Wednesday, November 30, 2022

Israeli Troops Kill Several Palestinians during Clashes in West Bank

Israeli troops shot dead several Palestinians, among them two brothers, during clashes in separate incidents in the occupied West Bank Tuesday.

The Palestinian Ministry of Health said in a press statement that a 22-year-old Palestinian named Jawad Al-Rimawi, and Zafer, his 21-year-old brother, were killed after they were shot by Israeli soldiers near the village of Kafr Ein northwest of the West Bank city of Ramallah.

The two brothers were critically wounded first and were taken to the Salfit Hospital, the statement said. They then succumbed to their wounds.

Another Palestinian man fell victim to Israeli violence in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday. Israeli regime forces shot dead the man in an alleged car ramming near Ramallah.

The killings came only a few hours after Israeli troops shot dead another Palestinian, named Mufeed Mohammad Ikhlil, during confrontations in Beit Ummar town, located eleven kilometers northwest of al-Khalil.

The 44-year-old was shot in the head and died as Israeli soldiers and stone-throwing Palestinians engaged in skirmishes.

Nine others were shot by live bullets as well. One was hit in the chest while the rest were struck in the upper and lower parts of their bodies. They were taken to nearby hospitals, and are said to be in stable condition.

The Palestinian Hamas resistance movement has strongly denounced the deaths of the three Palestinians on Tuesday, including the two brothers, during Israeli military raids across the West Bank, stating that the Tel Aviv regime’s crimes will be met with an upsurge in retaliatory attacks and acts of resistance.

Hazem Qassem, a spokesman for the Gaza-based group, said the occupying Israeli regime is desperately seeking to suffocate the legitimate struggle of the Palestinian nation to recover their land and enjoy freedom by means of killings and assassinations.

He stressed that the blood of martyrs will fuel the Palestinian nation’s ongoing popular uprising against the Israeli occupation.

Israeli forces have recently been conducting overnight raids and killings in the northern occupied West Bank, mainly in the cities of Jenin and Nablus, where new groups of Palestinian resistance fighters have been formed.

Since the start of 2022, Israeli troops have killed more than 200 Palestinians, including more than 50 children, in the occupied West Bank and East al-Quds as well as the besieged Gaza Strip.

According to the United Nations, the number of Palestinians killed by Israel in the occupied West Bank this year is the highest in 16 years.

Local and international rights groups have condemned Israel’s excessive use of force and “shoot-to-kill policy” against Palestinians.

TEHRAN, Nov. 30 (MNA) – Palestinian sources on Wednesday evening announced that a Palestinian child was martyred after sustaining severe injuries from a shot by the Zionist regime's forces.

The Palestinian child had been wounded when the Israeli regime police shot him on November 1, 2022.

The news comes as atrocities by the Zionists have increased against the Palestinian citizens in the Occupied West Bank and al-Quds.

5 Palestinians were martyred by the Zionist forces just yesterday.

CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME
Singapore's Temasek holds internal review of $275 mln FTX-related loss


Reuters
Publishing date: Nov 30, 2022 • 

SINGAPORE — Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said on Wednesday that Temasek Holdings has initiated an internal review of its investment in the now-bankrupt FTX crypto exchange, which resulted in a write-down of $275 million.

Wong, who is also finance minister, said the loss did not mean state investor Temasek’s governance system was not working and “no amount of due diligence and monitoring can eliminate the risks altogether.”

But Singapore’s leader-in-waiting told parliament the loss was “disappointing” and had caused reputational damage to Temasek.

“The fact that other leading global institutional investors like BlackRock and Sequoia Capital also invested in FTX does not mitigate this,” said Wong.

After pumping about $275 million into FTX, Temasek decided to write down the investment following the spectacular collapse of the exchange.

The review will be conducted by an independent internal team reporting directly to the board and will not involve those who made the investment, Wong said.

Temasek has said its cost of investment in FTX was 0.09% of its net portfolio value of S$403 billion ($293.97 billion) as of March 31, 2022, and it currently had no direct exposure in cryptocurrencies.

Explaining its actions, Temasek said it had conducted “extensive due diligence” on FTX from February to October 2021 and its audited financial statement then “showed it to be profitable.”

Wong told lawmakers the individual loss did not impact returns to Singapore’s reserves, which are tied to long-term returns.

FTX’s other backers such as SoftBank Group Corp’s Vision Fund and Sequoia Capital have also marked down their investment to zero after FTX, founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States this month week in the highest-profile crypto blowup to date. ($1 = 1.3709 Singapore dollars) (Reporting by Chen Lin and Xinghui Kok; Editing by Kanupriya Kapoor and Ed Davies)
Canadian federal police investigating widespread China interference


Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks with China's President Xi Jinping at the G20 Leaders' Summit in Bali, Indonesia, November 16, 2022. (Reuters)

AFP, Ottawa
Published: 30 November ,2022:

Canadian federal police are investigating widespread interference by China in Canadian affairs, including its “democratic processes,” the nation’s top cop has said in a letter to a parliamentary committee but without detailing the allegations.

The Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs is looking into possible foreign interference in Canadian elections.

For the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

The letter obtained by AFP on Tuesday was sent to the committee by Royal Canadian Mounted Police Commissioner Brenda Lucki.

In it she says there was “no evidence at the time” of interference in the 2019 federal election following reports that Beijing had funded a “clandestine network” of candidates.

But, she added, “the RCMP can confirm that it currently does have investigations into broader foreign actor interference activities.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said in the House of Commons that Canada’s “intelligence services have highlighted many times that interference in Canadian affairs by foreign powers is an ongoing thing.”

However, “Canadians can be reassured that the integrity of our elections was not compromised,” he added.

At the G20 summit earlier this month, Trudeau raised allegations of Chinese meddling with President Xi Jinping but got an on-camera dressing down by Xi after their discussions were leaked to the media.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino declined to comment on specific RCMP probes, but added: “We take allegations of foreign interference very seriously.”

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian on Wednesday described the accusations as “groundless.”

“China never interferes in other countries’ internal affairs and opposes any country interfering in other countries’ internal affairs. The so-called Chinese interference in the Canadian election is purely fictitious and sheer nonsense,” Zhao told a regular press briefing.

On Monday, a Chinese electric battery researcher facing charges of industrial espionage was granted bail.

Yuesheng Wang, 35, allegedly used his position at public utility Hydro Quebec to conduct research for a Chinese university and filed patents “in association with this foreign actor,” using proprietary information.

The RCMP has also said it is looking into China's use of illegal police stations in Toronto to carry out policing operations on foreign soil – which Beijing has denied as “completely false.”

And it is investigating the possible transfer of intellectual property to China by two scientists at Canada’s top-security infectious-disease laboratory in Winnipeg.

Xiangguo Qiu and her husband, Keding Cheng, have reportedly relocated to China after they were fired in January 2021 from the National Microbiology Laboratory.

Xi vs Trudeau: How China is Rewriting History with the Colonial West  

Though brief, the exchange between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Indonesia on November 16 has become a social media sensation. Xi, assertive if not domineering, lectured the visibly apprehensive Trudeau about the etiquette of diplomacy. This exchange can be considered another watershed moment in China’s relationship with the West.

“If there was sincerity on your part,” the Chinese President told Trudeau, “then we shall conduct our discussion with an attitude of mutual respect, otherwise there might be unpredictable consequences.”

At the end of the awkward conversation, Xi was the first to walk away, leaving Trudeau uncomfortably making his way out of the room.

For the significance of this moment to be truly appreciated, it has to be viewed through a historical prism.

When western colonial powers began the process of exploiting China in earnest – early to mid-19th century – the total size of the Chinese economy was estimated to be one-third of the world’s entire economic output. In 1949, when Chinese nationalists managed to win their independence following hundreds of years of colonialism, political meddling and economic exploitation, China’s total GDP merely accounted for 4 percent of the world’s total economy.

In the period between the first Opium War in 1839 and China’s independence, over a hundred years later, tens of millions of Chinese perished as a result of direct wars, subsequent rebellions and famines. The so-called Boxer Rebellion (1899-1901) was one of the many desperate attempts by the Chinese people to reclaim a degree of independence and assert nominal sovereignty over their land. The outcome, however, was devastating, as the rebels, along with the Chinese military, were crushed by the mostly Western alliance, which involved the United States, Austria-Hungary, Britain, France and others.

The death toll was catastrophic, with moderate estimations putting it at over 100,000. And subsequently, once more, China was forced to toe the line as it has done in the two Opium Wars and many other occasions in the past.

China’s independence in 1949 did not automatically signal the return of China to its past grandeur as a global, or even an Asian power. The process of rebuilding was long, costly and sometimes even devastating: Trials and errors, internal conflicts, cultural revolutions, periods of ‘great leaps forward’ but sometimes, also great stagnation.

Seven decades later, China is back at the center of global affairs. Good news for some. Terrible news for others.

The 2022 US National Security Strategy document released on October 22, describes China as “the only competitor with both the intent to reshape the international order and, increasingly, the economic, diplomatic, military and technological power to do it.”

The US position is not at all surprising, because the West continues to define its relationship with Beijing based on a colonial inheritance, a legacy that spans hundreds of years.

For the West, the re-rise of China is problematic, not because of its human rights record but because of its growing share of the global economy which, in 2021, accounted for 18.56%. This economic power, coupled with growing military prowess, practically means that Beijing will soon be able to dictate political outcomes in its growing sphere of influence in the Pacific region, and also worldwide.

The irony in all of this is that, once upon a time, it was China, along with most of Asia and the Global South that were divided into spheres of influence. Seeing Beijing creating its own equivalence to the West’s geopolitical dominance must be quite unsettling for Western governments.

For many years, Western powers have used the pretense of China’s human rights record to provide a moral foundation for meddling. Purporting to defend human rights and champion democracy have historically been convenient Western tools that provided a nominal ethical foundation for interventions. Indeed, in the Chinese context, the Eight-Nations Alliance, which crushed the Boxer Rebellion, was predicated on similar principles.

The charade continues until this day, with the defense of Taiwan and the rights of the Uyghurs and other minorities being placed on top of the US and Western agendas respectively.

Of course, human rights have very little to do with the US-Western attitude towards China. As much as  ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy’ were hardly the motivator behind the US-Western invasion of Iraq in 2003. The difference between Iraq, an isolated and weakened Arab country at the height of American military dominance in the Middle East, and China today is massive. The latter represents the backbone of the global economy. Its military power and growing geopolitical import will prove difficult – if at all possible – to curtail.

In fact, language emanating from Washington indicates that the US is taking the first steps in acknowledging China’s inevitable rise as a global competitor. Prior to his meeting with President Xi in Indonesia on November 15, Biden had finally, although subtly, acknowledged the uncontested new reality when he said that “We’re going to compete vigorously but I’m not looking for conflict. I’m looking to manage this competition responsibly.”

Xi’s attitude towards Trudeau at the G20 summit may be read as another episode of China’s so-called ‘Wolf Diplomacy’. However, the dramatic event – the words, the body language and the subtle nuances – indicate that China does not only see itself as deserving of global importance and respect, but also as a superpower.


TwitterReddit

Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of five books. His latest is These Chains Will Be Broken: Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons (Clarity Press). Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs, Istanbul Zaim University (IZU). Read other articles by Ramzy, or visit Ramzy's website.

Hey CIJA! Conflating Jews with Israel is racist

Charges of “antisemitism” have been degraded to the point where they often sound like a 6-year-old telling other kids not to play with Johnnie because he has cooties.

Recently federal NDP executive member Ryan Painter quote-tweeted me saying “Don’t listen to anything Yves Engler says. He’s Canada’s leading antisemite and doesn’t want anything more than to spread Jew hatred.” The Senior Director at the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) Nico Slobinsky, American Jewish Committee Campus Board Member Nati Pressmann and Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center Policy Director Jaime Kirzner-Roberts all liked the tweet from the chair of the Greater Victoria School Board.

The reason for the vitriol? Two months ago, I embarrassed Painter on Twitter after he slammed Jagmeet Singh for taking action on Palestine. In “Curious case of NDP exec attacking party leader on Palestine” I also detailed Painter’s bizarre shift from referring to Israel as an apartheid state to disparaging those, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, who point out the obvious institutional oppression of Palestinians.

Painter’s smear was a response to my challenging Noah Tepperman for criticizing Toronto Star columnist Shree Paradkar after she wrote critically about the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s anti-Palestinian definition of antisemitism. In response to Paradkar posting “Why the definition of antisemitism has become such a polarizing issue”, Tepperman wrote, “As a progressive I’m constantly shocked by the near-total acceptance of antisemitism in progressive dialogue, and the lack of self-awareness that enables it. In the face of rising violent and non-violent antisemitism, your argument amounts to little more than ‘all lives matter’.”

In response I wrote, “Progressives don’t sit on the board of explicitly racist groups as you do Noah. The Jewish National Fund operates a form of legalized racism Canadian courts outlawed 7 decades ago but you are ok with it so long as it’s Jews that benefit. Your anti Palestinian racism is disgusting.” Among the highest profile anti-Palestinian activists in the NDP, Tepperman has long sat on the board of the Windsor branch of the JNF, which excludes non-Jews from its vast landholdings in Israel.

Imagine calling yourself progressive and sitting on the board of an organization practicing a form of overt, legalistic, racism? And then having the chutzpah to complain about discrimination!

In the latest instance of the apartheid lobby claiming discrimination, CIJA attacked socialist Ontario MPP Joel Harden for “spreading what can only be called antisemitism and misinformation about Israel.” While there was nothing anti-Jewish in the interview between Harden and Peter Larson of Canada Talks Israel/Palestine, the Ontario NDP pressured him to apologize. To no one’s surprise CIJA and other Israel lobby groups immediately upped the ante by demanding Harden be expelled from the party’s caucus.

While the media and a disturbing number of ‘progressives’ blindly follow the apartheid lobby, CIJA’s double standards are flagrant. The well-staffed and financed group twisted a 30-minute long, nuanced, discussion into suggesting Harden blamed all Jews for Israel’s violence. While claiming a leftist had done a very bad thing by conflating Jews with Israel — even though Harden did not actually do that — CIJA regularly conflates Jews with Israel.

In fact, their name was partly chosen to blur that distinction. A decade ago, the Tanenbaums, Schwartz/Reisman and other wealthy hard-line apartheid promoters created CIJA to replace the Canadian Jewish Congress and Canada Israel Committee. They removed Canada from the name but left Israel in it.

As CIJA bemoaned Harden’s purported conflation of Jews with Israel CIJA associate director of partnerships Sheba Birhanu forcefully equated Jews and Zionism in “Jewish voices aren’t heard when we call out hate”. In Tuesday’s Globe and Mail she wrote “to deny Israel is to deny Jewish identity. Most Canadian Jews have an attachment to Israel. They are Zionists. Those who deny this component of Jewish identity exclude Jews from spaces that purport to seek justice. In rejecting Zionists, they reject Canadian Jews.”

In a bitter irony, there’s a correlation between Jewish activists who conflate Jews with Israel and those who cry antisemitism when someone associated with Palestine solidarity does so. A particularly striking example is disgraced former Green party adviser Noah Zatsman. He complained bitterly about Harden’s purported “trope” while repeatedly tweeting “All JEWS are Zionists”. He even does so in the same short message. In a tweet attacking Avi Lewis for defending Harden, Zatsman complained, “This is so disturbing. Has his Twitter been hacked? Avi Lewis begging you to please stop being this outlier for no reason in the face of a terrible antisemitic trope. ALL Jews are zionists.” The cognitive dissonance is remarkable.

The antisemitism charge is not simply a way to enable Palestinian oppression and protect a war-mongering settler colonial outpost, it’s a cudgel for the establishment to destroy the political forces that offer a glimmer of hope for overcoming the existential crises befalling humanity. The attack on Harden, an eco-socialist ‘movement’ politician, highlights that.

In Britain left-wing Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn was demonized as a supporter of dictatorsterrorist sympathizer, anti-English, etc., but the anti-Jewish slander stuck since Corbyn and some supporters bent to the defamation. That’s precisely what Harden and the Ontario NDP has just done. If leftists don’t come out swinging on these cynical smears the attacks will continue to destroy movements that offer the prospect of a better future.

But, as wise NDP executive member Ryan Painter once said, “don’t listen to anything Yves Engler says. He’s Canada’s leading antisemite.”Facebook

Yves Engler is the author of 12 books. His latest book is Stand on Guard for Whom?: A People's History of the Canadian Military . Read other articles by Yves.




What does the ‘end of the Christian era’ mean for the Church of England?

Latest census reveals England and Wales now minority Christian countries for first time

THE WEEK STAFF
30 NOV 2022

Matthew Lloyd/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Less than half of people in England and Wales describe themselves as Christian for the first time, the 2021 census has revealed.

Is the Vatican facing a cash crisis?

The proportion of those identifying as Christian when asked “what is your religion” fell to 46.2% last year, down from 59.3% in 2011 when the last census was conducted, a drop of 5.5 million people.

The number of people saying they had no religion rising to 37.2%, which means there are now nearly as many people who do not believe in a higher power as Christians in England and Wales.

The figures make grim reading for the Church of England, which was already facing record low church attendances and an ageing congregation, with many now saying it faces an existential threat to its centuries-old place at the heart of British society.
What did the papers say?

“It may feel like a pivotal moment,” said BBC religion editor Aleem Maqbool, “but for years social surveys have shown a rapid rise in those who define themselves as having no religion.” Now that figure is 46.2%, or 27.5 million people.

The Guardian reported that humanists and secularists have “seized on the figures as proof of the need for reform of religion’s role in a society which has bishops of the established Church of England voting on laws and compulsory Christian worship in all schools that are not of a designated religious character.

“One of the most striking things about these census results is how at odds the population is from the state itself,” the chief executive of Humanists UK, Andrew Copson, told the paper. “No state in Europe has such a religious set-up as we do in terms of law and public policy, while at the same time having such a non-religious population.”

Professor Alec Ryrie, of the University of Durham’s theology and religion department, told the inews site that “there’s every reason to think the fall in 2031 will be even sharper”, as the traditional English identity had been “rapidly softening since the 1960s”. “It may be that Christianity will no longer be a dominant or a default identity, but a religion of outsiders and of the marginalised,” he said.

But in a striking sign that a decline in religiosity is not universal, census data revealed that every major religion, except Christianity, increased in followers over the latest ten-year period, with more than 1.2 million more people identifying as Muslim in England and Wales in 2021 than in 2011.

“As with ethnicity, patterns of family size and immigration are seen as contributory factors”, said Maqbool.

What next?


The Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, said the latest census result “throws down a challenge to us not only to trust that God will build his kingdom on Earth but also to play our part in making Christ known.

“We have left behind the era when many people almost automatically identified as Christian but other surveys consistently show how the same people still seek spiritual truth and wisdom and a set of values to live by”.

But speaking to Fox News, Gavin Ashenden, a former Church of England priest who served as chaplain to Queen Elizabeth II from 2008 until he resigned in 2017, said the Church of England’s attempt to remain cultural relevant was rapidly losing it followers.

Ashenden, who is now a Roman Catholic, said he believed Anglicans and Protestants generally have experienced a “huge crisis in confidence” since losing their faith in the authority of the Bible, which he claimed has been replaced with political correctness.

“Political correctness arrived just at the point when the Protestants were losing maximum confidence, so they grabbed fairness, equality, inclusion,” he said. “This became for them a safety harness for all their utopian longing, which in a generation before, they would have put into heaven and hell.”

Modernising proposals are being fought against tooth and nail by congregations and clergy across the UK, with vicar Angela Tilby in the Church Times claiming the mass closure of rural churches “will change the landscape of England for ever.

“In small country communities, it could extinguish any remaining trust in the Church of England” she warned. “The institution seems hollowed out, defensive and diminished,” said the New European, and “although it strives to remain relevant in today’s society…it is these days pretty marginal to most people’s lives”.

Some point to the success of initiatives such as the Alpha Course, which attract a much younger demographic than traditionally attend church, as a model the wider Church of England could follow, while Cottrell has claimed that Christianity continues to play a major role in secular society, especially during the current cost-of-living crisis, when “people right across the country, some in desperate need, will be turning to their local church, not only for spiritual hope but practical help”.

This is ultimately a functionalist view of religion, “that a shared faith serves the needs of a society”, said Sumit Paul-Choudhury for BBC Future.

“Under this argument, any religion that does endure has to offer its adherents tangible benefits”, he said. The alternative “we take for granted” but are “also oddly blind to”, he added, is that “religions are born, grow and die”.

In the 1960s, when asked whether he thought the church would survive, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, Michael Ramsey replied “Well, you know, that is not certain. Not certain, not certain at all. It might easily, quite easily, just fall away.

“All Christian denominations are in long-term decline, but the established church particularly so,” concluded the New European. “On current projections, Ramsey’s prediction may even come true within 40 years.”
UK
Satanism and devil worship is on the rise, according to census data

Story by Ben Butcher, Gabriella Swerling • Yesterday 

The past decade may, for some, be characterised by Brexit, the pandemic, the death of Queen Elizabeth II, a recession, the rise of social media, and Adele releasing three albums.


Lucifer, as depicted by Federico Zuccari for Dante’s Divine Comedy, was the name given to 15 babies according to the last UK census - Roberto Palermo/Uffizi Gallery© Roberto Palermo/Uffizi Gallery

For others, however, it was the decade that saw a rise in Devil worshippers.

In collecting its data on religion, among the most surprising findings of the 2021 census include the rapid rise of Satanism.

The number of people in England and Wales identifying as Satanists saw a 167 per cent increase between 2011 and 2021. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) researchers found that within that ten-year period, the number of Satanists rose from 1,893 to 5,054.

Satanism is a religious, or counter-cultural practice, centred on the figure of Satan, otherwise known as the Devil. In Christianity and Judaism, the figure is seen as the embodiment of absolute evil. Historically, Satanism, which is also known as devil worship, rejects Satan’s antithesis - God and/or Jesus Christ.

The reason for the rise of Satanism remains unclear. However, it does correlate with separate ONS data published last year which clearly indicated that a reverence for the Devil was on the rise.

Last year, the ONS released baby name data which revealed that the name, Nigel, was on the verge of extinction, with no baby Nigels born in 2020 (or, statistically, two at most). This is arguably not that surprising, as more old-fashioned names often wane in popularity. There were, however, in that same year, a total of 15 Lucifers born that year.

Lucifer

In 2021, a further 15 babies were christened Lucifer - a name which didn’t appear in the rankings until 2016.

The figures should, however, be taken with a very large pinch of salt. In the 2011 census, 177,000 people declared themselves Jedi under the religion section, making it the seventh most popular religion. A further 6,242 people answered Heavy Metal for their religion, and 650 said they were New Age.

Many of these will now come under the ‘other’ section offered to respondents in the census. For those filling in forms for the 2021 census, Jedi Knights were left disappointed as this was no longer a separate option.

The 2021 census also revealed a rise in the number of Pagans up from 56,620 to 73,733 - as well as a rise in the number of Animists - who believe that all natural things have a soul. They increased from just 541 in 2011 to 802 in 2021.

In contrast, the number of people practising witchcraft in England and Wales is in decline. That community saw its population fall from 1,276 to 1,045 over the ten-year period. Scientologists also saw a similar level of decline (2,418 to 1,859) and members of the Occult fell from 502 to 490.



























Not just FIFA World Cup, Qatar is also hosting a beauty contest for… Camels

Published on Nov 30, 2022

FIFA World Cup: The participants belong to different Gulf countries and compete in different categories according to their age and breed.

A woman stands next to a camel near Sealine Beach in Mesaieed, Qatar.(AP)
A woman stands next to a camel near Sealine Beach in Mesaieed, Qatar.(AP)

The FIFA World Cup is not the only competition taking place in Qatar. Camels are taking part in the Qatar Camel Mzayen Club beauty contest in Ash-Shahaniyah.

“The idea is similar to the soccer World Cup, we did a camel beauty World Cup. We have participants from the Gulf Cooperation Council, we have big names and today is the fifth day of the tournament,” Hamad Jaber al-Athba, president of the Qatar Camel Mzayen club said.

Read more: FIFA World Cup reporter robbed while on air, shocked by cops' response: Report

The participants belong to different Gulf countries and compete in different categories according to their age and breed.

“The characteristics to measure the beauty of a camel differ from one group to another. For instance the black camels are judged according to the size of the body and the head and the location of the ears,” Hamad Jaber al-Athba said.

But for the Maghateer-type camel, we look for proportionality and the ears should be dropping down, not stand straight. In addition to the way the mouth is curved. As far as the Asel are concerned, they have special characteristics. The location of the ears is important, there should be a delicacy in the bones, the hooves, so there are characteristics that need more detail," Hamad Jaber al-Athba explained.

















Camel pageant 'like a World Cup'

for beautiful beasts in Qatar


Finest animals paraded in front of an audience 

as Gulf country hosts world's football nations

  
The camel beauty contest proved hugely popular with the crowd

The National
Nov 30, 2022

As football — the beautiful game — grasps the world's attention in Qatar, a beauty of a very different kind is also being appreciated enthusiastically in the small Gulf nation.

While most sets of eyes are on the Fifa World Cup, camels from across the Gulf are competing at the Qatar Camel Mzayen Club’s beauty festival in Ash-Shahaniyah.

"The idea is similar to the football World Cup, we did a camel beauty World Cup”, club president Hamad Jaber Al Athba told Reuters.

He called the camel "a companion during the beginning of civilisation in the Gulf".

With their heads held high and chewing constantly, participating camels waited in a pen before being paraded in front of an audience seated indoors and enjoying coffee and sweets while gauging the beautiful beasts.

The competition between camels is fierce with different categories according to age and type.

"Black camels are judged according to the size of the body and the head and the location of the ears,” Mr Al Athba said. "But with the Maghateer-type camel, we look for proportionality and the ears should be dropping down, not stand straight, in addition to the way the mouth is curved."

READ MORE

To avoid fraud and detect cosmetic surgery, a medical committee examined the animals before allowing them to participate in the beauty pageant.

The committee president said owners sometimes used fillers, Botox or silicon to increase their camel’s chances of winning — foul play that results in disqualification.

Ahead of declaring the winner of the day’s competing category, other female camels were milked and the owner of the one producing the most was rewarded 20,000 Qatari riyals (about $5,500).

But all eyes were on the competition between Maghateer-type camels over the age of four, the day’s competing category, the winner of which received a sum 10 times higher.

The Saudi Arabian owner of the camels that won bronze and gold in the competition, Mohanna Ibrahim Al Anazi, was thrilled after receiving his prize.

"I can't describe my feelings, because this female has an audience like the audience of the World Cup, like Real Madrid or Manchester (United)," he said. "And now, they are all celebrating."














Two Indonesian soldiers get seven months’ jail for gay sex

Amnesty International has reported that at least 15 Indonesian soldiers and policemen have been fired or sued for being gay.
 PHOTO: AFP

JAKARTA – Two Indonesian soldiers have been given a seven-month jail term for having gay sex, which is banned by the nation’s military as “inappropriate behaviour”.

The soldiers, who joined the army in 2021 and were based on the country’s main island of Java, were also booted from the army, according to a military court ruling dated Nov 9.

While gay sex is barred in the military, it is legal for civilians in the world’s biggest Muslim-majority nation, except in conservative province Aceh.

But there is widespread discrimination and some gay Indonesians have been arrested for lewd conduct under anti-pornography laws.

“The defendants’ acts of committing deviant sexual behaviour with the same sex was very inappropriate because as soldiers, the defendants should be an example for the people in the defendants’ surrounding environment,” the 60-page ruling read.

“The defendants’ actions were very much against the law or any religious provisions.”

The country’s Supreme Court posted the decision last week but the case was only brought to light on Tuesday evening by local news site Detik.

In 2020, Amnesty International said at least 15 members of Indonesia’s military or police have been sacked for having same-sex relations in recent years.

“This has been the increasing pattern among the Indonesian armed forces and police in recent years, where members were being fired or taken into court just for who they are, who they love, who they like,” Amnesty International Indonesia director Usman Hamid told AFP.

Mr Usman said “inflammatory statements” by the country’s political leaders have helped to further stigmatise minority groups, including the LGBTQ community, adding that the recent case was only “the tip of the iceberg”. 

AFP





Is the FBI’s ‘Black Identity Extremist’ Label Still in Use?

It’s been over five years since the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) “Black Identity Extremist” (BIE) report was leaked to Foreign Policy magazine in early October 2017. The August 3, 2017, report – which alleged that “perceptions of police brutality against African Americans spurred an increase in premeditated, retaliatory lethal violence against law enforcement” – drew a torrent of criticism from civil rights and civil liberties groups, as well as a backlash from Black House and Senate members. The fact that the FBI was employing overtly race-based criteria for investigating the political activities of Black Americans brought back ugly memories of the Bureau’s infamous Counterintelligence Program (COINTELPRO) targeting the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., the Southern Christian Leadership Congress, NAACP, and a host of other prominent Black civil rights leaders and organizations from the mid-1950s through at least the late 1970s.

In the two years after the leak of the “BIE” report, FBI Director Chris Wray found himself constantly on the defensive over the report and the FBI’s use of the BIE term. In late July 2019, Wray told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the Bureau had abandoned the use of the BIE phrase, with one other FBI official claiming the term had not been used by the FBI since 2018.

FBI documents obtained by the Cato Institute via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit appear to tell a somewhat different story.

The Cato FOIA request in question sought documents about the FBI’s compliance with its own Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG), a nearly 700-page manual that serves as the day-to-day guidance for FBI agents and their supervisors as to what kinds of investigative methods and tactics are, or are not, permissible. One document released in the litigation showed a case active as of June 2020 that involved FBI Investigative Classification 266K (see extract below):

That’s significant, because according to a previously classified FBI Investigative Classification guide released to Cato via FOIA, Classification 266K concerns “Black Separatist Extremists” (see extract below):

The acronym “AOT-DT” is shorthand for “Act of Terrorism – Domestic Terrorism” in FBI parlance.

The document containing the June 2020 Classification 266K also has the abbreviation of “FI,” which is short for Full Investigation – the most sweeping kind of FBI investigation in which the full range of investigative tools and techniques can be employed against a target, including wiretaps, covert physical searches, the use of confidential informants, the employment of “otherwise illegal activities,” and “undisclosed participation” in a domestic organization by an FBI employee.

As Cato’s FOIA was dated September 14, 2020, FBI provided no data in the FOIA litigation beyond the date of the request. Thus, whether any additional Classification 266K “Black Separatist Extremists” (which may now be the FBI’s replacement term for “Black Identity Extremists”) assessments or investigations have been opened is not publicly known.

The fact that the FBI’s Investigative Classification system continues to focus, at least in the case of Black Americans, on race-based criteria is clearly at odds with FBI Director Wray’s prior statements to Congress on the matter. Given the ongoing political activities of groups affiliated with the “Black Lives Matter” movement, a renewed Congressional examination of the FBI’s use of the 266K “Black Separatist Extremists” Investigative Classification (and perhaps others) is warranted.

Former CIA analyst and ex-House senior policy advisor Patrick Eddington is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute

ANTIWAR.COM