 |
| https://www.academia.edu/7980761/The_Situationist_City_MIT_Press_1998_ |
Peggy Deamer, ed., Architecture and Capitalism: 1845 to the Present, New York: Routledge, 2013
During the formative years of today’s senior architects and educators in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the architectural discipline faced seismic developments in political economy and culture. Architectural education was drawn to the way that the New Left (led out, from Paris, by situationists) and counterculture (led out by hippies in the West of the US) located political consciousness close to architecture’s disciplinary heart in design, aesthetics, and everyday life. After 1968, partly in response to counterculture, architecture schools reconsidered the making of the architect and architectural culture, yet the discipline also prevented design from becoming the instrument of total revolution that the counterculture demanded. The cleft between capitalism and counterculture, in which architecture was wedged by the late 1960s, instead prompted the discipline to reassert its relative autonomy from political economy and assimilate counterculture.
Publication Date: 2013
Publication Name: Peggy Deamer, ed., Architecture and Capitalism: 1845 to the Present, New York: Routledge
2011
A fresh history of the Situationist International by the author of A Hacker Manifesto.
Over fifty years after the Situationist International appeared, its legacy continues to inspire activists, artists and theorists around the world. Such a legend has accrued to this movement that the story of the SI now demands to be told in a contemporary voice capable of putting it into the context of twenty-first-century struggles.
McKenzie Wark delves into the Situationists' unacknowledged diversity, revealing a world as rich in practice as it is in theory. Tracing the group's development from the bohemian Paris of the '50s to the explosive days of May '68, Wark's take on the Situationists is biographically and historically rich, presenting the group as an ensemble creation, rather than the brainchild and dominion of its most famous member, Guy Debord. Roaming through Europe and the lives of those who made up the movement—including Constant, Asger Jorn, Michèle Bernstein, Alex Trocchi and Jacqueline De Jong—Wark uncovers an international movement riven with conflicting passions.
Accessible to those who have only just discovered the Situationists and filled with new insights, The Beach Beneath the Street rereads the group's history in the light of our contemporary experience of communications, architecture, and everyday life. The Situationists tried to escape the world of twentieth-century spectacle and failed in the attempt. Wark argues that they may still help us to escape the twenty-first century, while we still can ...
The book's jacket folds out into a poster, Totality for Beginners, a collaborative graphic essay employing text selected by McKenzie Wark with composition and drawings by Kevin C. Pyle.
Publication Date: 2011
"This ‘interactive commentary’ is a hybrid of a review of The Beach Beneath the Street and an interview with its author, Mckenzie Wark. His book profiles the beginnings of the Situationist International in 1957 through an organizational split in 1962. Outside of the tradition of past histories of the Situationists, Wark avoids the stories of ‘great men’ and their works. Instead, his book charts an intellectual history of the movement and characters heretofore marginalized. In conversation with Wark, we find the motivation behind his attention toward the Situationists, their relevance to his body of work, and to our political moment. Much of current Marxist theory retains the totalitarian legacy of Lenin and Mao; the Situationists offer an alternative pathway for distinctly critical and libertarian theory. While contemporary cultural theorists have maintained the prominence of Lacan, Althusser, and Foucault, Wark aims for renewed attention to Lefebvre, Jorn, and Debord.
by Anthony Hayes
McKenzie Wark’s
The Beach beneath the Street: The Everyday Life and Glorious Times of theSituationist International
is full of factual errors, a few of which I have drawn attention to in the review below. However the most appalling aspect of the book is in terms of its interpretative logic. Wark disguises his opinion by making historical figures act as his mouthpiece, whether that is Asger Jorn, Alexander Trocchi or even Guy Debord at times. Wark offers nothing new in terms of commentary and also pointedly fails to make good his promise of demonstrating the ‘contemporary resonance’ of aspects of the SI’s activity. The book is a poor introduction to the SI and anyone seeking such from it should instead seek out the writings of the SI themselves—most of them are available in English translation at the following sites:
Bureau of Public Secrets, NotBored! and Situationist International Online. The problem that people who are not familiar with preservationists face in reading Wark is that Wark’s substantive position is to be discovered in what he does not say and
leaves out in order to fashion an account favourable to his barely concealed bias, in this case the boring old chestnut of favouring the so-called ‘artistic’ SI.
Architectural Theory Review, 2011
The Situationist International introduced the creative, psychological, desiring individual as a counterweight to the utopian schemes of the modernist city. The resistance formulated throughout situationist principles underlies many contemporary activist urban practices. Nevertheless, the situationist approach to the city incorporated an affirmation of utopian thought. This totalizing aspect of modernist thought, still present in contemporary discourse, constrains our understanding of the potential of micro-interventions in the city. Although the “right to the city” may be crucial to reclaiming an active engagement with our urban environment, this paper discusses some limitations of situationist ideas, arguing that current urban practice requires a new discourse beyond the by now well-known frame of resistance and negation.
More Info: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Architectural Theory Review on 13 December, 2011, available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2011.621545
Journal Name: Architectural Theory Review
Publication Date: 2011
Publication Name: Architectural Theory Review
No comments:
Post a Comment