Wednesday, August 18, 2021

HEAVY HAND OF THE STATE

Protesters arrested as Halifax police clear shelters from city land

Dozens of tents and some wooden shelters were removed Wednesday

Halifax police surround one remaining shelter on Wednesday afternoon outside the old library on Spring Garden Road to keep protesters back. One protestor sat on the shelter roof for hours to prevent its removal. (Mark Crosby/CBC)

Multiple people have been arrested as Halifax municipal staff and police cleared dozens of tents and shelters from encampments Wednesday morning, with officers physically moving back protesters from at least one downtown site.

Just before 10 a.m. local time, videos on social media from various journalists showed tense moments between Halifax police and protesters who were supporting people who were being evicted at the old Spring Garden Road library site

  • 2 hours ago
  •  
  • 0:
Video from CBC reporter Nicola Seguin shows tense moments between police and protestors who were supporting people being evicted at the old Halifax library site. 0:36

Police forcibly moved back a group of protesters before a heavy piece of machinery was brought in to haul one shelter away. People linked arms and stood behind the police officers to block the machine's pathway to the street.

Police then arrested and handcuffed at least five people, placing them on the ground by the library.

A second shelter remained, with a protester sitting on the roof surrounded by a ring of police officers. He refused to leave when an officer climbed a ladder to speak with him.

The crowd, which shouted at police, grew to nearly 200 people around the one remaining shelter by Wednesday afternoon.

Provincial NDP Leader Gary Burrill also appeared at the protest in support of those being forced out.

Some Halifax police officers appeared to have removed their name tags from their uniforms.

Police were also seen directing journalists to move away from the area as the journalists filmed the evictions.

The Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ) tweeted that they were "concerned about the limits police are placing on reporters covering the dismantling of these shelters," and emphasized that reporters have the right to be there.

The removals come a month after similar controversial evictions of tent camps in Toronto parks by police.

By the early afternoon, dry patches of grass dotted Halifax parks and the Common where tents once sat.

In the city's west end, at Horseshoe Island Park on the Northwest Arm, Matthew Smith said he was awoken at 6 a.m. by a group of about 20 police and city bylaw officers. He has been living in a tent for the past two weeks with his girlfriend and their cat.

He said they told him he and anyone else in nearby tents had to leave the area within an hour.

"They said if I didn't pack up my stuff they would physically confiscate my stuff, confiscate my animal, and arrest me and take me to jail," Smith said.

Smith said he and others were ticketed $237 for breaking the bylaw.

"Which, obviously no one can pay, because we're living in a park," he said.

People watch as an emergency shelter is loaded onto a truck outside the old library on Spring Garden Road in Halifax on Wednesday. A large group of people stayed on scene for hours Wednesday to protest and attempt to block the removal of shelters and tents. (Mark Crosby/CBC)

Smith said they were told that the city would store belongings for free. He said he didn't want to hand anything over and give them "the chance to just take everything."

"We really don't have anywhere to go," Smith said.

He said a woman living next to the tent encampment had brought food every night and had left a note offering to help when everyone was evicted.

He said his plan is to move to another park further from public view, but predicts the same scene will likely repeat in a couple of weeks.

Smith said he wasn't offered any temporary housing options on Wednesday.  "When it comes to housing there's just nothing available," he said.

Smith said he works 60 hours a week, but still can't afford rent in Halifax and is his family's sole earner. "Someone needs to do something," he said.

Halifax police and city staff clear the tent encampments in the Peace and Friendship Park on Wednesday morning. Some people reported being handed $237 tickets for breaking a bylaw about living on municipal land. (Brett Ruskin/CBC)

Premier-designate Tim Houston, whose PC Party won a majority government Tuesday by defeating the governing Liberals, said during a news conference Wednesday that the housing crisis is "very real" in the province and did not develop overnight.

"We didn't have tent cities eight years ago in this province. We have them now, so we need real solutions for housing," he said. "We're going to work with people to make sure that people can access housing."

He added that the PC Party's transition team will be looking closely at the briefing notes around homelessness and housing in general to understand all angles of the situation.

The PC election platform included affordable housing. Part of the plan includes selling or leasing public land for developers to build on, with the caveat that a portion has to be affordable housing.

The PCs also suggested new taxes for non-resident property owners, which is the proposal that takes up the bulk of their housing plan.

The Tories have also said they will not extend rent control beyond the COVID-19 state of emergency. Houston repeated that stance on Wednesday morning and said increasing the housing stock is a better approach.

Houston said he would also respect the recent findings from the Nova Scotia Affordable Housing Commission's report.

At the Peace and Friendship Park on Hollis Street, Thomas Johnstone and Kaileigh Bruce said they were awoken around 6 a.m. by others pointing out that a large group of police had arrived.

They have been staying in the park for the past two months, and also said the lack of housing in the area is why they've been living in a tent.

Bruce said others expect everyone to have a job, and a "nice life" with two kids and a car, when in reality not everybody can find work, or is ready for that step.

"I could go get a job, but I'm not ready because I'm constantly moving places because I'm constantly getting kicked out of my home," Bruce said.

A large stuffed bear sits on a mattress at the Peace and Friendship Park Wednesday morning as tent encampments were cleared by police and city staff. The municipality has offered to store people's things for free. (CBC)

The city delivered about 40 notices to people living in tents across the municipality on Monday, according to a statement from city spokesperson Laura Wright. 

The notice stated people living on municipal land were violating a bylaw, and they must vacate and remove all belongings from municipal property immediately. 

Photos from the Halifax Mutual Aid group, which has provided wooden "crisis structures" for some people that sat alongside the tents in some areas, showed notices taped to the sides of tents.

On Wednesday morning, a release from Halifax Regional Municipality said municipal compliance officers are "following up" with tent occupants to aid the safe removal of tents from municipal parks. 

Staff from the parks and recreation department and Halifax police are assisting "with removal efforts if required," the release said.

"The situation at a number of parks, due to the recent proliferation of tents, has created an increased risk to the health and safety of both the tent occupants and the public, and must be addressed," the statement said.

The municipality said it has received numerous reports from residents about the tents, including public nuisance complaints and concerns for public safety. 

Last month, similar notices appeared on crisis shelters around the city, saying that after July 13, city officials would remove the shelters and anything in them. 

Thomas Johnstone, left, and Kaleigh Bruce were asked to leave the Peace and Friendship Park in downtown Halifax on Wednesday morning. People living in tents around the city were being forced to leave by police and city staff. (CBC)

But when the deadline arrived, Mayor Mike Savage said the deadline was a preferred "timeline" and no forced evictions would go ahead.

"I'm not going to force a deadline and say if people aren't out by this point in time then they're going to be forcibly removed. That's not my intent," Savage said July 13.

"We're not intending to have any kind of a confrontation over this. We don't want to criminalize homelessness. We just want to find a solution that's safe for everybody."

Ardath Whynacht, volunteer spokesperson for Halifax Mutual Aid, said the group was "very surprised" by the evictions Wednesday in light ot Savage's comments last month.

She pointed to the evictions coming on the morning after a provincial election, and suggested the city planned to act at that time to avoid media and public attention.

A person who had been living in a tent in Halifax's Horseshoe Island Park pets their dog early Wednesday morning before the tent was removed. Halifax police and city staff were at the site of various tent encampments Wednesday morning to make sure they were cleared to follow a bylaw. (Nicola Seguin/CBC)

Moving people out of public areas doesn't solve homelessness, Whynacht said, and only shifts them into more dangerous areas.

"This is a life-and-death crisis, especially during summer heat," Whynacht said.

The municipality has said it is making sure those using the wooden shelters and tents work with street navigators, the provincial Department of Community Services and support workers to find a housing option that works for them.

Wright said that since July 1, about five former occupants have accepted a housing option.

One of those options could be a local hotel, but 10 community groups have denounced the city's "heavy-handed" approach and noted hotels are not appropriate for everyone.

Halifax police use force, make arrests, as dismantled temporary shelters torn down

A wall of citizens form a protective wall in front of a crisis shelter at the Old Spring Garden Road Memorial library. Alexa MacLean/Global News

Halifax Regional Police officers were dismantling tents and temporary shelters and telling occupants to immediately vacate an encampment near the old Spring Garden Road Memorial Library early Wednesday.


Police were met with anger from a large group of people in the area, with several people later arrested after a protective wall was formed in front of the crisis shelters. The people could be heard telling police that the occupants had no other housing options.

Police officers eventually forcibly moved the wall of people, and could be heard telling them that contractors had been ordered to remove the shelters.

The number of arrests appeared to be higher than 10.

Officers were waiting outside each of the temporary crisis shelters and tents until the occupants left Wednesday morning. Most occupants were still sleeping.

One remaining shelter remained at the old library site during the noon hour Wednesday. Police circled the structure, which saw someone sitting on top, and with growing crowd gathering nearby.

More than 10 officers stood by as several youths tore down their tents at Peace and Friendship Park in Halifax also on Wednesday. One of the older occupants, whom Global News was told is also a military veteran, said he was “yanked” out of his tent when officers first arrived.

READ MORE: Unhoused man living in woods says crisis shelters needed throughout HRM

Another 22-year-old occupant, who goes by the name Thomas, was issued a $237.50 ticket at 7:30 a.m. by police officers for “camping in parks without permission.”

He said he was issued this ticket despite willingly gathering his belongings and vacating his tent.

Global News reporter Alexa MacLean took footage of the protest and police from the steps of the old Spring Garden Road Memorial Library, but was told by police that if she and other reporters moved off those steps they would be arrested for obstruction.

Halifax Regional Municipality trucks and staff have also arrived to load up occupants’ belongings. Many occupants say they have nowhere to put their belongings, so had to leave them behind.

HRM said the situation at a number of parks due to these tents has “created an increased risk to the health and safety of both the tent occupants and the public, and must be addressed.”

The municipality said it has received many reports from residents, including public nuisance complaints and concerns for public safety.

“In light of this, steps were taken earlier this week to provide tent occupants with written notice to vacate and remove all belongings from the municipal property immediately,” HRM said.

“The municipality is hopeful that occupants of homeless encampments will voluntarily vacate and remove their belongings from the parks,” it added.

As of Wednesday morning, HRM said it is following up with tent occupants “to aid the safe removal of tents from municipal parks.”

Organic food has become mainstream but still has room to grow

August 17, 2021




Organic vegetables at the Center for Urban Agriculture at Fairview Gardens, Goleta, Calif. Citizen of the Planet/Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images




CC BY-ND

Organic food once was viewed as a niche category for health nuts and hippies, but today it’s a routine choice for millions of Americans. For years following passage of the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990, which established national organic standards, consumers had to seek out organic products at food co-ops and farmers markets. Today over half of organic sales are in conventional grocery store chains, club stores and supercenters; Walmart, Costco, Kroger, Target and Safeway are the top five organic retailers.

Surveys show that 82% of Americans buy some organic food, and availability has improved. So why do overall organic sales add up to a mere 6% of all food sold in the U.S.? And since organic farming has many benefits, including conserving soil and water and reducing use of synthetic chemicals, can its share grow?

One issue is price. On average, organic food costs 20% more than conventionally produced food. Even hardcore organic shoppers like me sometimes bypass it due to cost.

Some budget-constrained shoppers may restrict their organic purchases to foods they are especially concerned about, such as fruits and vegetables. Organic produce carries far fewer pesticide residues than conventionally grown versions.

Read news coverage based on evidence, not alarm.Get newsletter

Price matters, but let’s dig deeper. Increasing organic food’s market share will require growing larger quantities and more diverse organic products. This will require more organic farmers than the U.S. currently has.

There are some 2 million farms in the U.S.. Of them, only 16,585 are organic – less than 1%. They occupy 5.5 million acres, which is a small fraction of overall U.S. agricultural land. Roughly two-thirds of U.S. farmland is dedicated to growing animal feed and biofuel feedstocks like corn and soybeans, rather than food for people.

In my view, converting more agricultural land to organic food production should be a national goal. Organic farmers produce healthy food, promote soil health and protect watersheds. Ruminant animals like dairy cows when raised organically must graze on pasture for at least 120 days each year, which reduces their methane emissions.

The list of climate and environmental benefits associated with organic is long. Organic farming consumes 45% less energy than conventional production, mainly because it doesn’t use nitrogen fertilizers. And it emits 40% less greenhouse gases because organic farmers practice crop rotation, use cover crops and composting, and eliminate fossil fuel-based inputs.

The vast majority of organic farms are small or midsized, both in terms of gross sales and acreage. Organic farmers are younger on average than conventional farmers.

Starting small makes sense for beginning farmers, and organic price premiums allow them to survive on smaller plots of land. But first they need to go through a tough three-year transition period to cleanse the land.

During this time they are ineligible to label products as organic, but must follow organic standards, including forgoing use of harmful chemicals and learning how to manage ecosystem processes. This typically results in short-term yield declines. Many farmers fail along the way.

The transition period is just one of many challenges for organic farmers. Greater federal government support could help. In a recent report, Arizona State University’s Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems, which I direct, identified actions the Biden administration can take within existing budgets and laws to realize the untapped promise of organic agriculture.

Current USDA assistance for organic producers is paltry, especially given the billions of dollars that the agency spends annually in support of agriculture. Two-thirds of farm subsidy dollars go to the top 10% richest farms.

Our report recommends dedicating 6% of USDA spending to supporting the organic sector, a figure that reflects its market share. As an example, in 2020 the agency spent about $55 million on research directly pertinent to organic agriculture within its $3.6 billion Research, Education and Economics mission area. A 6% share of that budget would be $218 million for developing things like better ways of controlling pests by using natural predators instead of chemical pesticides.

Organic food’s higher price includes costs associated with practices like forgoing use of harmful pesticides and improving animal welfare. A growing number of food systems scholars and practitioners are calling for use of a methodology called True Cost Accounting, which they believe reveals the full costs and benefits of food production.

[Over 100,000 readers rely on The Conversation’s newsletter to understand the world. Sign up today.]

According to an analysis by the Rockefeller Foundation, American consumers spend $1.1 trillion yearly on food, but the true cost of that food is $3.2 trillion when all impacts like water pollution and farmworker health are factored in. Looked at through a True Cost Accounting lens, I see organic as a good deal.

Author
Kathleen Merrigan
Executive Director, Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems, Arizona State University

Disclosure statement
Kathleen Merrigan directs the Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems at Arizona State University, which receives funding from the Organic Trade Association. She is co-director of a project on inadvertent chemical contamination of organic crops funded by the US Department of Agriculture. Merrigan is a member of the Advisory Committee for the Organic Farming Research Foundation. She also is an advisor to S2G Ventures and a Venture Partner at Astanor Ventures, two agtech firms that have some organic companies in their much broader portfolios. As a US Senate staffer, Merrigan drafted the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990. She has served on the National Organic Standards Board, as Administrator of the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service and as Deputy Secretary of Agriculture.





How a 'stubborn' Canadian saved thousands of American babies from birth defects

Frances Kelsey's first big break as a world-changing scientist may only have occurred because people assumed she was a man

Author of the article: Anna J. James,
 Special to National Post
Publishing date:Aug 17, 2021 • 

Frances Oldham Kelsey, is shown working in the lab in the mid to late 1930s with Dr. E.M.K. Geiling. She would later become instrumental in barring Thalidomide from the U.S. market. 
PHOTO BY MIKE HENSEN/THE LONDON FREE PRESS/QMI AGENCY

While you were busy memorizing interminable details about Responsible Government or Laura Secord, you missed out on some of the best parts of our national story: Secret Nazi weather bases, Mackenzie King’s extremely weird sexuality or the fact that Canada has been a surprise bit player in everything from the breakup of the Beatles to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln to the fall of Communism. Hopefully we can rectify things somewhat in a new occasional series, The Secret History of Canada, documenting the little-known (and often R-rated) parts you missed. Today, how a Canadian scientist averted an American medical disaster.

It’s been called the worst manmade medical disaster in history: An estimated 10,000 children born with stunted or non-existent limbs, and as many as 100,000 so chemically deformed that they were never born at all.

The culprit was an over-the-counter German-made sedative that once came close to rivalling aspirin in total sales. As thalidomide sowed disaster in worldwide maternity wards throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, only one developed country would be spared — and it would be thanks almost entirely to a Canadian.

Approving thalidomide for the U.S. market was to be Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey’s first assignment with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Born on Vancouver Island in 1914, Kelsey had come from a family that expected her to get an education equal to her brothers. Although she had a master’s in science from McGill University by 1935, one of Kelsey’s first big breaks into the medical field — a research assistant position at the University of Chicago’s new pharmacology department — may have occurred only because recruiters assumed she was a man.

Frances Kelsey, pictured in the 1960s. 
PHOTO BY FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

She received an offer addressed to “Mr. Oldham” — which she never corrected based on the advice of her professor. As the professor said, “don’t be stupid. Accept the job, sign your name and put ‘Miss’ in brackets afterward.”

Years later, Kelsey mused “that had her name been Elizabeth or Marie-Jane her career might have ended there.”

By the fall of 1960, Kelsey was in Washington, D.C., as one of seven full-time medical officers hired to review human drug applications at the FDA. Their caseload was heavy — about 300 applications per year.

The thalidomide approval was meant to be a straightforward one. Being a woman, a foreigner and new to the agency, the drug manufacturer William S. Merrell assumed Kelsey would be a pushover, even eager to please in her new role.

At that time, drugs could go to market only sixty days after a manufacturer had filed an application with the FDA. If no decision was reached by then, the drug was automatically approved. At the time, drug manufacturers also had “open door” access to the FDA officers assessing their applications, which allowed for coercion and pressure.
Kevadon, the thalidomide drug that was intended for the U.S. market. 
PHOTO BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN HISTORY

By the time the application for thalidomide hit Kelsey’s desk, it was already being prescribed to pregnant women in Europe and Canada as a miracle cure for morning sickness and insomnia. Intended to be marketed as Kevadon in the United States, its selling point was that it was a safe alternative to barbiturates.

It wasn’t as easy to overdose on the drug, and it was thus pegged as an ideal medication for vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly and pregnant women. Merrell even claimed it was “suicide-proof,” stating in its FDA application that one man had taken 140 tablets and woke up days later with a mere hangover.

Merrell had applied to the FDA to distribute it across the U.S. in time for Christmas 1960.

In Kelsey’s position, denying this application in her first month at the FDA — even on solid scientific grounds — could attract labels of “skepticism” and “stubbornness” (the exact words later used to commend her decisions on thalidomide).
A 1968 photo of German thalidomide victims. 
PHOTO BY D.P.A./ ARCHIVE PHOTOS

The pill was already being sold in more than 20 countries. At the time of application, almost 2.5 million thalidomide pills had already been administered to about 20,000 patients, many of whom were pregnant.

But Kelsey, along with two other FDA officers held out their approval, citing a lack of clinical data to support the claims that the drug was safe and effective.

“It was just too positive; this couldn’t be the perfect drug with no risk,” she once said. Kelsey then ran the application by her pharmacologist husband, Fremont Ellis Kelsey, who worked at the National Institutes of Health.
In December 1960, he confirmed her suspicions, calling the submission “an interesting collection of meaningless pseudoscientific jargon apparently intended to impress chemically unsophisticated readers.”
Alvin Law, a drummer and Canadian motivational speaker who was born without arms due to thalidomide. PHOTO BY CHRIS EAKIN/QMI

Over the course of nine months (which was then an unheard of length of time to review an FDA application), the team reviewed a growing spate of data proving the horrifying effects of thalidomide on pregnant women.

In February 1961, Kelsey was thumbing through a copy of the British Medical Journal when she saw a letter to the editor from a physician who reported cases of nerve damage among four of his patients who’d taken thalidomide.

Kelsey and her team also reviewed several studies attesting that if a child lived long enough to make it out of the womb, many were born with severe deformities including atrophied limbs, missing toes and fingers, and even absence of the anus and organ damage. Kelsey even met with pediatrician Dr. Helen Taussig at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, who had seen the effects of thalidomide first-hand in Europe.

Frances Oldham Kelsey at 100 years old.
 PHOTO BY MIKE HENSEN/THE LONDON FREE PRESS/QMI AGENCY

Meanwhile, Merrell executives hounded Kelsey for a favourable outcome through the phone, fax, and in person. They went so far as to complain to her FDA bosses up to three times per week, calling her a bureaucrat, irresponsible, and unreasonable. “Most of the things they called me, you couldn’t print,” Kelsey later told reporters.

It was ultimately denied by Kelsey and her team, citing that thalidomide’s safety was unproven. Furthermore, it caused significant harm, particularly to the unborn fetus. Within months, growing evidence of the toxic effects of thalidomide would ensure Kelsey’s title as “the most famous government regulator in American history.”

Had thalidomide taken root in the U.S. at the same rate with which it did in the U.K. or Germany, thousands of Americans — now in their 60s — would still be carrying the signs of thalidomide deformity. Instead, just 17 “thalidomide babies” were born in the U.S.


Frances Oldham Kelsey, is shown receiving the President’s Award for Distinguished Civilian Service in 1962 from then-president J.F. Kennedy. 

Kelsey’s home country would not be so lucky. Thalidomide was released in Canada on April 1, 1961 and officially pulled from shelves three months later after the damage had become apparent across Europe. In 2015, the federal government admitted fault and granted pensions to the nearly 100 thalidomide survivors still alive.

Kelsey would live to 101 and for a brief period in the 1960s was hailed as a hero across the U.S. In 1962, U.S. President John F. Kennedy awarded her the President’s Award for Distinguished Federal Civilian Service. She was only the second woman to receive the honour. Scores of mothers who had been pregnant in the early 1960s mailed Kelsey directly to thank the physician for sparing them the likely fate of being prescribed thalidomide.

An asteroid is named in her honour. In 2015, she was presented with the Order of Canada only hours before her death.

And her influence would not be limited to thalidomide. Her refusal of Merrell’s application put a spotlight on the FDA’s flaws, and in 1962, the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938 was amended to abolish the 60-day time limit for FDA reviews and require manufacturers to prove a drug’s efficacy as a non-negotiable criterion for approval.

Throughout her century-long life, however, Kelsey was always quick to deflect personal praise, saying she couldn’t have done it without the full support of her FDA superiors.

In 1962, Kelsey gave this staid assessment of the bureaucratic decision that staved off a human catastrophe: “They (Merrell) certainly thought I was unreasonable, but I didn’t feel the material to back it up was very adequate.”

 

Feds drop court fight to block documents on firing of National Microbiology Lab scientists

Opposition parties want to know why Xiangguo Qiu, husband Keding Cheng were fired from Wininpeg lab

Scientists Xiangguo Qiu and her husband, Keding Cheng, were escorted out of Winnipeg's National Microbiology Laboratory in July 2019 and subsequently fired last January. (Governor General's Innovation Awards)

The Trudeau government is dropping its quest to have a court prohibit the disclosure of documents related to the firing of two scientists at Canada's highest security laboratory.

A House of Commons order to produce the documents was terminated, along with all other business before the House, when Parliament was dissolved Sunday for an election.

Consequently, a Justice Department official says no purpose would be served in continuing the government's application to the Federal Court to block the release of the documents which it maintained would be injurious to national security.

The government has served the Federal Court with a notice of discontinuance in the case.

The decision leaves unresolved the question of whether the House of Commons is supreme and has unfettered power to demand the production of any documents it sees fit, no matter how sensitive and regardless of privacy or national security laws.

Opposition parties joined forces to demand the documents in hopes that they'd shed light on why scientists Xiangguo Qiu and her husband, Keding Cheng, were escorted out of Winnipeg's National Microbiology Laboratory in July 2019 and subsequently fired last January.

 

Manitoba passes Pension Act amendments, making it easier to unlock funds

Amendments go into effect Oct. 1

Finance Minister Scott Fielding says the legislation will give Manitobans more flexibility with their pensions. (Mikaela MacKenzie/The Canadian Press)

Manitobans with pensions will soon be able to unlock some of their money under certain conditions without needing the government to approve requests, the finance minister announced on Tuesday.

Effective Oct. 1, the Pension Benefits Amendment Act, which was announced in 2019, will allow Manitobans greater and easier access to their pension funds if they're facing financial hardships.

"Manitobans work hard for their pensions and we want to ensure those funds are protected while at the same time giving them greater flexibility to meet their needs," Finance Minister Scott Fielding said in a news release on Tuesday. 

The amendment will allow Manitobans of all ages with funds in Manitoba locked-in accounts at a financial institution to unlock their money when under certain financial hardships, such as low expected income, threat of eviction, mortgage foreclosure and medical or dental expenses not covered by other insurance or government programs.

Manitobans 65 and older will have the option to unlock all of their funds from locked-in retirement accounts (LIRA) or life income funds (LIF) with a financial institution.

People in relationships who break up will also be able to split pension assets based on their shared circumstances, rather than the currently mandated 50/50 split or no division at all.

The amendments are an effort to reduce red tape and administrative inefficiencies for pensioners, financial institutions and the government, Fielding said.

The changes are similar to what's been done in other provinces, he said, and were made after the provincial government received recommendations from the Pension Commission of Manitoba and feedback from online consultation.

Manitoba Federation of Labour president Kevin Rebeck considers the changes a gamble.

"Most people aren't actuaries or pension experts," Rebeck said.

"To unlock your funds and go gamble it in the market in the hopes that you might do better while people are taking additional fees from it — the reality is most people are much better off if their money is kept in the [pension] plan."

Rebeck would rather see the province call on other provinces and the federal government to create a pension insurance program "to make sure that when companies like Sears go under that workers aren't the last ones paid and get screwed at the end," he said.

"This this is a move in the wrong direction, in my mind."

Drought conditions impacting cattle prices across the Prairies

By Quinn Campbell
Global News
Posted August 16, 2021 


Cattle producers across the Prairies are facing some tough decisions this year due to the widespread drought. As Quinn Campbell reports, with so many cattle going to market, prices are expected to soften as the fall run continues.

As drought conditions and wildfires continue to worsen across the Prairies, the volatile market continues to keep those in the agriculture industry on edge.

“This fall, this next five to six months, is going to be dramatic with the number of cows, unfortunately, that are going to come to town and the only place for them to go is to slaughter,” said Bob Balog with Balog Auction Services in Lethbridge.


READ MORE: ‘It’s looking terrible’: Alberta ranchers struggling in provincial drought

Balog said the calls just keep coming from concerned producers spanning all the prairie provinces.

“Most of the calls coming in have been about a lack of pasture, now the last 10 days we are getting lots and lots of calls because people are out of water. So it’s a double whammy, there is a third whammy with the fact there is very little, if any, hay.”

READ MORE: CFA working on initiative to send hay from Eastern Canada to Western farmers

Senior analyst Brian Perillat with CanFax, a division of the Canadian Cattlemen’s Association that tracks cattle market data, said the drought has driven the price of slaughter cows down about 20 cents a pound and August is usually the strongest month for price of the year.

“It takes a good cow probably to make 80 cents now. Lots of cows trading in the 70 cent range. In June, a couple months ago, we were over a dollar a pound. And some of these cow prices are pretty much the lowest we’ve been in August in almost 10 years,” added Perillat.

Perillat added a continued downslide is expected into the fall for cattle. The early price on calves is holding on, but it’s also expected to slip as the realities of the drought continue for farmers and ranchers.

“Some of those five weights, six weights are just over two bucks a pound, $2.10 to $2.15 in spots, which is close to where it was a year ago. And last year wasn’t a great market either.”

The federal government announced Sunday it is increasing the AgriRecovery funding up to $500 million to address the extraordinary costs associated with the drought and wildfires, that includes the $100 million announced at the beginning of August. The rollout has not been finalized.

READ MORE: CFA working on initiative to send hay from Eastern Canada to Western farmers

Hay crimes expected to grow in southwest Saskatchewan as drought persists


The Canadian Federation of Agriculture is also looking into sending any extra hay from farmers on the East Coast to farmers in Western Canada, to help ease the burden. Balog said any help is a step in the right direction, but it needs to come now.

“If they can find hay, which is going to be a problem, they need to buy it, if they are going to bale crops up, they need to do it right now. So time is of a very significant factor right now and all the help we could get, the sooner the better.”

Perillat said if farmers can look ahead, there is some optimism. With less cattle in North America in the coming years, the futures prices are looking optimistic in the long term.

“April futures are 140 which is some of the highest levels we have seen in five, six years.”


READ MORE: Severe drought in Alberta brings on early harvest

The season is just beginning, and Balog said only time will tell just how disruptive the drought will have been, especially since it is hitting all aspects of the agriculture industry.