Only Christians need apply? 

Gov. Mike Parson’s ‘Christian values’ statement prompts legal concerns

2022/2/3

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Does the next director of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services need to be a Christian?

That is the question after Gov. Mike Parson said in a statement Tuesday that he would only choose someone for the job who shared the “same Christian values” as him.

Parson, a Republican, was blasting conservative hard-liners in the Missouri Senate who had just jettisoned his pick for state health director, Donald Kauerauf, a pro-vaccine and mask public health professional with 35 years of experience.

But in defending his pick, Parson’s statement, which his office also shared on social media, prompted a whole new round of criticism.

“I’m curious Governor, is this a standard you traditionally use?” state Rep. Adam Schwadron, a Republican, asked on Twitter. “Article VI of the US Constitution strictly prohibits a religious test as a qualification to any office or public trust. Considering that, I then must ask the question. Would someone who is Jewish, such as myself, be considered for nomination?”

In his statement, Parson said, “Don is a public health expert that is on record opposing masking requirements and COVID-19 vaccine mandates. He is outspokenly pro-life and morally opposed to abortion. Missourians know that I share these beliefs and would not have nominated someone who does not share the same Christian values.”

Brian Kaylor, the editor of Word&Way, a Jefferson City-based publication founded in 1896 and focused on the Baptist faith and other topics, said in an interview he found the tweet “inappropriate, but also not surprising.”

“It’s a little shocking just to see the governor make such an explicitly sectarian claim about who he would pick for this type of position,” said Kaylor, who is a board member of the St. Louis chapter of the Americans United for Separation of Church and State, according to his online biography.

Kaylor also referenced a news release Parson had sent earlier defending Kauerauf, saying he is “guided by our Missouri principles: Christian values, family values, and love for this nation.”

“He was already kind of framing this as a ‘you all should just vote for my guy because I’m a Christian, he’s a Christian, we’re all Christians,” Kaylor said.

“The only religious reference in the United States Constitution is that there be no religious test for office, Article VI,” Kaylor said. “This is a public office. So it is unconstitutional to suggest that someone should be a Christian to be the director of the state’s DHSS.

“This is a state where this director is going to be serving people of many faiths and no faith,” Kaylor said, “and so I think that’s very concerning that a governor would send a message that only Christians need to apply to this type of position, which not only impacts any applicants, or people who might be chosen, but also sends a message to the rest of the state that maybe you’re a second-class citizen.”

Chuck Hatfield, a Jefferson City attorney who has worked in state government, said Parson’s use of “Christian values” instead of plainly saying he would only hire a Christian could be the state’s saving grace if and when jilted job applicants start filing employment discrimination lawsuits because of the statement.

Religious discrimination in employment is illegal under federal and state law.

“He pulled up just short of saying, I’m not going to hire someone ... who’s not a Christian,” Hatfield said. “But by saying I’m only going to hire people who share ‘my Christian values,’ as opposed to ‘my values,’ I think he does open the state up (to lawsuits) if there are folks out there who, you know, do not share the Christian religion who’ve not been hired for jobs.

“They’ve got a plausible claim that perhaps Missouri discriminates against folks who aren’t Christians,” Hatfield said.

Asked if saying he would hire someone with “Christian values,” instead of saying he would only hire a Christian would save the state from legal liability, Kaylor said he wasn’t a lawyer but thought the message “was pretty clear.”

“Who shares Christian values that’s not a Christian?” Kaylor asked. “If he’s talking about some generic non-sectarian values those aren’t Christian values, right? If he’s talking about being pro-life, well there are non-Christians who are pro-life and there are some Christians who are not pro-life.

“As a minister I would suggest that you really can’t hold Christian values and not be a Christian,” Kaylor said. “The chief of all Christian values from the early church, and for 2,000 years, is that declaration, the foundational declaration, that Jesus is Lord.”

Kelli Jones, a spokeswoman for Parson, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday regarding the governor’s remarks.

The Madison, Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation, which says it “works as an umbrella for those who are free from religion and are committed to the cherished principle of separation of state and church,” on Wednesday called on Parson to delete his tweet.

“The ban on religious tests in the United States Constitution is one of the truly great and original bulwarks for freedom of thought and expression,” Annie Laurie Gaylor and Dan Barker, co-presidents of the foundation, wrote in a letter to Parson dated Wednesday. “Our Constitution is godless, omitting any mention of god or Jesus — a unique contribution of our founders.”

The group also linked to a Pew Research Center article that said according to telephone surveys in 2018 and 2019, the number of American adults who said they were Christians had dropped 12% over the last decade, to 65%.

A March 2021 Pew survey found most U.S. adults support the separation between church and state, but that many Americans supported more Christian influence within public institutions.

The survey found 19% of respondents wanted the federal government to “stop enforcing separation of church and state,” for example.

Kaylor said the episode is "the same type of Christian nationalism that we saw helping storm the Capitol on Jan. 6 (2021).

“It’s dangerous,” Kaylor said. “As a Christian myself I speak up against (it) because it’s dangerous politically. I also think it’s a heresy of the Christian faith.”

THE ULTIMATE IN WHITE ON WHITE VIOLENCE 

Iowa man sentenced to life in prison after killing his friend in a fight over mayonnaise

By 

Mark Lungariello

February 3, 2022 

Kristofer Erlbacher murdered his friend Caleb Solberg over an argument about mayo.Harrison County Sheriff’s Offi

An Iowa man was sentenced to life behind bars for the murder of a friend he repeatedly ran over with a pickup truck after a fight about mayonnaise.

Kristofer Erlbacher, now 29, used his truck to ram Caleb Solberg, 30, outside a café in the small town of Pisgah on Dec. 17, 2020, the Des Moines Register reported. Erlbacher initially drove away, then came back and ran over Solberg two more times, according to the Register.

The two had been out drinking at a bar with another person earlier in the night in nearby Moorhead, but things took a turn when Erlbacher spread mayo on Solberg’s food, which riled Solberg and sparked a bar fight, the Woodbine Twiner-Herald reported.

A furious Erlbacher called Solberg’s half-brother, Craig Pryor, on the way to the café and threatened to set Solberg’s house on fire and shoot him, the newspaper said. Pryor later came to Dave’s Old Home in Pisgah, where another confrontation was brewing.

Erlbacher eventually rammed his truck into Pryor’s, then rammed Solberg.

“Erlbacher’s first blow to Solberg did not kill him. He can be heard screaming for his brother, Craig Pryor,” District Judge Greg Steensland wrote in the verdict, according to the Twiner-Herald.

The fatal incident happened in Pisgah, Iowa.

Jared Winkler/Creative Commons

“Rather than just leave, Erlbacher went down the street, turned around, and came back to strike Solberg a second time … To be sure he had completed the job, Erlbacher drove his truck up and over Solberg one last time.”

Erlbacher then drove off, but his truck broke down a short while later. On the phone, he told Pryor that he had killed Solberg, according to the verdict.

Erlbacher was convicted after a bench trial in December last year and sentenced Monday.

With Post wires

MAYO IS THE ULTIMATE 'WHITE PEOPLE' FOOD

Why do white people eat mayo sandwiches? - General ...

https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-do-white-people-eat-mayo...

Why do white people eat mayo sandwiches? General Questions. grude April 22, 2012, 10:33am #1. Whats the connection here in this phrase? I saw someone say a black guy should eat a mayo sandwich to turn white, in a sarcastic manner. I have seen this several places and it doesn’t seem to make much sense unless it is the color white?

Where does "Black people don't eat mayo/Mayonnaise is a ...

https://boards.straightdope.com/t/where-does-black-people-dont-eat...

Where does "Black people don't eat mayo/Mayonnaise is a white people food" come from? Factual Questions. Asuka April 27, 2020, 10:24am #1. It wasn’t something I’ve ever heard at all well until the last decade, and I literally can’t find anything about it before the 2002 film “Undercover Brother” uses it extensively as a joke where a ...

The Rich, Tangy Cultural History of Mayo

https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/the-rich-tangy-cultural-history-of-mayo

Mayonnaise is middle class/rich people’s food. Miracle Whip is poor people’s food, the stuff of blacks, rednecks, and other social inferiors. Mayo, or “aioli,” is seen as “authentic” because it’s a product of European cultural heritage, the same cultural heritage that considers (explicitly or not) French food to be inherently superior to all other cuisines. Miracle Whip is mayonnaise. It’s …

‘White People Food’ Is Creating An Unattainable Picture Of ...

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/white-people-food_n_5b75c270e4b0df9b093...

Jones describes “white people food” as salads, fruits, yogurts, cottage cheeses and lean meats ― the standard low-fat, heart-healthy foods promoted by the U.S. Dietary Guidelines. Every five years, a

Crisis-hit Turkey survives as an extension of China

Turkey is weathering the storm of a catastrophic currency crisis through tighter trade integration with China

By DAVID P GOLDMAN

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

Turkey's trade with China is keeping its economy afloat amid a financial crisis. 

NEW YORK – Despite a catastrophic currency devaluation and 50% annual inflation as of December, Turkish manufacturing is booming and exports have risen by more than half from pre-pandemic levels.

A real economic boom in the midst of financial disaster is puzzling, but there’s a simple explanation: Turkish manufacturing doesn’t have much to do with Turkey. It buys Chinese capital equipment and semi-finished goods and sells the finished products to Europe.

Turkey has found a niche in the fast-growing trade relationship between Europe and China as a producer of steel products, chemicals, household appliances and other goods, concentrating on more labor-intensive and environmentally problematic industries.

Its economic dependence on China has increased significantly. This helps explain why Turkey eschewed American efforts for a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Winter Olympics to protest against China’s treatment of its Uighur minority, even though the Uighurs speak a Turkish dialect and have strong cultural and religious ties to Turkey.

Mao Zedong might have said that political power grows out of the barrel of a gun, but for Xi Jinping, it is more likely to grow out of the door of a shipping container.

China’s imports from the rest of Asia have nearly tripled during the past five years, prompting 15 Asian countries including Australia to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership with China – but not the United States.

That was an important Chinese diplomatic victory. Now, a quantum jump in Sino-Turkish trade is likely to enhance China’s political influence in Western Asia.

Turkey’s surprising resilience is yet another expression of the Sino-forming of the world economy. China’s robust supply chains support not only China’s remarkable trade performance, but move the trade of its Asian neighbors into a tightly-integrated commercial nexus.

The Turkish lira has fallen by more than 50% against the US dollar since 2018, and the cost of production against default on its foreign-currency debt is more than 5 percentage points, compared to 2 percentage points for Brazil.

Nonetheless, Turkey has managed to more than double its imports from China in the past two years. Turkey runs a trade deficit, so it has to borrow in order to buy more foreign goods.

Turkey’s official data show little increase in foreign debt, but the triangular trade among China, Turkey and Europe allows ways to keep trade credits off the official balance sheet.

Turkey imports in order to export. Consumption and other goods imports fell during 2021, while imports of intermediate and capital goods rose, supporting a 32% overall rise in exports

.

The Turkish Statistical Institute’s breakdown of trade by country shows that the lion’s share of the increase in imports came from Russia – mainly due to higher energy prices – and China.




The export picture is markedly different. Europe accounted for more than half the 2021 increase in Turkish exports.

Turkish industrial companies who benefit from this trade boom earn foreign currency by exporting and paying for their imports with foreign currency.

The value of the Turkish currency is of secondary importance to them. That explains why the stock prices of Turkish industrial companies rose as the Turkish lira fell, that is, remained stable in terms of US dollars.

Turkish stock prices are a secondary concern for the Recep Tayyip Erdogan government. The market capitalization of the Istanbul 100 Index is less than US$40 billion.

The dollar value of Turkey’s housing stock, the main repository of middle-class wealth, exceeds $700 billion, I calculated in a 2020 study.


Erdogan’s low interest-rate policy sunk the Turkish lira, but Turkish home prices have more than kept pace with inflation. That is key to President Erdogan’s political staying power.

Unlike the Latin American and African devaluations of the past generation, the collapse of the lira did not take down with it the wealth of the middle class and industrial investors

Tensions between China and Turkey flare up periodically over the Uighur problem. Religious conservatives in Erdogan’s Justice and Freedom Party complain about China’s forced assimilation of Muslims into secular Chinese culture, and the nationalist Gray Wolves movement occasionally breaks the window of a Chinese restaurant in Istanbul.

But President Erdogan wants to stay in power, and China controls the means by which Erdogan can do so, namely Turkish economic growth, jobs and asset prices.

American strategists who hope that Turkey will provide a counterweight to growing Chinese and Russian influence in Western Asia may be spinning their wheels. Without China, Turkey’s economy would be a Venezuelan-style shambles, and that gives China enormous pull in Ankara.

Follow David P Goldman on Twitter at @davidpgoldman

S. KOREA Supreme Court ruled that police breached freedom of expression of demonstrators in US Embassy Rallies

Updated: 2022-02-04

On Thursday, the Supreme Court of South Korea ruled in favor of a civic group, judging that local police breached the group's freedom of expression during single-person demonstrations in February of 2016.

The ten-member civic group had filed an indemnity suit against the government for restricting single-person protests over the then planned installation of the U.S. anti-missile THAAD system.
Police had blocked the rally, citing security concerns.

Lower courts had ruled it not plausible to believe single-person rallies pose a threat to the security of the U.S. Embassy or their diplomats.

The Supreme Court upheld the decision.

Argentina and China sign agreement to build fourth nuclear power plant

New nuclear power plant, Atucha III, requires an investment of more than US$8 billion and will create 7,000 new jobs, according to the government. Announcement made on eve of president’s visit to China.

Argentina and China this week announced an agreement to construct the Latin American country’s fourth nuclear power plant, just days before President Alberto Fernández is due to visit Beijing.

State-owned energy company Nucleoeléctrica Argentina and the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) signed a contract Tuesday for the development of ‘Atucha III,’ which will feature a 1,200 megawatt electric reactor (MWE) and have an initial operating life of 60 years.

The project, part of the government’s ‘Nucleoeléctrica Plan,’ will require an investment of more than US$8 billion and create 7,000 jobs, according to a statement.

The plant will be located at the Atucha Nuclear Complex in Lima, in northern Buenos Aires Province. Construction works are expected to begin at the end of this year.

The EPC (engineering purchasing and construction, for its acronym in English) contract provides for the provision of engineering, construction, acquisition, start-up and delivery of a plant of HPR-1000 type, which will use enriched uranium as fuel and light water as coolant and moderator.

The news was announced at a virtual press conference attended by Buenos Aires Province Governor Axel Kicillof, China’s Ambassador to Argentina Zou Xiaoli, his Argentine peer in China, Sabino Vaca Narvaja, and Energy Undersecretary Federico Basualdo, among others.

“We all know that without energy we have no development or possible future, so it is a great pleasure for me to accompany this signing,” said Kicillof.

Nucleoeléctrica President José Luis Antúnez, stressed the importance of advancing in concrete actions, “so that we can supply Argentina’s electricity demand with basic, clean, safe, and sustainable energy, and combat the effects of climate change that affects the planet.”

The state firm operates and constructs Argentina’s three existing nuclear power plants, which include the Juan Domingo Perón – Atucha I, Néstor Kirchner – Atucha II sites, both located in Lima; and Embalse, in Córdoba Province, providing up to 7.5 percent of Argentina's electricity, according to private estimates.

President’s visit

Fernández arrived in Beijing late Thursday night ahead of a four-day visit that includes a headline-grabbing meeting with Chinese Premier Xi Jingping.

Trips to the Museum of the Chinese Communist Party, the Forbidden City, Mao Zedong's mausoleum and the Great Wall are also on the presidential agenda.

The Peronist leader, who will attend the inauguration of the 2022 Winter Olympics on Friday and meet Argentina’s athletes on Sunday, is seeking to deepen ties with China during his visit. Talks are expected to focus on boosting trade between the two nations.

"It is a great opportunity to make our ties and common commercial projects more solid," Fernández told China Central Television (CGTN) earlier this week.

One of the president's aims is to advance ongoing talks for a new currency swap. Buenos Aires has asked the Chinese authorities for an extension of an existing agreement by a further US$1.3 billion in order to boost Central Bank reserves.

Fernández and Xi will also discuss ongoing and potential infrastructure and construction projects, with Atucha III the latest in a series of works undertaken with Chinese capital.

Reports in multiple outlets this week suggested the two nations are close to agreeing a five-year investment plan worth an initial US$35 billion which would pave the way for several major energy and infrastructure projects to get underway, including two hydroelectric dams in Santa Cruz Province, Néstor Kirchner and Jorge Cepernic (former Cóndor Cliff and La Barrancosa).


– TIMES/NA/PERFIL

IMF debt deal: The roots of Argentina's economic crisis

Argentina, which has been battling a deep economic crisis

since 2018, has unveiled a new debt repayment deal with

 the International Monetary Fund 

Argentina, which has been battling a deep economic crisis since 2018, has unveiled a new debt repayment deal with the International Monetary Fund.

Here is a recap of recent turmoil.

Currency collapse
In April and May 2018, Argentina's peso loses nearly 20 percent of its value in 45 days. The Central Bank intervenes several times, hiking its benchmark interest rate to 40 percent and selling foreign currency reserves.

Massive IMF loan
In June, the IMF approves a US$50-billion bailout. President Mauricio Macri's government agrees to take austerity measures.

Strike, protests
Later that month, the country grinds to a halt in a general strike to protest the loan. In July and August, there are demonstrations over soaring inflation in Buenos Aires and other cities. In September, the government announces new austerity measures. Another major strike takes place in response.

Even bigger loan
The IMF agrees to boost its crisis loan package to US$57.1 billion, with US$44 billion eventually paid out. Argentina ends 2018 in recession. On April 4, 2019, tens of thousands of people protest against austerity. To limit inflation, the government freezes the price of basic goods and public services.  The fifth general strike of Macri's presidency brings the country to a standstill on May 29. 

Macri poll setback
In August, Macri loses a key primary election to Peronist leader Alberto Fernández. Macri announces minimum wage hikes, tax cuts and a freeze on fuel prices. Fitch and S&P downgrade Argentina's credit rating. In late August, Argentina asks the IMF to reschedule its debt.

Food emergency
On September 1, the government imposes exchange controls. On September 19, Congress adopts a food emergency law to allocate greater resources to social programmes. 

Fernández president
Fernández wins the October presidential election. Argentina's Central Bank says it has sharply tightened currency exchange controls to temper capital flight. Fernández says that he will renounce the remaining US$13-billion tranche of Argentina's IMF loan as soon as he takes office in December. At his swearing in ceremony, Fernandez insists Argentina "wants to pay" its external debt but that it doesn't have "the means to do so."

'Selective default'
On December 20, the government postpones paying some US$9 billion, leading ratings agencies to downgrade its debt.

Emergency measures
On December 24, the government adopts a package of emergency measures. Inflation reaches 53.8 percent in 2019, while the economy shrinks by 2.1 percent.

Debt restructuring
In February 2020, the IMF says Argentina's debt is "not sustainable." In March, the government proposes to restructure US$68.8 billion of the US$311-billion public debt, which accounts for 90 percent of GDP. On April 6, Argentina defers payments of up to US$9.8 billion on its local public debt until 2021 in response to the coronavirus crisis. In mid-April, Fernández says his country has found itself in "a sort of virtual default."

New default
On May 22, Argentina defaults for the ninth time after failing to pay US$500 million of interest on its bond debt. Fitch and S&P reduce its credit rating.

Accord
In August, Argentina announces it has reached an agreement with three major creditors over the restructuring of a US$66-billion debt.

Discussions with IMF
Argentina then launches discussions with the IMF for a new financial programme. In 2020, Argentina's GDP contracts by nearly 10 percent.

Avoids default
In June 2021, Argentina reaches an agreement with the Paris Club of creditor countries to avoid defaulting on its loan repayments. On January 28, 2022 Argentina's president announces what he says is a "reasonable" accord with the IMF.

A conversation with Professor Stiglitz

The strong show of political support for Guzmán’s negotiating techniques from one of the world’s most renowned economists is the mirror image of what he’s suffered internally, particularly within the ranks of Frente de Todos.

A CONVERSATION WITH PROFESSOR STIGLITZ | ART BY JOAQUIN TEMES

Argentina has once again become a relevant subject matter for some of the most important English-language media outlets and scholars on the back of the recent agreement with the International Monetary Fund over its unsustainable debt. In recent weeks, both the Financial Times and The Economist penned critical editorials, as did The Wall Street Journal. The staunchest supporter of the Argentine cause happens to be none other than Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel laureate and Columbia University professor who's been critical of the International Monetary Fund and austerity policies for some time now. Stiglitz, it seems, is the only one that’s happy with his protégé, Economy Minister Martín Guzmán, and the results of the negotiation with the IMF, which, in his words, doesn’t impose “detrimental austerity and other counterproductive conditionalities.”

Stiglitz appears to be alone in his defence of Guzmán’s negotiation strategy, even when counting the minister himself, who recently noted that “nobody can be happy to have the IMF in our country” after explaining that “we arrived at the best agreement we could get.” Such enthusiasm. Alberto Fernández, Argentina’s president, initially appeared content, justifying the deal by saying the agreement didn’t include structural reforms, reductions in public works projects or a zero-deficit policy. “We had a noose around our neck, the sword of Damocles,” he said in a pre-recorded statement at the Olivos presidential residence. “Now we have a path to go on.” A few days later he offered a different perspective: “There’s nothing to celebrate here, but if we hadn’t closed by Friday, today I wouldn’t be here speaking with you but analysing whether to decree a bank holiday on Monday [to avoid a run on the peso],” he said to Página/12, less than 48 hours after announcing the deal.

In his two pieces defending Argentina’s stance, Professor Stiglitz highlights an impressive economic rebound in 2021 with GDP expanding 10 percent and a fall in the primary budget deficit of 3.5 percentage points. Growth, rather than austerity, is a much better antidote for balance of payment crises and rampant fiscal deficits, as the failed 2018 programme signed on by former president Mauricio Macri would show. “In the upside-down world we live in,” Stiglitz writes alongside economist Mark Weisbrot in Foreign Policy, “there’s a school of thought that argues that contractionary policies can be expansionary.” The idea would be that slashing deficits builds confidence, which in turn attracts capital inflows and then investments that would overcompensate reduced government spending. This is the hypocrisy of rich nations that relied on aggressive fiscal spending in the face of Covid-19 and would now force Argentina and other developing nations to go the other way. Regarding persistent high inflation, the Nobel laureate pins the blame on Macri but also claims the costs of bringing it down quickly outweigh the benefits in that it would stifle the recovery and job growth. He does pat his own back a few times, calling Argentina’s negotiators “well-trained economists” with a “high-level of expertise at the negotiating table.”

The strong show of political support for Guzmán’s negotiating techniques from one of the world’s most renowned economists is the mirror image of what he’s suffered internally, particularly within the ranks of Frente de Todos. The bombshell resignation of Máximo Kirchner from the leadership of the ruling coalition’s bloc in the lower house Chamber of Deputies and his scathing letter delivered a debilitating blow to Guzmán – and President Alberto of course. Claiming he cannot defend the indefensible, he decided to step aside, which forces one to ask, what does Momma Cristina think? Mrs. Fernández de Kirchner, the vice-president, hasn’t said a word, but those close to her and Máximo say they feel betrayed by Alberto and Guzmán. Máximo K apparently said it to the president’s face when he phoned to inform him of his resignation, allegedly telling him he never agreed with Cristina’s decision to pick him for the Presidency. His delusions of grandeur — Alberto is reported to have stayed calm during the meeting, only to call him infantile with his closest aides in the aftermath — are in some way tied to an image of himself as part of the Kirchner clan who finally got the IMF out of the country. A sort of Mel Gibson-like patriot fighting the Evil Empire for national sovereignty.

The “exposed fracture” within Frente de Todos didn’t count on the vice-president’s approval, who is said to have been equally dismayed by the level of fiscal tightening exposed by Guzmán’s numbers, particularly ahead of the upcoming electoral season. President Fernández isn’t all that happy with his economy minister either, according to a few reports, as he’s been misleading throughout the whole IMF ordeal. Ultimately, Guzmán didn’t manage to bring home an extraordinary extension of maturities or a reduction on IMF surcharges, or other exotic suggestions such as green bonds to pay for debt. And he’s pissed everyone off, including Sergio Massa (who is trying to paint himself as the saviour of the deal after IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva received a last second call indicating the US Treasury Department and State Department backed the deal), and even the IMF’s negotiating team. According to information published by La Nación, at one point Kristalina asked Gustavo Béliz, strategic affairs secretary, to take over negotiations.

If I were to share a conversation with Professor Stiglitz, I’d ask him whether pissing everyone off isn’t a sign of a job well done. Ultimately, if Guzmán’s extravagant strategy implied keeping information from other members of the governing coalition (possibly including the Fernández-Fernández tandem) and pushing the IMF negotiators to a limit where they agreed on a “soft” deal with Argentina in order to avoid default, then he very well may have achieved the best possible deal under current circumstances. I’d also ask about the importance of how to communicate things, given this “anti-austerity” IMF programme includes a path of fiscal consolidation that would eliminate the deficit by 2025 and aggressively cut monetary financing. Is there indeed no austerity here, or just no “structural reforms,” given they probably wouldn’t be politically achievable? And, to cap it off, whether he truly believes the 2018 IMF deal, persistently high inflation, economic contraction, and some of the worse poverty figures in a very long time in Argentina are all just Macri’s fault – or whether he’s also playing Guzmán’s game?

Sole American Hacker Took down N.Korea's Internet

February 04, 2022 12:50

A lone disgruntled American hacker identified only as "P4x" was behind the breakdown of all online traffic in North Korea for six hours on Jan. 26, U.S. magazine Wired said Wednesday.

The websites that were brought down by his distributed denial-of-service attack included "Naenara," the official portal for the North Korean government, and the websites of the Foreign Ministry, the official Rodong Sinmun, the Korean Central News Agency, and Air Koryo.

According to Wired, P4x is an independent hacker who does not belong to any agency. 'It was the work of one American man in a T-shirt, pajama pants, and slippers, sitting in his living room night after night, watching Alien movies and eating spicy corn snacks -- and periodically walking over to his home office to check on the progress of the programs he was running to disrupt the internet of an entire country," the magazine wrote.

P4x claims he was hacked by North Korean spies in late January 2021 and never offered any real help from the U.S. government to assess the damage, nor did he ever hear of any open investigation. "It began to feel… like 'there's really nobody on our side,'" he told the magazine.

"His cyberattacks on North Korean networks are, he says, in part an attempt to draw attention to what he sees as a lack of government response to North Korean targeting of U.S. individuals," Wired added. "If no one's going to help me, I'm going to help myself," P4x said.

P4x told the magazine he found "numerous known but unpatched vulnerabilities in North Korean systems that have allowed him to singlehandedly launch 'denial-of-service' attacks on the servers and routers the country's few internet-connected networks depend on."

He hopes to "recruit more hacktivists to his causes with a dark website he launched Monday called the FUNK Project," for "FuckyoU North Korea."

© This is copyrighted material owned by Digital Chosun Inc. No part of it may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission.

New Poll: Voters Overwhelmingly Oppose Las Vegas DA Seeking the Death Penalty Against Vulnerable and Impaired Persons

Posted on Feb 03, 2022


Likely voters in Clark County, Nevada overwhelmingly oppose the use of capital punishment against broad categories of vulnerable and impaired persons whom county prosecutors have been trying to execute, a new poll released by Vegas Watch on January 27, 2022 shows.

The poll, conducted by the Justice Research Group from December 1 to 13, 2021, found a significant disconnect between voters views on capital punishment and the practices of Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson (pictured). According to Vegas Watch, Clark County prosecutors have “repeatedly sought] death against people who are mentally ill and have intellectual disabilities—including former service members struggling with PTSD.” On the other hand, substantial bipartisan majorities of the county’s voters told the pollsters that they oppose using the death penalty against these individuals.

The poll questions asked 314 likely voters, “Do you support or oppose Clark County district attorney Steve Wolfson seeking a death sentence against” six different types of defendants: people with a diagnosed mental illness, serious intellectual impairment, traumatic brain injury, veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, those who experienced severe physical or sexual abuse as a child, and defendants who were between the ages of 18 and 21 at the time of the offense. By margins of better than 2 to 1, voters opposed seeking the death penalty against those with mental illness, intellectual impairment, or brain damage, and veterans with PTSD. With significant partisan differences, voters narrowly opposed seeking the death penalty against adolescent offenders and victims of abuse.

Voter opposition was greatest when it came to seeking the death penalty against veterans with PTSD. 62% of voters said Wolfson should not seek a death sentence “against a person who suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder after serving their country in the U.S. Armed Forces,” while 23% supported such prosecutions. 69% of Democrats, 60% of Independents, and 52% of Republicans opposed capitally prosecuting veterans with PTSD, while 12% of Democrats and 18% of Republicans and Independents supported it.

Wolfson is currently seeking to execute Zane Floyd, a decorated Marine with brain damage who was diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome after his deployment in Guantánamo Bay. Wolfson sought and obtained a warrant for Floyd’s execution in May 2021, while the Nevada State Senate was considering a bill to abolish the state’s death penalty. The Senate majority leader and the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee are both employees of the Clark County DA’s office, and although the bill had passed the state House of Representatives, it never received a hearing or a vote in committee in the Senate.


Clark County voters by a 37-percentage-point margin opposed “seeking a death sentence against a person with serious intellectual impairment.” 60% of respondents, including 67% of Democrats, 60% of Independents, and 52% of Republicans opposed such prosecutions, while 27% of Republicans, 21% of Democrats, and 20% of Independents supported them. 59% opposed “seeking a death sentence against a person with a diagnosed mental illness” and “against a person with a traumatic brain injury.” 67% of Democrats, 60% of Independents, and 48% of Republicans opposed capital prosecutions of those with mental illness. 68% of Democrats, 63% of Independents, and 43% of Republicans opposed capital prosecutions of those with brain injuries. 29% of Republicans and 23% of Democrats and Independents supported the use of the death penalty against the mentally ill. 35% of Republicans, 22% of Democrats, and 19% of Independents endorsed capital prosecution of brain injured defendants.

Clark County respondents expressed significant partisan differences over the use of the death penalty against adolescent offenders and victims of physical or sexual abuse. A 45% plurality of respondents opposed “seeking a death sentence against a person who has endured severe physical or sexual abuse as a child,” while 36% supported it. Democrats opposed such prosecutions, 52% to 31% and Independents were split evenly 39% to 39%. Republicans narrowly approved of seeking the death penalty in cases of severe abuse, 40% to 38%.

When it came to adolescent offenders, a narrow plurality, 46% to 43% opposed “seeking the death penalty against a person who is over the age of 18 but under the age of 21.” Democrats strongly opposed the practice, 60% to 28%, while Republicans even more strongly supported it, 62% to 25%. Independents narrowly opposed such prosecutions, 48% to 45%.

Clark County’s Capital Prosecution Practices

Wolfson was the lead witness against a bill to abolish the death penalty that was introduced in the Nevada legislature during the 2021 legislative session. During his testimony, Wolfson said, “the death penalty should be reserved for the very rare and extreme circumstances” and claimed he sought it in only “the worst of the worst” cases. Assistant Public Defender Scott Coffee disputed that notion, telling Vegas Watch that Wolfson had filed 128 notices of intent to seek the death penalty since becoming District Attorney in 2012. “These cases are filed like candy,” he said.

Clark County has imposed more death sentences in the last decade than all but three counties four in the nation, trailing only Riverside, CA; Los Angeles, CA; and Maricopa, AZ. They are the only counties in the country to have averaged more than one death sentence per year since 2012. All the other counties in Nevada combined have imposed just one new death sentence in the past decade.

A Death Penalty Information Center analysis of death-row data collected by the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund found that, as of October 1, 2020, the 52 people on death row or facing capital retrials or resentencings in Clark County were more than in all but six other U.S. counties. By itself, Clark County accounted for three-quarters of Nevada’s death-row population.

A 2016 study by Harvard University’s Fair Punishment Project found that of the 16 most prolific death-sentencing counties in the U.S. in the years 2010 through 2015, Clark County had the highest rate of convictions or death sentences overturned as a result of prosecutorial misconduct. The Project reported that the Nevada Supreme Court had found misconduct in 47% of the Clark County death penalty cases it reviewed on direct appeal during the previous decade.

RIGHT WINGER PRO IMMIGRANT

The Immigrant Superpower: How Brains, Brawn, and Bravery Make America Stronger

by Timothy Kane

via Oxford University Press

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Publication date: January 27, 2022

America was built by immigrants, yet there has long been strong political opposition to immigration. In recent years, the hostility toward immigration has reached a tipping point. While partisan fighting and confusion over basic policy dominate a broken conversation, we often overlook a fundamental
American truth: immigration makes America great.

In The Immigrant Superpower, Tim Kane argues that immigration has been a source of American strength and American exceptionalism since the nation's founding. This book explores how immigration is essential to the military strength, economic power, and innovation of the United States. By combining
stories of immigrants who have contributed to the American experience, including in the military and business, with analysis of immigration's effects on wages and unemployment, Kane presents a clear defense of greater immigration as a matter of national security. The only way to win the great power
competition of the twenty-first century is to embrace America's identity as a nation of immigrants. As politicians in Washington continue to negotiate with no intention to reach an agreement, Kane exposes the immigration consensus hiding in plain sight. Using original, in-depth surveys of American
attitudes toward immigration reform he maps out a step-by-step process to achieve reform.

Straight-talking and full of common sense, The Immigrant Superpower stands in sharp contrast to the wholly dysfunctional debate about immigration in the United States.