Saturday, October 17, 2026

 

Contact with nature is linked to healthy eating



Study is first to find connection between intuitive eating and natural environments




Anglia Ruskin Universit





A new study has discovered that contact with natural environments may help people develop healthier eating habits.

Led by Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) and published in the journal Body Image, this is the first research to provide evidence that exposure to nature can influence people’s relationship with food.

The study involved 500 UK adults who were assessed on their individual levels of contact with the natural world, such as how much they noticed nature in their everyday lives, as well as the frequency and duration of the time spent in natural environments.

The participants also completed surveys measuring body image, self-compassion, connectedness to nature and intuitive eating, which is an anti-dieting approach to eating that focuses on listening to the body’s internal signals instead of following strict eating rules.

The study found a direct positive relationship between nature contact and intuitive eating, but pathways involving other factors were even more important.

One pathway involved nature contact influencing intuitive eating habits through higher levels of body appreciation. It is thought that nature contact helps people feel more comfortable in their body, more appreciative of what their body can do and more responsive to their body’s needs, which in turn leads to higher levels of intuitive eating.

A second pathway involved self-compassion. Greater nature contact promotes self-compassion and the researchers believe this provides a buffer against responding to difficult thoughts and emotions through impulsive eating. Instead, it may encourage people to follow their body’s signals and choose foods that better meet their physiological needs.

Lead author Viren Swami, Professor of Social Psychology at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) in Cambridge, England, said: “These findings are important because they provide the first evidence that contact with nature may shape people’s eating habits.

“We already know that contact with natural environments can reduce anxiety and depression and improve various measures of wellbeing, including life satisfaction. Our new study is the first to show how it can influence our eating habits, thanks to helping people develop more positive relationships with their bodies and greater self-compassion, and these findings could have practical benefits for public health professionals.

“We recognise there are limitations to this study, particularly as it is based on self-reported data, and further studies in other countries are needed. However, these initial results suggest that greater access to and engagement with nature could support efforts to promote healthier, more sustainable eating behaviours.”

 

Sydney student creates first map of Martian soils



If we are to grow food on Mars, we will need to know what we are growing it in




University of Sydney


PhD candidate Daniel Irving from the University of Sydney

image: 

PhD candidate Daniel Irving at the University of Sydney

view more 

Credit: Stephanie Zingsheim





A PhD student at the University of Sydney has produced the first comprehensive classification system and map of Martian soils, creating a new framework that could help scientists compare landscapes across the Red Planet and identify promising locations for future exploration, habitation and food production.  

 

The research, led by Daniel Irving from the Sydney Institute of Agriculture and the Faculty of Science, proposes a new term for Martian soil classes: “areths”, derived from Ares, the Greek name for Mars.  

 

Published in the soil science journal Catena, the research uses orbital observations and models to classify almost 800 million locations across Mars into a hierarchy of 2000 soil classes and presents a global map showing where they occur.  

 

“This is the first time a classification system of this scale has been developed for Martian soils,” Irving said. “Scientists have mapped Mars’ geology, mineralogy and chemistry before, but our system brings together multiple properties into a single framework, helping us understand how different Martian soils relate to one another and where they’re found.” 

 

Irving’s supervisor, Professor Alex McBratney, said: “A future greenhouse on Mars would need more than air, water and light. Its builders would also need to know what lies beneath to understand better starting points for growing plants.” 

 

The Provisional Polythetic Areth Classification System, or PPACS, groups Martian soils into 10 major “realms”, 100 “assemblages” and 2000 detailed “forms”, based on properties including texture, mineralogy, pH and profile thickness.  

 

The classification is accompanied by a detailed map covering 92 percent of the Martian surface, allowing researchers to visualise the distribution of different soil types.  

 

Beyond science fiction 

 

The prospect of growing crops on Mars has long captured the public imagination, most famously in the film The Martian, in which astronaut Mark Watney, played by Matt Damon, survives by growing potatoes in Martian soil. 

 

While a greenhouse on Mars remains firmly in the future, Irving‘s research offers a scientific starting point for understanding which Martian soils might be best suited to supporting plant growth under controlled conditions.  

 

As a proof of concept, the researchers assessed all 2000 soil classes for characteristics important to plant production, including water-holding capacity, pH, profile thickness, clay content and gravel content. One soil class, known as Nohibareth, emerged as the most promising candidate, scoring 0.93 on the study’s zero-to-one grading scale. 

 

Nohibareth’s modelled average profile includes a pH of 6.8, 72 percent clay, minimal sand or gravel and an estimated water holding capacity of 202 millimetres per metre. The map places this class particularly in the mid-latitudes of Mars, around Tharsis, central Arabia Terra and Elysium Planitia. Nohibareth soils are found on 0.14 percent of Mars’ surface. 

 

These areas are candidates for closer investigation, not selected greenhouse sites. Among the assessed properties, water holding capacity was the limiting factor in 73 percent of forms studied. Classes in the Fareth to Mareth realms all scored below 0.3 in this initial test, reflecting less favourable combinations of the properties considered. 

 

The researchers stress that this does not mean crops could be grown directly in Martian soil.  

Future habitats would still require controlled environments, water, nutrients and treatment of potentially harmful substances. 

 

Testing on Earth before growing on Mars 

 

The next steps to progress this work would require research on Earth. Scientists can make or obtain Mars-like substrate mixtures representing the mapped classes, then test them in controlled growing spaces with crops, added nutrients and managed water.  

 

Those experiments could compare plant growth, water use and the treatment needed to make each mixture safe. In time, rover measurements and samples from Mars could check whether the promising mapped classes are present where the models place them. 

 

The current map does not include factors such as perchlorate toxicity, nitrogen availability or depth profiles. Many input properties are inferred from orbital data and terrestrial relationships, so the classification will need revision as direct measurements improve. 

 

Lessons for our home planet 

 

Although Martian soils contain no organic matter, the research may also help soil scientists better understand some of Earth’s most challenging landscapes such as Atacama Desert, the Pilbara region and various polar regions.  

 

“People often think soil needs lots of organic matter to function, but there are soil types on Earth, particularly in arid regions, that contain very little organic matter,” Professor McBratney said. “These results from Mars actually make us think more deeply about this kind of soil on Earth, and what we might do with it." 

 

“Every rover mission collects valuable information about Mars, but scientists need consistent ways to organise and compare that knowledge,” Irving said. “This gives us a framework that can grow and evolve as new data becomes available.”  

 

 

Exploring African DNA can transform understanding of human genetics – what does that mean for medicine?



Why African genomics holds the key to precision medicine and global health equity




Taylor & Francis Group







Africa is home to more human genetic diversity than anywhere else on Earth. The average African genome shows nearly a million more genetic variants than the average non-African genome.

But this wealth of data remains largely unexplored, with African populations historically underrepresented in research. Less than 3% of global genomic datasets and genome-wide association studies include participants of African descent.

Renowned African researchers have released a new book to explain what we know about the continent’s remarkable genetic diversity, showcase on-the-ground research being carried out today and set out a roadmap for future discoveries.

Genomics in Africa is designed to support the next generation of African scientists, providing vital information for researchers, funders and policymakers working to advance genomics and precision medicine in the continent.

It is co-edited by Professor Segun Fatumo of Queen Mary University of London, and Dr Tinashe Chikowore of Harvard Medical School, who believe there is an urgent need to invest in African genomics research.

Professor Fatumo says: “Genetic research on the African continent could create more effective precision medicine, improve global drug development, and help scientists understand everything from our evolutionary history to why some people develop particular diseases.”

Why is Africa so genetically diverse?

While there is a lot we don’t know about human evolution and background, it is accepted that early Homo sapiens evolved in Africa approximately 300,000 years ago. Over millennia, we spread across the continent and settled all over it.

At some point between 50,000 and 70,000 years ago, a small band of people left Africa. This might have been a single tribe or group of tribes, and it likely had only a few thousand people of childbearing age.

There have been other migrations, but this particular one – known as the Southern Route or Southern Dispersal – is believed to be the founder population which colonised the rest of the world and interbred with archaic humans such as Neanderthals and Denisovans.

The small size of this founder population means all modern humans with ancestry outside Africa share a high degree of genetic similarity.

While we can’t know exactly how many people in total were living on the African continent at that time, we do know that the population the group left was much larger and much more genetically diverse. This means many gene variants not present in the handful of people who left Africa have been passed down and are thriving in people of African genetic heritage.

What would more research tell us?

Ambroise Wonkam, Professor of Medical Genetics at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and current President of the African Society of Human Genetics said of the work: “Increasing the number of sequenced African genomes will refine tools for predicting disease-related variants, improve diagnoses, and enhance precision medicine.

“Ultimately, investing in African genomics promotes both scientific innovation and health equity worldwide.”

Professor Segun Fatumo and Dr Tinashe Chikowore suggest that further research into African genomics could also develop and improve treatments of inherited diseases which predominantly affect African populations, such as sickle cell disease.

African researchers are currently exploring research into infectious diseases, cardiometabolic traits, cancer, mental health traits and medicine sensitivities – but the authors argue more investment both in research and infrastructure is needed to unlock the potential of these studies.

They propose a ten-year strategic roadmap for research leaders, funders, and governments planning future genomic initiatives on the continent.

“Research into these areas is essential to ensure that people with African genetic heritage can experience the full benefit of precision medicine and gene therapies,” Professor Fatumo explains. “Genetic variation could mean they react differently to treatments or medicines developed for the population outside Africa, so for true health equity there is an urgent case to expand on current scientific knowledge.”

 

New genetic study reveals surprising origin of Native Hawaiians




Stanford Medicine






Europe was deep in the Middle Ages when halfway around the world, on the remote, windswept shores of tiny Easter Island, a group of skilled seafarers prepared for a long voyage. They stocked their double-hulled catamarans with taro, sweet potato and bananas — food for many weeks at sea, but also, they hoped, to plant on a distant land they would make their new home.

There is no written record of their journey, but Stanford Medicine researchers and collaborators analyzing the genomes of modern-day Polynesians have discovered indelible genetic evidence that ancient sailors from this region did settle a faraway land. To the researcher’s surprise, their new home was Hawaii, some 7,000 kilometers away, among the most distant Polynesian islands from Easter Island.

The findings are reported in a study published Oct. 8 in Science.

“What we uncover in this paper is where the native people of Hawaii had come from,” said Alexander Ioannidis, PhD, assistant professor of genetics and of biomedical data science, and co-senior author of the study. “Hawaii is the only Polynesian island in the Northern Hemisphere, so it’s a long way from everything.”

The other co-senior author is Keolu Fox, PhD, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of California, San Diego, and a Native Hawaiian.

Polynesia consists of more than 1,000 islands spread over an area of the Pacific Ocean roughly equivalent to the areas of North and South America combined. Tropical, lush Hawaii is about as far away from temperate Easter Island in the far south Pacific as San Francisco is from Lima, Peru.

But the new findings do more than help reconstruct the settlement of Polynesia and add to evidence of an ancient ultravoyaging culture — they also identify genetic bottlenecks that have profound implications for precision medicine and disease risks among modern Polynesians.

Founder effects

These genetic bottlenecks are known as founder effects when they result from a small portion of a population separating and founding a new population. This narrowing of the gene pool can amplify the frequency of otherwise rare genetic variants, sometimes linked to disease. Founder effects have been well studied in groups of European descent like the Amish, the Ashkenazi Jews and the Finns, resulting in standard screenings for certain genetic conditions in these groups.

The new study reveals that an even stronger founder effect has been overlooked among Native Hawaiians.

“What we discovered is in the Eastern Polynesians, such as Native Hawaiians, the founder effects are more than an order of magnitude, so more than 10 times, larger than what we have in the populations of European descent we’ve studied so well,” Ioannidis said.

That’s because Native Hawaiians sit at the end of a long sequence of genetic bottlenecks as their ancestors sent off small groups, perhaps only a few hundred individuals at a time, to settle new islands over the course of a few centuries.

An earlier genetic study by the researchers had traced the settlement of Polynesia from Samoa to Fiji and Tonga, then gradually eastward to the Cook Islands, the Society Islands (including Tahiti), Mangareva and ultimately Easter Island around the year 1210. But the longest journey was still to come.

“We thought Easter Island was the end when we were first doing that study, but now it looks like it was part of this path to Hawaii, which is really incredible,” Ioannidis said. “By the time you’ve gotten all the way to Hawaii, you’re at the end of a series of founder effects, so it’s really intense.”

Encoded genealogy

The researchers made their latest discovery by analyzing the genomes of over 1,000 individuals throughout Polynesia.

“People on the islands today have encoded in their genomes essentially the genealogy of all of their ancestors,” Ioannidis said.

They focused on genome segments of Polynesian ancestry, removing more recent additions of European and Asian ancestry, for example. They compared the length of chromosomal segments, known as identity-by-descent segments, shared among people from different islands. The longer the shared segments between two people, the more recently they shared a common ancestor.

They found that Hawaiians share the most Polynesian ancestry with people on Easter Island, followed by people on Mangareva, an island nearly 3,000 kilometers east of Easter Island. Though no one had connected these distant dots previously, it makes sense that an ultravoyaging culture capable of reaching Easter Island from Mangareva would be the one to then settle Hawaii, Ioannidis said. (An earlier study by the researchers found that members of the same ultravoyaging population also reached South America and came in contact with Native Americans.)

The team also conducted a more detailed genomic analysis of people from Tahiti, the island for which they had the most genomes. By comparing identity-by-descent segments within the population, they could estimate the size and date of the founding generation — a group of approximately 800 people who arrived on the island about 34 generations ago, around the year 1070. (The population estimate is of a single generation of reproductive age and doesn’t include children and elders they may have brought along.)

“Archaeologists and others have long wondered how many people founded these islands. That’s not something that you can determine definitively from archaeology, but we can determine it from genetics,” Ioannidis said.

The genomic analysis also reconstructed the rapid population growth on Tahiti after the initial settlement and a significant population crash in the 1700s following European colonial contact.

The researchers are working on similar reconstructions for Easter Island and Hawaii, which will require more genomes.

Clinical urgency

But more pressing is the need for large-scale genomic studies to identify clinically relevant variants that may be unusually prevalent among Polynesians.

The researchers analyzed three variants that recently have been linked to autosomal recessive conditions (requiring two copies of the gene) among Eastern Polynesians: ADAMTSL4, which can cause dislocated lens in the eyes; PDE6B, which can cause progressive vision loss; and FAN1, which can lead to kidney failure.

These variants are exceedingly rare among the global population and hardly present in international genome databases, but they are carried by 2% to 3% of the Eastern Polynesians studied. That level meets standard thresholds for genetic screening recommendations.

“We should be doing more sequencing and trying to characterize more of these conditions among Native Hawaiians,” said Ioannidis, noting that the Native Hawaiian population is nearly twice the size of the Amish population, yet still lacks genetic testing guidelines. “We don’t have recommendations for genetic testing, and there’s no reimbursement from insurance because these are conditions we don’t even know about.”

“This is a population that should be getting research resources and attention from geneticists even more urgently.”

Researchers from the University of California, Santa Cruz; Variant Bio; Direction de la Santé de Polynésie Française in Tahiti; Hôpital Saint-Philibert in France; the University of Chile; the National Polytechnic Institute in Mexico; and the University of Alabama at Birmingham contributed to the study.

The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health (grants T32HG012344, U01HG007417 and U01HG007419).

# # #

                                                                                       

About Stanford Medicine

Stanford Medicine is an integrated academic health system comprising the Stanford School of Medicine and adult and pediatric health care delivery systems. Together, they harness the full potential of biomedicine through collaborative research, education and clinical care for patients. For more information, please visit med.stanford.edu.

 

KAIST proposes a common framework for understanding the “Anthropocene,” the Earth altered by humans



Endowed Chair Professor Buhm Soon Park of the Graduate School of Science and Technology Policy and an international research team propose a definition of the Anthropocene and directions for its application




The Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)

KAIST Proposes a Common Framework for Understanding the “Anthropocene,” the Earth Altered by Humans

image: 

Great Acceleration graphs showing the mid-20th-century starting point of the Anthropocene: changes in the socioeconomic system (a) and changes in the Earth system (b)

view more 

Credit: KAIST






How much have humans changed the Earth? An international research team including a KAIST researcher has proposed a common framework for defining the meaning and starting point of the “Anthropocene,” a period in which human activities have rapidly transformed the global environment. The researchers propose using 1952 as a reference point to distinguish the relatively stable Earth environment before that year from the rapid changes that followed, allowing the scale and speed of today’s environmental crisis to be understood more accurately.

KAIST (President Choongsik Bae) announced on October 16 Buhm Soon Park, Endowed Chair Professor of the STP and Director of the Center for Anthropocene Studies, published a paper with an international research team proposing a definition of the Anthropocene and future directions for its research and application.

The Anthropocene is a concept used to describe an epoch in which human activities have become powerful enough to affect the Earth’s environment as a whole, including the climate and ecosystems. Over the past two decades, the concept has spread beyond the natural sciences into the humanities and social sciences, education, and the arts, but differing interpretations of its meaning and starting point have continued.

A proposal to formally recognize the Anthropocene as an official geological epoch was not approved in 2024. Nevertheless, the concept continues to be widely used across academic and social fields to describe the impact of human activities on the global environment. Against this background, the new paper seeks to establish a more consistent understanding of the Anthropocene and proposes research directions that can be applied across disciplines.

The researchers pointed out that if the Anthropocene is broadly defined simply as “the period in which humans affected the environment,” it becomes difficult to distinguish how the rapid changes occurring in recent decades differ from earlier human impacts. Humans have altered the environment for a long time, but the researchers argue that particular attention should be paid to the fact that, since the mid-20th century, the scale of human influence has grown large enough to destabilize the Earth system as a whole.

The point of comparison is the Holocene, which has lasted for approximately 12,000 years. The relatively stable climate and environmental conditions of the Holocene, which began after the last Ice Age, enabled humans to develop agriculture, cities, and civilizations. The researchers emphasized that identifying the point at which this stability began to be significantly disrupted is necessary to assess more clearly how rapidly and extensively the Earth’s environment is changing today.

Accordingly, the research team proposes 1952 as the starting point of the Anthropocene. This coincides with the period of the “Great Acceleration,” when industrialization and urbanization expanded rapidly in the mid-20th century and numerous indicators of human activity and the global environment began changing sharply.

By clearly defining the starting point and meaning of the Anthropocene in this way, researchers and policymakers from different fields can compare and discuss global environmental changes using a common reference point. The research team explained that the Anthropocene could serve as a shared language connecting the natural sciences with the humanities and social sciences, while also helping improve understanding of and responses to environmental crises in areas such as policy, international law, and education.

Professor Buhm Soon Park said, “The Anthropocene is a common language for understanding how rapidly and extensively humans are changing the Earth,” adding, “By clarifying its meaning and criteria, we can compare changes in the global environment more accurately and discuss together how we should respond.” He continued, “I hope this paper will provide an opportunity to connect diverse fields such as science, policy, education, and the arts in responding collectively to environmental crises.”

The paper involved international scholars from a wide range of disciplines, including Professor Jan Zalasiewicz of the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom, co-chair of the Anthropocene Working Group; Professor Julia Adeney Thomas of the University of Notre Dame in the United States; and Professor Jürgen Renn of the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology in Germany.

The paper was published on September 8, 2026, as part of a special collection titled “The Anthropocene debate” in the international journal Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. The collection presents a range of academic perspectives on the definition of the Anthropocene and the debate over whether it should be formally recognized as a geological epoch.
※ Paper title: Future directions for Anthropocene research and its applications, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00820-z, Article type: Perspective (an article presenting an academic viewpoint and future research directions)

Professor Buhm Soon Park established the Center for Anthropocene Studies in 2018 and has continued research and public discussion on the Anthropocene through publications and translations, lectures, exhibition consulting, and academic conferences. More recently, he has been conducting a research project entitled “A Study of the Great Acceleration in the Anthropocene” through the Global Humanities and Social Sciences Convergence Research Support Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea.