence-based, mind-body therapy developed by Garland that combines mindfulness with techniques designed to help people reframe stressful experiences and savor positive experiences and emotions. Previous clinical trials have found that MORE reduces opioid misuse by 45% — nearly three times more effective than supportive psychotherapy — and among people receiving medication for opioid use disorder, reduces drug relapse by 42%.

In the Nature Mental Health study, the researchers found that participants who received MORE plus psychedelic doses of ketamine reported significantly fewer instances of drug use after treatment and lower opioid craving at the three-month follow-up than those who received MORE alone. Across the period from the end of treatment through the three-month follow-up, the ketamine group had 44% fewer instances of drug use. Ketamine-induced experiences such as a sense of oneness with the universe were associated with greater reductions in cravings. The new study examined why the combined treatment may have produced those benefits.

The researchers focused on interoception — the ability to sense, interpret and respond to signals coming from inside the body, such as changes in breathing, heart rate, tension or other physical sensations. These skills play an important role in emotional regulation, decision-making and self-control and may be disrupted in people with substance use disorders.

Throughout treatment and for one month afterward, participants received smartphone prompts three times a day asking how aware they were of sensations in their bodies at that moment. Researchers found that body awareness increased more rapidly among participants receiving MORE plus ketamine, with the gain in body awareness emerging around the time of the first ketamine session. Higher levels of body awareness were maintained through follow-up at the one month mark.

But simply noticing bodily sensations may not be enough. The researchers also found that participants receiving ketamine showed greater improvements in two specific abilities: listening to their bodies for useful information and using awareness of bodily sensations to regulate distress. Together, improvements in these abilities were associated with lower opioid cravings three months later, suggesting a potential pathway through which ketamine may enhance the therapeutic effects of mindfulness training.

“Craving isn’t just a thought, it can be experienced throughout the body,” Garland said. “Mindfulness teaches people to notice those sensations without immediately reacting to them. What these findings suggest is that ketamine-induced experiences may help accelerate or deepen that learning process, so bodily sensations can become useful information for self-regulation rather than triggers for drug use.”

The researchers caution that the findings are preliminary. The new analysis relied on self-reported measures of body awareness and participants also knew they received the ketamine treatment. Larger studies using objective measures of how the brain and body process internal signals are needed to confirm the findings.

Future research could also investigate whether ketamine creates a temporary period in which the brain is especially receptive to learning new mindfulness and self-regulation skills, and whether those changes can produce longer-lasting reductions in cravings and drug use.

“The goal isn’t simply to avoid cravings,” Garland said. “It’s to help people develop skills they can carry into everyday life — skills that allow them to recognize what their bodies are telling them, regulate difficult feelings and make choices that support recovery.”

Read the full study: Ketamine, an interoceptive associative agent? Evidence from ketamine-assisted Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for opioid use disorder

Additional co-authors on the study include: Benjamin Lewis, MD, from the University of Utah.

The study was funded, in part, by a gift from Tanya and Richard Andrew. Garland was also supported by UG3DA062106, R01DA056537 and R01DA057631 from the National Institutes of Health.

Eric Garland is the director of UC San Diego ONEMIND (Optimized Neuroscience-Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention Design). UC San Diego ONEMIND provides MORE, mindfulness-based therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy in the context of research trials for no cost to research participants; however, Garland has received honoraria and payment for delivering seminars, lectures and teaching engagements (related to training clinicians in mindfulness) sponsored by institutions of higher education, government agencies, academic teaching hospitals and medical centers. Garland also receives royalties from the sale of books related to MORE. No other authors have any related conflicts of interest to disclose.

 

Who is behind the UK’s billion-pound AI boom?



Researchers from the University of Warwick and Imperial College London have analysed who is most likely to pay for AI tools like ChatGPT or Claude out of their own pocket.



University of Warwick






Who is most likely to pay for ChatGPT or Claude out of their own pocket? Who Pays for AI?, a new study by economists at University of Warwick and Imperial College London, uses anonymised bank and card transactions to examine the UK’s boom in use of paid AI tools.

The study estimates that 5.1% of UK adults - around 2.8 million people - paid for AI assistants themselves in June 2026, with subscriber numbers roughly doubling each year. UK consumer spending on AI tools has grown from almost nothing in early 2023 to a billion-pound annual market.

Occupations

What people do at work is a key factor in whether they pay for AI out of pocket. Across professions identified subscription rates varied from roughly:

  • 20% among IT professionals
  • 13–16% among university lecturers and finance professionals,
  • 7-9% among school teachers, writers, artists, and doctors,  
  • under 3% among electricians, nurses, and social care workers. 

Claude or ChatGPT?

The research found that ChatGPT remains the market leader, but Claude has gained ground rapidly, increasing its share of subscription spending from 7% to 29% between December 2025 and July 2026. ChatGPT’s share fell from 74% to 53% over the same period.

Claude’s growth also reflects uptake of more expensive plans, particularly among people working in technical and professional roles. Claude has a stronger following among software and IT workers, engineers, finance professionals and academics, while teachers, healthcare workers and HR staff tend to favour ChatGPT.

UK Regions

Londoners are more likely than adults elsewhere in the UK to pay for their own subscription to AI tools like ChatGPT or Claude. In June 2026, an estimated 7.9% of adults living there were estimated to have subscribed, compared with 5.1% nationally. The North East trailed the UK region rankings with 3.8%.

Age, men and women, and income

The study also found that overall:

  • under-30s are five times as likely to pay for AI than over-60s,
  • men are 27% more likely to subscribe than women,
  • the top fifth of earners are almost twice as likely to subscribe than the bottom fifth

Commenting on their results, Dr Peter Lambert from University of Warwick’s Department of Economics said: “Millions of people are now putting their hands into their own pockets to pay for AI every month. In little more than three years, these tools have become a billion-pound consumer market in the UK. This surge has been phenomenal and with only one in twenty adults currently subscribing, there’s still room for further growth. The big question is how many people currently using free AI tools will eventually decide they are worth paying for?”

Dr Nikhil Datta from the University of Warwick’s Department of Economics added: “People whose jobs involve tasks that AI can help with are more likely to pay for it themselves, so that suggests people are buying these tools partly for what they can do for them at work. The first paying customers were disproportionately men and high earners, but that picture is changing rapidly with women now making up nearly half of new subscribers.”

Dr Patrick Schneider from Imperial Business School said: “Like many early-stage markets, the picture can change very quickly. ChatGPT still leads at present, but its early dominance is shrinking. Claude captured almost a third of consumer subscription spending by July, up from just 7% seven months earlier.”

For more information, including the full paper, methods, and interactive charts, visit the Who Pays for AI? website.

ENDS

Notes to Editors

Who Pays for AI? is authored by Nikhil Datta (University of Warwick and Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics), Peter John Lambert (University of Warwick and Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics) and Patrick Schneider (Imperial Business School).

The researchers have compared occupations by the estimated share of workers with an active personal AI subscription. They identified occupations using professional membership and registration payments, alongside employer records. The study covers personal payment transactions, not employer-paid licences, business-account payments or free AI use.

For more information please contact:

Ann Baylis, Media and Communications Officer

ann.baylis@warwick.ac.uk | +44 (0) 7425 722087

About the University of Warwick

Founded in 1965, the University of Warwick is a world-leading institution known for its commitment to era-defining innovation across research and education. A connected ecosystem of staff, students and alumni, the University fosters transformative learning, interdisciplinary collaboration and bold industry partnerships across state-of-the-art facilities in the UK and global satellite hubs. Here, spirited thinkers push boundaries, experiment and challenge convention to create a better world.

The ESRC Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) was founded in 2010 to examine routes to success for both developed and emerging economies around the world. Since then, the centre has used historical and theoretical economic analysis to integrate the study of history and address real-world policy issues. Based in the department of economics at the University of Warwick, the centre delivers policy-driven economics research informed by culture, history and behaviour. Our research findings have been used by policymakers, journalists, practitioners and the general public to drive policy debate and reform opinion.

About Imperial Business School

Imperial College Business School is the business school of Imperial College London, a public research university specialising in science, technology, engineering, medicine and business (STEMB). Based in the South Kensington district in London, the School blends business education with entrepreneurship and technology innovation to convert pioneering scientific discovery into commercial, societal, and sustainable solutions.

 

Researchers warn clinicians to be alert to health risks of “looksmaxxing” among boys and young men



New Journal of Adolescent Health commentary outlines how appearance-focused online trends can range from routine grooming to potentially dangerous practices and offers guidance for assessment and intervention



University of Toronto





TORONTO, ON — A rapidly growing online trend known as “looksmaxxing” may expose some boys and young men to significant physical and mental health risks, according to a new Commentary published in the Journal of Adolescent Health. 

Looksmaxxing refers to efforts to “maximize” physical attractiveness, often according to highly rigid standards of male appearance. While some looksmaxxing practices involve relatively common behaviours such as skincare, grooming, exercise, and hair-loss prevention, others can include starvation, anabolic-androgenic steroid and peptide use, skin whitening, cosmetic procedures, and “bonesmashing” (i.e., deliberately striking the face in an attempt to change its structure). 

“Looksmaxxing exists on a spectrum, and it is important that we do not automatically pathologize normal grooming, exercise, or appearance-related behaviours among adolescent boys and young adult men,” said Kyle T. Ganson, PhD, MSW, lead author of the Commentary and associate professor at the University of Toronto’s Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work. “At the same time, clinicians need to recognize when these behaviours become extreme, unsafe, or connected with significant distress and impairment.” 

The authors note that looksmaxxing communities often promote the idea that attractiveness can be objectively measured and optimized. Common ideals include facial symmetry, a strong square jaw, chiselled cheeks, clear skin, and a tall, lean, muscular body. 

These appearance standards can contribute to intense appearance comparison, body dissatisfaction, and overvaluation of physical appearance. Online looksmaxxing spaces may also expose young people to pseudoscientific health claims, unregulated products, extreme body-change practices, and content involving misogyny, racism, social demoralization, and self-harm. 

Some young people may place particular trust in social media influencers, before-and-after images, online ratings, and anecdotal testimonials when deciding whether to try looksmaxxing practices, even when those sources conflict with established medical or scientific evidence. 

The Commentary calls on clinicians who work with adolescent boys and young adult men to become familiar with looksmaxxing terminology and to ask about appearance concerns, body-change behaviours, and the motivations behind them. 

Assessment should distinguish between lower-risk or developmentally typical practices and behaviours that may indicate psychological or medical concern. Clinicians should pay particular attention when looksmaxxing is associated with emotional distress, obsessive appearance monitoring, distorted perceptions of the body or face, impaired social or educational functioning, or declining quality of life. 

The authors recommend screening, when appropriate, for concerns including: 

  • body dysmorphic disorder and body image disturbance; 

  • disordered eating and eating disorders; 

  • anxiety and depression; 

  • obsessive or compulsive appearance-focused behaviors; 

  • substance use, including steroids and peptides; 

  • suicidal thoughts and self-harm; 

  • nutritional problems and altered growth or development; and 

  • physical harms related to cosmetic procedures, unregulated products, or self-injury. 

The Commentary also encourages clinicians to explore social isolation, loneliness, bullying, relationship difficulties, social media influences, and anti-feminist ideology and manosphere involvement that may accompany problematic involvement in looksmaxxing. 

When clinicians identify risks, the authors recommend harm-reduction-based interventions rather than simply dismissing young people’s appearance concerns. 

“Clinicians can provide accurate information about higher-risk behaviours, correct misinformation, discourage self-harming practices and the use of unregulated products, and support healthier approaches to body image and coping,” says Ganson. “Interventions should also account for masculine gender norms that may make some boys and young men reluctant to disclose body image concerns or seek help.” 

The authors point to strategies such as media literacy, which can help young people identify manipulated images, question commercial motives, and critically evaluate unrealistic appearance standards, as well as interventions that encourage them to examine and challenge narrow body ideals. 

When needed, clinicians should coordinate care with professionals in adolescent medicine, mental health, psychiatry, dermatology, and nutrition, and involve caregivers when appropriate. 

Despite increasing attention to looksmaxxing online, the researchers say fundamental questions remain unanswered. They call for a greater understanding of who may be at the greatest risk and the psychological, social, and structural factors driving looksmaxxing; its short- and long-term health consequences; and how best to prevent and address harmful involvement. 

“Boys and young men are navigating a digital environment where appearance advice, pseudoscience, commercial interests, and potentially dangerous health behaviours can become intertwined,” Ganson said. “Understanding that environment is increasingly important for clinicians, researchers, families, and others who support boys and young men.” 

The authors conclude that clinicians should be prepared not only to recognize looksmaxxing, but also to determine when engagement reflects ordinary adolescent appearance concerns and when it signals a need for further assessment, counselling, or specialized care.