STELLA MCCARTNEY AND AUTHOR JONATHAN SAFRAN FOER LAUNCH SUSTAINABLE COLLECTION TO HIGHLIGHT CLIMATE CRISIS

Pieces made using fabrics such as organic cotton and regenerated cashmere

Sarah Young @sarah_j_young

Stella McCartney has launched a sustainable capsule collection in collaboration with bestselling author Jonathan Safran Foer.

The collection, titled We are the Weather, is inspired by Foer’s book of the same name which recommends eating less meat and aiming to eat no animal products before dinner, as a way to save the planet.

Upon reading a draft copy of the title, McCartney, a lifelong vegetarian who has put environmentalism and animal rights at the centre of her brand for decades, felt inspired to bring Foer’s words to life through the medium of fashion.

In a bid to personify the novel’s spirit of positive change, McCartney launched a capsule of pieces adorned with statements from the book, such as knitwear and accessories featuring the slogan “we are entirely free to live differently”.

Elsewhere, handwritten messages from Foer radiate from graphic sun illustrations, while ribbons embroidered with messages are draped over sharp Savile Row tailoring and regenerated cashmere sweaters come printed with the ”SOS” motif previously seen at McCartney’s autumn/winter 2019 collection.

Stella McCartney launches sustainable capsule: We are the Weather
Show all 6




In keeping with the capsule’s environmentalist spirit, all of the pieces are made using sustainable fabrics such as organic cotton and linen, and regenerated cashmere which comes from textile waste created during the production process.

On Instagram, the luxury fashion brand marked the release with an accompanying photo series showcasing the collection. However, this was a photo shoot with a difference.
Pieces in the collection feature statements from Foer's book "We are the Weather" (Stella McCartney)

Shot by documentary photographer Lee Whittaker and stylist Lee Trigg, the clothes were modelled by residents of an island off the coast of Canada, where people live “off the grid”.

“Shot by @Lee__Whittaker and styled by @ltrigg on a Canadian island where the inhabitants live totally off the grid and believe in a low-impact life, this collection drives the point of sustainability and celebrates everything we stand for,” the brand wrote.

Speaking to Another magazine, Whittaker described the island as “essentially a forest, with wild goats roaming free, surrounded by water”, adding that the tight-knit group of residents sought “something outside of ‘normal life’” by living self-sufficiently, using solar energy and growing their own food.


Few designers in the fashion industry as dedicated to sustainability as McCartney.

Over the years, the brand has championed the use of innovative materials such as “fur-free-fur”, vegetarian leather and viscose fibres sourced in a way that helps to protect ancient forests.

The capsule was made using sustainable fabrics such as regenerated cashmere (Stella McCartney)

The label also recently introduced a garment labelling system called Clevercare to its ranges, which helps remind customers to consider the environment when washing and caring for their clothes.

Iowa voter asks to change vote after learning Pete Buttigieg is gay


“Are you kidding? Then I don’t want anybody like that in the White House", the voter says

Graig Graziosi

A video of an Iowa caucus voter asking to change her vote after finding out Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg has surfaced following the confusing and frustrating Monday night electoral event.

Tuesday afternoon, Laura Hubka, the Howard County Democratic Party Chairwoman, shared the video on Twitter, calling the caucus captain Nikki Heever who responds to the woman a “wonderful example of Cresco [Iowa].”

In the video, the voter shows shock when she learns that Mr Buttigieg is a gay man with a husband and then asks if she can take her vote back.

“Are you kidding? Then I don’t want anybody like that in the White House. So can I have my card back?” the woman asked.

Ms Heever doesn’t immediately refund the woman’s vote and instead attempts to convince her that Mr Buttigieg’s sexual orientation shouldn’t invalidate his viability as a candidate.

“The whole point of it though, he’s a human being, right, just like you and me. It shouldn’t really matter,” Ms Heever replied.
“Well he better read the Bible,” the voter said.

Ms Heever goes on to explain that Mr Buttigieg is also a Christian and continued to try to convince the voter that she should support him.

“I would like you to just dig deep inside and think, should it matter if it’s a woman or if it’s a man or if they’re heterosexual or homosexual, if you believe in what they say? That’s my question to you.”

The voter wasn’t moved.

“It all just went right down the toilet, is where it went,” she said.

As the exchange continues, Ms Heever says that she’ll get clarification on the rules for rescinding a vote, but tries one last argument, appealing to her own Christian faith to try to convince the voter.

Unfortunately for Ms Heever, the woman shrugs the argument off, instead suggesting that Ms Heever’s acceptance of Mr Buttigieg means she must not believe in what the Bible says. The voter asks why Mr Buttigieg’s sexual orientation wasn’t more widely known, which Ms Heever correctly points out is “common knowledge.”

The events leading up to the confrontation and the events immediately after – including whether or not the woman’s vote was refunded – are still unclear.

The video is holding Democrats over as they wait for the results of Monday night’s caucus. Issues with a third-party voting app were cited by state party officials as the primary factor holding up the official results.

Mr Buttigieg came under some fire Tuesday after choosing to give a speech that seemed to declare his victory in Iowa despite there being no announcement by the state party of a winner. “#MayorCheat” and “#PetetheCheat” were trending on Twitter, along with rat emojis.

In an interview with MSNBC today, Mr Buttigieg walked back the soaring language from his speech on Tuesday, instead referring to the caucus as a “clear victory for this campaign” rather than an overall victory.

The Iowa Democratic Party said it should have the results available by late Tuesday afternoon.

A doorbell camera has captured footage of a meteor exploding in the sky above Derbyshire.

Derby resident Gary Rogers received a text alert from his security camera after it detected suspicious movement outside his home on Monday night.

When he checked the footage, Mr Rogers was stunned to see the extraordinary celestial phenomenon lighting up the night sky.

Experts believe the clip, captured at 11.30pm on Monday, shows a bolide (an extremely bright meteor) crashing towards Earth and disintegrating in the atmosphere.

Mr Rogers said: “'I thought it was a firework at first, but I listened to the sound and you couldn’t hear any noise.

“I thought it could have been a plane crashing but the footage clearly shows a large ball of fire. It was amazing to see.

“I’ve seen shooting stars before but never a meteor. I thought it’s definitely not a firework, it was too bright for that. The whole horizon was lit up and there was no sound.

“I saw the trail first then it exploded into the sky. I knew then it was a meteor.

“It was really nice to see. I was expecting it to be a fox or hedgehog like usual.

“My friends have been saying it’s like something out of ‘War of the Worlds’.”

Rob Dawes, chairman of Sherwood Observatory in Derbyshire, said: “Mr Rogers was very lucky to get such a nice bright one.

“But you'd be surprised how many of these do come into the atmosphere at any time of year.“

Wild seal filmed ‘clapping’ underwater for first time

'I’ve heard the distinctive shotgun-like ‘Crack!’ many times over the years... but filming the seals in action has eluded me for 17 years,' says researcher
Kate Ng 1 day ago

Researchers have captured video footage of a wild grey seal “clapping” and producing a “gunshot-like sound” underwater for the first time.

The video was part of an international study led by Monash University in Australia, and was published in the journal Marine Mammal Science on Sunday.

Clapping is believed to be used by male grey seals as a show of strength to warn competitors to stay away and attract potential mates.

The sound created by the clap is described as a “loud high-frequency noise” that cuts through any background noise in order to send a “clear signal” to nearby seals.

It was previously thought to be a vocal sound, but the new footage captured by Dr Ben Burville around Farne Islands, off the coast of Northumberland, clearly shows a male grey seal clapping its flippers to produce it.

Mr Burville, a researcher at Newcastle University, said: “I was diving off the Farne Islands when I first saw a large male clap underwater. The effect of the clap was instant and the rival males rapidly dispersed.

“The clap was incredibly loud and at first I found it hard to believe what I had seen. How could a seal make such a loud clap underwater with no air to compress between its flippers?

“I’ve heard the distinctive shotgun-like ‘Crack!’ many times over the years and I felt sure this clapping behaviour was the source, but filming the seals in action has eluded me for 17 years.

“Then one day I had heard a couple of slaps in the distance, I just hit the record button and eureka! I got it!,” he added.

Lead author Dr David Hocking of Monash University said: “The discovery of ‘clapping seals’ might not seem that surprising, after all, they’re famous for clapping in zoos and aquaria.

“But where zoo animals are often trained to clap for our entertainment – these grey seals are doing it in the wild of their own accord.

“Clapping appears to be an important social behaviour for grey seals, so anything that disturbed it could impact breeding success and survival for this species.”He added that noise pollution created by humans has been known to “interfere” with other forms of communications between marine mammals, including whale song.

“But if we do not know a behaviour exists, we cannot easily act to protect it,” he said.

---30---

IOWA CAUCUS: FORMER HILLARY CLINTON STAFF REVEALED TO BE BEHIND ‘SHADOW’ APP THAT CAUSED CHAOS

A similar app will be used in Nevada caucuses
Nevada ditches plans to use app blamed for Iowa caucus chaos


Andrew Griffin @_andrew_griffin Tuesday 4 February 2020

The team behind the disastrous app used in the Iowa election app has been revealed.

The app, created by a startup named Shadow, was supposed to be used to co-ordinate information from the caucuses and allow organisers to send results back to the party. But it crashed repeatedly through the night, and has led to a failure to declare any kind of result.

The party said the problems had been caused by a “coding issue in the reporting system” that has since been fixed but meant it was still unable to declare any results.

Now focus has turned onto the company behind the app, Shadow, and the confusion surrounding how it managed to be created and used in one of the most important parts of the lead-up to the presidential election later this year.

Shadow’s website describes the team behind the app as “campaign and technology veterans who have built and implemented technology at Hillary for America, Obama for America, Google, Kiva, Apple, the AFL-CIO, and the DNC”.

Explaining the name of the company, it claims to be a “building a long-term, side-by-side “Shadow” of tech infrastructure to the Democratic Party and the progressive community at large”.

The history of Shadow is unclear and somewhat obscure.

Watch more
What is the ‘Shadow’ app causing chaos at Iowa caucus?

A since-deleted post on the website of nonprofit Acronym, apparently written by CEO Gerard Niemira, announced “the launch of Shadow, a new technology company that will exist under the ACRONYM umbrella and build accessible technological infrastructure and tools to enable campaigns to better harness, integrate and manage data across the platforms and technologies they all use”.

But in a statement last night, as the chaos in Iowa continued, Acronym distanced itself from the app. A spokesperson said it had “not provided any technology” for the causes, and suggested that Acronym was only an “investor”.

Shadow appears to have begun life as an app called GroundGame, and then Groundbase, which was first founded in 2017. It appears to have been re-branded in the intervening period, before being launched under its current name in 2017.

Niemira said in the same post that he had created the app with “a few of my colleagues from the Hillary for America campaign where we built tools for [the campaign’s] field team”. Many of the people involved in the creation of what is now called Shadow worked on the Clinton campaign, as well as at technology firms, according to LinkedIn profiles.

The app will also be used in the Nevada caucus, due to happen on 22 February. The local Democratic parties in each state paid $60,000 to Shadow for their services, according to Federal Election Commission disclosures.

A new app has helped cause chaos in the first chance voters had to determine who could be the next president of the US.

The app was intended to help gather information from across Iowa on who the roughly 1,700 caucus sites had chosen to be their presidential nominee.

But it has ended up contributing to chaos that means that there is no clarity over who won the contest, hours after it has finished.

At the time of publication, officials were still scrambling to find and verify the results. And they were scrambling, too, to explain how one of the most closely-watched moments in the lead-up to the election could have gone so dramatically wrong.

What was the app supposed to do?

The plan was that caucus organisers would be able to use the app to send in their results, allowing the state party to easily collate them from those submissions. It is the first time that such a system has been used in the Iowa caucus.

The decision to use the app came together at the last minute, according to the New York Times, which reported that the Iowa Democrats had been preparing to use a different system that would involve people calling in their results over the phone. That plan was pulled with just two weeks to go, the paper reported.

What is so wrong with the app?

Very quickly, users started reporting glitches and errors, and organisers were able to input the information as intended. Many complained that they were being shown error messages and that the app would not load properly, forcing them to call in rather than use the app as planned.

The Iowa caucus fiasco is a metaphor for the state of US democracy

Jonathan Green, who chaired a precinct in Lone Tree, said that when he tried to put the results into the reporting app, he kept getting a confusing error message: “Unknown protocol. The address specifies a protocol (e.g., “wxyz:??”.) the browser does not recognise, so the browser cannot properly connect to the site.”


The backup plan of having people call in their results also ran into trouble because the phones they had been asked to use in case of problems were not being answered, according to Des Moines County Democratic Chair Tom Courtney.

Issues were further exacerbated by the fact that the app was only made available at a later stage, in an attempt to stop outside interference. That meant it had not been fully tested, and that organisers had little experience of it before the caucuses.

Officials have stressed that the delays and problems are not the result of a hack or intrusion, and that the results will remain safe despite the problems.

“We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results,” the party said in a statement. “This is simply a reporting issue, the app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results.”
Who made the app?

The creation of the app still remains mired in some mystery: very little is known about the process of its creation, or where it came from. Though it is reported to have been made by a company called “Shadow”, the exact details of that startup are still unclear.

In fact, many of the organisations – such as nonprofit Acronym, which was reported to be an investor – have actually distanced themselves from the creation of the app in the wake of the mess.

What happens now?

All of the information is also kept in paper backups, and officials can now scour through those to find less high-tech but more reliable results for who has won. Local Democratic officials have claimed that means that the result will still arrive as normal, and will be reliable when it does, with the problems only meaning that they will take longer to actually report.

But the fallout could have broader implications beyond Iowa – into the rest of the primaries and caucuses, and even into further elections. As well as further scrutiny of the app, it could lead to yet more questions about why Iowa gets to be the first state in the country to declare, and whether that privilege should go to somewhere else in the wake of such high-profile mistakes.

Additional reporting by agencies

UK
This journalist-banning government tried to defend the indefensible – and failed miserably

Poor Chloe Smith was sent to claim the mass journalist walkout from Downing Street had all been ‘standard practice’. It was nothing of the sort Tom Peck Political Sketch Writer @tompeck Tuesday 4 February 2020It was, in the end, an MP called Chloe Smith who was sent to the despatch box of the House of Commons to account for the government’s behaviour on Monday afternoon, when journalists arrived at No 10 to find themselves being sorted on to separate sides of a large rug, and told which would be allowed into a special briefing and which would not, before they all walked out in protest.

You almost have to feel sorry for her. Not for the first time in her life, one suspects, a lot of names will have to have been crossed off the list before they got to her.

It should really have been Nicky Morgan, the culture secretary. But she’s not allowed in the Commons, because she stood down as an MP at the last election, having refused to serve in the government in which she now serves.

And she also would have been far too busy on Tuesday, getting ready to give a speech on Wednesday on “the future of broadcasting”, which is expected to pave the way for smashing up the BBC, because it dared to do its job and criticise the government she refused to serve in.

READ ON

Team Trump photo has internet baffled over why Ben Carson doesn’t have a seat

Twitter users are quick to point out that the only African American in the photo is squatting awkwardly in the aisle of the plane

Oxford alumni threaten to withhold donations to college amid row over fossil fuels

‘The heat has really turned up on colleges who have own endowments,’ warns alumnus
Eleanor Busby Education Correspondent

Alumni of the Oxford college attended by Tony Blair and Evan Davies are threatening to withhold donations unless it commits to selling shares in fossil fuel companies.

Hundreds of graduates have signed a letter to St John’s College urging bosses to cut all ties with fossil fuel firms after students camped out in the college quad to protest against investments.

The college, which is the wealthiest in Oxford, currently invests around £8m in BP and Shell.

A five-day student occupation, which ended on Sunday, attracted support from Oxford alumni around the world — including award-winning poet and writer Mark Abley.

But the group of graduates has accused college leaders of “dismissing” the action taken by students.

It comes after Professor Andrew Parker, principal bursar of the college, told students demanding divestment that he could instead arrange for the gas central heating to be switched off.
The letter from alumni, which has been sent to Professor Parker and the college’s president, says: “In light of your troubling response to this peaceful occupation and continued refusal to align your endowment with climate justice, as alumni and alumnae, we cannot in good faith donate to St John’s, the University of Oxford, or any college which has not made a divestment commitment at this time.”

Last month, an analysis revealed that almost all of Britain’s top universities have pledged to at least partially divest from fossil fuels following years of campaigning from students.

Oxford and Cambridge have committed to remove investments from coal and tar sands companies, but they are still subject to student-led campaigns over their links to the fossil fuel industry

Read more
 

Universities commit to selling shares in fossil fuels after protests

Just last week, another Oxford college, Balliol College, agreed to reduce investments in fossil fuel companies “as far and as fast as is practicable” following increasing pressure from students.

Julia Peck, who launched the open letter on behalf of alumni, said: “I think this occupation will be a watershed moment. It comes at a really crucial time when student campaigners are actively taking divestment proposals to the highest decision-making bodies of the university.

“This is a moment where Oxford leadership have clearly seen the amount of public support among the students, the faculty and the alumni. This kind of thing has never happened at an Oxford college.

“Now the heat has really turned up on the colleges who have their own endowments. They can make just as strong a statement about aligning themselves as climate justice as can the university.”
(Suzanne Williams )

A spokesperson for St John’s College said the college had received a lot of correspondence following the protests, adding that the views expressed “have been mixed and on both sides of the debate”.

They said: “We would like to assure you that, like many of our students, the president, bursar and fellows of St John’s are deeply concerned about climate change — indeed some directly work on aspects of it.

“The college is conscious of many calls for divestment. In response to this, we set up a working group in 2019 which is conducting a wide-ranging review of current policies, sustainable finance and ‘intentional’ investing — how trustees might reflect their charity’s aims and values in their investment policies.

“This work will, of course, continue and we expect to bring recommendations to the governing body by the end of the academic year.

“It is absolutely crucial in our view, that divestment does not become a divisive debate.”

---30---

Four in 10 people are not aware that women have a right to equal pay while only a quarter of women say their workplace is open about the issue of wages, a new study has found.

The research, carried out by the Fawcett Society, found only a third of people know women possess the legal right to probe male co-workers about how much money they earn if they suspect they are suffering pay discrimination.

Equal pay law in the UK is “not fit for purpose” and there is a grave ignorance among a “shocking amount” of people towards issues of equal pay, the women’s rights organisation warned.

Trump's State of the Union speech was the most exploitative TV I've seen in years

The president pulled out his greatest gameshow tactics for his speech to the nation, and who cares who's going to pay for these children's therapy?

SOTU never disappoints with Donald Trump at the helm, and this really was a bumper edition. You will laugh; you will cry. You will mostly cry. 

Holly Baxter New York @h0llyb4xter THE INDEPENDENT 

Welcome to SOTU, 2020’s brand new gameshow! It’s like Oprah or Ellen except the star is a straight white man and most of the real beneficiaries will be too! We have a really great show planned for you tonight, folks! You won’t believe the prizes, the intrigue, the ups and downs! You will laugh and you will cry! The best is yet to come!

That was the feel of Trump’s State of the Union speech tonight, delivered as it was in this brave new world where it’s perfectly normal for a president to stand up and declare the union “stronger than ever before” 24 hours before he faces an impeachment vote in the Senate. Come and watch the orange man in a red tie and his vice president, who gave so many standing ovations during the excessively long speech that he gave the impression of a jack-in-the-box powered by sycophancy. Come and see wealthy, conservative men in expensive suits jump out of their seats to applaud for a “blue-collar boom”. Watch again as they boo “the previous administration” while the Speaker of the House, wearing the same pin she used during the House’s impeachment on her white suit jacket, shakes her head after having her handshake refused by the president.

Come and watch a promise to “ban late-term abortion” announced minutes after the leader of the free world cynically introduces the teary mother of a small child born at 21 weeks’ gestation. Come and watch Donald Trump take personal credit for inventing gentrification when he claims that “wealthy people are pouring money into poor neighborhoods” in the “first time these communities have seen anything like this”. Come and watch a billionaire snowflake with a victim complex and a miniature American flag claim that “for many years we were treated unfairly on trade” because of “China’s massive theft of America’s jobs” which they were “getting away with year after year, decade after decade”. Truly, it has to be seen to be believed.

If you think it’s cynical and audacious for the president to bring a single mother and her young daughter to a State of the Union address to illustrate how Democrats are apparently failing in their state, then fine. But at least wait until the final reveal — the one where the president says: “Tonight we can exclusively reveal you will be going to the school of your choice!” to a confused eight-year-old who’s been waiting for a scholarship in Philadelphia. Nothing beats watching that awkward, awkward moment play out. Nothing at all.

Or does it? Wait, because there’s more. There’s a young family — a mother called Amy and her two children — being introduced to the floor because her husband is currently on deployment. The president just wants to thank her for being part of a military family that makes sacrifices on behalf of America. Actually, he doesn’t just want to thank her. He wants to announce that “we have your husband right here and we’re bringing him out!” Amy’s two small children, caught up in the clapping and the Republicans unironically chanting “USA, USA!” look stunned as their father appears in uniform. The little boy mouths, “Daddy?” Yes, Donald Trump has paid to have this prize delivered to them in front of the cameras. Will he pay for the years of therapy this will likely necessitate? Who cares?! USA, USA!

Then there are, of course, the mentions of Space Force; the promise to put the first woman on the moon; the claims that “unlike so many before me, I keep my promises”; the “true and real president of Venezuela, Juan Guaido” forced to stand and nod for a long, uncomfortable few minutes to Trump can segue into a rant about how “socialism destroys countries” and Democrats are socialists who will take away your healthcare. Everyone can be a player in the Trump 2020 campaign: an exiled Venezuelan politician, a two-year-old born prematurely, Brett Kavanaugh, Rush Limbaugh, those “illegal alien criminals” who just keep shooting people, Hunter Biden. All Trumpworld’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players (well, except women at eight months’ gestation with dead fetuses in their wombs. But who cares about them?!)

And he wouldn’t let you go without playing some of his greatest hits, either. The wall is back! (‘We have now completed over 100 miles and have over 500 miles completed in a very short amount of time, so by next year we will have 500 miles completed,” FYI. That’s creative math.) Space Force is going to make your child an astronaut! “The best is yet to come”! Nancy Pelosi will hand out a special treat at the end: signed shredded pieces of the speech made by the 45th president to the United States of America.

SOTU never disappoints with Donald Trump at the helm, and this really was a bumper edition. You will laugh; you will cry. You will mostly cry. But your tears will be used to power great new opportunities for oil and gas workers! And you will get to keep your overpriced healthcare plan! Smile a little, why don’t you? “The United States is where all the action is!” And shouldn’t that count for something?